Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 67(3): 243-260, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265110

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is associated with occupational high-force repetitive tasks and vibration. This project examines the relationship between CTS and work to: (1) identify jobs and industries with increased CTS risk; (2) explore whether there is a sex difference in the risk of CTS after controlling for occupation; and (3) determine whether any observed relationships persist after excluding Workers Compensation Board (WCB) accepted time-loss CTS claims. METHODS: We linked 95.5% of time-loss WCB claims from 2006 to 2019 to provincial administrative health data. The cohort included 143,001 unique person-occupation combinations. CTS cases were defined as at least two medical claims for (ICD-9 354) within a 12-month period or a surgical claim for CTS from 2 years before the WCB claim to 3 years after. WCB accepted CTS time-loss claims not identified by the medical claims were also included. RESULTS: A total of 4302 individuals (3.0%) met the CTS definition. Analysis revealed that the hazard ratios (HRs) of CTS vary considerably with occupation. Sex-based differences in CTS risks were observed, both in low- and high-risk occupations. In many occupations with increased HR, the HR remained elevated after excluding accepted time-loss WCB cases. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing CTS varied with occupation. Job titles with ergonomic risk factors had higher risks than those with lower exposures. This finding remained after eliminating time-loss compensated WCB cases, suggesting that all cases of CTS in high risk jobs are not identified in WCB statistics. Female workers in some job titles had excess CTS cases compared to male workers within the same job title.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal , Doenças Profissionais , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/epidemiologia , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/etiologia , Manitoba/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Indústrias , Ocupações , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Fatores de Risco
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(9): 791-799, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37264255

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objective was to explore the relationship of sun behavior patterns with the risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Sun behavior information from Alberta's Tomorrow Project, CARTaGENE, and Ontario Health Study were utilized. The relationship between time in the sun during summer months and risk of NHL was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models with age as the time scale and adjustment for confounders. Cohorts were analyzed separately and hazard ratios (HR) pooled with random effects meta-analysis. Joint effects of time in the sun and use of sun protection were examined. Patterns of exposure were explored via combinations of weekday and weekend time in the sun. RESULTS: During an average follow-up of 7.6 years, 205 NHL cases occurred among study participants (n = 79,803). Compared to < 30 min daily in the sun, we observed HRs of 0.84 (95% CI 0.55-1.28) for 30-59 min, 0.63 (95% CI 0.40-0.98) for 1-2 h, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.61-1.36) for > 2 h. There was suggestive evidence that > 2 h was protective against NHL with use of sun protection, but not without it. Compared to < 30 min daily, moderate exposure (30 min to 2 h on weekdays or weekend) was associated with a lower risk of NHL (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92), while intermittent (< 30 min on weekdays and > 2 h on weekends) and chronic (> 2 h daily) were not. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of a protective effect of moderate time spent in the sun on NHL risk.


Assuntos
Linfoma não Hodgkin , Luz Solar , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Linfoma não Hodgkin/etiologia , Ontário
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(12): 706-714, 2023 Nov 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857488

RESUMO

Ionising radiation is a human carcinogen, but the evidence is less clear that exposure to low-dose ionising radiation (LDIR) increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We synthesised the literature of chronic occupational exposure to LDIR and cardiovascular disease, particularly for ischaemic heart disease (IHD).The literature search was conducted using three databases including studies published between 1990 and 2022. A quality assessment of the studies was completed using the Office of Health and Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool. We conducted meta-analyses for IHD mortality using random effects models using measures of excess relative risk per sievert (ERR/Sv) obtained from internal cohort comparisons, as well as with standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) from external cohort comparisons.We identified 2189 articles, and of these, 26 provided data on IHD and were retained. Most studies were classified as having a 'moderate' level of risk of bias. Fourteen and 10 studies reporting external radiation doses were included in meta-analyses using SMR and ERR/Sv, respectively. The meta-summary SMR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) with evidence of reduced risk but high heterogeneity across studies. For internal cohort measures, the summary ERR/Sv for a lagged exposure of 10 years was 0.10 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.20) with low heterogeneity. The subgroup analysis by lagged exposure time showed the strongest association were for the 15 and 20 years lag.Our findings suggest that occupational exposure to LDIR increases the risk IHD mortality and highlight the relevance of internal cohort comparisons.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Isquemia Miocárdica , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Exposição à Radiação , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Radiação Ionizante , Risco , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição à Radiação/efeitos adversos
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(8): 679-686, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249122

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to identify jobs and industries that may be associated with increased or decreased risk of myocardial infarction. METHODS: We linked provincial health care data with Workers Compensation Board (WCB) of Manitoba claims data to create the Manitoba Occupational Disease Surveillance System (MODSS). Workers were eligible for inclusion in this study if their WCB claim listed an occupation, their claim could be linked to health data, they had an accepted non-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) compensation time loss claim and were free of a recent (<1 year) AMI diagnosis at the start of disease follow-up. AMI cases were identified as the most-responsible diagnosis in the hospitalization file (ICD-9 410 or ICD-10 I20). Cases were included if they occurred after the WCB record injury date until end of coverage, either through moving out of province, reaching age 65, death, or the end of the study period (March 1, 2020). RESULTS: We identified 1880 incident AMIs amongst 150,022 claims recorded in the MODSS (1.25%). A number of industries and occupations were found to have higher and lower AMI rates. Care providers and educational, legal, and public protection support occupations had a lower hazard ratio (HR; 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.92) compared to the overall cohort. Female chefs and cooks, and male butchers and bakers had elevated AMI HRs. Both male and female transport and heavy equipment operators and related maintenance occupations had increased HRs (1.48; 95% CI: 1.30-1.67). Often male and female workers employed in the same occupations had congruent AMI risks, but this was not always the case. CONCLUSIONS: The linkage of a WCB data set with provincial health claims data led to the identification of a number of occupations with elevated risks of AMI in Manitoba. This was most notable in the transportation industry. Identifying work areas with increased risk of AMIs could lead to targeted educational efforts and potential workplace modifications to lower this risk.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Manitoba/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Ocupações , Indústrias
5.
Environ Res ; 206: 112587, 2022 04 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34951990

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Some studies suggest that residential surrounding greenness is associated with improved mental health. Few of these studies have focussed on middle-aged and older adults, explored the modifying effects of social determinants of health, or accounted for the extent to which individuals interact with their neighbourhood environments. METHODS: We analysed cross-sectional data collected from 26,811 urban participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging who were between 45 and 86 years of age. Participants provided details on socioeconomic characteristics, health behaviours, and their frequency of neighbourhood interactions. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a measure of greenness, was assigned to participants' residential addresses at a buffer distance of 500 m. Four self-reported measures of mental health were considered: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10; short scale), past diagnosis of clinical depression, perceptions of mental health, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Regression models were used to describe associations between greenness and these outcomes, and spline models were fit to characterize the exposure-response function between greenness and CES-D-10 scores. Stratified analyses evaluated whether associations varied by sociodemographic status. RESULTS: In adjusted models, we observed a 5% (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.90, 0.99) reduced odds of depressive symptoms in relation to an interquartile range increase of NDVI (0.06) within a 500 m buffer of the participant's residence. Similarly, we found an inverse association with a self-reported clinical diagnosis of depression (OR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.92-1.01). Increases in surrounding greenness were associated with improved perceptions of mental health, and the SWLS. Our spline analyses found that beneficial effects between greenness and the CES-D-10 were strongest among those of lower income. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that residential greenness has mental health benefits, and that interventions to increase urban greenness can help reduce social inequalities in mental health.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Características de Residência , Idoso , Envelhecimento , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(8): 1709-1721, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34612752

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Antineoplastic drugs are widely used in the treatment of cancer. However, some are known carcinogens and reproductive toxins, and incidental low-level exposure to workers is a health concern. CAREX Canada estimated that approximately 75,000 Canadians are exposed to antineoplastic drugs in workplace settings. While policies and guidelines on safe handling of antineoplastic drugs are available, evidence suggests that compliance is low. In this paper, we identify barriers and facilitators for safe handling of antineoplastic drugs in workplace settings. METHODS: We utilized a unique method to study public policy which involved compiling policy levers, developing a logic model, conducting a literature review, and contextualizing data through a deliberative process with stakeholders to explore in-depth contextual factors and experiences for the safe handling of antineoplastic drugs. RESULTS: The most common barriers identified in the literature were: poor training (46%), poor safety culture (41%), and inconsistent policies (36%). The most common facilitators were: adequate safety training (41%), leadership support (23%), and consistent policies (21%). Several of these factors are intertwined and while this means one barrier can cause other barriers, it also allows healthcare employers to mitigate these barriers by implementing small but meaningful changes in the workplace. CONCLUSION: The combination of barriers and facilitators identified in our review highlight the importance of creating work environments where safety is a priority for the safe handling of antineoplastic drugs. The results of this study will assist policy makers and managers in identifying gaps and enhancing strategies that reduce occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Canadá , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Local de Trabalho , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
7.
Environ Res ; 191: 110100, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853660

RESUMO

Residents in close proximity to agricultural land are at risk of higher pesticide exposures. The purpose of this study was to generate national population-level exposure estimates for Canada for three commonly applied pesticides that are suspected carcinogens (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), glyphosate and chlorothalonil). Using geographic information systems, pesticide exposure was estimated for every - census subdivision (CSD) in Canada (n = 5054) by combining raster-based surfaces for the distribution of crops with average crop-specific pesticide application rates data. Analyses examined all identified crops in combination with different pesticide application rates to obtain a cumulative potential total exposure. Specifically, the number of acres of particular crops were calculated for each CSD and then multiplied by the average pesticide application rates data, summed across crops, and combined with population data by CSD to provide a potential pesticide exposure estimate for each CSD. Results demonstrate that the population exposure varies greatly depending on agricultural production by CSD region. For example, in Ontario, the 2,4-D application rate was an average of 361 kg/km2, while in Saskatchewan, which primarily grows field/cereal crops, 2,4-D application rates were much higher (3810 kg/km2). The highest potential exposures to all three pesticides were in the prairie provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) along with Prince Edward Island, Southern Quebec and British Columbia. This work can be used in conjunction with other exposure assessment approaches to better understand overall pesticide exposure among Canada's general population.


Assuntos
Praguicidas , Agricultura , Alberta , Colúmbia Britânica , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Humanos , Ontário , Praguicidas/análise , Quebeque , Saskatchewan
8.
Environ Res ; 189: 109902, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32980002

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Outdoor workers are at risk of prolonged and high solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure, which is known to cause skin cancer. The objectives of this study were to characterize the UVR exposure levels of outdoor workers in Alberta, Canada, and to investigate what factors may contribute to their exposure. METHODS: This study collected objective solar UVR measurements from outdoor workers primarily in Alberta during the summer of 2019. Workers were recruited via the management or health and safety teams from building trade unions and employers. Calibrated, electronic UVR dosimeters were worn by workers on their hardhats, wrists, or lapels for five working days. Data on workers' demographics, jobs, sun protection behaviors, and personal risk factors were collected using questionnaires, and meteorological data for each sampling day were noted. Mean daily exposure measured as the standard erythemal dose (SED) was calculated and compared to the international occupational exposure limit guideline (1.3 SED). Marginal models were developed to evaluate potential determinants of occupational solar UVR exposure. RESULTS: In total, 883 measurements were collected from 179 workers. On average, workerswere exposed to 1.93 SED (range: 0.03-16.63 SED) per day. Just under half of workers (45%) were exposed to levels exceeding the international exposure limit guideline. In the bivariate analyses, landscape and maintenance workers, as well as trade and recreation workers, had the highest levels of exposure (average: 2.64 and 1.84 SED, respectively). Regional variations were observed, with the "other" cities/regions (outside of Edmonton and Calgary) experiencing the highest average levels (2.60 SED). Workers who placed the dosimeters on their hardhats experienced higher levels compared to the other groups. Exposure was highest on sunny and mixed days. Education, trade, city, dosimeter placement, forecast, hair colour, and number of hours outside were included in the final exposure model, of which trade, dosimeter placement, forecast, and number of hours outside at work were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to elevated solar UVR levels is common among outdoor workers in Alberta. The study findings can help inform future monitoring studies and exposure reduction initiatives aimed at protecting workers.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional , Raios Ultravioleta , Alberta , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Ocupações , Luz Solar , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
9.
Prev Med ; 122: 128-139, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31078166

RESUMO

Exposure to occupational carcinogens is often overlooked as a contributor to the burden of cancer. To estimate the proportion of cancer cases attributable to occupational exposure in Canada in 2011, exposure prevalence and levels of 44 carcinogens were informed by data from the Canadian carcinogen exposure surveillance project (CAREX Canada). These were used with Canadian Census (between 1961 and 2011) and Labour Force Survey (annual surveys between 1976 and 2013) data to estimate the number of workers ever exposed to occupational carcinogens. Risk estimates of the association between each carcinogen and cancer site were selected mainly from published literature reviews. Population attributable risks were estimated using Levin's equation and applied to the 2011 cancer statistics from the Canadian Cancer Registry. It is estimated that 15.5 million Canadians alive in 2011 were exposed, during at least one year between 1961 and 2001, to at least one carcinogen in the workplace. Overall, we estimated that in 2011, between 3.9% (95% CI: 3.1%-8.1%) and 4.2% (95% CI: 3.3%-8.7%) of all incident cases of cancer were due to occupational exposure, corresponding to lower and upper numbers of 7700-21,800 cases. Five of the cancer sites - mesothelioma, non-melanoma skin cancer, lung, female breast, and urinary bladder - account for a total of 7600 to 21,200 cancers attributable to occupational exposures such as solar radiation, asbestos, diesel engine exhaust, crystalline silica, and night shift work. Our study highlights cancer sites and occupational exposures that need recognition and efforts by all stakeholders to avoid preventable cancers in the future.


Assuntos
Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Amianto/toxicidade , Neoplasias da Mama , Canadá/epidemiologia , Censos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/etiologia , Neoplasias/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Dióxido de Silício/toxicidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(9): 668-671, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413189

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The causes of kidney cancer are not well understood though occupational exposures are thought to play a role. Crystalline silica is a known human carcinogen, and despite previous links with kidney disease, there have been few studies investigating its association with kidney cancer. We addressed this research gap using a population-based case-control study of Canadian men. METHODS: Questionnaire data were obtained from individuals with histologically confirmed kidney cancer, and population-based controls recruited from eight Canadian provinces (1994-1997). An industrial hygienist characterised participants' lifetime occupational exposure, and their confidence in the assessment (possibly, probably or definitely exposed) to silica on three dimensions (intensity, frequency and duration), and cumulative exposure was estimated. Logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Nearly half of the 689 kidney cancer cases (49%) and 2369 controls (44%) had ever been occupationally exposed to crystalline silica. In a fully adjusted model, workers ever-exposed to silica had a slightly increased risk of kidney cancer relative to those who were unexposed (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.32). Odds were modestly (and generally not statistically significantly) increased for models with duration of exposure and cumulative exposure, though exposure-response relationships were not evident. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not provide evidence that occupational exposure to crystalline silica increases risk of kidney cancer in men.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional , Dióxido de Silício/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 92(8): 1151-1157, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270593

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Outdoor workers are exposed daily to solar ultraviolet radiation, an important contributor in the development of non-melanoma skin cancer. This study aimed to quantify the health burden of non-melanoma skin cancers among outdoor workers in Canada. METHODS: Solar ultraviolet radiation exposure and estimates of exposure levels were applied to employment information from Canada census data to determine the exposed population in the risk exposure period (1961-2001). Risk estimates were drawn from meta-analyses selected based on quality and relevance to the current study. Population-attributable fractions were calculated using Levin's equation and attributable cases were estimated based on incidence data reported by the Canadian Cancer Society. RESULTS: In 2011, 6.31% (4556 cases) of non-melanoma skin cancer cases were estimated to be attributable to occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation. The majority of these cases occurred in men in the agriculture or construction industries. CONCLUSIONS: These estimates of the burden of non-melanoma skin cancer in Canada identify the need for further prevention efforts, particularly in agriculture and construction. Introducing workplace sun safety measures could be an important area for policy development.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Local de Trabalho
12.
Am J Ind Med ; 62(8): 635-642, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31172551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We estimated the proportion and number of female breast cancer cases in Canada attributable to night shift work, a probable cause of breast cancer. METHODS: Levin's equation was used to calculate population attributable fractions (PAFs) among Canadian women who ever worked night/rotating shifts from 1961 to 2000, accounting for labor turnover and survival to the year 2011. The calculated PAFs were applied to 2011 Canadian breast cancer incidence statistics to obtain the number of attributable cases. RESULTS: Approximately 1.5 million women ever worked night/rotating shifts during 1961-2000 and survived to 2011. The PAFs ranged from 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-6.2) to 5.2% (95% CI: 3.7-13.6), and 470 to 1200 incident breast cancer cases in 2011 were likely due to shift work, of which 38% would have been diagnosed among women in health-related occupations. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to increase the certainty of this association, but current evidence supports workplace-based prevention.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Jornada de Trabalho em Turnos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Tolerância ao Trabalho Programado
13.
Cancer Causes Control ; 29(10): 937-950, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099630

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite a strong association between indoor tanning and the risk of cutaneous cancers, the relationship between indoor tanning and non-cutaneous cancers is unknown. Our objective was to estimate the association of indoor tanning with developing non-cutaneous cancers. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the association between indoor tanning and non-cutaneous cancer sites. Associations were estimated using random effects models. Heterogeneity was investigated through subgroup analyses and the Q-test and I2 statistics. RESULTS: From 15 identified studies, 33 effect estimates for 12 cancer sites were included in the review. Adjustment for sun exposure was a significant source of heterogeneity in the association of indoor tanning and non-cutaneous cancer risk (meta-regression p = 0.0043). When restricting to studies that adjusted for solar ultraviolet radiation (7 studies and 19 effect estimates) a potential increased risk was observed among ever users of indoor tanning devices with the risk of hematologic malignancies (pooled relative risk = 1.11; 95% CI 0.96-1.28), with differing effects observed by hematologic types and subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. No association was observed among solid non-cutaneous cancers (pooled relative risk = 0.98; 95% CI 0.94-1.19). Neither study design nor geographical region was significant sources of heterogeneity in these associations. CONCLUSION: When controlling for sun exposure, indoor tanning does not protect against solid non-cutaneous cancers and may increase the risk of some hematologic malignancies. Given the well-established relationship with skin cancer and potential relationship with hematologic malignancies, efforts to reduce the use of indoor tanning devices should continue.


Assuntos
Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Banho de Sol , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Linfoma não Hodgkin/epidemiologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Risco
14.
Occup Environ Med ; 75(9): 617-622, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29705772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the population attributable fraction (PAF) and number of incident and fatal lung cancers in Canada from occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust (DEE). METHODS: DEE exposure prevalence and level estimates were used with Canadian Census and Labour Force Survey data to model the exposed population across the risk exposure period (REP, 1961-2001). Relative risks of lung cancer were calculated based on a meta-regression selected from the literature. PAFs were calculated using Levin's equation and applied to the 2011 lung cancer statistics obtained from the Canadian Cancer Registry. RESULTS: We estimated that 2.4% (95% CI 1.6% to 6.6%) of lung cancers in Canada are attributable to occupational DEE exposure, corresponding to approximately 560 (95% CI 380 to 1570) incident and 460 (95% CI 310 to 1270) fatal lung cancers in 2011. Overall, 1.6 million individuals alive in 2011 were occupationally exposed to DEE during the REP, 97% of whom were male. Occupations with the highest burden were underground miners, truck drivers and mechanics. Half of the attributable lung cancers occurred among workers with low exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the burden of lung cancer attributable to occupational DEE exposure in Canada. Our results underscore a large potential for prevention, and a large public health impact from occupational exposure to low levels of DEE.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Gasolina/toxicidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Emissões de Veículos/toxicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 15(6): 481-491, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29695213

RESUMO

Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the second most prevalent carcinogenic exposure in Canada and is similarly important in other countries with large Caucasian populations. The objective of this article was to estimate the economic burden associated with newly diagnosed non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) attributable to occupational solar radiation exposure. Key cost categories considered were direct costs (healthcare costs, out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs), and informal caregiver costs); indirect costs (productivity/output costs and home production costs); and intangible costs (monetary value of the loss of health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). To generate the burden estimates, we used secondary data from multiple sources applied to computational methods developed from an extensive review of the literature. An estimated 2,846 (5.3%) of the 53,696 newly diagnosed cases of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and 1,710 (9.2%) of the 18,549 newly diagnosed cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 2011 in Canada were attributable to occupational solar radiation exposure. The combined total for direct and indirect costs of occupational NMSC cases is $28.9 million ($15.9 million for BCC and $13.0 million for SCC), and for intangible costs is $5.7 million ($0.6 million for BCC and $5.1 million for SCC). On a per-case basis, the total costs are $5,670 for BCC and $10,555 for SCC. The higher per-case cost for SCC is largely a result of a lower survival rate, and hence higher indirect and intangible costs. Our estimates can be used to raise awareness of occupational solar UV exposure as an important causal factor in NMSCs and can highlight the importance of occupational BCC and SCC among other occupational cancers.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/economia , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/economia , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/economia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
16.
Health Rep ; 28(5): 3-11, 2017 May 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28513818

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Depletion of the ozone layer has meant that ambient ultraviolet radiation (UVR) has increased in recent decades. At the same time, the incidence of skin cancers, including melanoma, has risen. The relatively few large-scale studies that linked ambient UVR to melanoma found a trend toward rising incidence closer to the equator, where UVR estimates are highest. Similar research has not been conducted in Canada, where ambient UVR is generally lower than in countries further south. DATA AND METHODS: Modelled UVR data for the months of June through August during the 1980-to-1990 period were spatially linked in Geographic Information Systems to 2.4 million white members of the 1991 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort and tracked for melanoma diagnosis over an 18-year period (1992 to 2009). Standard Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate melanoma risk associated with increases of ambient summer UVR, assigned by residence at baseline. Models were adjusted for age, sex and socioeconomic (SES) characteristics. Separate analyses by body site of melanoma were conducted. Effect modification of the association between ambient UVR and melanoma by sex, age, outdoor occupation and selected SES characteristics was evaluated. RESULTS: Differences of one standard deviation (446 J/m², or 7% of the mean) in average ambient summer UVR were associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for melanoma of 1.22 (95% CI: 1.19 to 1.25) when adjusting for sex, age and SES characteristics. The HR for melanoma in relative UVR (per 1 standard deviation) was larger for men (HR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.30) than for women (HR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.22). INTERPRETATION: Ambient summer UVR is associated with a greater risk of melanoma among the white population, even in a country where most people live within a narrow latitudinal belt. A stronger association between melanoma and ambient UVR was evident among men and among people of lower SES.


Assuntos
Melanoma/epidemiologia , Estações do Ano , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Censos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle
17.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 14(1): 1-8, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27468809

RESUMO

Isocyanates such as toluene 2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI), methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI), and hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) are known sensitizers and exposure to these chemicals can result in isocyanate-induced asthma-the leading cause of occupational asthma. A newly created exposure database was available containing occupational isocyanate measurements spanning 1981-1996 from Ontario and British Columbia (BC)-two of the largest provinces in Canada. The aim was to describe the historical measurements relative to exposure thresholds, ascertain differences in the data between provinces, and identify time trends. Descriptive statistics of the observations were summarized and stratified by isocyanate species and province. Chi-square tests and Student's t-test were performed to determine differences between provinces. To investigate time trends in the odds of a measurement exceeding the limit of detection (LOD) and time-weighted average (TWA), mixed effects logistic regression models were constructed. In total, 6,984 isocyanate measurements were analyzed, the majority of which were below the LOD (79%). Overall, 8.3% of samples were in excess of the 2014 TLV-TWA of 0.005 ppm. Comparing the two provinces, the proportion of samples exceeding the LOD and TLV-TWA was greater in BC for all isocyanate species. Differences in time trends were also observed between provinces-the odds of a sample exceeding the TLV-TWA decreased over time in the case of MDI (Ontario only), TDI (both Ontario and BC), and other isocyanates (BC only). Our finding that a majority of the exposure measurements was below the LOD is similar to that reported by others. Differences between provinces may be due the fact that isocyanates are classified as a designated substance in Ontario and must adhere to specific exposure control regulations. Limitations of the database, such as finite number of variables and measurements available until 1996 only, presents challenges for more in-depth analysis and generalization of results. An argument is made that a Canadian occupational exposure database be maintained to facilitate risk assessments as well as for occupational epidemiology research.


Assuntos
Isocianatos/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Canadá , Bases de Dados Factuais , Monitoramento Ambiental , Limite de Detecção , Modelos Logísticos
18.
Occup Environ Med ; 73(11): 742-748, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27466617

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Preventable risk factors for prostate cancer are poorly understood; sun exposure is a possible protective factor. The goal of this study was to investigate prostate cancer risk in outdoor workers, a population with high sun exposure. METHODS: Prostate cancer cases and controls from a large study (conducted between 1994 and 1997) were used for this analysis. A job exposure matrix (JEM) was used to assign solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) at work as moderate (2 to <6 hours outside/day) or high (≥6 hours). Average daily satellite UV-B measures were linked to the latitude/longitude of the residences of each participant. Several other exposure metrics were also examined, including ever/never exposed and standard erythemal dose by years (SED×years). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between solar UVR exposure and the odds of prostate cancer. RESULTS: A total of 1638 cases and 1697 controls were included. Men of Indian and Asian descent had reduced odds of prostate cancer (ORs 0.17 (0.08 to 0.35) and 0.25 (0.15 to 0.41), respectively) compared with Caucasian men, as did single men (OR 0.76 (0.58 to 0.98)) compared with married men. Overall, no statistically significant associations were observed between sun exposure and prostate cancer with 1 exception. In the satellite-enhanced JEM that considered exposure in high category jobs only, prostate cancer odds in the highest quartile of cumulative exposure was decreased compared with unexposed men (OR 0.68 (0.51 to 0.92)). CONCLUSIONS: This study found limited evidence for an association with prostate cancer, with the exception of 1 statistically significant finding of a decreased risk among workers with the longest term and highest sun exposure.


Assuntos
Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Monitoramento Ambiental , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações , Fatores de Risco , Sistema Solar , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos
19.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 60(7): 825-35, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27279636

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Outdoor workers are at high risk of exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR), a known human carcinogen. In Canada, no objective measures of UVR exposure are available for occupational settings. METHODS: The Outdoor Workers Project collected UVR exposure data among outdoor workers in Vancouver, Canada during the summer of 2013. Objective measures of exposure were taken for one week using calibrated electronic UVR dosimeters. Additional data was collected from workers on skin cancer risk factors, family history of skin cancer, and job type; as well as meteorological data for sampling days. Marginal models were constructed to examine the worker, job and meteorological determinants of UVR exposure levels, as measured in standard erythemal dose (SED). RESULTS: Seventy-eight workers were recruited, of which 73 had at least 1 day of measured UVR exposure for this analysis. Participants were mostly male, young and Caucasian. Mean exposure (corrected for repeated measures) was 1.08 SED. Exposure measures were highly variable even in the same workplace, ranging from 0.01 SED to 19.2 SED. Younger age, working in land-based construction, and sunnier weather forecasts led to higher levels of UVR exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure levels capable of causing sunburn were common in this study of outdoor workers, in a location not typically associated with high sun exposure.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Luz Solar/efeitos adversos , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Colúmbia Britânica , Indústria da Construção , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tempo (Meteorologia) , Local de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA