RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Understanding the burden of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is critical to allocate resources for prevention, management, and research. The objectives of this study were to define incidence, epidemiology, and mortality of adult patients hospitalized with CAP in the city of Louisville, and to estimate burden of CAP in the US adult population. METHODS: This was a prospective population-based cohort study of adult residents in Louisville, Kentucky, from 1 June 2014 to 31 May 2016. Consecutive hospitalized patients with CAP were enrolled at all adult hospitals in Louisville. The annual population-based CAP incidence was calculated. Geospatial epidemiology was used to define ecological associations among CAP and income level, race, and age. Mortality was evaluated during hospitalization and at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year after hospitalization. RESULTS: During the 2-year study, from a Louisville population of 587499 adults, 186384 hospitalizations occurred. A total of 7449 unique patients hospitalized with CAP were documented. The annual age-adjusted incidence was 649 patients hospitalized with CAP per 100000 adults (95% confidence interval, 628.2-669.8), corresponding to 1591825 annual adult CAP hospitalizations in the United States. Clusters of CAP cases were found in areas with low-income and black/African American populations. Mortality during hospitalization was 6.5%, corresponding to 102821 annual deaths in the United States. Mortality at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year was 13.0%, 23.4%, and 30.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated US burden of CAP is substantial, with >1.5 million unique adults being hospitalized annually, 100000 deaths occurring during hospitalization, and approximately 1 of 3 patients hospitalized with CAP dying within 1 year.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Adulto , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pneumonia/economia , Vigilância da População , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid abuse has increased to epidemic proportions in the United States. Kentucky, along with other states, passed comprehensive legislation to monitor and curb opioid prescribing. OBJECTIVES: This paper characterizes patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) after abusing prescription opioids and heroin prior to and after the passage of House Bill 1 (HB1) in April 2012. METHODS: Based on a retrospective review of ED visits from 2009-2014 in one urban adult facility, patients were included if the chief complaint or diagnosis was directly related to prescription opioid or heroin abuse. The primary outcome is the number and type of substance abused by each ED patient. RESULTS: From 2009-2014, 2945 patients presented to the ED after prescription opioid or heroin abuse. The number of prescription opioid patients decreased from 215 (of 276 patients) in 2009 to 203 (of 697 patients) in 2014; 77.9% of patients abused opioids in 2009, vs. 29% in 2014 (a 63% decrease). The number of heroin patients increased from 61 in 2009 to 494 in 2014; 22% of patients in 2009 abused heroin, vs. 71% in 2014 (a 221% increase). Both piecewise regression and autoregressive integrated moving average trend models showed an increased trend in patient heroin abuse beginning in 2011-2012. CONCLUSIONS: Our facility experienced a decrease in the number of patients who abused prescription opioids and an increase in the number of patients who abused heroin over the study period. The transition seemed to occur just prior to, or concurrent with, enforcement of statewide opioid legislation.
Assuntos
Jurisprudência , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although not all health care-associated infections (HAIs) are preventable, reducing HAIs through targeted intervention is key to a successful infection prevention program. To identify areas in need of targeted intervention, robust statistical methods must be used when analyzing surveillance data. The objective of this study was to compare and contrast statistical process control (SPC) charts with Twitter's anomaly and breakout detection algorithms. METHODS: SPC and anomaly/breakout detection (ABD) charts were created for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Acinetobacter baumannii, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and central line-associated bloodstream infection data. RESULTS: Both SPC and ABD charts detected similar data points as anomalous/out of control on most charts. The vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus ABD chart detected an extra anomalous point that appeared to be higher than the same time period in prior years. Using a small subset of the central line-associated bloodstream infection data, the ABD chart was able to detect anomalies where the SPC chart was not. DISCUSSION: SPC charts and ABD charts both performed well, although ABD charts appeared to work better in the context of seasonal variation and autocorrelation. CONCLUSIONS: Because they account for common statistical issues in HAI data, ABD charts may be useful for practitioners for analysis of HAI surveillance data.
Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Algoritmos , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Vigilância da PopulaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of time spent in the emergency department (ED) and process of care on mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis or septic shock. METHODS: An observational cohort study was conducted on 117 patients who came through the University of Louisville Hospital ED and subsequently were directly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Variables of interest were time in the ED from triage to physical transport to the ICU, from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered, and from triage to antibiotic(s) administered. Expected mortality was calculated according to the University Health System Consortium Database. Primary and secondary outcomes were in-hospital death and hospital length of stay in days, respectively. RESULTS: We found no significant association between time in the ED and mortality between survivors and nonsurvivors (5.5 versus 5.7 hours, P = 0.804). After adjusting for expected mortality, a 22% increase in mortality risk was found for each hour delay from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered; a 15% increase in mortality risk was observed for each hour from triage to antibiotic(s) given. Both time from triage to antibiotic(s) ordered (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, P = 0.044) and time from triage to antibiotic(s) delivery (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092) were independently associated with an increased hospital stay (HR = 0.79, P = 0.0092). CONCLUSION: Though no significant association between mortality and ED time was demonstrated, we observed a significant increase in mortality in septic patients with both delays in antibiotic(s) order and administration. Delay in care also resulted in increased hospital stays both overall and in the ICU.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Esquema de Medicação , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , TriagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: We investigated whether early enteral nutrition alone may be sufficient prophylaxis against stress-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in mechanically ventilated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, exploratory study that included mechanically ventilated patients in medical ICUs of two academic hospitals. Intravenous pantoprazole and early enteral nutrition were compared to placebo and early enteral nutrition as stress-ulcer prophylaxis. The incidences of clinically significant and overt GI bleeding were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: 124 patients were enrolled in the study. After exclusion of 22 patients, 102 patients were included in analysis: 55 patients in the treatment group and 47 patients in the placebo group. Two patients (one from each group) showed signs of overt GI bleeding (overall incidence 1.96%), and both patients experienced a drop of >3 points in hematocrit in a 24-hour period indicating a clinically significant GI bleed. There was no statistical significant difference in the incidence of overt or significant GI bleeding between groups (p=0.99). CONCLUSION: We found no benefit when pantoprazole is added to early enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. The routine prescription of acid-suppressive therapy in critically ill patients who tolerate early enteral nutrition warrants further evaluation.
Assuntos
2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevenção & controle , Úlcera Péptica/prevenção & controle , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pantoprazol , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração ArtificialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is central to Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) programs. Challenges may occur when applying quality improvement methodologies like process control charts, often due to the limited exposure of typical IPs. Because of this, our team created an open-source database with a process control chart generator for IPC programs. The objectives of this report are to outline the development of the application and demonstrate application using simulated data. METHODS: We used Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap Consortium, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN), R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and R Studio Shiny (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) to create an open source data collection system with automated process control chart generation. We used simulated data to test and visualize both in-control and out-of-control processes for commonly used metrics in IPC programs. RESULTS: The R code for implementing the control charts and Shiny application can be found on our Web site (https://github.com/ul-research-support/spcapp). Screen captures of the workflow and simulated data indicating both common cause and special cause variation are provided. CONCLUSIONS: Process control charts can be easily developed based on individual facility needs using freely available software. Through providing our work free to all interested parties, we hope that others will be able to harness the power and ease of use of the application for improving the quality of care and patient safety in their facilities.