Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible mean fluorescence intensity-selected platelet products have corrected count increments similar to HLA antigen-matched platelets.

BACKGROUND: Donor specific antibody sum mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values have been successfully used in transplant medicine to assess risk for organ rejection. However, little is known regarding whether MFI values could be similarly used to aid in platelet product selection. We have developed a novel protocol where MFI values are used to offer human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible platelet products when HLA antigen-matched products are not available. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this protocol. METHODS: We performed a 4-year retrospective chart review for all patients who received at least one MFI-selected platelet product. A corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated for each transfusion event. A mixed effects model was used to investigate the association between CCIs for MFI-selected, HLA antigen matched, and random donor platelet transfusions. A random effects expectation-maximization regression tree was used to define the extent to which other patient variables, such as age, sex, and diagnosis impacted the CCI for each platelet transfusion. RESULTS: Twenty highly HLA alloimmunized patients received a total of 591 platelets. MFI-selected platelet (low MFI) transfusions had a significantly higher median CCI 0-6 hour post-transfusion (13,559, interquartile range [IQR]: 8275-18,736) compared to random donor platelets (2121, IQR: 0-10,368, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in median CCI between HLA antigen matched and MFI selected platelet transfusions (p = 0.2). Mixed effects and regression modeling revealed that MFI-selected platelet products had a significantly higher CCI than non-matched platelets, even when accounting for other significant patient variables. CONCLUSION: MFI-selected HLA-incompatible platelet products could provide a comparable alternative to traditional HLA antigen-matched platelet products.

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is 1 of the most common neurobehavioral disorders of childhood and can profoundly affect children's academic achievement, well-being, and social interactions. The American Academy of Pediatrics first published clinical recommendations for evaluation and diagnosis of pediatric ADHD in 2000; recommendations for treatment followed in 2001. The guidelines were revised in 2011 and published with an accompanying process of care algorithm (PoCA) providing discrete and manageable steps by which clinicians could fulfill the clinical guideline's recommendations. Since the release of the 2011 guideline, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been revised to the fifth edition, and new ADHD-related research has been published. These publications do not support dramatic changes to the previous recommendations. Therefore, only incremental updates have been made in this guideline revision, including the addition of a key action statement related to diagnosis and treatment of comorbid conditions in children and adolescents with ADHD. The accompanying process of care algorithm has also been updated to assist in implementing the guideline recommendations. Throughout the process of revising the guideline and algorithm, numerous systemic barriers were identified that restrict and/or hamper pediatric clinicians' ability to adopt their recommendations. Therefore, the subcommittee created a companion article (available in the Supplemental Information) on systemic barriers to the care of children and adolescents with ADHD, which identifies the major systemic-level barriers and presents recommendations to address those barriers; in this article, we support the recommendations of the clinical practice guideline and accompanying process of care algorithm.

Auditory spatial localization and attention deficits in autistic adults.

The objective of this study was to compare autistic adults and matched control subjects in their ability to focus attention selectively on a sound source in a noisy environment. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while subjects attended to a fast paced sequence of brief noise bursts presented in free-field at a central or peripheral location. Competing sequences of noise bursts at adjacent locations were to be ignored. Both behavioral measures of target detection and auditory ERP amplitudes indicated that control subjects were able to focus their attention more sharply on the relevant sound source than autistic subjects. These findings point to a fundamental deficit in the spatial focusing of auditory attention in autism, which may be a factor that impedes social interactions and sensory-guided behavior, particularly in noisy environments.