Distribution of endometriosis phenotypes according to patients' age in adult women with surgical evaluation.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the distribution of endometriosis phenotypes according to age in adult women undergoing surgery? SUMMARY ANSWER: The phenotype of endometriosis did not significantly vary after 24 years old. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The phenotypic evolution of endometriosis over time remains unclear. While adolescents can exhibit any type of endometriosis lesions, ovarian endometriosis (OMA) and/or deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) tend to increase with age in young adults. In adulthood, understanding the evolution of lesions is crucial for disease management, but the literature on this subject is limited. This study aims to examine the distribution of endometriosis phenotypes in relation to age among adult patients requiring surgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This observational cohort study included patients aged between ≥18 and ≤42 years, who underwent surgery for benign gynecological conditions at our institution between January 2004 and December 2022. A standardized questionnaire was completed for each patient during a face-to-face interview conducted by the surgeon in the month preceding surgery. Women with histologically proven endometriosis were included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The distribution of endometriosis phenotypes (isolated superficial (SUP) endometriosis, OMA ± SUP, DIE ± SUP/OMA) was compared between young adults (≤24 years) and adults (>24 years) and among adults (25-28 years, 29-33 years, 34-38 years, 39 to ≤42 years) using univariate and multivariate analysis. The distribution of different subtypes of DIE (uterosacral ligament(s), vagina, bladder, intestine, and ureter), OMA size, and intensity of pain symptoms were also examined. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1311 adult women with histologically proven endometriosis were included. In women aged 24 years or younger (n = 116), the distribution of endometriosis phenotypes differed significantly from women older than 24 years (n = 1195): The frequency of the DIE ± SUP/OMA phenotype was lower (41.4% versus 56.1%, respectively), while the rate of isolated superficial lesions was higher (from 32.0% versus 25.9%) (P = 0.001). In the group of women aged >24 years, a significantly higher proportion of vaginal DIE lesions (P = 0.012) and a lower proportion of uterosacral ligament DIE lesions (P = 0.004) were found compared to women aged ≤24 years. No significant differences were observed in terms of endometrioma size. Between the ages of 25 and 42 years, there were no significant changes in the distribution of endometriosis phenotypes after univariate and multivariate analysis. The distribution of subtype of DIE lesions did not significantly change with age between 25 and 42 years. Concerning pain symptom scores, there was a significant decrease with age for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Inclusion of only surgical patients may have introduced a selection bias. Women referred to our center may have suffered from particularly severe clinical forms of endometriosis. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study highlights that endometriosis presentation did not change with age in adult women. Further research on endometriosis phenotype evolution is necessary to assist practitioners in clinical decisions and treatment strategies. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Endometriosis-related infertility: severe pain symptoms do not impact assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: Do severe endometriosis-related painful symptoms impact ART live birth rates? SUMMARY ANSWER: Severe pain symptoms are not associated with reduced ART live birth rates in endometriosis patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ART is currently recognized as one of the main therapeutic options to manage endometriosis-related infertility. Presently, no data exist in the literature regarding the association between the core symptom of the disease, e.g. pain and ART reproductive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Observational cohort study of 354 endometriosis patients, who underwent ART at a tertiary care university hospital, between October 2014 and October 2021. Diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and histologically confirmed in women who had a previous history of endometriosis surgery (n = 127, 35.9%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The intensity of painful symptoms related to dysmenorrhea (DM), dyspareunia (DP), noncyclic chronic pelvic pain, gastrointestinal (GI) pain, or lower urinary tract pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), before ART. Severe pain was defined as having a VAS of 7 or higher for at least one symptom. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per patient. We analyzed the impact of endometriosis-related painful symptoms on ART live births using univariable and multivariate analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred and fifty-four endometriosis patients underwent 711 ART cycles. The mean age of the population was 33.8 ± 3.7 years, and the mean duration of infertility was 3.6 ± 2.1 years. The distribution of the endometriosis phenotypes was 3.1% superficial endometriosis, 8.2% ovarian endometrioma, and 88.7% deep infiltrating endometriosis. The mean VAS scores for DM, DP, and GI pain symptoms were 6.6 ± 2.7, 3.4 ± 3.1, and 3.1 ± 3.6, respectively. Two hundred and forty-two patients (68.4%) had severe pain symptoms. The CLBR per patient was 63.8% (226/354). Neither the mean VAS scores for the various painful symptoms nor the proportion of patients displaying severe pain differed significantly between patients who had a live birth and those who had not, based on univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.229). The only significant factors associated with negative ART live births were age >35 years (P < 0.001) and anti-Müllerian hormone levels <1.2 ng/ml (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on imaging rather than surgery. This limitation is, however, inherent to the design of most studies on endometriosis patients reverting to ART first. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Rather than considering a single argument such as pain, the decision-making process for choosing between ART and surgery in infertile endometriosis patients should be based on a multitude of aspects, including the patient's choice, the associated infertility factors, the endometriosis phenotypes, and the efficiency of medical therapies in regard to pain symptoms, through an individualized approach guided by a multidisciplinary team of experts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding; no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.