Cell viability and cytotoxicity of inkjet-printed flexible organic electrodes on parylene C.

This study reports on the fabrication of biocompatible organic devices by means of inkjet printing with a novel combination of materials. The devices were fabricated on Parylene C (PaC), a biocompatible and flexible polymer substrate. The contact tracks were inkjet-printed using a silver nanoparticle ink, while the active sites were inkjet-printed using a poly (3,4ethylenedioxythiophene)/polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) solution. To insulate the final device, a polyimide ink was used to print a thick film, leaving small open windows upon the active sites. Electrical characterization of the final device revealed conductivities in the order of 103 and 102 S.cm-1 for Ag and PEDOT based inks, respectively. Cell adhesion assays performed with PC-12 cells after 96 h of culture, and B16F10 cells after 24 h of culture, demonstrated that the cells adhered on top of the inks and cell differentiation occurred, which indicates Polyimide and PEDOT:PSS inks are non-toxic to these cells. The results indicate that PaC, along with its surface-treated variants, is a potentially useful material for fabricating cell-based microdevices.

Endocannabinoids, through opioids and prostaglandins, contribute to fever induced by key pyrogenic mediators.

This study aims to explore the contribution of endocannabinoids on the cascade of mediators involved in LPS-induced fever and to verify the participation of prostaglandins and endogenous opioids in fever induced by anandamide (AEA). Body temperature (Tc) of male Wistar rats was recorded over 6h, using a thermistor probe. Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of PGE2 and ß-endorphin were measured by ELISA after the administration of AEA. Intracerebroventricular administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (5µg, i.c.v.), reduced the fever induced by IL-1ß (3ng, i.c.v.), TNF-α (250ng, i.c.v.), IL-6 (300ng, i.c.v.), corticotrophin release factor (CRH; 2.5µg, i.c.v.) and endothelin (ET)-1 (1pmol, i.c.v.), but not the fever induced by PGE2 (250ng, i.c.v.) or PGF2α (250ng, i.c.v.). Systemic administration of indomethacin (2mgkg(-1), i.p.) or celecoxib (5mgkg(-1), p.o.) reduced the fever induced by AEA (1µg, i.c.v.), while naloxone (1mgkg(-1), s.c.) abolished it. The increases of PGE2 and ß-endorphin concentration in the CSF induced by AEA were abolished by the pretreatment of rats with AM251. These results suggest that endocannabinoids are intrinsically involved in the pyretic activity of cytokines (IL-1ß, TNF-α, IL-6), CRH and ET-1 but not the PGE2 or PGF2α induced fevers. However, anandamide via CB1 receptor activation induces fever that is dependent on the synthesis of prostaglandin and opioids.

Endothelins modulate inflammatory reaction in zymosan-induced arthritis: participation of LTB4, TNF-alpha, and CXCL-1.

Endothelins (ETs) are involved in inflammatory events, including pain, fever, edema, and cell migration. ET-1 levels are increased in plasma and synovial membrane of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, but the evidence that ETs participate in RA physiopathology is limited. The present study investigated the involvement of ETs in neutrophil accumulation and edema formation in the murine model of zymosan-induced arthritis. Intra-articular (i.a.) administration of selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists (BQ-123 and BQ-788, respectively; 15 pmol/cavity) prior to i.a. zymosan injection (500 microg/cavity) markedly reduced knee-joint edema formation and neutrophil influx to the synovial cavity 6 h and 24 h after stimulation. Histological analysis showed that ET(A) or ET(B) receptor blockade suppressed zymosan-induced neutrophil accumulation in articular tissue at 6 h. Likewise, dual blockade of ET(A)/ET(B) with bosentan (10 mg/kg, i.v.) also reduced edema formation and neutrophil counts 6 h after zymosan stimulation. Pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (i.a.; 15 pmol/cavity) also decreased zymosan-induced TNF-alpha production within 6 h, keratinocyte-derived chemokine/CXCL1 production within 24 h, and leukotriene B(4) at both time-points. Consistent with the demonstration that ET receptor antagonists inhibit zymosan-induced inflammation, i.a. injection of ET-1 (1-30 pmol/cavity) or sarafotoxin S6c (0.1-30 pmol/cavity) also triggered edema formation and neutrophil accumulation within 6 h. Moreover, knee-joint synovial tissue expressed ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. These findings suggest that endogenous ETs contribute to knee-joint inflammation, acting through ET(A) and ET(B) receptors and modulating edema formation, neutrophil recruitment, and production of inflammatory mediators.

GABA(A) signalling is involved in N/OFQ anxiolytic-like effects but not in nocistatin anxiogenic-like action as evaluated in the mouse elevated plus maze.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and nocistatin are two neuropeptides originated from the same precursor prepronociceptin/orphanin FQ (ppN/OFQ). N/OFQ is the endogenous ligand of the NOP receptor, while the target of action of nocistatin is still unknown. N/OFQ modulates various biological functions, including anxiety. Conversely, nocistatin either behaves as a functional N/OFQ antagonist or evokes per se effects opposite to those of N/OFQ. Here we investigated the interaction between the anxiolytic-like effects of N/OFQ and the anxiogenic-like action of nocistatin with those evoked by GABA(A) receptor ligands in the mouse elevated plus maze. The anxiogenic-like effects of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist pentylenetetrazol (20mg/kg; intraperitoneal, i.p.) were abolished by the co-treatment with N/OFQ (10pmol; intracerebroventricular, i.c.v.) while potentiated by the administration of nocistatin (0.01pmol; i.c.v.). The anxiolytic-like effects of the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (0.75mg/kg, i.p.) were reversed by nocistatin (0.1pmol; i.c.v.), whereas signs of sedation were observed when mice were co-treated with diazepam and N/OFQ (3pmol). Interesting enough, the i.p. treatment with flumazenil (1mg/kg) blocked the anxiolytic-like effects of N/OFQ (10pmol; i.c.v.), but not the anxiogenic effect elicited by nocistatin. Collectively, our findings suggest that the effects on anxiety elicited by pentylenetetrazol and diazepam can be counteracted or potentiated in the presence of N/OFQ and nocistatin. In addition, the effects on anxiety of N/OFQ, but not nocistatin, appear to be dependent on the benzodiazepine site of the GABA(A) receptor.

Endothelin-1 as a central mediator of LPS-induced fever in rats.

Fever induced by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in rats is substantially reduced by blockade of central endothelin ET(B) receptors. This study explores the role of endothelin-1 as a central mediator of fever in rats, by investigating the effect of a pyrogenic dose of LPS on the levels of big endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and endothelin-1 in the plasma. We further assessed whether the increase in body temperature caused by central injection of endothelin-1 constitutes solely a hyperthermia or a true integrated febrile response. LPS (5 mug kg(-1), i.v.) induced fever which peaked at 1.16 +/- 0.24 degrees C within 2 h and remained stable up to 5 h. CSF levels of immunoreactive (ir) big endothelin-1 decreased to undetectable levels at 3 h after LPS, returning only partially at 5 h post-injection. CSF ir-endothelin-1 levels were undetectable in saline-treated animals, but reached 21.9 +/- 5.2 fmol ml(-1) at 3 h after LPS treatment. Plasma ir-endothelin-1 levels were unchanged after saline or LPS. Central injection of endothelin-1 (1 pmol, i.c.v.) caused long-lasting increases in body temperature (0.81 +/- 0.17 degrees C, 3 h), but simultaneously decreased tail skin temperature (-1.10 +/- 0.26 degrees C), indicating cutaneous vasoconstriction. Moreover, endothelin-1 induced fever (1.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C, 3 h) when injected into the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus (100 fmol), but not i.v. (1 or 10 pmol). These data suggest that endothelin-1 is produced in the brain and acts centrally as a mediator of LPS-induced fever.

Effects of endothelin ETA receptor antagonism on granulocyte and lymphocyte accumulation in LPS-induced inflammation.

Endothelin peptides play active roles in different aspects of inflammation. This study investigates the contribution of endogenous endothelins to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) pulmonary inflammation by assessing the influence of ET(A) receptor antagonism on leukocyte accumulation, granulocyte adhesion molecule expression, and chemokine/cytokine modulation. Local pretreatment with BQ-123 or A-127722 (150 pmol), two selective and chemically unrelated endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonists, inhibits neutrophil and eosinophil accumulation in LPS-induced pleurisy at 24 h but not neutrophil migration at 4 h. The effect of endothelin antagonism on neutrophil accumulation at 24 h was concomitant with inhibition of eosinophil and CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte influx. It is surprising that the ET(A) receptor blockade did not inhibit the accumulation of gammadelta T lymphocytes, cells that are important for granulocyte recruitment in this model. Blockade of ET(A) receptors did not influence the expression of adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD49d) on granulocytes but abrogated the increase in tumor necrosis factor alpha levels 4 h after LPS stimulation and also markedly inhibited increases in levels of interleukin-6 and keratinocyte-derived chemokine/CXC chemokine ligand 1 but not eotaxin/chemokine ligand 11. Thus, acting via ET(A) receptors, endogenous endothelins play an important role in early cytokine/chemokine production and on granulocyte and lymphocyte mobilization in LPS-induced pleurisy.

Pressor and pulmonary responses to ET-1(1-31) in guinea-pigs.

1. Endothelin-1(1-31) (ET-1(1-31); 0.25 to 4 nmol kg(-1); i.v.) induced, in the guinea-pig, graded increases in MAP and an indomethacin-sensitive enhancement of pulmonary insufflation pressure (PIP). At all doses, ET-1(1-31) induced a monophasic pressor response, except at 4 nmol kg(-1), which caused a rapid and transient response (first phase: over first 10 min after injection) followed by a more slowly-developing and sustained (second phase: between 10 and 45 min after injection) increase in MAP. ET-1(1-31) was 4 to 10 fold less potent than ET-1 on PIP responses. 2. Phosphoramidon (5 and 10 mg kg(-1)) reduced both pressor and PIP effects of ET-1(1-31). Thiorphan (0.25 and 2.5 mg kg(-1)) did not affect the pressor responses to ET-1(1-31) although its PIP effects were markedly reduced by the NEP inhibitor. A selective endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE) inhibitor, CGS 35066 (1 mg kg(-1)), significantly reduced the second phase pressor response and increase in PIP triggered by ET-1(1-31). 3. The second (but not the first) pressor phase of ET-1(1-31) (4 nmol kg(-1)) was markedly reduced by BQ-123 (selective ET(A) antagonist), whereas the increase of PIP was significantly reduced by BQ-788 (selective ET(B) antagonist). Co-administration of BQ-123 plus BQ-788 abolished ET-1(1-31)-induced increase in PIP, but blockade of the second pressor phase afforded by BQ-123 was now reversed. 4. In guinea-pig isolated perfused lungs, ET-1(1-31) (50 nM) induced the release of prostacyclin and thromboxane A(2), which was inhibited by BQ-788 (5 nM) or thiorphan (25 microM), but not BQ-123 (1 microM). 5. These results suggest that ET-1(1-31) enhances MAP. Its sustained, but not transient, pressor effects are mediated via ET(A) receptor activation. Furthermore, ET-1(1-31) increases airway resistance in vivo and triggers prostacyclin and thromboxane A(2) release from perfused lungs predominantly via ET(B) receptor activation. ET-1(1-31) failed to display any selectivity of action towards either ET(A) or ET(B) receptors in these models. 6. We suggest that, in order to raise MAP, ET-1(1-31) requires conversion to ET-1, predominantly by ECE and to a lesser extent neutral endopeptidase 24.11, whereas the reverse holds true regarding its pharmacological effects in airways.

Central injections of nocistatin or its C-terminal hexapeptide exert anxiogenic-like effect on behaviour of mice in the plus-maze test.

. Nocistatin (NST) antagonizes several actions of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), but acts on distinct receptors. As N/OFQ exerts anxiolytic-like actions in various tests, its behavioural actions in the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test were compared with those of bovine NST. 2. Five minutes after i.c.v. treatment, mice were placed on the EPM for 5 min and entries into and time spent on open and closed arms were recorded alongside other parameters. 3. NST (0.1 - 3 pmol) reduced percentages of entries into (control 39.6+/-3.1%, peak effect at 1 pmol NST 8.5+/-2.9%) and time spent on open arms (control 30.8+/-2.3%, NST 2.7+/-1.5%). The C-terminal hexapeptide of NST (NST-C6; 0.01 - 10 pmol) closely mimicked these actions of NST, with peak effects at 0.1 pmol. 4. N/OFQ (1 - 100 pmol) increased percentages of entries into (control 38.5+/-3.4%; peak effect at 10 pmol N/OFQ 67.9+/-4.9%) and time spent on open arms (control 32.0+/-3.8%; N/OFQ 74.9+/-5.8%). Closed arm entries, an index of locomotor activity, were unchanged by all peptides. 5. Effects of NST or NST-C6, but not N/OFQ, were still detectable 15 min after injection. Behaviour of animals co-injected with NST (1 pmol) or NST-C6 (0.1 pmol) plus N/OFQ (10 pmol) was indistinguishable from that of controls. 6. These results reveal potent anxiogenic-like actions of NST and NST-C6, and confirm the anxiolytic-like properties of N/OFQ. As NST and N/OFQ both derive from preproN/OF, anxiety may be modulated in opposing directions depending on how this precursor is processed.

Endothelins contribute towards nociception induced by antigen in ovalbumin-sensitised mice.

1. The contribution of endogenous endothelins to nociceptive responses elicited by ovalbumin (OVA) in the hind-paw of mice sensitised to this antigen (50 microg OVA+5 mg Al(OH)(3), s.c., 14 days beforehand) was investigated. 2. Sensitised mice exhibited greater nocifensive responsiveness to intraplantar (i.pl.) OVA (total licking time over first 30 min: 85.2+/-14.6 s at 0.3 microg; 152.6+/-35.6 s at 1 microg) than nonsensitised animals (29.3+/-7.4 s at 1 microg). Nocifensive responses of sensitised mice to 0.3 microg OVA were inhibited by morphine (3 mg kg(-1), s.c.) or local depletion of mast cells (four daily i.pl. injections of compound 48/80). 3. Pretreatment with i.v. bosentan (mixed ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 52 micromol kg(-1)) or A-122722.5 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 6 micromol kg(-1)) reduced OVA-induced licking from 124.8+/-20.6 s to 45.7+/-13.0 s and 64.2+/-12.1 s, respectively, whereas A-192621.1 (selective ET(B) receptor antagonist; 25 micromol kg(-1)) enhanced them to 259.2+/-39.6 s. 4. Local i.pl. pretreatment with BQ-123 or BQ-788 (selective ET(A) or ET(B) receptor antagonists, respectively, each at 3 nmol) reduced OVA-induced licking (from 106.2+/-15.2 to 57.0+/-9.4 s and from 118.6+/-10.5 to 76.8+/-14.7 s, respectively). Sarafotoxin S6c (selective ETB receptor agonist, 30 pmol, i.pl., 30 min after OVA) induced nocifensive responses in OVA-sensitised, but not in nonsensitised, animals. 5. Compound 48/80 (0.3 microg, i.pl.) induced nocifensive responses per se and potentiated those induced by i.pl. capsaicin (0.1 microg). Treatment with BQ-123 (3 nmol, i.pl.) reduced only the hyperalgesic effect of compound 48/80, whereas BQ-788 (3 nmol) was ineffective. 6. Thus, immune-mediated Type I hypersensitivity reactions elicit mast cell- and endothelin-dependent nociception in the mouse hind-paw, which are mediated locally by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. The nocifensive response to antigen is amenable to blockade by systemic treatment with dual ET(A)/ET(B) or selective ET(A) receptor antagonists, but is sharply potentiated by systemic selective ET(B) receptor antagonist treatment. The apparently distinct roles played by ET(B) receptors in this phenomenon at local and other sites remain to be characterised.

Endothelin ETB receptors inhibit articular nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the rat knee-joint.

The participation of the endothelin system on nociception and priming induced by carrageenan in the knee-joint was investigated. Intra-articular (i.a.) carrageenan (300 microg) caused long-lasting nociceptive effects (i.e., increases in paw elevation time [PET]), which were potentiated by endothelin-1 (dual endothelin ETA/ETB receptor agonist) and inhibited by sarafotoxin S6c (endothelin ETB receptor agonist; both at 30 pmol, i.a., 24 h beforehand). Priming the naive joint with carrageenan augmented nociceptive responses to a second carrageenan challenge, 72 h later. Carrageenan-induced priming, but not nociception, was potentiated by local BQ-788 (10 nmol, i.a., 15 min before priming; endothelin ETB receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyl-tryptophanil-D-norleucine), but BQ-123 (endothelin ETA receptor antagonist; cyclo [D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) was ineffective. Sarafotoxin S6c markedly suppressed carrageenan-induced priming to nociception triggered by carrageenan, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c, and BQ-788 prevented this action. Thus, selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists inhibit carrageenan-induced nociception and priming in the naive joint. This priming effect of carrageenan to nociception evoked by subsequent inflammatory insults is limited by an endothelin ETB receptor-operated mechanism.

Endothelins induce ETB receptor-mediated mechanical hypernociception in rat hindpaw: roles of cAMP and protein kinase C.

The present study assesses the capacity of endothelins to induce mechanical hypernociception, and characterises the receptors involved and the contribution of cAMP and protein kinases A (PKA) and C (PKC) to this effect. Intraplantar administration of endothelin-1, endothelin-2 or endothelin-3 (3-30 pmol) induced dose- and time-dependent mechanical hypernociception, which was inhibited by BQ-788 (N-cys-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-l-gamma-methylleucyl-d-1-methoxycarboyl-d-norleucine; endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist), but not BQ-123 (cyclo[d-Trp-d-Asp-Pro-d-Val-Leu]; endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist; each at 30 pmol). The selective endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist BQ-3020 (N-Ac-Ala(11,15)-endothelin-1 (6-21)) fully mimicked the hypernociceptive effects of the natural endothelins. Treatments with indomethacin, atenolol or dexamethasone did not inhibit endothelin-1-evoked mechanical hypernociception. However, endothelin-1-induced mechanical hypernociception was potentiated by the cAMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram (4-[3-(cyclopentyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-pyrrolidinone) and inhibited by the PKC inhibitors staurosporine and calphostin C, but was unaffected by the PKA inhibitor H89 (N-[2-((p-bromocinnamyl)amino)ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide). Thus, endothelins, acting through endothelin ET(B) receptors, induce mechanical hypernociception in the rat hindpaw via cAMP formation and activation of the PKC-dependent phosphorylation cascade.

Influence of indomethacin on effects of endothelin-1 on guinea pig isolated rings of common bile duct and sphincter of Oddi.

The effects of endothelin-1 on motility of guinea pig extra-hepatic biliary tract portions were studied. Endothelin-1 (< or =100 nM) failed to contract rings of hepatic, cystic, proximal or distal common bile ducts, or choledochal or papillary halves of sphincter of Oddi. At 100 nM, endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c (selective endothelin ET(B) receptor agonist) inhibited contractions of choledochal (but not papillary) sphincter of Oddi to carbachol (1 microM) by 63+/-5 and 45+/-9%, respectively. In distal common bile duct, indomethacin (5.6 microM) unmasked potent contractile effects of endothelin-1 [EC(50) 7.8 (5.5-11.1) nM; E(MAX) 80+/-6% of response to 80 mM KCl] and enhanced the contractile potency of carbachol (585-fold at EC(50) level), but not cholecystokinin C-terminal octapeptide. Inhibition of cholinergic responsiveness of the choledochal sphincter of Oddi by endothelin-1 was reduced by BQ-123 (1 microM; endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist; cyclo[DTrp-DAsp-Pro-DVal-Leu]) and abolished by either BQ-123 plus BQ-788 (1 microM; endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist; N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarboyl-D-norleucine) or indomethacin. Thus, eicosanoids of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway (i.e. prostanoids) suppress endothelin-1-induced contractions of distal common bile duct and mediate endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-dependent inhibition of cholinergic responsiveness of the choledochal portion of the sphincter of Oddi.

Cardiovascular responses to sciatic nerve stimulation are blocked by paratrigeminal nucleus lesion.

The paratrigeminal nucleus (Pa5) receives primary sensory inputs from the vagus, glossopharyngeal, and trigeminal nerves and has efferent projections to the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), rostroventrolateral reticular nucleus (RVL), as well as to the nucleus ambiguus (Amb), lateral reticular (LRt), parabrachial (PB) and ventral posteromedial thalamic (VPM) nuclei, suggesting that it may play a significant role in cardiovascular responses to nociceptive stimuli. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of unilateral lesions of the Pa5 on cardiovascular alterations induced by afferent somatic sensory nerve stimulation (SNS), also known as the somatosympathetic reflex (SSR). Cardiovascular responses were recorded in rats following either sham operation or unilateral lesions of the Pa5 with ibotenic acid. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) increased after SNS, which in sham-lesioned animals raised from 95 +/- 4 to 115 +/- 2 mmHg. Ipsilateral Pa5 lesion did not significantly reduce the pressor response to SNS (from 91 +/- 7 to 107 +/- 4 mmHg increase of baseline MAP). On the other hand, contralateral Pa5 lesion significantly reduced the response to SNS (from 99 +/- 5, to 104 +/- 2 mmHg). Sciatic nerve stimulation did not alter heart rate (HR) neither did ipsi- or contralateral Pa5 lesion HR baseline response level. These findings support a crucial role for the Pa5 in cardiovascular regulation, by relaying SSR input evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation.

Peripheral substance P and neurokinin-1 receptors have a role in inflammatory and neuropathic orofacial pain models.

There is accumulating evidence that substance P released from peripheral sensory neurons participates in inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In this study it was investigated the ability of substance P to induce orofacial nociception and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia, as well as the role of NK1 receptors on models of orofacial inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Substance P injected into the upper lip at 1, 10 and 100 µg/50 µL failed to induce nociceptive behavior. Also, substance P (0.1-10 µg/50 µL) injected into the upper lip did not evoke orofacial cold hyperalgesia and when injected at 1 µg/50 µL did not induce mechanical hyperalgesia. However, substance P at this latter dose induced orofacial heat hyperalgesia, which was reduced by the pre-treatment of rats with a non-peptide NK1 receptor antagonist (SR140333B, 3mg/kg). Systemic treatment with SR140333B (3 mg/kg) also reduced carrageenan-induced heat hyperalgesia, but did not exert any influence on carrageenan-induced cold hyperalgesia. Blockade of NK1 receptors with SR140333B also reduced by about 50% both phases of the formalin response evaluated in the orofacial region. Moreover, heat, but not cold or mechanical, hyperalgesia induced by constriction of the infraorbital nerve, a model of trigeminal neuropathic pain, was abolished by pretreatment with SR140333B. Considering that substance P was peripherally injected (i.e. upper lip) and the NK1 antagonist used lacks the ability to cross the blood-brain-barrier, our results demonstrate that the peripheral SP/NK1 system participates in the heat hyperalgesia associated with inflammation or nerve injury and in the persistent pain evoked by formalin in the orofacial region.

Involvement of PGE2 and RANTES in Staphylococcus aureus-induced fever in rats.

This study investigated the involvement of prostaglandins and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), in fever induced by live Staphylococcus aureus (no. 25923, American Type Culture Collection) injection in rats. S. aureus was injected intraperitoneally at 10(9), 10(10), and 2 × 10(10) colony-forming units (CFU)/cavity, and body temperature (T(b)) was measured by radiotelemetry. The lowest dose of S. aureus induced a modest transient increase in T(b), whereas the two higher doses promoted similar long-lasting and sustained T(b) increases. Thus, the 10(10) CFU/cavity dose was chosen for the remaining experiments. The T(b) increase induced by S. aureus was accompanied by significant decreases in tail skin temperature and increases in PGE(2) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and hypothalamus but not in the venous plasma. Celecoxib (selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, 2.5 mg/kg po) inhibited the fever and the increases in PGE(2) concentration in the CSF and hypothalamus induced by S. aureus. Dipyrone (120 mg/kg ip) reduced the fever from 2.5 to 4 h and the PGE(2) increase in the CSF but not in the hypothalamus. S. aureus increased RANTES in the peritoneal exudate but not in the CSF or hypothalamus. Met-RANTES (100 µg/kg iv), a chemokine (C-C motif) receptor (CCR)1/CCR5 antagonist, reduced the first 6 h of fever induced by S. aureus. This study suggests that peripheral (local) RANTES and central PGE(2) production are key events in the febrile response to live S. aureus injection. As dipyrone does not reduce PGE(2) synthesis in the hypothalamus, it is plausible that S. aureus induces fever, in part, via a dipyrone-sensitive PGE(2)-independent pathway.

The antipyretic effect of dipyrone is unrelated to inhibition of PGE(2) synthesis in the hypothalamus.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces fever through two parallel pathways; one, prostaglandin (PG)-dependent and the other, PG-independent and involving endothelin-1 (ET-1). For a better understanding of the mechanisms by which dipyrone exerts antipyresis, we have investigated its effects on fever and changes in PGE(2) content in plasma, CSF and hypothalamus induced by either LPS or ET-1. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats were given (i.p.) dipyrone (120 mg·kg(-1)) or indomethacin (2 mg·kg(-1)) 30 min before injection of LPS (5 µg·kg(-1), i.v.) or ET-1 (1 pmol, i.c.v.). Rectal temperature was measured by tele-thermometry. PGE(2) levels were determined in the plasma, CSF and hypothalamus by elisa. KEY RESULTS: LPS or ET-1 induced fever and increased CSF and hypothalamic PGE(2) levels. Two hours after LPS, indomethacin reduced CSF and hypothalamic PGE(2) but did not inhibit fever, while at 3 h it reduced all three parameters. Three hours after ET-1, indomethacin inhibited the increase in CSF and hypothalamic PGE(2) levels but did not affect fever. Dipyrone abolished both the fever and the increased CSF PGE(2) levels induced by LPS or ET-1 but did not affect the increased hypothalamic PGE(2) levels. Dipyrone also reduced the increase in the venous plasma PGE(2) concentration induced by LPS. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings confirm that PGE(2) does not play a relevant role in ET-1-induced fever. They also demonstrate for the first time that the antipyretic effect of dipyrone was not mechanistically linked to the inhibition of hypothalamic PGE(2) synthesis.

Contribution of peripheral endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in neuropathic pain induced by spinal nerve ligation in rats.

Endothelins (ETs) contribute to the sensory changes seen in animals models of inflammatory, cancer and diabetic neuropathic pain, but little is known about their nociceptive role following peripheral nerve injury. The current study evaluated mechanisms by which ETs can drive changes in nociceptive responses to thermal stimulation of the hind paw of rats induced by unilateral lumbar L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) injury. SNL sensitizes rats to acetone-evoked cooling of and radiant heat application (Hargreaves test) to the ipsilateral hind paw (throughout 3-40 and 9-40 days after surgery, respectively). At 12 days after SNL, intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1, 10 pmol) induces greater overt nociception that was reduced only by treatment with the selective ET(A) peptidic antagonist (BQ-123, 10 nmol, i.pl), but unchanged by the selective ET(B) peptidic antagonist (BQ-788). Cold allodynia evoked by cooling the ipsilateral hind paw with acetone was reduced by i.pl. injection of both antagonists BQ-123 or BQ-788 (3 or 10 nmol). In contrast, heat hyperalgesia evaluated by Hargreaves method was reduced only by BQ-123. SNL enhanced the [Ca(+2)](i) increases induced by ET-1 (100 nM) in neurons from L5/L6 (injured) and L4 (intact) cultured dorsal root ganglion, but did not change the responses of non-neuronal cells. Furthermore, Western blot analysis revealed that SNL increased ET(A) and ET(B) receptor protein expression in spinal nerves. Thus, SNL induces marked hind paw hypersensitivity to thermal stimulation in part via up-regulation of peripheral sensory nerve pronociceptive ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-operated mechanisms.

Mechanisms operated by endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in the trigeminal ganglion contribute to orofacial thermal hyperalgesia induced by infraorbital nerve constriction in rats.

Endothelins, acting through specific endothelin ET(A) and/or ET(B) receptors, participate in nociceptive processing in models of cancer, inflammatory and neuropathic pain. The present study investigated which cell types express endothelin receptors in the trigeminal ganglion, and the contribution of mechanisms mediated by endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors to orofacial heat hyperalgesia induced by unilateral constriction of the infraorbital nerve (CION). Both receptor types were identified by immunohistochemistry in the trigeminal ganglion, ET(A) receptors on small-sized non-myelinated and myelinated A-fibers and ET(B) receptors on both satellite glial cells and small-sized non-myelinated neuronal cells. CION promoted ipsilateral orofacial heat hyperalgesia which lasted from Day 2 until Day 10 after surgery. Ongoing CION-induced heat hyperalgesia (on Day 4) was reduced transiently, but significantly, by systemic or local treatment with antagonists of endothelin ET(A) receptors (atrasentan, 10 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-123, 10 nmol/lip), endothelin ET(B) receptors (A-192621, 20 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-788, 10 nmol/ lip), or of both ET(A)/ET(B) receptors (bosentan, 10 mg/kg, i.v.; or BQ-123 plus BQ-788, each at 10 nmol/lip). On the other hand, CION-induced heat hyperalgesia was transiently abolished over the first 90 min following i.p. injection of morphine hydrochloride (2.5 mg/kg), but fully resistant to reversal by indomethacin (4 mg/kg, i.p.) or celecoxib (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Thus, heat hyperalgesia induced by CION is maintained, in part, by peripheral signaling mechanisms operated by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Endothelin receptors might represent promising therapeutic targets for the control of trigeminal neuropathic pain.

Roles of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in nociception and chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia induced by endothelin-1 in the rat hindpaw.

Evidence on the relative roles of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in mediating the nociceptive and hyperalgesic actions of endothelin-1 is still fragmented and conflicting, due to variations between species and/or models. This study assesses the participation of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors on the nociceptive behavior and hyperalgesia to chemical (formalin), mechanical and thermal stimuli evoked by endothelin-1 injected into the rat hind-paw. Intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol, 50 microl) induced dose-dependent nociceptive behaviors over the first hour. Endothelin-1 (3-30 pmol) also potentiated both phases of nociception induced by a subsequent ipsilateral i.pl. injection of formalin (0.5%, 50 microl). Endothelin-1, at 10 pmol, increased responses of the first phase (0-10 min) by 97% and of the second phase (15-60 min) by 120%, and similar degrees of potentiation were observed following 30 pmol of the peptide. Endothelin-1 (1-30 pmol) caused slowly developing long-lasting thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia with maximum effects at 10 and 30 pmol, respectively, reaching significance at 2-3h and remaining elevated for up to at least 8h after injection. Treatment with the selective ET(A) and ET(B) peptidic antagonists BQ-123 and BQ-788 (i.pl., both at 10 nmol, 3.5h after ET-1 injection) or with the non-peptidic antagonists atrasentan and A-192621 systemically (i.v., 10 and 20mg/kg, respectively) each caused significant reductions in endothelin-1-induced nociception, as well as chemical, thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. Thus, the nociceptive and hyperalgesic effects induced by i.pl. endothelin-1 seem to be mediated by both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors.

Central endothelin ET(B) receptors mediate IL-1-dependent fever induced by preformed pyrogenic factor and corticotropin-releasing factor in the rat.

Blockade of central endothelin ET(B) receptors inhibits fever induced by LPS in conscious rats. The contribution of ET(B) receptor-mediated mechanisms to fever triggered by intracerebroventricular IL-6, PGE2, PGF(2alpha), corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), and preformed pyrogenic factor derived from LPS-stimulated macrophages (PFPF) was examined. The influence of natural IL-1 receptor antagonist or soluble TNF receptor I on endothelin (ET)-1-induced fever was also assessed. The selective ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 (3 pmol icv) abolished fever induced by intracerebroventricular ET-1 (1 pmol) or PFPF (200 ng) and reduced that caused by ICV CRF (1 nmol) but not by IL-6 (14.6 pmol), PGE2 (1.4 nmol), or PGF(2alpha) (2 nmol). CRF-induced fever was also attenuated by bosentan (dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist; 10 mg/kg iv) but unaffected by BQ-123 (selective ET(A) receptor antagonist; 3 pmol icv). alpha-Helical CRF(9-41) (dual CRF1/CRF2 receptor antagonist; 6.5 nmol icv) attenuated fever induced by CRF but not by ET-1. Human IL-1 receptor antagonist (9.1 pmol) markedly reduced fever to IL-1beta (180 fmol) or ET-1 and attenuated that caused by PFPF or CRF. Murine soluble TNF receptor I (23.8 pmol) reduced fever to TNF-alpha (14.7 pmol) but not to ET-1. The results of the present study suggest that PFPF and CRF recruit the brain ET system to cause ET(B) receptor-mediated IL-1-dependent fever.