RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the feasibility of a large RCT assessing the effectiveness of an accelerated oxytocin titration (AOT) protocol compared with a standard gradual oxytocin titration (GOT) in reducing the risk of CS in nulliparous women diagnosed with dystocia in the first stage of labour. The secondary objective was to obtain preliminary data on the safety and efficacy of the foregoing AOT protocol. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-masked, parallel-group pilot RCT. This study was conducted in three Canadian birthing centres. A total of 79 term nulliparous women carrying a singleton pregnancy in spontaneous labour, with a diagnosis of labour dystocia, were randomized to receive either GOT (initial dose 2 mU/min with increments of 2 mU/min) or AOT (initial dose 4 mU/min with increments of 4 mU/min), in a 1:1 ratio. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied. RESULTS: A total of 252 women were screened and approached, 137 (54.4%) consented, and 79 (31.3%) were randomized. Overall protocol adherence was 76 of 79 (96.2%). Of the women randomized, 10 (25.6%) allocated to GOT had a CS compared with six (15.0%) allocated to AOT (Fisher exact test P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated that a large, multicentre RCT is not only feasible, but also necessary to assess the effectiveness and safety of an AOT protocol for labour augmentation with regard to CS rate and indicators of maternal and perinatal morbidities.