Multicenter Performance Evaluation of Elecsys Anti-HBc II, Anti-HCV II, HIV combi PT, HBsAg II, and Syphilis Immunoassays.

BACKGROUND: The WHO recommends mandatory serological testing of blood donors for hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and syphilis. We evaluated the performance of Elecsys® infectious disease immunoassays against commercially available comparator assays. METHODS: Prospective, routine, anonymized patient or donor samples (n = 8,821) were analyzed at three German sites using Elecsys antihepatitis B core antigen (Anti-HBc II), Anti-HCV II, HIV combi PT, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg II), and Syphilis immunoassays (cobas e 411 analyzer) versus ARCHITECT comparator assays. RESULTS: The Elecsys immunoassays demonstrated comparable sensitivity (≤ 1.54% difference) and equivalent specificity (≤ 0.63% difference) to the respective ARCHITECT comparator assays. Overall sensitivity for the Elecsys and ARCHITECT infectious disease panels was 99.78% vs. 99.40%, respectively, and overall specificity was 99.74% vs. 99.80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Elecsys infectious disease immunoassays demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, which were similar to comparator assays, supporting their suitability for routine laboratory practice.

Laboratory testing in hemophilia: Impact of factor and non-factor replacement therapy on coagulation assays.

The advent of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant clotting factors and innovative non-factor replacement therapeutics, such as emicizumab, offers several advantages over existing products for the prophylactic treatment of people living with hemophilia (PwH). These include low annual bleeding rates with less frequent dosing, higher trough plasma concentrations, and a more convenient route of administration. However, increasing use of these therapies poses challenges to clinicians and coagulation laboratories due to the lack of standardized assays for monitoring of hemostatic parameters, and the potential for misinterpretation of test results, which may jeopardize patient safety. Definitive diagnosis of hemophilia and treatment monitoring is reliant on demonstrating factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; hemophilia B) deficiency using a functional coagulation assay. The most frequently used assays are based on activated partial thromboplastin time, using a one-stage or two-stage process. While one-stage and chromogenic assays have performed well with human-derived FVIII and FIX and full-length recombinant products, EHL recombinant factors are heterogeneous in structure and mode of action and therefore show wide variation in activity levels between different one-stage assays, and between one-stage and chromogenic assays. In the context of the recommended stepwise approach for laboratory diagnosis of hemophilia, we examine the diagnostic challenges associated with the use of EHL factors and novel non-factor therapeutics and consider the optimal diagnostic approach in PwH who are receiving these treatments. Ultimately, accurate diagnostic solutions are a prerequisite for personalized therapy to minimize treatment burden and improve quality of life in PwH.

Apolipoprotein-mediated transport of nanoparticle-bound drugs across the blood-brain barrier.

Recent studies have shown that drugs that are normally unable to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) following intravenous injection can be transported across this barrier by binding to poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles and coating with polysorbate 80. However, the mechanism of this transport so far was not known. In the present paper, the possible involvement of apolipoproteins in the transport of nanoparticle-bound drugs into the brain is investigated. Poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles loaded with the hexapeptide dalargin were coated with the apolipoproteins AII, B, CII, E, or J without or after precoating with polysorbate 80. In addition, loperamide-loaded nanoparticles were coated with apolipoprotein E alone or again after precoating with polysorbate 80. After intravenous injection to ICR mice the antinociceptive threshold was measured by the tail flick test. Furthermore, the antinociceptive threshold of polysorbate 80-coated dalargin-loaded nanoparticles was determined in ApoEtm1Unc and C57BL/6J mice. The results show that only dalargin or loperamide-loaded nanoparticles coated with polysorbate 80 and/or with apolipoprotein B or E were able to achieve an antinociceptive effect. This effect was significantly higher after polysorbate-precoating and apolipoprotein B or E-overcoating. With the apolipoprotein E-deficient ApoEtm1Unc mice the antinociceptive effect was considerably reduced in comparison to the C57BL/6J mice. These results suggest that apolipoproteins B and E are involved in the mediation of the transport of drugs bound to poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles across the BBB. Polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles adsorb these apolipoproteins from the blood after injection and thus seem to mimic lipoprotein particles that could be taken up by the brain capillary endothelial cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Bound drugs then may be further transported into the brain by diffusion following release within the endothelial cells or, alternatively, by transcytosis.

Direct evidence that polysorbate-80-coated poly(butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles deliver drugs to the CNS via specific mechanisms requiring prior binding of drug to the nanoparticles.

PURPOSE: [corrected] It has recently been suggested that the poly(butylcyanoacrylate) (PBCA) nanoparticle drug delivery system has a generalized toxic effect on the blood-brain barrier (BBB) (8) and that this effect forms the basis of an apparent enhanced drug delivery to the brain. The purpose of this study is to explore more fully the mechanism by which PBCA nanoparticles can deliver drugs to the brain. METHODS: Both in vivo and in vitro methods have been applied to examine the possible toxic effects of PBCA nanoparticles and polysorbate-80 on cerebral endothelial cells. Human, bovine, and rat models have been used in this study. RESULTS: In bovine primary cerebral endothelial cells, nontoxic levels of PBCA particles and polysorbate-80 did not increase paracellular transport of sucrose and inulin in the monolayers. Electron microscopic studies confirm cell viability. In vivo studies using the antinociceptive opioid peptide dalargin showed that both empty PBCA nanoparticles and polysorbate-80 did not allow dalargin to enter the brain in quantities sufficient to cause antinociception. Only dalargin preadsorbed to PBCA nanoparticles was able to induce an antinociceptive effect in the animals. CONCLUSION: At concentrations of PBCA nanoparticles and polysorbate-80 that achieve significant drug delivery to the brain, there is little in vivo or in vitro evidence to suggest that a generalized toxic effect on the BBB is the primary mechanism for drug delivery to the brain. The fact that dalargin has to be preadsorbed onto nanoparticles before it is effective in inducing antinociception suggests specific mechanisms of delivery to the CNS rather than a simple disruption of the BBB allowing a diffusional drug entry.