Prediction of hospital admissions and grade 3-4 toxicities in cancer patients 70 years old and older receiving chemotherapy.

AIM: To predict chemotherapy toxicity and hospitalisations in elderly patients using clinical and laboratory parameters. METHODS: Records of cancer patients 70 years old or older who received adjuvant chemotherapy or first-line chemotherapy for a cancer in a single centre were reviewed. Factors associated with hospitalisations, grade 3-4 toxicities and dose reductions during treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients included in the study. Most patients (53.8%) were 70 to 75 years old. One hundred and five patients (38.2%) had a hospital admission during or within a month after their chemotherapy treatment. The only factor associated with admissions in the multivariate analysis was ECOG performance status (PS) >1 (p = .008, odds ratio 2.66, 95% CI: 1.28-5.53) and hypoalbuminaemia approached significance. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were associated with a lower creatinine clearance in the multivariate analysis (p = .01, odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-1.0), and dose reductions were associated with metastatic stage (p = .03, odds ratio 1.88, 95% CI: 1.05-3.35). A combined index with all four parameters was associated with all three outcomes of interest. CONCLUSION: ECOG PS, stage, albumin and creatinine clearance may be predictive of hospital admissions, grade 3-4 toxicities and dose reduction rates in cancer patients 70 years old and older receiving chemotherapy.

Focal fat masquerading as malignancy in the liver graft of a post-transplant patient.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver failure from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasing indication for liver transplant and recurrence of fatty liver in transplanted grafts has been documented. Herein is described an atypical recurrence of steatosis as a de novo focal fatty lesion that mimicked a more ominous cancerous lesion. This presentation of recurrent NAFLD has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: Chart review. RESULTS: Biopsy of an atypical lesion was found to be focal fat with surrounding steatohepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may recur after liver transplant and manifest as a focal fatty lesion. It is important to catalogue the atypical presentations of the increasingly common NAFLD developing in transplanted livers.

Diabetes, Obesity, and the Metabolic Syndrome as Prognostic Factors in Stages I to III Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Attempts to introduce prognostic factors for survival outcomes in localized colorectal cancer patients receiving surgical treatment with or without adjuvant therapies, beyond the classic staging parameters, have been met with limited success. Obesity and diabetes mellitus are among the conditions that predispose to colorectal cancer but their value as prognostic markers once the disease is diagnosed is controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study examines the prognostic value of the components of metabolic syndrome in a retrospective series of colorectal cancer patients with stages I to III disease followed in a single center. RESULTS: Among the four components of the metabolic syndrome, only diabetes was independently associated with progression-free survival (PFS) while obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were not. No associations of the metabolic syndrome (MS) or its components with overall survival (OS) were observed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These data pinpoint to diabetes mellitus (DM) as a possible prognostic factor for PFS in localized colorectal cancer and further cast doubt for the value of obesity as measured by body mass index (BMI) on local stage colorectal cancer prognosis.

The metabolic syndrome and its components as prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) are involved in colorectal cancer development and the incidence of the disease is higher in obese and diabetic patients. Nevertheless, the value of these diseases or the MetS as a whole as prognostic markers once colorectal cancer is diagnosed is controversial. METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in our center over a 6-year period were reviewed and data on baseline characteristics of the patients and their cancers were extracted. Data on the presence and pharmacologic treatments of the four components of the MetS (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) were also recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), Kaplan-Meier curves of the various groups were constructed and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three patients were included in the analysis. The prevalence of the four MetS components was 66.1% for overweight/obesity, 25.2% for diabetes, 61% for hypertension, and 41.5% for dyslipidemia. Among the four components of the metabolic syndrome, none was associated with either PFS or OS. Diabetes tended to approach significance for PFS (p = 0.08). The MetS as a whole did not influence survival outcome. MetS was not prognostic even if the overweight category was not considered as a positive element of the syndrome. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that diabetes or other metabolic syndrome elements are not prognostic factors for PFS or OS in metastatic colorectal cancer. Further investigation may be warranted with a focus on refinement of the metabolic evaluation.

Differences in Referral Access to Care Between Gastrointestinal Subspecialty Patients: Barriers and Opportunities.

Purpose: Referral access to subspecialty care for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) diseases is not well defined, but has significant importance to patients. We hypothesized that patients experience barriers to care in two common gastroenterology subspecialties, Hepatology and Motility, in a university medical center. Methods: Two hundred thirteen clinic patients (mean age 46.5 years; 66.5% female; 85.6% Caucasians) completed a formatted questionnaire on access to care. Hepatology patients were older (49.7 years, p=0.008); motility patients predominantly female (76.8%, p<0.001). Gender distribution was even for hepatology (51.2% female). Both groups were overweight (mean body mass index 28.4). Results: Patients waited a mean 89.5 days to be seen by a subspecialist. There were differences by subspecialty (107.6 days for motility vs. 64.3 days for hepatology, p=0.022). A larger percentage of motility patients were told nothing was wrong with them (16.8%, p<0.01) and could not be helped (42.1%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Access to care for subspecialty gastroenterology patients in a university center appears to be impacted by a number of variables. While there are similarities, differences exist between these two subspecialties. Motility patients were more likely to have been told they have nothing wrong with them, suffer setbacks financially, and suffer mood problems. Their wait time for appointments was also greater than hepatology patients. Further investigations of referral access for gastroenterology patients may yield additional insights into disease-specific barriers to accessing subspecialty care.