RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Readmissions after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can have severe impacts on long-term health outcomes as well as rehabilitation. The aim of this descriptive study was to analyze the Nationwide Readmissions Database to determine possible risk factors associated with readmission for patients who previously sustained a TBI. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to explore gender, age, injury severity score, comorbidities, index admission hospital size, discharge disposition of the patient, and cause for readmission for adults admitted with a TBI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess likelihood of readmission. RESULTS: There was a readmission rate of 28.7% (n = 31,757) among the study population. The primary cause of readmission was either subsequent injury or sequelae of the original injury (n = 8825; 29%) followed by circulatory (n = 5894; 19%) and nervous system issues (n = 2904; 9%). There was a significantly higher risk of being readmitted in males (Female odds ratio: 0.87; confidence interval [0.851-0.922), older patients (65-79: 32.3%; > 80: 37.1%), patients with three or more comorbidities (≥ 3: 32.9%), or in patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility/intermediate care facility/rehab (SNF/ICF/Rehab odds ratio: 1.55; confidence interval [0.234-0.262]). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a large proportion of patients are readmitted after sustaining a TBI. A significant number of patients are readmitted for subsequent injuries, circulatory issues, nervous system problems, and infections. Although readmissions cannot be completely avoided, defining at-risk populations is the first step of understanding how to reduce readmissions.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Bases de Dados Factuais , Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Masculino , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , ComorbidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newly developed regional anesthesia technique designed to manage postoperative hip pain following a fracture or surgery while also maintaining quadriceps strength and mobility. The goal of our study was to compare postoperative pain scores and opioid usage during the postoperative period before discharge following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the posterior approach between patients who received a PENG block and those who did not. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients undergoing elective, posterior approach THA at a single tertiary-care academic center. The 2 groups included a study group (THA with PENG block in 2021; n = 66) and a control group (THA before PENG block implementation in 2019; n = 70). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in pain scores during postoperative minutes 0 to 59 (study group 6.8; control group 6.6; P = .81) or during postoperative minutes 60 to 119 (study group 6.2; control group 5.6; P = .40). There were no significant differences in total postoperative in-hospital morphine milliequivalent opioid consumption (study group 55.8 morphine milligram equivalents; control group 75.0 morphine milligram equivalents; P = .14). The study group was found to have a shorter length of stay (study group 17.0 hours; control group 32.6 hours; P < .0001) and faster mobilization (study group 3.0 hours; control group 4.9 hours; P < .0001) than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that use of the PENG block did not result in lower postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption after THA using the posterior surgical approach. The study group had a shorter length of stay and time to mobilization than the control group, though this was likely due to standard hospital procedure shifting to same-day discharge for THA between 2019 and 2021 due to COVID-19.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Artroplastia de Quadril , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Medição da Dor , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/métodosRESUMO
The poultry and meatpacking industry is one of the largest in Arkansas and was associated with several COVID-19 outbreaks at the start of the pandemic. Marshallese and Hispanic workers account for much of the poultry and meatpacking workforce and were disproportionately affected. The Arkansas Department of Health held worksite vaccination clinics and administered 1794 doses. Of those doses, 1219 (67.9%) and 391 (21.8%) were administered to Hispanic and Marshallese workers, respectively. Vaccination efforts must target populations that have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(5):500-503. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307226).
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Aves Domésticas , Humanos , Animais , Arkansas/epidemiologia , Populações Vulneráveis , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have explored psychosocial effects as possible triggers of opioid overdose (OOD). However, little is known about the temporal association between OOD and prescribed controlled substance (CS) acquisition. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal relationship between OOD and acquiring prescribed CSs prior to OOD. METHODS: This study is an exploratory descriptive analysis using Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (AR-PDMP) data linked to death certificate and statewide inpatient discharge records. All persons with ≥1 AR-PDMP prescription fill(s) between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017 were included (n = 1,946,686). For persons that experienced OOD and had ≥1 PDMP record(s), the difference in days between OOD and the most recent AR-PDMP prescription filled prior to an OOD was recorded. To account for censoring, a sensitivity analysis was conducted restricting the study group to "New AR-PDMP Entrants" that had at least a 180-day gap between consecutive AR-PDMP fill dates. RESULTS: 28,998,307 AR-PDMP records were analyzed for 1,946,686 individuals. 7195 persons experienced 9223 OODs and 414 (4.49%) of those were fatal. Of these, 6236 experienced ≥1 OOD and acquired prescribed CSs prior to or on the day of the first OOD. Of those that experienced ≥1 OOD(s), 2201 (30.59%) had an AR-PDMP record in the 0- to 5-day period prior to their overdose and 497 (6.91%) had an AR-PDMP record the day prior to their overdose. Among New AR-PDMP Entrants that experienced ≥1 OOD(s), 408 (27.38%) had an AR-PDMP record in the 0- to 5-day period prior to their overdose. CONCLUSION: Though the vast majority of persons accessing CSs in Arkansas did not experience an OOD, a sizable proportion of persons that experience an OOD(s) obtained prescribed CSs immediately prior.
Assuntos
Overdose de Drogas , Overdose de Opiáceos , Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Substâncias Controladas , Overdose de Opiáceos/tratamento farmacológico , Overdose de Drogas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Three different surgical approaches (the direct anterior, antero-lateral, and posterior) are commonly used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to an internervous and intermuscular approach, the direct anterior approach may result in less postoperative pain and opioid use, although all 3 approaches have similar outcomes 5 years after surgery. Perioperative opioid medication consumption poses a dose-dependent risk of long-term opioid use. We hypothesized that the direct anterior approach is associated with less opioid usage over 180 days after surgery than the antero-lateral or posterior approaches. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including 508 patients (192 direct anterior, 207 antero-lateral, and 109 posterior approaches). Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were identified from the medical records. The state prescription database was used to determine opioid use 90 days before and 1 year after THA. Regression analyses controlling for sex, race, age, and body mass index were used to determine the effect of surgical approach on opioid use over 180 days after surgery. RESULTS: No difference was seen in the proportion of long-term opioid users based on approach (P = .78). There was no significant difference in the distribution of opioid prescriptions filled between surgical approach groups in the year after surgery (P = .35). Not taking opioids 90 days prior to surgery, regardless of approach, was associated with a 78% decrease in the odds of becoming a chronic opioid user (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use prior to surgery, rather than THA surgical approach, was associated with chronic opioid consumption following THA.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologiaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to describe a statewide COVID-19 transmission involving places of worship (POWs) during the early phase of the pandemic. During the period of May 2020-December 2020, this analysis evaluated COVID-19 cases in Arkansas reported in REDCap for overall cases associated with POWs, cluster detection, and network analysis of one POW utilizing Microbetrace. A total of 9904 COVID-19 cases reported attending an in-person POW service during the early phase of the pandemic with 353 probable POW-associated clusters identified. Network analysis for 'POW A' showed at least 60 COVID-19 cases were traced to at least 4 different settings. The pandemic gave an opportunity to observe and stress the importance of public health and POWs working closely together with a shared goal of facilitating worship in a manner that optimizes congregational and community safety during a public health emergency.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Arkansas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Pandemias , Saúde Pública , Controle de Doenças TransmissíveisRESUMO
Minority populations have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and disparities have been noted in vaccine uptake. In the state of Arkansas, health equity strike teams (HESTs) were deployed to address vaccine disparities. A total of 13 470 vaccinations were administered by HESTs to 10 047 eligible people at 45 events. Among these individuals, 5645 (56.2%) were African American, 2547 (25.3%) were White, and 1068 (10.6%) were Hispanic. Vaccination efforts must specifically target populations that have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):29-33. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306564).
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Minorias Étnicas e Raciais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Equidade em Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Arkansas , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Determinantes Sociais da SaúdeRESUMO
Masks are effective at limiting transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1), but the impact of policies requiring masks in school settings has not been widely evaluated (2-4). During fall 2021, some school districts in Arkansas implemented policies requiring masks for students in kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12). To identify any association between mask policies and COVID-19 incidence, weekly school-associated COVID-19 incidence in school districts with full or partial mask requirements was compared with incidence in districts without mask requirements during August 23-October 16, 2021. Three analyses were performed: 1) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated comparing districts with full mask requirements (universal mask requirement for all students and staff members) or partial mask requirements (e.g., masks required in certain settings, among certain populations, or if specific criteria could not be met) with school districts with no mask requirement; 2) ratios of observed-to-expected numbers of cases, by district were calculated; and 3) incidence in districts that switched from no mask requirement to any mask requirement were compared before and after implementation of the mask policy. Mean weekly district-level attack rates were 92-359 per 100,000 persons in the community* and 137-745 per 100,000 among students and staff members; mean student and staff member vaccination coverage ranged from 13.5% to 18.6%. Multivariable adjusted IRRs, which included adjustment for vaccination coverage, indicated that districts with full mask requirements had 23% lower COVID-19 incidence among students and staff members compared with school districts with no mask requirements. Observed-to-expected ratios for full and partial mask policies were lower than ratios for districts with no mask policy but were slightly higher for districts with partial policies than for those with full mask policies. Among districts that switched from no mask requirement to any mask requirement (full or partial), incidence among students and staff members decreased by 479.7 per 100,000 (p<0.01) upon implementation of the mask policy. In areas with high COVID-19 community levels, masks are an important part of a multicomponent prevention strategy in K-12 settings (5).
Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Máscaras , Instituições Acadêmicas , Arkansas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While interest has focused on opioid use after total hip arthroplasty, little research has investigated opioid use in elderly patients after hip fracture. We hypothesize that a substantial number of opioid-naïve elderly patients go on to chronic opioid use after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 219 patients 65 years and older who underwent surgical fixation between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019 for a native hip fracture. Patients were excluded for polytrauma, periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, recent major surgery, or death within 90 days of their hip surgery. The state prescription monitoring database was used to determine opioid use. RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients (26%) were postoperative chronic opioid users. Of the initial 188 opioid-naïve patients, 43 (23%) became chronic users. Of the 31 preoperative opioid users, 15 (48%) continued as chronic users. Chronic postoperative users were more likely to be White (76% vs 91%, P = .04), younger (78 vs 82 years, P = .003), and preoperative opioid users (odds ratio 3.3, P = .007). Arthroplasty vs fixation did not affect the rate of chronic opioid use (P = .22). CONCLUSION: Chronic opioid use is surprisingly common after hip fracture repair in the elderly. Twenty-three percent of opioid-naïve hip fracture patients became chronic users after surgery. Continued vigilance is needed by orthopedic surgeons to limit the amount and duration of postoperative narcotic prescriptions and to monitor for continued use.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Quadril , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Quadril/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Prevalência , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in colleges and universities requires mitigation strategies that address on- and off-campus congregate living settings as well as extracurricular activities and other social gatherings (1-4). At the start of the academic year, sorority and fraternity organizations host a series of recruitment activities known as rush week; rush week culminates with bid day, when selections are announced. At university A in Arkansas, sorority rush week (for women) was held during August 17-22, 2020, and consisted of on- and off-campus social gatherings, including an outdoor bid day event on August 22. Fraternity rush week (for men) occurred during August 27-31, with bid day scheduled for September 5. During August 22-September 5, university A-associated COVID-19 cases were reported to the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH). A total of 965 confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases associated with university A were identified, with symptom onset occurring during August 20-September 5, 2020; 31% of the patients with these cases reported involvement in any fraternity or sorority activity. Network analysis identified 54 gatherings among all linkages of cases to places of residence and cases to events, 49 (91%) were linked by participation in fraternity and sorority activities accounting for 42 (72%) links among gatherings. On September 4, university A banned gatherings of ≥10 persons, and fraternity bid day was held virtually. The rapid increase in COVID-19 cases was likely facilitated by on- and off-campus congregate living settings and activities, and health departments should work together with student organizations and university leadership to ensure compliance with mitigation measures.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Fraternidades e Irmandades Universitárias/organização & administração , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Arkansas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Universidades , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with a declining volume of patients seen in the emergency department. Despite the need for seeking urgent care for conditions such as myocardial infarction, many people may not seek treatment. This study seeks to measure associations between the COVID-19 pandemic and location of death among individuals who died from ischemic heart disease (IHD). Data obtained from death certificates from the Arkansas Department of Health was used to conduct a difference-in-difference analysis to assess whether decedents of IHD were more likely to die at home during the pandemic (March 2020 through September 2020). The analysis compared location of death for decedents of IHD pre and during the pandemic to location of death for decedents from non-natural causes. Before the pandemic, 50.0% of decedents of IHD died at home compared to 57.9% dying at home during (through September 2020) the pandemic study period (p < .001). There was no difference in the proportion of decedents who died at home from non-natural causes before and during the pandemic study period (55.8% vs. 53.5%; p = .21). After controlling for confounders, there was a 48% increase in the odds of dying at home from IHD during the pandemic study period (p < .001) relative to the change in dying at home due to non-natural causes. During the study period, there was an increase in the proportion of decedents who died at home due to IHD. Despite the ongoing pandemic, practitioners should emphasize the need to seek urgent care during an emergency.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Isquemia Miocárdica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of crop burning on the prevalence of asthma and COPD emergency department (ED) treatments in a rural Arkansas county. METHODS: Administrative datasets listing ED treatments for asthma and COPD obtained from the Arkansas Hospital Discharge Dataset System for the calendar years 2014-2016 were used in this semi-ecological study. Primary diagnosis codes (ICD-9: 490-496 and ICD-10: J40-J47) were used to identify patients who were diagnosed with asthma and COPD. Patients with a reported county of residence in Craighead County were determined as case county residents and those in Sebastian County were control county residents. Month of visit was used to determine seasonal variation. PM 2.5 air quality data were obtained from the EPA AQS Data Mart. RESULTS: Between 2014 through 2016, there were a combined total of 2,536 ED treatments due to asthma and 8,530 due to COPD in Craighead and Sebastian counties. The odds of being treated in the ED during the fall months for asthma and COPD are associated with a 20.9% increase and 16.9% increase respectively in Craighead County as compared to Sebastian Country after adjusting for potential confounders (p = 0.04, p = 0.003). PM 2.5 concentrations were higher in Craighead County than Sebastian County during the fall season (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Fall ED treatments for asthma and COPD were higher in Craighead County, Arkansas compared to Sebastian County, Arkansas for the years 2014-2016. PM 2.5 levels were also higher in Craighead County in the fall during these years. These differences may be attributable to crop burning.â.
Assuntos
Agricultura , Asma/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Incêndios/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Poluição do Ar , Arkansas/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Grupos Raciais , População Rural , Estações do Ano , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Marshallese and Latino communities in Benton and Washington counties, Arkansas, were disproportionately affected by COVID-19. We evaluated the effectiveness of a comprehensive community-based intervention to reduce COVID-19 disparities in these communities. We examined all laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases in the 2 counties reported from April 6, 2020, through December 28, 2020. A 2-sample serial t test for rate change was used to evaluate changes in case rates before and after implementation of the intervention. After implementation, the proportions of cases among Marshallese and Latino residents declined substantially and began to align more closely with the proportions of these 2 populations in the 2 counties. Infection rates remained lower throughout the evaluation period, and weekly incidence also approximated Marshallese and Latino population proportions. Leveraging community partnerships and tailoring activities to specific communities can successfully reduce disparities in incidence among populations at high-risk for COVID-19 .
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Arkansas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/etnologia , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/organização & administração , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a health insurance disparity exists among pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury using the National Trauma Data Bank. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National Trauma Data Bank, a dataset containing more than 800 trauma centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (< 18 yr old) with a severe isolated traumatic brain injury were identified in the National Trauma Database (years 2007-2016). Isolated traumatic brain injury was defined as patients with a head Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 3+ and excluded those with another regional Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3+. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Procedure codes were used to identify four primary treatment approaches combined into two classifications: craniotomy/craniectomy and external ventricular draining/intracranial pressure monitoring. Diagnostic criteria and procedure codes were used to identify condition at admission, including hypotension, Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanism and intent of injury, and Injury Severity Score. Children were propensity score matched using condition at admission and other characteristics to estimate multivariable logistic regression models to assess the associations among insurance status, treatment, and outcomes. Among the 12,449 identified patients, 91.0% (n = 11,326) had insurance and 9.0% (n = 1,123) were uninsured. Uninsured patients had worse condition at admission with higher rates of hypotension and higher Injury Severity Score, when compared with publicly and privately insured patients. After propensity score matching, having insurance was associated with a 32% (p = 0.001) and 54% (p < 0.001) increase in the odds of cranial procedures and monitor placement, respectively. Insurance coverage was associated with 25% lower odds of inpatient mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with insured pediatric patients with a traumatic brain injury, uninsured patients were in worse condition at admission and received fewer interventional procedures with a greater odds of inpatient mortality. Equalizing outcomes for uninsured children following traumatic brain injury requires a greater understanding of the factors that lead to worse condition at admission and policies to address treatment disparities if causality can be identified.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Criança , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The most recent guidelines on prescribing opioids from the United States Centers for Disease Control recommend that clinicians not prescribe opioids as first-line therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. If an opioid prescription is considered for a patient already on opioids, prescribers are encouraged to check the statewide prescription drug monitoring database (PDMP). Some additional guidelines recommend screening tools such as the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) which may also help identify drug-aberrant behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the PDMP and the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM), a commonly-recommended screening tool for patients on opioids, in detecting drug-aberrant behaviors in patients already taking opioids at the time of ED presentation. METHODS: Patients on opioids were enrolled prospectively in a mixed urban-suburban ED seeing approximately 65,000 patients per year. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios of the PDMP and COMM were compared against objective criteria of drug-aberrant behaviors as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) and medical examiner databases. RESULTS: Compared to the COMM, the PDMP had similar sensitivity (36% vs 45%) and similar specificity (79% vs 55%), but better positive predictive value, better negative predictive value, and better diagnostic odds ratio. The combination of the PDMP and the COMM did not improve the detection of drug-aberrant behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: The PDMP alone is a more useful as a screening instrument than either the COMM or the combination of the PDMP plus COMM in patients already taking opioids at time of ED presentation. However, the PDMP misses a majority of patients with documented drug-aberrant behaviors in the EMR, and should not be used in isolation to justify whether a particular opioid prescription is appropriate.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Dor Crônica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Office of Health Equity at the Arkansas Department of Health created the Arkansas Minority Barber & Beauty Shop Health Initiative (ARBBS) to address cardiovascular disease (CVD) among racial/ethnic minority populations. The objective of this study was to describe CVD-related screening results for ARBBS participants and their knowledge of CVD-related risk factors, signs, and symptoms before and immediately after participation in a screening event. METHODS: ARBBS screening events were held from February 2016 through June 2019 at barber and beauty shops in 14 counties in Arkansas. During each event, participants were screened for hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes; surveys on CVD-related knowledge were administered before (pretest) and after (posttest) screening. Onsite public health practitioners reviewed surveys and identified abnormal screening results. Participants with abnormal screening results were counseled and given a referral to follow up with a primary care physician, wellness center, or charitable clinic. The nurse coordinator followed up to confirm that a visit or appointment had been made and provide case-management services. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,833 people were screened. The nurse coordinator followed up with 320 (55.7%) of 574 unique referrals. Of the 574 referrals, 418 (72.8%) were for hypertension, 156 (27.2%) for high cholesterol, and 120 (20.9%) for diabetes. The overall knowledge of risk factors and symptoms of heart attack and stroke increased significantly by 15.4 percentage points from pretest to posttest (from 76.9% to 92.3%; P < .001). The follow-up approach provided anecdotal information indicating that several participants discovered they had underlying medical conditions and were given medical or surgical interventions. CONCLUSION: Through referrals and follow-ups, ARBBS participants gained greater knowledge of chronic disease prevention and risk factors. Additionally, this program screened for and identified people at risk for CVD.
Assuntos
Beleza , Arkansas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Etnicidade , Humanos , Grupos MinoritáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010 and enacted in 2013 which improved insurance coverage across America due to increasing Medicaid eligibility as well as changes to individual insurance markets. In Arkansas, this was implemented by a Medicaid expansion waiver which allowed patients to purchase insurance with funds provided by the government to subsidize premiums through the marketplace. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on Arkansas patients with peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: A pre-post research design using the Arkansas Hospital Discharge Dataset was used to study the impact of the ACA on limb amputation, distal bypass, discharge disposition, and total costs for patients diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease/atherosclerosis. The data were obtained for the years 2007 through 2009 (pre-ACA), 2011 through 2013 (post-ACA), and 2014 through 2015 (post-Arkansas expansion). Bivariate analysis, analysis of variance, and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 10,923 patients were identified. Uninsured patients ("self-pay") decreased from 7% pre-ACA to 3.4% post-Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was a decrease in adjusted health-care costs after the Arkansas expansion (P < 0.0001). There was no change in mortality or transfer to rehabilitation facilities, but there was an increase in discharge to skilled nursing facilities along with a decrease in patients being discharged home (P < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed private insurance to be associated with a 49% reduction in the odds of an amputation (P < 0.0001). The Arkansas expansion was associated with a 26% reduction in the odds of an amputation when compared with that before the ACA implementation (P < 0.005). Having private insurance was associated with a 26% increase in the odds of having a bypass when compared with uninsured patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with private insurance have a decreased chance of amputation and increased odds of having a bypass when compared with patients who were of the self-pay category. The increase in private insurance coverage in our patient population could improve the rate of amputation in the vascular population in Arkansas by increasing early interventions for peripheral vascular disease.
Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/tendências , Amputação Cirúrgica/legislação & jurisprudência , Arkansas/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Salvamento de Membro/legislação & jurisprudência , Salvamento de Membro/tendências , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislação & jurisprudência , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a focused education program and implementation of a treatment bundle increases the rate of early evidence-based interventions in patients with acute infections. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, before-and-after feasibility trial. SETTING: Emergency department of a sub-Saharan African district hospital. PATIENTS: Patients > 28 days of life admitted to the study hospital for an acute infection. INTERVENTIONS: The trial had three phases (each of four months). Interventions took place during the second (educational program followed by implementation of the treatment bundle) and third (provision of resources to implement treatment bundle) phases. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected at study enrollment; 24, 48, and 72 hours after hospital admission; and at discharge. A total of 1,594 patients were enrolled (pre-intervention, n = 661; intervention I, n = 531; intervention II, n = 402). The rate of early evidence-based interventions per patient during Intervention Phase I was greater than during the pre-intervention phase (74 ± 17 vs. 79 ± 15%, p < 0.001). No difference was detected when data were compared between Intervention Phases I and II (79 ± 15 vs. 80 ± 15%, p = 0.58). No differences in the incidence of blood transfusion (pre-intervention, 6%; intervention I, 7%; intervention II, 7%) or severe adverse events in the first 24 hours (allergic reactions: pre-intervention, 0.2%; intervention I, 0%; intervention II, 0%; respiratory failure: pre-intervention, 2%; intervention I, 2%; intervention II, 2%; acute renal failure: pre-intervention, 2%; intervention I, 2%; intervention II, 1%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that a focused education program and implementation of an infection treatment bundle in clinical practice increased the rate of early evidence-based interventions in patients with acute infections (mostly malaria) admitted to a sub-Saharan African district hospital. Provision of material resources did not further increase this rate. While no safety issues were detected, this could be related to the very low disease severity of the enrolled patient population (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02697513).
Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis/terapia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Capacitação em Serviço/organização & administração , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Glicemia , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Temperatura Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hidratação/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Malária/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Oxigenoterapia/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ruanda , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Expert consensus panels have recommended risperidone as first-line treatment for agitation of psychiatric origin. However, there are few if any studies on this medication in the emergency setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the hemodynamic effects of risperidone in an emergency department (ED) setting, stratified by age. METHODS: This is a structured chart review of all patients who received oral risperidone over a 6-year period in an ED setting, excluding patients who received this medication as a prescription refill. Vital signs were analyzed for this subset prior to and after medication administration, and changes in vital signs were stratified by age. RESULTS: The median dose of risperidone was less in patients aged > 65 years. However, the median drop in systolic blood pressure was larger in this age group compared with younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians tend to be more cautious with dosing of risperidone to geriatric patients in the ED. Despite this, decreases in systolic blood pressure are larger and more frequent in this age group. When possible, clinicians should consider or attempt nonpharmacologic methods of agitation treatment prior to administering medications such as risperidone to elderly patients.