Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
HIV Med ; 25(1): 72-82, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37619609

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To perform an external validation of the Dat'AIDS score for predicting 5-year overall mortality among people with HIV (PWH) aged 60 years or older. METHODS: This was a multi-centre prospective cohort study at all sites participating in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS). We calculated the Dat'AIDS score in PWH aged 60 years or older at their first visit between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2020. People living with HIV-2 and those whose Dat'AIDS score could not be calculated were excluded. Patients were followed until 1 January 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Vital status was collected throughout the study period. We obtained population and score descriptive statistics and assessed the score's discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: We included 2205 participants (82% male) of median [interquartile range (IQR)] age 62.0 (60.3-67.0) years, mostly with viraemia <50 copies/mL (92.7%). Median follow-up time was 15.9 years and median (IQR) CD4 cell count at enrolment was 586 (420-782) cells/µL. In all, 152 deaths were recorded during a total follow-up period of 7147 patient-years. The median (IQR) observed Dat'AIDS score was 3 (0-8). Discriminative capacities were good as the C-statistic was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77) and consistent across all subgroups. Comparison of observed and expected survival probabilities showed good calibration. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of the Dat'AIDS score in patients aged 60 years or older showed that it could be a useful tool not only for research purposes, but also to identify older patients at a higher mortality risk and to tailor the most appropriate interventions.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Infecções por HIV , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Mycoses ; 60(10): 676-685, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28833577

RESUMO

Candida bloodstream infection (CBI) is associated with high mortality. The aim of this study was to compare the utility of the combined use of the Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) or Chronic Disease Score (CDS) to predict mortality among patients with CBI. Thereby, all consecutive patients with CBI at our institution between 2010 and 2014 were included. The PBS was used to evaluate CBI severity and the CCI and CDS were used to assess comorbidities of patients with CBI. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios for 30-day mortality in models including the PBS and CCI or CDS. A total of 189 CBI episodes were identified. Logistic regression models including the PBS and either CCI or CDS showed that the combined use of a comorbidity score and a severity score significantly predicted 30-day mortality. The performance of the different models was similar. Aggregated scores of comorbidity (CCI and CDS) and disease severity (PBS) are useful for the prediction of 30-day mortality risk in patients with CBI. Their use may facilitate the analysis of risk factors for poorer outcome and the development of an index for CBI mortality.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Candida/patogenicidade , Candidemia/mortalidade , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candida/fisiologia , Candidemia/epidemiologia , Candidemia/microbiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(5): ofae201, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756760

RESUMO

Background: Limited data exist on when and how to stop antifungal treatment (AFT) in patients with invasive mold infections (IMIs) who are immunocompromised. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and proven/probable IMI (1 January 2010-31 December 2022) in 3 university hospitals. The primary objective was to describe AFT duration and adaptation. Secondary objectives were to investigate the reasons for AFT adjustments and prolongation. Results: In total 71 patients with 73 IMIs were identified; 51 (71.8%) had an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Most infections were invasive aspergillosis (IA; 49/71, 69%), followed by mucormycosis (12, 16.9%) and other (12, 16.9%); there were 2 mixed infections. Median treatment duration was 227 days (IQR, 115.5-348.5). There was no difference in AFT duration between patients with IA and non-IA IMI (P = .85) or by center (P = .92). Treatment was longer in patients with an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant vs not (P = .004). Sixteen patients (22.5%) had no therapy modifications. In 55 patients (77.5%), a median 2 changes (IQR, 1-3; range, 1-8) were observed. There were 182 reasons leading to 165 changes, associated with clinical efficacy (82/182, 44.5%), toxicity (47, 25.8%), and logistical reasons (22, 12.1%); no reason was documented in 32 changes (18.8%). AFT was continued beyond days 90 and 180 in 59 (83%) and 39 (54.9%) patients, respectively, mostly due to persistence of immunosuppression. Conclusions: AFT in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and IMI is longer than that recommended by guidelines and is frequently associated with treatment adjustments due to variable reasons. More data and better guidance are required to optimize AFT duration and secondary prophylaxis administration according to immunosuppression.

4.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 13(1): 73, 2024 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971822

RESUMO

The implementation of isolation precautions for patients with suspected Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pending test results is resource intensive. Due to the limited availability of single-bed rooms at our institution, we isolated patients with suspected COVID-19 together with patients without suspected COVID-19 on-site in multiple-bed rooms until SARS-CoV-2-test results were available. We evaluated the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to individuals sharing the room with patients isolated on-site. This observational study was performed at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, from 03/20 - 11/20. Secondary attack rates were compared between patients hospitalized in multiple-bed rooms and exposed to individuals subjected to on-site isolation precautions (on-site isolation group), and patients exposed to individuals initially not identified as having COVID-19, and not placed under isolation precautions until the diagnosis was suspected (control group). Transmission events were confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Among 1,218 patients with suspected COVID-19, 67 (5.5%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 21 were isolated on-site potentially exposing 27 patients sharing the same room. Median contact time was 12 h (interquartile range 7-18 h). SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified in none of the patients in the on-site isolation group vs. 10/63 (15.9%) in the control group (p = 0.03). Isolation on-site of suspected COVID-19-patients in multiple-bed rooms avoided single-room occupancy and subsequent in-hospital relocation for many patients without confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection. The absence of secondary transmission among the exposed patients in the on-site isolation group allows for assessment of the risk/benefit ratio of this strategy given the limitation of a small sample size.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Isolamento de Pacientes , Quartos de Pacientes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/transmissão , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Suíça/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitais Universitários
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(12): 1959-1965, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37424228

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing bacteria (CPB) in Switzerland by comparing risk factors between patients colonized with CPB and patients colonized with extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital Basel in Switzerland. Hospitalized patients with CPB in any sample between January 2008 and July 2019 were included. The ESBL-PE group consisted of hospitalized patients with detection of ESBL-PE from any sample between January 2016 and December 2018. Comparisons of risk factors for acquisition of CPB and ESBL-PE were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met for 50 patients in the CPB group and 572 in the ESBL-PE group. In the CPB group, 62% had a travel history and 60% had been hospitalized abroad. When comparing the CPB group to the ESBL-PE group, hospitalization abroad (odds ratio [OR], 25.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.07-57.98) and prior antibiotic therapy (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.15-10.55) remained independently associated with CPB colonization. Hospitalization abroad (P < .001) and prior antibiotic therapy (P < .001) predicted CPB in the comparison of CPB with ESBL Escherichia coli, whereas hospitalization abroad was associated with CPB in comparison to ESBL Klebsiella pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Although CPB still seem to be mainly imported from areas of higher endemicity, local acquisition of CPB is emerging, especially in patients with close and/or frequent contact with healthcare services. This trend resembles the epidemiology of ESBL K. pneumoniae, supporting mainly healthcare-associated transmission. Frequent evaluation of CPB epidemiology is required to improve detection of patients at risk of CPB carriage.


Assuntos
Bactérias , beta-Lactamases , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Fatores de Risco , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
6.
J Med Case Rep ; 16(1): 45, 2022 Jan 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35073976

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of clinical manifestations and differential diagnosis associated with coronavirus disease 2019 is broad, ranging from fever and cutaneous eruptions to respiratory distress or even neurological disorders. Coexisting multipathogen infections significantly increase the complexity of the proper diagnostic and therapeutic approach and correlate with the rate of intensive care unit admissions and in-hospital mortality. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of multipathogen respiratory infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, varicella zoster virus, and polymicrobial tracheobronchitis in a 48-year-old Caucasian male hospitalized after traumatic brain injury. The patient tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection upon admission. During his stay in the intensive care unit, the patient developed a vesicular exanthema along with respiratory failure and signs of septic shock. CONCLUSION: This case of an adult presenting with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and simultaneous primary varicella zoster virus infection illustrates the importance of considering coinfections in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 with unusual clinical manifestations.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Coinfecção , Herpes Zoster , Adulto , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventiladores Mecânicos
7.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 60, 2022 04 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35418099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of screening of contact patients (CoPat) after exposure to patients infected or colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively developed a new risk stratification for screening patients exposed to VRE, based on data from three outbreaks-two with Enterococcus faecium vanB and one with Enterococcus faecium vanA involving 1096 CoPat-in a low endemic setting. We classified them into four risk groups: three on environmental exposure, one by healthcare exposure: high (sharing the same room/bathroom with a VRE-colonized patient), medium (hospitalization in the same room after a VRE-colonized patient's discharge until terminal disinfection including ultraviolet C (UVc)-disinfection), low (hospitalized in the same room within three weeks before the VRE-colonized patient), and "staff" (screening of patients having the same medical care team). RESULTS: VRE-transmission occurred in 7.9% in the high-risk group compared to 0.6% and 0% in the medium and low risk groups. There was a significant trend to higher rates of transmission by risk level of exposure (p < 0.001). In the "staff" group, VRE transmission rate was 2.3%. CONCLUSION: Based on this stratification, we recommend to focus screening of exposed CoPat on the high-risk and "staff" group, saving resources and costs, but larger studies will allow to further improve the yield of VRE screening in the outbreak setting.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(2): ofab638, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35111868

RESUMO

Among 400 Aspergillus species from respiratory samples in Switzerland, Aspergillus fumigatus was the most frequent species. Non-fumigatus Aspergillus spp were more prevalent among solid organ transplant recipients and after azole exposure. Azole resistance was detected in 4 A fumigatus isolates, 3 of them with the "environmental" mutation TR34/L98H in the cyp51A gene.

9.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 10(1): 50, 2021 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden of antimicrobial resistance is high in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Among Swiss SOT recipients, we assessed temporal trends of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), identified risk factors for ESBL-E, and assessed the impact of resistance on patient outcome. METHODS: Data from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS), a nationwide prospective cohort of SOT-recipients, were analysed. Temporal trends were described for ESBL-detection among Escherichia coli and non-Escherichia coli. In a nested case-control study, cases with ESBL-E infection were 1:1 matched (by time since transplantation, organ transplant, pathogen) to controls infected with non-ESBL-E. Factors associated with resistance and with unfavourable 30-day outcome (death, infection relapse, graft loss) were assessed. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018, we identified 1'212 infection episodes caused by Enterobacterales in 1'074 patients, thereof 11.4% (138/1'212) caused by ESBL-E. The proportion of ESBL-production among Escherichia coli remained stable over time (p = 0.93) but increased for non-E. coli (p = 0.02) Enterobacterales. In the case-control study (n = 102), antibiotic pre-treatment was independently associated with ESBL-production (aOR = 2.6, 95%-CI: 1.0-6.8, p = 0.046). Unfavourable outcome occurred in 24/51 (47%) cases and 9/51 (18%) controls (p = 0.003). Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy was the only modifiable factor associated with unfavourable outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In Swiss SOT-recipients, proportion of infections with ESBL-producing non-E. coli Enterobacterales increased in recent years. Antibiotic pre-treatment represents a risk factor for ESBL-E. Improving appropriateness of empiric antibiotic treatment might be an important measure to reduce unfavourable outcome, which was observed in almost half of SOT-recipients with ESBL-E infections.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/mortalidade , Rejeição de Enxerto/microbiologia , Transplantados , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/complicações , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Órgãos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suíça , beta-Lactamases
10.
EClinicalMedicine ; 42: 101188, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34778734

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, no direct antiviral treatment is effective as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) was repurposed as a potential PEP agent against COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic open-label, parallel, cluster-randomised superiority trial in four sites in Switzerland and Brazil between March 2020 to March 2021. Clusters were randomised to receive LPV/r PEP (400/100 mg) twice daily for 5 days or no PEP (surveillance). Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 was defined as a close contact of >15 minutes in <2 metres distance or having shared a closed space for ≥2 hours with a person with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome is the occurrence of COVID-19 defined by a SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive oropharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR and/or a seroconversion) and ≥1 compatible symptom within 21 days post-enrolment. ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04364022); Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal: SNCTP 000003732. FINDINGS: Of 318 participants, 157 (49.4%) were women; median age was 39 (interquartile range, 28-50) years. A total of 209 (179 clusters) participants were randomised to LPV/r PEP and 109 (95 clusters) to surveillance. Baseline characteristics were similar, with the exception of baseline SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity, which was 3-fold more frequent in the LPV/r arm (34/209 [16.3%] vs 6/109 [5.5%], respectively). During 21-day follow-up, 48/318 (15.1%) participants developed COVID-19: 35/209 (16.7%) in the LPV/r group and 13/109 (11.9%) in the surveillance group (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.44; 95% CI, 0.76-2.73). In the primary endpoint analysis, which was adjuted for baseline imbalance, the hazard ratio for developing COVID-19 in the LPV/r group vs surveillance was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.29-1.26; p =0.18). INTERPRETATION: The role of LPV/r as PEP for COVID-19 remains unanswered. Although LPV/r over 5 days did not significantly reduce the incidence of COVID-19 in exposed individuals, we observed a change in the directionality of the effect in favour of LPV/r after adjusting for baseline imbalance. LPV/r for this indication merits further testing against SARS-CoV-2 in clinical trials. FUNDING: Swiss National Science Foundation (project no.: 33IC30_166819) and the Private Foundation of Geneva University Hospitals (Edmond Rothschild (Suisse) SA, Union Bancaire Privée and the Fondation pour la recherche et le traitement médical).

11.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 16(10): 2513-2517, 2020 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118514

RESUMO

YouTube has become a large source of health information, and it has the capacity to influence users: for instance, regarding their vaccination habits. The aim of our study was to analyze the characteristics of the videos published on YouTube about the meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB, Bexsero®). A search was made on YouTube using the keyword "Bexsero." The association between the authorship of videos (health professionals or others) and the rest of the variables (tone of the message and vaccination recommendations, among others) was evaluated using the Chi-square test. In total, 77 videos were analyzed; 74% supported the use of the vaccine, and the most frequently mentioned vaccination recommendations were in epidemic outbreaks (28.6%) and in children (18.2%). Depending on the type of authorship, significant differences were observed regarding the tone of the message and the frequency with which the videos discussed effectiveness, dosage, adverse effects, and vaccination recommendations. There is a difficulty in obtaining information on vaccination recommendations. Recommendations are very diverse since there is a great heterogeneity in the official recommendations for the use of this vaccine, depending on the country the information is from.


Assuntos
Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Neisseria meningitidis Sorogrupo B , Mídias Sociais , Criança , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Infecções Meningocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
12.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10714, 2020 Sep 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145123

RESUMO

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease with a highly variable clinical impact. Accurate prognostic evaluation is fundamental to establish the best therapeutic approach. Multiorgan disease and especially the involvement of vital organs, such as the heart, are associated with worse outcomes and often require more aggressive therapy. Here, we describe the case of a young adult with sarcoidosis with lymph node, pulmonary, hepatosplenic, and cardiac involvement. This clinical scenario emphasizes the importance of a thorough prognostic assessment and highlights some of the main unmet clinical needs for the risk stratification and management of these patients.

13.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e040110, 2020 11 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33184083

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) has been proposed as repurposed drugs for pre-exposure and postexposure prophylaxis as well as therapy of COVID-19. Coronavirus postexposure prophylaxis (COPEP) trial aims at assessing their efficacy as postexposure ring-prophylaxis among adults exposed to SARS-CoV-2. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: COPEP is a two-arm open-label cluster-randomised trial conducted in three cantons of Switzerland. Asymptomatic contacts (≥16 years) of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 will be randomised (2:1) to either LPV/r (400 mg/100 mg two times per day) for 5 days, or a standard of care arm (no treatment). Asymptomatic individuals may be either SARS-CoV-2 positive or negative. Contacts living in the single household will form a cluster and will be randomised into the same arm. All participants will be followed-up for 21 days and undergo daily monitoring for COVID-19 symptoms. The primary endpoint is 21-day incidence of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with ≥1 compatible symptom, analysed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The secondary endpoints include the 21-day incidence of COVID-19 as well as SARS-CoV-2 infection in a modified ITT analysis, excluding participants who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR from oropharyngeal swab and/or a positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG serology at baseline. Assuming a 21-day incidence for COVID-19 of 20% among contacts without postexposure chemoprophylaxis, to detect a relative risk reduction of 60% (ie, translating in an absolute reduction from 20% to 8%), with a power of 80%, an alpha of 5%. Accounting for design effect of cluster design of circa 1.1, we plan to enrol 200 participants to the LPV/r arm and 100 to the standard of care arm, 300 participants in total. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Commission Cantonale d'Ethique de la Recherche, Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz and Comitato Etico Cantonale (ref 2020-00864) and Swissmedic (2020DR3056). Results from this trial will be disseminated via journal articles and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov Registry (NCT04364022); Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal Registry (SNCTP 000003732). REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER: CCER 2020-0864.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Lopinavir/uso terapêutico , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Suíça
16.
Intern Emerg Med ; 12(5): 693-703, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27905006

RESUMO

Several guidelines often exist on the same topic, sometimes offering divergent recommendations. For the clinician, it can be difficult to understand the reasons for this divergence and how to select the right recommendations. The aim of this study is to compare different guidelines on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), and provide practical and affordable advice on its management in the acute setting. A PubMed search was performed in May 2014 to identify the three most recent and cited published guidelines on AF. During the 1-week school of the European School of Internal Medicine, the attending residents were divided in five working groups. The three selected guidelines were compared with five specific questions. The guidelines identified were: the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on AF, the Canadian guidelines on emergency department management of AF, and the American Heart Association guidelines on AF. Twenty-one relevant sub-questions were identified. For five of these, there was no agreement between guidelines; for three, there was partial agreement; for three data were not available (issue not covered by one of the guidelines), while for ten, there was complete agreement. Evidence on the management of AF in the acute setting is largely based on expert opinion rather than clinical trials. While there is broad agreement on the management of the haemodynamically unstable patient and the use of drugs for rate-control strategy, there is less agreement on drug therapy for rhythm control and no agreement on several other topics.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Guias como Assunto/normas , Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Cardioversão Elétrica/métodos , Cardioversão Elétrica/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos
17.
Immunol Res ; 61(1-2): 97-103, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25480740

RESUMO

Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) is defined by buds of granulation tissue within lung distal airspaces. The diagnosis requires the histopathologic evidence of organizing pneumonia along with a suggestive clinical and radiographic pattern. This disorder is characterized by a good response to corticosteroids and an excellent prognosis. It can occur in association with a broad spectrum of clinical conditions or can be isolated, in this last case named cryptogenic organizing pneumonia. We searched for BOOP in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) in the literature, and we found 32 well-documented cases. We reported here demographic features, manifestations, treatment and outcome of patients with BOOP associated with ARD. Notably, BOOP can be the presenting feature in some patients with ARD; thus, a close follow-up of patients with BOOP is recommended.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/complicações , Pneumonia em Organização Criptogênica/complicações , Pneumonia em Organização Criptogênica/diagnóstico , Doenças Reumáticas/complicações , Doenças Autoimunes/diagnóstico , Pneumonia em Organização Criptogênica/epidemiologia , Pneumonia em Organização Criptogênica/terapia , Humanos , Doenças Reumáticas/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA