Genetic modifications designed for xenotransplantation attenuate sialoadhesin-dependent binding of human erythrocytes to porcine macrophages.

The phenomenon of diminishing hematocrit after in vivo liver and lung xenotransplantation and during ex vivo liver xenoperfusion has largely been attributed to action by resident liver porcine macrophages, which bind and destroy human erythrocytes. Porcine sialoadhesin (siglec-1) was implicated previously in this interaction. This study examines the effect of porcine genetic modifications, including knockout of the CMAH gene responsible for expression of Neu5Gc sialic acid, on the adhesion of human red blood cells (RBCs) to porcine macrophages. Wild-type (WT) porcine macrophages and macrophages from several strains of genetically engineered pigs, including CMAH gene knockout and several human transgenes (TKO+hTg), were incubated with human RBCs and "rosettes" (≥3 erythrocytes bound to one macrophage) were quantified by microscopy. Our results show that TKO+hTg genetic modifications significantly reduced rosette formation. The monoclonal antibody 1F1, which blocks porcine sialoadhesin, significantly reduced rosette formation by WT and TKO+hTg macrophages compared with an isotype control antibody. Further, desialation of human RBCs with neuraminidase before addition to WT or TKO+hTg macrophages resulted in near-complete abrogation of rosette formation, to a level not significantly different from porcine RBC rosette formation on porcine macrophages. These observations are consistent with rosette formation being mediated by binding of sialic acid on human RBCs to sialoadhesin on porcine macrophages. In conclusion, the data predict that TKO+hTg genetic modifications, coupled with targeting of porcine sialoadhesin by the 1F1 mAb, will attenuate erythrocyte sequestration and anemia during ex vivo xenoperfusion and following in vivo liver, lung, and potentially other organ xenotransplantation.

Kidney Disease-Associated APOL1 Variants Have Dose-Dependent, Dominant Toxic Gain-of-Function.

BACKGROUND: Two coding renal risk variants (RRVs) of the APOL1 gene (G1 and G2) are associated with large increases in CKD rates among populations of recent African descent, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. Mammalian cell culture models are widely used to study cytotoxicity of RRVs, but results have been contradictory. It remains unclear whether cytotoxicity is RRV-dependent or driven solely by variant-independent overexpression. It is also unknown whether expression of the reference APOL1 allele, the wild-type G0, could prevent cytotoxicity of RRVs. METHODS: We generated tetracycline-inducible APOL1 expression in human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells and examined the effects of increased expression of APOL1 (G0, G1, G2, G0G0, G0G1, or G0G2) on known cytotoxicity phenotypes, including reduced viability, increased swelling, potassium loss, aberrant protein phosphorylation, and dysregulated energy metabolism. Furthermore, whole-genome transcriptome analysis examined deregulated canonical pathways. RESULTS: At moderate expression, RRVs but not G0 caused cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner that coexpression of G0 did not reduce. RRVs also have dominant effects on canonical pathways relevant for the cellular stress response. CONCLUSIONS: In HEK293 cells, RRVs exhibit a dominant toxic gain-of-function phenotype that worsens with increasing expression. These observations suggest that high steady-state levels of RRVs may underlie cellular injury in APOL1 nephropathy, and that interventions that reduce RRV expression in kidney compartments may mitigate APOL1 nephropathy.

Non-Lung Solid Organ Transplantation From SARS-CoV-2-Positive Donors to Uninfected Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence on the risk of donor-recipient transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ transplant recipients. Initial impressions suggest non-lung solid organs may be safely transplanted from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors without risk of viral transmission. METHODS: We reviewed clinical results of transplants in which SARS-CoV-2-negative recipients received non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors at a single transplant center. No prisoners were used in this study, and participants were neither coerced nor paid. The manuscript was created in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and January 2023, we transplanted 26 solid organs, including 13 kidneys, 8 livers, 3 hearts, and 1 simultaneous heart and kidney, from 23 SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into 25 SARS-CoV-2 negative recipients. Two of the recipients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction after transplantation, but otherwise, patients had no SARS-CoV-2-related complications, and all patients to date are alive with excellent allograft function. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into uninfected recipients can be safely performed without adverse effects from SARS-CoV-2.

Creating a Chest Wall Injury and Reconstructive program: A single center experience with rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: New Chest Wall Injury and Reconstructive Centers (CWIRC) are emerging; this study aims to investigate the potential benefits of implementing a CWIRC at a single institution. We hypothesized that patients treated at CWIRC will have improved outcomes. METHODS: We instituted a CWIRC in 2019 at our American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level One Trauma Center. We retrospectively compared trauma patients with rib fractures who presented to our center 18 months before (PRE-C) and 18 months after CWIRC implementation (POST-C). Outcomes measured included mortality, length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU-LOS), readmission rates, and unplanned ICU admission. RESULTS: There were 192 PRE-C patients, compared to 388 POST-C. The mortality in PRE-C was not significantly different compared to the POST-C group (11.46% vs 8.8%, p=0.308). There were also no differences in LOS, ICU-LOS, readmission, and unplanned ICU admission. ICU utilization was dramatically different: PRE-C 17.8% were admitted to ICU compared to 35.6% POST-C (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients admitted with rib fractures to our center nearly doubled after CWIRC establishment. Early diagnosis and triage led to significantly more admissions to higher levels of care. There are trends toward improved outcomes using practice management protocols, albeit with higher ICU utilization. Establishment of a CWIRC should be considered for level 1 ACS trauma centers and as utilization of established CWIRC protocols are increased, patients will have improved outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV STUDY TYPE: Retrospective chart review.