Food as Medicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events Following an Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in men and women in the USA. Once a patient experiences an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), they are at increased risk for hospital readmission within 30 days and 6 months after discharge and more importantly, they have worse survival. Hospital readmissions lead to poor clinical outcomes for the patient and also significantly increase healthcare costs due to repeat diagnostic evaluation, imaging, and coronary interventions. The goal after hospital discharge is to modify cardiovascular (CV) risk factors including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes to prevent repeat coronary events; however, drug therapy is only one aspect. Several diets have been shown to decrease weight and reduce these risk factors over short durations; however, most people typically cannot sustain their diet and regain the weight. The Intelligent Quisine (IQ) diet is a prepared meal plan that was designed to meet the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association nutritional guidelines and simplify the daily consumption of a nutritionally complete, calorie conscious meal. The IQ diet has been shown to significantly reduce blood pressure, cholesterol levels, glucose levels, and weight over a 10-week period. Additional studies have shown that patients are able to remain compliant on the diet for a year and maintain the reduction of their CV risk factors. If patients are consistent with a healthy calorie conscious and nutritionally complete diet modifying CV risk factors long term, then food could be as powerful in reducing CV events as evidence-based drug therapy. There is a need to begin conceptualizing food as medicine. To this end, it is time for a randomized control trial implementing the IQ diet versus current standard dietary recommendations in a large number of patients and measuring hard CV endpoints. Many readmissions can be avoided with proper patient education and support emphasizing lifestyle modifications such as eating healthy and smoking cessation on a foundation of optimal medical therapy.

Is intra-procedure three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiogram an alternative to preprocedure multidetector computed tomography for the measurement of the aortic annulus in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

BACKGROUND: The role of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) vs multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in aortic annular sizing has been poorly defined in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR). We set to determine the correlation between 3DTEE and MDCT in measuring the aortic annulus prior to TAVR. METHODS: In an observational, retrospective study, we compared aortic annular areas measured by MDCT and 3DTEE in TAVR patients. The aortic annular area was measured by planimetry of images obtained by MDCT pre-TAVR and by intra-TAVR TEE using 3D rendering of the aortic annulus followed by planimetry. Our primary outcome was degree of correlation between mean aortic annulus area by 3DTEE and MDCT. RESULTS: Of the 111 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR who had measurements from both modalities available for comparison between February 2012 and April 2015, 87 met inclusion criteria. The mean aortic annular area by MDCT was 4.44±0.88 cm2 and by 3DTEE was 4.33±0.78 cm2 . There was a strong positive linear correlation between aortic annular area measurements obtained from these two modalities with mild relative underestimation by 3DTEE (ρ=.833). This relationship can be estimated using the predictive formula: [Formula: see text] CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography measurements have a high degree of correlation with MDCT measurements and thus can assist in proper valve prosthesis selection for TAVR. Our study thus supports use of 3DTEE as a reasonable alternative imaging modality in patients undergoing TAVR.

Thrombolytics for late superior caval vein thrombus in a patient with tricuspid atresia and single-lung Glenn anastomosis.

BACKGROUND: Those with cyanotic heart disease have an elevated bleeding risk but also are hypercoaguable. Treating haemodynamically significant thrombi in this unique cohort poses a monumental challenge. Case A 29-year-old women with tricuspid atresia and left pulmonary artery atresia presented with superior caval vein syndrome. She had a right modified Blalock-Taussig shunt as a neonate. A left modified Blalock-Taussig shunt performed later failed to establish flow to her left lung. At age 5, she had a Fontan procedure to the right lung but could not tolerate the physiology and had a low cardiac output syndrome. The Fontan was taken down and she was left with a Glenn anastamosis to the right pulmonary artery. She did well for years until she had dyspnea, upper extremity oedema and "facial fullness". On examination she was tachycardic, hypotensive, and more desaturated than baseline. She also had facial plethora. Decision-making Echocardiogram showed a large 9 × 3 mm nearly occlusive thrombus in the superior caval vein at the bifurcation of the left and right innominate veins. An emergent venogram confirmed the location and size of the thrombus. Given the thrombus burden and potential for distal embolisation through the Glenn to the single functional lung, we chose to treat the patient with thrombolytics. She had uncomplicated ICU course and was sent home on warfarin. Follow-up echocardiogram showed complete resolution of clot. CONCLUSION: This case shows the importance of history and physical exam in caring for this complex cohort of adult patients with CHD.

Aortic Size Distribution in the General Population: Explaining the Size Paradox in Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a diameter of 5-5.5 cm as the threshold for surgery on the ascending aorta. However, a study from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection showed that nearly 60% occurred at <5.5 cm (the 'aortic size paradox')--leading to a debate whether the size threshold should be lowered. However, the study showing dissection at small size had no knowledge of the population at risk. Herein, we aim to calculate the relative risk of aortic dissection at sizes<5.5 cm by analyzing both the number of occurring dissections (numerator) and the population at risk at each aortic size (denominator). METHODS: Using a publicly available database of 3,573 multiethnic subjects (46% male, mean age 60.7 years) from the general population, we plotted a distribution curve of ascending aortic size (by magnetic resonance imaging). The relative risk of aortic dissection was calculated by dividing the proportion of dissections occurring at each size (numerator) by the proportion of aortas of that same size in the general population (denominator). RESULTS: The mean ascending aortic diameter of the reference population was 3.2 cm (±0.4 cm). The largest diameter was 4.9 cm in women and 5.0 cm in men. The proportion of subjects with an aorta <3.5 cm was 79.2%, that of subjects with 3.5-3.9 cm was 18.0%, that of subjects with 4.0-4.4 cm was 2.6%, and that of subjects with ≥4.5 cm was 0.22%. The relative risk of dissection in those categories was found to be 0.055, 2.5, 4.9, and 346.8, respectively. Patients with an aorta≥4.5 cm were 6,305 times more likely to suffer aortic dissection than those with an aorta<3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The normal aorta is deceptively small, most commonly <3.5 cm. The aortic size paradox is a byproduct of the very large number of patients in small size ranges. This study fully supports current recommendations for surgical intervention at 5-5.5 cm.

Middle Aortic Syndrome in a Child-Bearing Age Patient.

We report a rare case of a 30-year-old female who had a long-standing history of middle aortic syndrome that was being managed nonsurgically. She presented with hypertension and buttock pain with plans to become pregnant. She underwent an aortoiliac bypass.

Prognostic Value of Late Gadolinium Enhancement in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement seen on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP). Patients with NICMP are at increased risk for cardiovascular events and death. The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in CMR may be associated with a poor prognosis, but its significance is still under investigation. We retrospectively studied 105 consecutive patients with NICMP and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% referred for CMR. The cohort was analyzed for the presence of LGE and left and right ventricular functional parameters. Patients were followed for the composite end point of hospitalization for congestive heart failure, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, or all-cause mortality. LGE was observed in 68% (n = 71) of the cohort. Both groups were similar in age, LVEF and LV end-diastolic volume. The LGE+ patients were more often men and had larger right ventricular volumes. At a mean follow-up of 806 ± 582 days, there were 26 patients (23 in the LGE+ group) who reached the primary end point. Event-free survival was significantly worse for the LGE+ patients. After adjusting for traditional risk factors (age, gender, and LVEF), patients with LGE had an increased risk of experiencing the primary end point (hazard ratio 4.47, 95% CIs 1.27 to 15.74, p = 0.02). The presence of LGE in patients with NICMP strongly predicts the occurrence of adverse events. In conclusion, this may be important in risk stratification and management.

Indications and imaging for aortic surgery: size and other matters.

OBJECTIVES: To review the current general concepts and understanding of the natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysm and their clinical implications. METHODS: Data on the the normal thoracic aortas were derived from the database of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (n = 3573), representative of the general population. Data on diseased thoracic aorta were derived from the database of the Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital (n = 3263), representative of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. RESULTS: Our studies have shown that the normal aorta in the general population is small (3.2 cm for the ascending aorta). Aortas larger than 5 cm are rare in the real world. The aneurysmal aorta grows at a mean of 0.2 cm/y, and larger aneurysms grow faster than do smaller ones. The dissection size paradox (which shows some aortic dissections occurring at small aneurysm sizes) is explained by the huge number of patients with small aortas in the general population. Genetic testing of patients with thoracic aortic disease helps identify genes responsible for aortic aneurysm and dissection. New imaging techniques such as 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging may add engineering data to our decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Size continues to be a strong predictor of natural complications and a suitable parameter for intervention. As we enter the era of personalized aneurysm care, it is likely that specific genetic mutations will facilitate the determination of the appropriate size criterion for surgical intervention in individual cases.

Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity: prospective validation trial of a novel technique in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Low baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) indicates poor prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Noninvasive BRS assessment is complicated by nonstationarities and noise in electrocardiogram and pressure signals. Phase-rectified signal averaging is a novel signal processing technology overcoming these problems. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively validate a BRS measure (baroreflex sensitivity assessed by means of phase-rectified signal averaging [BRS(PRSA)]) based on this technology. METHODS: Nine hundred forty-one consecutive acute myocardial infarction survivors aged 80 years or younger in sinus rhythm were prospectively enrolled at 2 German university hospitals. All patients underwent 30-minute recordings of electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressures (Portapres; TNO-TPD Biomedical Instrumentation, Amsterdam, Netherlands) within the first 2 weeks after myocardial infarction. BRS(PRSA) was prospectively dichotomized at 1.58 ms/mm Hg. Primary end point was all-cause mortality at 5 years. Multivariable analyses included Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score (dichotomized at ≥120), sex, BRS(PRSA), left ventricular ejection fraction (dichotomized at ≤35%), and diabetes mellitus. BRS(PRSA) was compared with 3 standard noninvasive BRS measures, that is, the sequence method, the transfer function method, and the correlation method. RESULTS: During follow-up, 72 patients (7.7%) died. BRS(PRSA) stratified the study population into a high-risk group of 405 patients (≤1.58 ms/mm Hg) with an estimated 5-year mortality of 14.2% and a low-risk group of 536 patients (>1.58 ms/mm Hg) with a 5-year mortality of 2.8% (P <.0001). On multivariable analysis, BRS(PRSA) ≤ 1.58 ms/mm Hg was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.1 (confidence interval 1.7-5.6; P = .001). Predictive power of BRS(PRSA) ≤ 1.58 ms/mm Hg was particularly strong in patients with a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score of ≥120 or with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%. CONCLUSION: BRS(PRSA) is a powerful and independent predictor of mortality in postinfarction patients especially when assessed in patients with a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score of ≥120 or a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%.

Clinical utility of a novel wireless implantable loop recorder in the evaluation of patients with unexplained syncope.

BACKGROUND: The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is particularly useful for monitoring patients with syncope, given the episodic nature and unpredictable pattern of recurrent episodes. Current practice guidelines advocate ILR implantation in select patients with unexplained syncope. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility and potential advantages of a novel wireless ILR in a consecutive cohort of patients with unexplained syncope. METHODS: Patients with unexplained syncope despite a comprehensive evaluation who underwent implantation of a Transoma Medical Sleuth ILR were examined. ILR implantation was considered in these patients if left ventricular function was ≥ 40% and if syncope was recurrent, associated with trauma, and/or associated with an abnormal ECG (e.g., bifascicular block). RESULTS: The Sleuth ILR was implanted in 50 patients. During mean follow-up 293 ± 211 days, 16 (32%) patients had recurrent near-syncope or syncope. Only half of the patients self-activated the ILR; in the other half, a diagnosis was established based on autoactivation-initiated storage of a significant arrhythmia event. Overall, there were 5 patients with complete heart block, 3 with sinus node dysfunction, 3 with supraventricular tachycardia, 2 with neurally mediated syncope, and 3 with a nonarrhythmic cause of syncope. The median time from an event to physician notification was 150 minutes (interquartile range 99, 297 min). Median time from ILR implantation to final diagnosis was 71 days (interquartile range 24, 143 days; range 3-683 days). CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of syncope was ultimately made in nearly one third of patients with unexplained syncope. Patients frequently did not activate their ILR at the time of recurrent syncope. However, the wireless ILR automatically transferred ECG data to a central monitoring station within minutes to hours of the arrhythmic event, virtually eliminating the possibility of data loss, thus greatly facilitating clinical decision making.

How to Learn Epicardial Intervention Techniques in Electrophysiology.

This article outlines an approach to begin an epicardial ablation program in the electrophysiology laboratory. There are some logistical hurdles in getting this program up and running, so this is a good opportunity to review the indications, the risks that are inherent in the procedure, and the infrastructure necessary in the electrophysiology laboratory and institution to perform the procedure safely and effectively.