Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vascular ; 31(6): 1124-1127, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35737445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Persistent sciatic artery (PSA) is a rare congenital anomaly, whereby the embryonic sciatic artery remains patent with associated degrees of femoral axis hypoplasia. Aneurysmal degeneration and distal ischaemia from thromboembolic complications are common. Revascularisation strategies include embolectomy, bypass or interposition grafting and catheter-directed thrombolysis. METHODS: We describe a sedentary 88-year-old woman with right acute limb ischaemia secondary to a thrombosed PSA aneurysm and concurrent occlusive thrombus at the femoral bifurcation. RESULTS: The patient presented with a 3-day history of a cold, painful right foot. Examination revealed Rutherford IIb ischaemia. CT-angiography demonstrated no continuity between the hypoplastic superficial femoral and popliteal arteries, complete occlusion of the right PSA distal to the thrombosed aneurysm and occlusive thrombus in the right profunda. As she was too frail for femoral-distal bypass, we restored femoral axis inflow via profunda embolectomy. Her prognosis remained guarded as we deliberately did not reconstruct the PSA. However, she was discharged pain-free and mobilising with aids 2 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Limb ischaemia in frail, high-risk patients is an ever-increasing challenge for vascular surgeons and requires complex decision-making, balancing comorbidities against desired outcomes. This case illustrates that a selective approach can be sufficient to maintain function despite complex anatomy.


Assuntos
Aneurisma , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas , Trombose , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Idoso , Idoso Fragilizado , Octogenários , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/etiologia , Isquemia/cirurgia , Artéria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Poplítea/cirurgia , Aneurisma/complicações , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma/cirurgia , Trombose/complicações , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
World J Surg ; 46(6): 1353-1358, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35274182

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common indication for laparoscopy to diagnose and treat appendicitis. When a macroscopically normal appendix is found, there is no standard consensus regarding excision. Some surgeons remove the appendix due to the risk of microscopic inflammation and to avoid a future, repeat laparoscopy for possible appendicitis. Alternatively, others leave the appendix in situ to avoid morbidity from a potentially unnecessary procedure. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with macroscopically normal appendices left in situ. METHODS: All emergency laparoscopies without appendicectomy between January 1st 2010- December 31st 2020 were identified from theatre records. All operative notes were individually evaluated and comments on the macroscopic appearance of the appendix and any intra-operative pathology were recorded. Only patients undergoing laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis with macroscopically normal appendices were included. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients [median age 21.68 (range 9-90.8) years] were included. The cohort was predominantly female (n=105, 87.5%). Forty-eight patients (40.0%) had a positive finding during index laparoscopy. During a median duration of 94.5 (range 8-131) months' follow-up, 16 patients (13.33%) underwent a repeat laparoscopy for recurrent RIF pain. Thirteen (10.8% of total cohort) subsequently underwent an appendicectomy. Histology confirmed acute appendicitis in six cases (4.17% of entire cohort). On subanalysis of smaller cohort, index laparoscopies with no positive findings (n=72), nine patients (12.5%) underwent appendicectomy with two (2.7%) appendices demonstrating appendicitis on histological examination. CONCLUSION: 87% of the total cohort with a normal appendix at laparoscopy for RIF pain did not undergo further laparoscopy. Less than 5% of the total cohort and 2.7% of subanalysis cohort had an appendicectomy for histologically-proven appendicitis within the follow-up period. From the evidence in this study, we conclude that leaving the appendix in situ unless macroscopically inflamed is a viable alternative to excision.


Assuntos
Apendicite , Apêndice , Laparoscopia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Apendicectomia/métodos , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/patologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apêndice/patologia , Apêndice/cirurgia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor , Adulto Jovem
3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 160(2): 514-519, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213897

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether HE4 and CA125 could identify endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients who might most benefit from full staging surgery with lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Sequential patients with a preoperative banked serum and histology of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of endometrium who had undergone surgical staging with lymph node dissection over a 5-year period between 2011 and 2016 were included from a tertiary Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Dublin, Ireland. Preoperative serum HE4 and CA125 were measured using ELISA, with the cut-offs HE4 81 pmol/L and CA125 35 U/ml. Predictive values were estimated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity and odds ratios. RESULTS: 9.5% of the cohort had lymph node metastases. A HE4 cut-off of 81 pmol/L yielded a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 53.4% for predicting lymph node metastases. Sensitivity of CA125 at 35 U/ml was 57% and specificity 91.4%. The AUC was 0.66 (0.52-0.80) for HE4 and 0.74 (0.58-0.91) for CA125. Sensitivity was 92.8% and specificity 51.1% when an elevation of either HE4 or CA125 was included, AUC was 0.72 (0.61-0.83), this combination yielded the highest NPV of 98.6%. Sensitivity was 42.9% and specificity 93.8% if both markers were elevated simultaneously, AUC was 0.68 (0.51-0.86). Preoperative clinical predictors of high-grade preoperative histology and radiology had sensitivities of 21.4% and 41.7%, respectively. Patients with a HE4 above 81 pmol/L had an odds ratio of 4.2 (1.12-15.74), p < 0.05, of lymph node metastases and CA125 had an odds ratio of 14.2 (4.16-48.31), p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Serum HE4 and CA125 improved on existing methods for risk stratification of endometrioid carcinomas and warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Antígeno Ca-125/sangue , Carcinoma Endometrioide/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Proteínas de Membrana/sangue , Proteína 2 do Domínio Central WAP de Quatro Dissulfetos/análise , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Endometrioide/sangue , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/sangue , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Endométrio/patologia , Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo/estatística & dados numéricos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/estatística & dados numéricos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Período Pré-Operatório , Curva ROC , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Salpingo-Ooforectomia
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(8): 1998-2006, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905599

RESUMO

AIM: Patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC/LRRC) experience higher rates of local recurrence (LR) and poorer overall survival than patients with primary rectal cancer restricted to the mesorectum despite improved neoadjuvant treatment regimens and radical surgical procedures. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been suggested as an adjunctive tool in the surgical management of these challenging cases. However, clear evidence regarding the oncological benefit of IORT is sparse. The aim of this review was to update this evidence in the era of standardized neoadjuvant radiotherapy administration. METHOD: A systematic review of patients who received IORT as part of multimodal treatment for advanced rectal cancer from 2000 to 2020 and an analysis of IORT and surgery/external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) groups was performed. The primary endpoint was the rate of LR between the two groups. RESULTS: Seven papers met the predefined criteria. LR was reduced by the addition of IORT when compared with the surgery/EBRT alone group (14.7% vs. 21.4%; OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.27-1.14; p = 0.11). There was no increase in reported genitourinary morbidity, wound issues, pelvic collections or anastomotic leak in those patients who received IORT. Notably, there was no survival difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of IORT to current treatment strategies in the management of patients with LARC/LRRC is associated with a lower rate of locoregional recurrence without increased morbidity. However, this marks a highly selective group of patients, with heterogeneity regarding indications, prior neoadjuvant treatments and/or IORT dosing.


Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retais , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(6): 623-632, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610070

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous ablation has revolutionized treatment of varicose vein surgery but is associated with a risk of venous thromboembolism. There is no consensus regarding anticoagulation protocols for these patients. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to identify which anticoagulant is optimal in this cohort for clot prevention with minimal risk of adverse bleeding events. METHODS: Library databases were searched for studies where patients were treated with one or more anticoagulants following endovenous ablation for varicose veins. The methodological quality of included studies was quantified using the Risk of Bias (ROB) assessment tools. Findings were reported using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) checklist. Statistical analysis was carried out using metainsight (rpackage). RESULTS: Observational data on just under 1500 patients prescribed post ablation anticoagulation (Rivaroxaban, Enoxaparin, Fondaparinux) were analyzed. Patient characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. 81 thrombotic and 40 minor bleeding events occurred in total. Overall rivaroxaban is found to be superior to the other agents. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA indicates that prophylactic rivaroxaban is the highest ranked anticoagulant for thromboprophylaxis in patients post endovenous ablation for varicose veins, with a low risk of adverse bleeding. The choice whether to anticoagulate these patients is likely to remain at the discretion of the treating clinician.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Metanálise em Rede , Varizes , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas de Ablação/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/administração & dosagem , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/cirurgia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico
6.
Phlebology ; : 2683555241298028, 2024 Nov 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39498993

RESUMO

Objective: A prospective cohort study aimed to determine factors which influence the progression of chronic venous disease (CVD) in an attempt to aid in the early identification of those at patients who are likely to benefit from early intervention.Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients referred to tertiary vascular services with varicose veins over 7 years was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the rate of disease progression from time of referral to time of consultation. The secondary outcome measure was to the rate of venous complications during the same time period.Results: 1000 patients from routine varicose vein waiting lists were included in the study. The mean waiting time was 2.96 ± 1.25 years. The majority of patients were female (73% versus 27%), and the average age was 57.8 ± 14.7 years. One fifth of the cohort developed a complication or showed evidence of disease progression. Logistic regression showed that advancing age and previous episodes of cellulitis are significant risk factors for the development of CVD progression.Conclusions: Varicose veins are more than a cosmetic issue and can be associated with substantial health and economic costs. Continuous identification of risk factors will enable clinicians to implement treatment strategies earlier for at risk patients.

7.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 16(12): 435-438, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36656691

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, with a European-wide annual incidence rate of 1/100 000 males. Approximately one-third of cases are attributable to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. p16INK4a is a recognized surrogate marker for HPV infection in penile cancer. University Hospital Waterford (UHW) is the national referral center for penile cancer in Ireland. We report the prevalence of HPV infection and histological characteristics of an Irish penile cancer cohort using p16INK4a as a surrogate marker. METHODS: Patients who attended UHW for penile cancer surgery between June 2015 and November 2020 were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Clinical, histopathological, and outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Over the study period, 70 patients with a histological diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma had staining for p16INK4a, of whom 64% were positive. p16INK4a-positive patients were significantly younger at diagnosis, with a mean age of 61±15 years compared to 68±12 (p <0.05). Of note, 97% of tumors with high-risk histology were p16INK4a-positive (p<0.001). p16INK4a positivity was more prevalent among higher-grade tumors (p<0.02). Interestingly, p16INK4a status was not associated with recurrence-free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data is representative of the Irish landscape in penile cancer over the last five years. Using p16INK4a staining, we demonstrate a high rate of HPV prevalence in penile cancer cases in our patient cohort, which is associated with prognostically worse tumor subtypes. This would suggest that HPV vaccination of adolescent boys is a useful public health intervention in preventing penile cancer in the Irish male population.

8.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 25(1): 53-57, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27139928

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Characteristics of older frequent users of Emergency Departments (EDs) are poorly understood. Our aim was to examine the characteristics of the ED frequent attenders (FAs) by age (under 65 and over 65 years). METHODS: We examined the prevalence of FA attending the ED of an Urban Teaching Hospital in a cross-sectional study between 2009 and 2011. FA was defined as an individual who presented to the ED four or more times over a 12-month period. Randomly selected groups of FA and non-FA from two age groups (under 65 and over 65 years) were then examined to compare the characteristics between older FAs and non-FAs and older FAs and younger FAs. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for 12-month mortality in FA compared with non-FA aged at least 65 years. RESULTS: Overall, 137 150 ED attendances were recorded between 2009 and 2011. A total of 21.6% were aged at least 65 years, 4.4% of whom were FAs, accounting for 18.4% of attendances by patients older than 65 years. There was a bimodal age distribution of FA (mean±SD; under 65 years 40±12.7; and over 65 years 76.9±7.4). Older FAs were five times more likely to present outside normal working hours and 5.5 times more likely to require admission. Cardiovascular emergencies were the most common complaint, in contrast with the younger FA group, where injury and psychosocial conditions dominated. The odds ratio for death at 12 months was 2.07 (95% confidence interval 0.93-4.63; P=0.07), adjusting for age and sex. CONCLUSION: One-in-five ED patients older than 65 years of age are FAs. Older FAs largely present with complex medical conditions. Enhanced access to expert gerontology assessment should be considered as part of effective intervention strategies for older ED users.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Irlanda , Masculino , Prevalência , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA