Impact of surgeon volume on 18-month unclosed ileostomy rate after restorative rectal cancer resection.

AIM: The impact of surgeon volume on 18-month unclosed ileostomy rates after rectal cancer surgery has not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to describe the effect of surgeon volume and evaluate factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy. METHOD: Patients undergoing anterior resection with a diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer from March 2004 to October 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The unclosed ileostomy rate was determined by those with an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months. High- and low-volume surgeons (HVS and LVS, respectively) were classed as those performing five or more or fewer than five rectal cancer resections per year, respectively. Data on sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), tumour height, T-stage, anastomotic leak, surgical approach and adjuvant chemotherapy were also collected. Factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months were explored using a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 415 patients (62.4% male) with a median age of 67 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 115 (27.7%) had an unclosed ileostomy at 18 months. HVS had an unclosed ileostomy rate of 24.6% (72/292) compared with 34.9% (43/123) for LVS. Volume was associated with an unclosed ileostomy in univariable analysis (p = 0.032) but not in multivariate analysis (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.92-3.32, p = 0.08). Independent factors predictive of an unclosed ileostomy were anastomotic leak (OR 10.41, 3.95-27.0, p < 0.01), adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.23, 1.24-3.96, p < 0.01) and neoadjuvant CRT (OR 2.16, 1.15-5.75, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LVS were associated with a higher unclosed ileostomy at 18 months compared with HVS. This study adds further weight to the call for adoption of a minimum annual case threshold in rectal cancer surgery.

External validation of postoperative pancreatic fistula prediction scores in pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple risk scores claim to predict the probability of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy. It is unclear which scores have undergone external validation and are the most accurate. The aim of this study was to identify risk scores for POPF, and assess the clinical validity of these scores. METHODS: Areas under receiving operator characteristic curve (AUROCs) were extracted from studies that performed external validation of POPF risk scores. These were pooled for each risk score, using intercept-only random-effects meta-regression models. RESULTS: Systematic review identified 34 risk scores, of which six had been subjected to external validation, and so included in the meta-analysis, (Tokyo (N=2 validation studies), Birmingham (N=5), FRS (N=19), a-FRS (N=12), m-FRS (N=3) and ua-FRS (N=3) scores). Overall predictive accuracies were similar for all six scores, with pooled AUROCs of 0.61, 0.70, 0.71, 0.70, 0.70 and 0.72, respectively. Considerably heterogeneity was observed, with I2 statistics ranging from 52.1-88.6%. CONCLUSION: Most risk scores lack external validation; where this was performed, risk scores were found to have limited predictive accuracy. . Consensus is needed for which score to use in clinical practice. Due to the limited predictive accuracy, future studies to derive a more accurate risk score are warranted.

A Comparative Account of Institutional Approaches to Addressing Campus-Based Sexual Violence in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Sexual violence is prevalent on university campuses globally. In this article, we report a qualitative insider research study examining practices for addressing sexual violence at four universities across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. We collected, analysed, and synthesised descriptive information about the practices at each institution. We found unique institutional approaches that nonetheless share some commonalities, yieldingseveral themes that are central to practice. In reflecting on our findings, we conclude with an outline of critical considerations and a call to action for future efforts to address campus-based sexual violence, particularly as this field remains underdeveloped across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

Establishing a COVID-secure site for elective surgery during the COVID pandemic: An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining timely and safe delivery of major elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is essential to manage cancer and time-critical surgical conditions. Our NHS Trust established a COVID-secure elective site with a level 2 Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) facility. Patients requiring level 3 Intensive Care Unit admission were transferred to a non-COVID-secure site. We investigated the relationship between perioperative anaesthetic care and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing major surgery at the COVID-secure site between June and November 2020 were included. Patient demographics, operative interventions and 30-day outcomes were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio of outcomes according to PACU length of stay and the use of spinal or epidural anaesthesia, with age, sex, malignancy status and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade as independent co-variables. RESULTS: There were 280 patients. PACU length of stay >23h was associated with increased 30-day complications. Epidural anaesthesia was associated with PACU length of stay >23h, increased total length of stay, increase hospital transfer and 30-day complications. Two patients acquired nosocomial COVID-19 following hospital transfer. DISCUSSION: Establishing a separate COVID-secure site has facilitated delivery of major elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Choice of perioperative anaesthesia and utilisation of PACU appear likely to affect the risk of adverse outcomes.

Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Management of Non-traumatic Splenic Pathologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

We aimed to evaluate comparative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with non-traumatic splenic pathologies. A systematic search of electronic databases and bibliographic reference lists were conducted, and a combination of free text and controlled vocabulary search adapted to thesaurus headings, search operators and limits in electronic databases were applied. Intraoperative and post-operative complications, wound infection, haematoma, conversion to open procedure, return to theatre, volume of blood loss, procedure time and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. We identified 8 comparative studies reporting a total of 560 patients comparing outcomes of robotic (n = 202) and laparoscopic (n = 258) splenectomies. The robotic approach was associated with significantly lower volume of blood loss (MD: -82.53 mls, 95% CI -161.91 to -3.16, P = .04) than the laparoscopic approach. There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications (OR: 0.68, 95% CI .21-2.01, P = .51), post-operative complications (OR: .91, 95% CI .40-2.06, P = .82), wound infection (RD: -.01, 95% CI -.04-.03, P = .78), haematoma (OR: 0.40, 95% CI .04-4.03, P = .44), conversion to open (OR: 0.63; 95% CI, .24-1.70, P = .36), return to theatre (RD: -.04, 95% CI -.09-.02, P = .16), procedure time (MD: 3.63; 95% CI -16.99-24.25, P = .73) and length of hospital stay (MD: -.21; 95% CI -1.17 - .75, P = .67) between 2 groups. In conclusion, robotic and laparoscopic splenectomies seem to have comparable perioperative outcomes with similar rate of conversion to an open procedure, procedure time and length of hospital stay. The former may potentially reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss. Future higher level research is required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of a bundle of care to reduce incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery. METHOD: This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission. RESULTS: In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (P=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (P=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, P=0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, P=0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, P=0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (P=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, P=0.047). CONCLUSION: Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Mechanical factors in the prediction of integrity of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in ex-vivo RYGB models.

BACKGROUND: Surgical staplers represent one of the important instruments in modern surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures. Various techniques have been described for performing gastrojejunal (GJ) anastomosis, including linear stapled anastomosis (LSA), circular stapled anastomosis (CSA) and hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA). OBJECTIVES: An ex-vivo porcine-based experiment was designed to compare the mechanical integrity of the GJ anastomosis among the 3 different techniques by measuring burst pressure (BP). SETTING: Laboratory-based study conducted at the clinical skills laboratory at Birmingham Heartlands Hospitals, Birmingham, United Kingdom. METHODS: Porcine stomachs and small bowels were used to create a GJ model. Four GJ anastomosis models each were created using circular stapler (CSA group) and hand-sewn techniques (HSA group). Stomach and small bowel thickness were recorded. BP was measured by sequential injections of methylene-blue diluted saline until a leak was detected. Total volume until leak is recorded. Compliance (C) was calculated using the formula C = ΔP/ΔV. RESULTS: Results from our previous experiment for the LSA group are included. One model was excluded from the CSA and the HSA groups due to technical errors. Results were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Total volume in LSA, CSA, and HSA groups was 60 ± 4.08 mL, 73.67 ± 3.22 mL, and 51.67 ± 20.21 mL, respectively. BP in LSA, CSA, and HSA groups was 18 ± 4.69 mm Hg, 20.33 ± 5.77 mm Hg, and 9.67 ± 3.79 mm Hg, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in BP among the 3 groups (P = .033; Kruskal-Wallis test). C in LSA, CSA, and HSA were 3.50 ± .88 mm Hg/mL, 3.78 ± .85 mm Hg/mL, and 5.39 ± 1.34 mm Hg/mL, respectively (P = .064). CONCLUSION: BP was higher in CSA and LSA groups compared with the HSA group, suggesting a mechanically stronger anastomosis. Despite the lack of statistical significance, higher BP recorded in the CSA group than in the LSA group suggests better anastomotic integrity.