Mobilization of hemopoietic stem cells with high-dose methotrexate plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support after standard dose induction is a promising approach for therapy of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is a standard drug for induction of PCNSL; however, data about the capacity of HD-MTX plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize hemopoietic progenitors are lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This investigation describes the data from stem cell mobilization and apheresis procedures after one or two cycles of HD-MTX for induction of PCNSL within the East German Study Group for Haematology and Oncology 053 trial. Eligible patients proceeded to high-dose busulfan/thiotepa after induction therapy and mobilization. RESULTS: Data were available from nine patients with a median age of 58 years. The maximal CD34+ cell count per microL of blood after the first course of HD-MTX was 13.89 (median). Determination was repeated in six patients after the second course with a significantly higher median CD34+ cell count of 33.69 per microL. Five patients required two apheresis procedures and in four patients a single procedure was sufficient. The total yield of CD34+ cells per kg of body weight harvested by one or two leukapheresis procedures was 6.60 x 10(6) (median; range, 2.68 x 10(6)-15.80 x 10(6)). The yield of CD34+ cells exceeded the commonly accepted lower threshold of 3 x 10(6) cells per kg of body weight in eight of nine cases. Even in the ninth, hemopoietic recovery after stem cell reinfusion was rapid and safe. CONCLUSION: HD-MTX plus G-CSF is a powerful combination for stem cell mobilization in patients with PCNSL and permits safe conduction of time-condensed and dose-intense protocols with high-dose therapy followed by stem cell reinfusion after HD-MTX induction.

Fludarabine combination therapy for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Fludarabine combination therapies have attained an increased popularity in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Among them, the combination of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (FC) is by far the best regimen studied. Patients receiving FC at relapse show response rates (RRs) of 70%-94% with 11%-34% complete remission (CR) rates. In previously untreated patients with CLL, RRs of 64%-88% with 21%-46% CR rates were observed. The main side effects of FC are myelotoxicity and infections; most complications are reported as fever of unknown origin, infections of the upper respiratory tract, or herpes virus infection. There is probably a correlation between the higher dose of cyclophosphamide (> 750 mg/m2 per treatment course) and an increase in the number of severe infectious complications. Similar results were reported regarding the RRs and side effects of the combination of fludarabine/epirubicin. The triple combination of fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone and fludarabine combinations with anti-CD20 (rituximab) or anti-CD52 (Campath-1H) antibody, might be even be more promising, since a relevant number of complete molecular remissions are achieved with these drugs. The precise role of fludarabine combinations within the overall treatment strategy remains to be determined. Our current recommendation is to use these combinations at relapse, while their use in first-line therapy should be investigated in clinical protocols. It remains to be shown whether patients with CLL achieve improved overall survival with these combination chemotherapies.

Fludarabine and bendamustine in refractory and relapsed indolent lymphoma--a multicenter phase I/II Trial of the east german society of hematology and oncology (OSHO).

The therapy of patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma relies on the development of new drug combinations. The drugs bendamustine and fludarabine have cytotoxic activity as monotherapy in indolent lymphoma and show synergism in vitro. In this study, we combined both drugs in a multicenter clinical phase I/II trial to evaluate their toxicity and efficacy. Bendamustine was given at 30 or 40 mg/m2/d (dose levels 1 and 2), fludarabine at 30 mg/m2/d, each drug on days 1 to 3. Six cycles were to be given every 4 weeks. A total of 29 patients with relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma were included in the study. During phase I, 9 patients were treated at dose level 1 and 7 patients at dose level 2. Thirteen patients were added to the study during phase II. Fourteen patients had follicular lymphoma, 11 patients mantle cell lymphoma, 2 patients lymphoplasmocytic and 2 patients nodal marginal zone lymphoma. Median age was 62 years (range 39-74). All patients were in stages III or IV of their disease and had received prior chemotherapy with or without additional radio- or immunotherapy. The dose limiting toxicity was hematotoxicity in all cases and occurred in 3 of 7 evaluable patients at dose level I and in 3 of 7 patients at dose level 2. One patient at dose level 2 died of sepsis in neutropenia with persistent thrombocytopenia. The study was continued at dose level 1 (phase II). Analysis of 19 evaluable patients treated at dose level 1 reveiled hematotoxicity CTC grade III in 47% and grade IV in 26%. Neutropenic fever occurred in 4 patients (21%). On an intent-to-treat basis, 45% or 32% of all patients at dose level 1 reached CR or PR, respectively. Nine of 9 patients with mantle cell lymphoma responded to therapy. The overall response rate was 77%. Eight of 15 responders relapsed after a median follow-up time of 14 months (range 2-43). The major complication of fludarabine in combination with bendamustine is hematotoxicity. Dose level 1 with 30 mg/m2/d of both drugs on days 1 to 3 was defined as the recommended dose. Despite unfavorable prognostic features (histologic subtype, stage of disease, pretreatment) response rates were good with this regimen.

Intermediate-dose cytarabine treatment delivered at moderate infusion rates for de novo acute myeloid leukemia-results of a phase I-II study.

Published randomized trials on different cytarabine doses for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) provide evidence of a dose-response effect. However, high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) regimens correlate with increased morbidity and toxicity related mortality. Typical HIDAC regimens deliver 6 g/m2/d in infusion rates of 500-3000 mg/m2/h. However, pharmacokinetic measurements indicate that intracellular Ara-CTP formation is saturated at lower infusion rates than used in HIDAC schedules, probably causing cytarabine accumulation in the plasma and increased toxicity. It was our objective to investigate in a prospective non-randomized phase I-II study feasibility and efficacy of intermediate doses of cytarabine delivered at the presumptive saturating moderate infusion rate (mir-IDAC), as induction therapy in order to optimize intensified treatment for acute myeloid leukemia. Forty previously untreated patients younger than 60 years of age with de novo AML received intermediate doses of cytarabine (2-4 g/m2/d) at moderate infusion rates (250-667 mg/m2/h) over 6 or 8 h. Cytarabine was applied on alternate days (day 1, 3, 5, 7) in combination with an anthracycline as induction and consolidation therapy. Thirty-two of the 40 patients (80%, 95%CI:64-91%) achieved CR after induction treatment. Treatment-related mortality during induction chemotherapy was 2.5%. No cerebellar toxicity was observed. After two to four mir-IDAC courses stem cell harvesting was successful in 71% of the patients eligible for high-dose chemotherapy. After three years 56% (95%CI:40-72%) of all patients are alive and 59% (95%CI:42-76%) of the patients who entered CR are free of leukemia. In conclusion, favorable long-term outcomes and moderate acute toxicities were observed in patients with de novo AML treated with IDAC schedules delivered at moderate infusion rates (mir-IDAC) starting as induction treatment. The data suggest that a randomized trial should now be undertaken to examine whether mir-IDAC has clinical advantages over HIDAC.

An open-label randomized trial comparing itraconazole oral solution with fluconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy and profound neutropenia.

OBJECTIVES: This trial studied the efficacy and safety of itraconazole and fluconazole in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An 8 week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicentre trial comparing itraconazole oral solution (2.5 mg/kg twice daily; N=248) with fluconazole oral solution or capsules (400 mg daily; N=246) in 494 patients with anticipated profound neutropenia (i.e. neutrophil count expected to be <500 cells/mm3 for at least 10 days) from tertiary care centres. RESULTS: Invasive fungal infections were reported for 4 out of 248 patients (1.6%) in the itraconazole group and 5 out of 246 patients (2.0%) in the fluconazole group. Invasive Aspergillus infections were proven for 2 out of 248 patients (0.8%) in the itraconazole group and 3 out of 246 patients (1.2%) in the fluconazole group. For both the ITT and profoundly neutropenic populations, no differences were detected between treatment groups in proven or suspected invasive fungal infections or other endpoints. The mortality rates owing to proven invasive fungal infections were 2 out of 248 patients (0.8%) for the itraconazole group and 3 out of 246 patients (1.2%) for the fluconazole group. There was also no difference between treatment groups in the number of patients who recovered from neutropenia or in the duration of neutropenia. More discontinuation of drug intake owing to nausea and more hypokalaemia occurred in the itraconazole group, other adverse events and the total number of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study there were no differences in the efficacy and safety of itraconazole and fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies.

Fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine alone in first-line therapy of younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Combination chemotherapy with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC) was compared with the standard regimen of fludarabine monotherapy in first-line treatment of younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Between 1999 and 2003, a total of 375 patients younger than 66 years who predominantly had advanced CLL were randomly assigned to receive either fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) for 5 days intravenously, repeated every 28 days) or FC combination therapy (fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m(2) for 3 days intravenously, repeated every 28 days). Both regimens were administered to a maximum of 6 courses. FC combination chemotherapy resulted in significantly higher complete remission rate (24%) and overall response rate (94%) compared with fludarabine alone (7% and 83%; P < .001 and P = .001). FC treatment also resulted in longer median progression-free survival (48 vs 20 months; P = .001) and longer treatment-free survival (37 vs 25 months; P < .001). Thus far, no difference in median overall survival has been observed. FC caused significantly more thrombocytopenia and leukocytopenia but did not increase the number of severe infections. In summary, first-line treatment with FC increases the response rates and the treatment-free interval in younger patients with advanced CLL.

Response to chemotherapy and treating institution predict survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

The majority of the available data on primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) derive from small unicentric or oligocentric studies. In this multicentre study, we evaluated the response, survival and toxicity in PCNSL patients after carmustine, methotrexate 1.5 g/m2, procarbazine and dexamethasone (BMPD) chemotherapy and searched for prognostic factors. Fifty-six patients received the BMPD protocol (dexamethasone was given only in course 1). The overall complete response rate to chemotherapy was 61% (34/56). Ten complete responders received whole-brain irradiation and 24 were not irradiated. Responders to chemotherapy had significantly longer median overall survival than non-responders (18.2 vs. 9.9 months, P = 0.02). Median survival was significantly longer at institutions accruing at least four patients than at those with fewer patients (31.5 vs. 9.5 months, P = 0.03).