Evaluation and Utilization of Flow Artifacts at CT.

Flow artifacts are commonly encountered at contrast-enhanced CT and can be difficult to discern from true pathologic conditions. Therefore, radiologists must be comfortable distinguishing flow artifacts from true pathologic conditions. This is of particular importance when evaluating the pulmonary arteries and aorta, as a flow artifact may be mistaken for a pulmonary embolism or dissection flap. Understanding the mechanics of flow artifacts and how these artifacts are created can help radiologists in several ways. First, this knowledge can help radiologists appreciate how the imaging characteristics of flow artifacts differ from true pathologic conditions. This information can also help radiologists better recognize the clinical conditions that predispose patients to flow artifacts, such as pneumonia, chronic lung damage, and altered cardiac output. By understanding when flow artifacts may be confounding the interpretation of an examination, radiologists can then know when to pursue other troubleshooting methods to assist with the diagnosis. In these circumstances, the radiologist can consider several troubleshooting methods, including adjusting the imaging protocols, recommending when additional imaging may be helpful, and suggesting which imaging study would be the most beneficial. Finally, flow artifacts can also be used as a diagnostic tool when evaluating the vascular anatomy, examples of which include the characterization of shunts, venous collaterals, intimomedial flaps, and alternative patterns of blood flow, as seen in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Volumetric computed tomography measurements as predictors for outcomes in a cohort of Fournier's gangrene patients.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the prognostic value of CT findings, including volumetric measurements, in predicting outcomes for patients with Fournier gangrene (FG), focusing on mortality, ICU admission, hospital stay length, and healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 38 FG patients who underwent CT scans before surgical debridement. We analyzed demographic data, CT volumetric measurements, and clinical outcomes using logistic and linear regression models. RESULTS: No single CT measurement significantly predicted mortality or ICU admission. The best model for mortality prediction included age, air volume, NSTI score, and male sex, with an AUC of 0.911. Intubation likelihood was modeled with an AUC of 0.913 using age, NSTI score, and visceral to subcutaneous fat ratio. The ICU admission model achieved an AUC of 0.677. Hospital stay was predicted by air volume (ß = 0.0002656, p = 0.0505) with an adjusted R-squared of 0.1287. Air volume significantly predicted hospital costs (ß = 2.859, p = 0.00558), resulting in an adjusted R-squared of 0.2165. CONCLUSION: Volumetric CT findings provide valuable prognostic insights for FG patients, suggesting a basis for informed clinical decisions and resource allocation. Further validation in larger, multi-center studies is recommended to develop robust predictive models for FG outcomes.

CT Approach to Lung Injury.

Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), which represents the pathologic changes seen after acute lung injury, is caused by damage to all three layers of the alveolar wall and can ultimately result in alveolar collapse with loss of the normal pulmonary architecture. DAD has an acute phase that predominantly manifests as airspace disease at CT owing to filling of the alveoli with cells, plasma fluids, and hyaline membranes. DAD then evolves into a heterogeneous organizing phase, with mixed airspace and interstitial disease characterized by volume loss, architectural distortion, fibrosis, and parenchymal loss. Patients with DAD have a severe clinical course and typically require prolonged mechanical ventilation, which may result in ventilator-induced lung injury. In those patients who survive DAD, the lungs will remodel over time, but most will have residual findings at chest CT. Organizing pneumonia (OP) is a descriptive term for a histologic pattern characterized by intra-alveolar fibroblast plugs. The significance and pathogenesis of OP are controversial. Some authors regard it as part of a spectrum of acute lung injury, while others consider it a marker of acute or subacute lung injury. At CT, OP manifests with various forms of airspace disease that are most commonly bilateral and relatively homogeneous in appearance at individual time points. Patients with OP most often have a mild clinical course, although some may have residual findings at CT. In patients with DAD and OP, imaging findings can be combined with clinical information to suggest the diagnosis in many cases, with biopsy reserved for difficult cases with atypical findings or clinical manifestations. To best participate in the multidisciplinary approach to patients with lung injury, radiologists must not only recognize these entities but also describe them with consistent and meaningful terminology, examples of which are emphasized in the article. © RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Kligerman et al in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Preoperative computed tomography in Fournier's gangrene does not delay time to surgery.

PURPOSE: Fournier's gangrene (FG), a rapidly progressive necrotizing soft tissue infection of the external genitalia and perineum, necessitates urgent surgical debridement. The time to surgery effect of preoperative computed tomography (CT) in managing this condition is yet to be fully explored. The purpose of this study was to assess whether obtaining a preoperative CT in patients with FG impacts the time to surgical intervention. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent CT prior to surgical debridement of FG during a 9-year period vs patients who did not undergo CT. In 76 patients (male = 39, mean age = 51.8), 38 patients with FG received a preoperative CT, and 38 patients with FG did not receive CT prior to surgical debridement. Time to operating room and outcome metrics were compared between CT and non-CT groups. RESULTS: The time from hospital presentation to surgical intervention was not significantly different between patients who underwent CT and those who did not (6.65 ± 3.71 vs 5.73 ± 4.33 h, p = 0.37). There were also no significant differences in cost ($130,000 ± $102,000 vs $142,000 ± $152,000, p = 0.37), mortality (8 vs 7, p = 1), duration of hospital stay (15.5 ± 15 vs 15.7 ± 11.6 days, p = 0.95), average intensive care unit stay (5.82 ± 5.38 days vs 6.97 ± 8.58 days, p = 0.48), and APACHE score (12 ± 4.65 vs 13.9 ± 5.6, p =0.12). CONCLUSION: Obtaining a preoperative CT did not delay surgical intervention in patients with FG.

Subclavian Artery: Anatomic Review and Imaging Evaluation of Abnormalities.

The subclavian artery is an important structure that may be overlooked at CT of the chest and neck, in part because of its anatomic location at the periphery of the field of view but also because the clinical indication for CT examinations infrequently directs attention specifically to evaluation of the subclavian artery. As with all arteries, the subclavian artery has the potential to be involved in a variety of abnormalities, including pseudoaneurysms, dissections, stenosis or thrombosis, and vasculopathies. In addition, the subclavian artery can be secondarily involved as a collateral pathway because of an abnormality elsewhere. The subclavian artery may also be involved in surgical procedures to supply blood to other sites in the body or as an arterial access site. In these cases, recognizing the postsurgical appearance of the subclavian artery has become increasingly complex because of the use of the artery in an increasing number of procedures. Recognizing expected postoperative changes remains important to avoid mistaking them for abnormalities. The authors describe the imaging appearance of the normal anatomy of the subclavian artery and its anatomic variants, related abnormalities, and important postsurgical considerations. ©RSNA, 2022.

CT of the Difficult Acute Aortic Syndrome.

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is classically attributed to three underlying pathologic conditions-aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU). In the majority of cases, the basics of image interpretation are not difficult and have been extensively reviewed in the literature. In this article, the authors extend existing imaging overviews of AAS by highlighting additional factors related to the diagnosis, classification, and characterization of difficult AAS cases. It has been well documented that AAS is caused not only by an AD but by a spectrum of lesions that often have overlap in imaging features and are not clearly distinguishable. Specifically, phase of contrast enhancement, flow artifacts, and flapless AD equivalents can complicate diagnosis and are discussed. While the A/B dichotomy of the Stanford system is still used, the authors subsequently emphasize the Society for Vascular Surgery's new guidelines for the description of acute aortic pathologic conditions given the expanded use of endovascular techniques used in aortic repair. In the final section, atypical aortic rupture and pitfalls are described. As examples of pericardial and shared sheath rupture become more prevalent in the literature, it is important to recognize contrast material third-spacing and mediastinal blood as potential mimics. By understanding these factors related to difficult cases of AAS, the diagnostic radiologist will be able to accurately refine CT interpretation and thus provide information that is best suited to directing management. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

Imaging of Genetic Thoracic Aortopathy.

Aortopathy is a term most commonly used to describe a group of genetic diseases that predispose patients to an elevated risk of aortic events including aneurysm and acute aortic syndrome. Types of genetic aortopathy are classified as either heritable or congenital, with heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD) further subclassified into syndromic HTAD or nonsyndromic HTAD, the former of which is associated with specific phenotypic features. Radiologists may be the first physicians to encounter features of genetic aortopathy, either incidentally or at the time of an acute aortic event. Identifying patients with genetic aortopathy is of substantial importance to clinicians who manage thoracic aortic disease, because aortic diameter thresholds for surgical intervention are often lower than those for nongenetic aortopathy related to aging and hypertension. In addition, when reparative surgery is performed, the approach and extent of the repair may differ in patients with genetic aortopathy. The radiologist should also be familiar with competing diagnoses that can result in acute aortic events, mainly acquired inflammatory and noninflammatory thoracic aortic disease, because these conditions may be associated with increased risks of similar pathologic endpoints. Because many imaging and phenotypic features of various types of genetic aortopathy overlap, diagnosis and determination of appropriate follow-up recommendations can be challenging. A multidisciplinary approach with the use of imaging is often required and, once the diagnosis is made, imaging has additional importance because of the need for lifelong follow-up. ©RSNA, 2022.

Diagnostic and Imaging Approaches to Chest Wall Lesions.

Chest wall lesions are relatively uncommon and may be challenging once they are encountered on images. Radiologists may detect these lesions incidentally at examinations performed for other indications, or they may be asked specifically to evaluate a suspicious lesion. While many chest wall lesions have characteristic imaging findings that can result in an accurate diagnosis with use of imaging alone, other entities are difficult to distinguish at imaging because there is significant overlap among them. The interpreting radiologist should be familiar with the imaging features of both "do not touch" benign entities (which can be confidently diagnosed with imaging only, with no need for biopsy or resection unless the patient is symptomatic) and lesions that cannot be confidently characterized and thus require further workup. CT and MRI are the main imaging modalities used to assess the chest wall, with each having different benefits and drawbacks. Chest wall lesions can be classified according to their predominant composition: fat, calcification and ossification, soft tissue, or fluid. The identification or predominance of signal intensities or attenuation for these findings, along with the patient age, clinical history, and lesion location, can help establish the appropriate differential diagnosis. In addition, imaging findings in other organs, such as the lungs or upper abdomen, can at times provide clues to the underlying diagnosis. The authors review different chest wall lesions classified on the basis of their composition and highlight the imaging findings that can assist the radiologist in narrowing the differential diagnosis and guiding management. ©RSNA, 2022.

CT of Postoperative Repair of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch.

While many of the classic open surgical repairs are still used to repair the ascending aorta, management of the aortic arch has become more complex via implementation of newer open surgical and endovascular techniques. Furthermore, techniques are often combined in novel repairs or to allow extended anatomic coverage. As such, a framework that rests on understanding the expected postoperative appearance is necessary for the diagnostic radiologist to best interpret CT studies in these patients. After reviewing the imaging appearances of the common components used in proximal aortic repair, the authors present a structured approach that focuses on the key relevant questions that diagnostic radiologists should consider when interpreting CT studies in these patients. For repair of the ascending aorta, this includes determining whether the aortic valve has been repaired, whether the sinuses of Valsalva have been repaired, and how the coronary arteries were managed, when necessary. In repairs that involve the aortic arch, the relevant considerations relate to management of the arch vessels and the distal extent of the repair. In focusing on these questions, the diagnostic radiologist will be able to identify and describe the vast majority of repairs. Understanding these questions will also facilitate improved understanding of novel repairs, which often use these basic building blocks. Finally, complications-which typically involve infection, noninfectious repair breakdown, hemorrhage, problems with endografts, or disease of the remaining adjacent aorta-will be identifiable as deviations from the expected postoperative appearance. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

CT of Penetrating Abdominopelvic Trauma.

Penetrating abdominopelvic trauma usually results from abdominal cavity violation from a firearm injury or a stab wound and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality from traumatic injuries. Penetrating trauma can have subtle or complex imaging findings, posing a diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Contrast-enhanced CT is the modality of choice for evaluating penetrating injuries, with good sensitivity and specificity for solid-organ and hollow viscus injuries. Familiarity with the projectile kinetics of penetrating injuries is an important skill set for radiologists and aids in the diagnosis of both overt and subtle injuries. CT trajectography is a useful tool in CT interpretation that allows the identification of subtle injuries from the transfer of kinetic injury from the projectile to surrounding tissue. In CT trajectography, after the entry and exit wounds are delineated, the two points can be connected by placing cross-cursors and swiveling the cut planes obliquely in orthogonal planes to obtain a double-oblique orientation to visualize the wound track in profile. The path of the projectile and its ensuing damage is not always straight, and the imaging characteristics of free fluid of different attenuation in the abdomen (including hemoperitoneum) can support the diagnosis of visceral and vascular injuries. In addition, CT is increasingly used for evaluation of patients after damage control surgery and helps guide the management of injuries that were overlooked at surgery. An invited commentary by Paes and Munera is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

CT for Evaluation of Hemoptysis.

Hemoptysis, which is defined as expectoration of blood from the alveoli or airways of the lower respiratory tract, is an alarming clinical symptom with an extensive differential diagnosis. CT has emerged as an important noninvasive tool in the evaluation of patients with hemoptysis, and the authors present a systematic but flexible approach to CT interpretation. The first step in this approach involves identifying findings of parenchymal and airway hemorrhage. The second step is aimed at determining the mechanism of hemoptysis and whether a specific vascular supply can be implicated. Hemoptysis can have primary vascular and secondary vascular causes. Primary vascular mechanisms include chronic systemic vascular hypertrophy, focally damaged vessels, a dysplastic lung parenchyma with systemic arterial supply, arteriovenous malformations and fistulas, and bleeding at the capillary level. Evaluating vascular mechanisms of hemoptysis at CT also entails determining if a specific vascular source can be implicated. Although the bronchial arteries are responsible for most cases of hemoptysis, nonbronchial systemic arteries and the pulmonary arteries are important potential sources of hemoptysis that must be recognized. Secondary vascular mechanisms of hemoptysis include processes that directly destroy the lung parenchyma and processes that directly invade the airway. Understanding and employing this approach allow the diagnostic radiologist to interpret CT examinations accurately in patients with hemoptysis and provide information that is best suited to directing subsequent treatment. ©RSNA, 2021.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Thoracic Vasculature: Technique and Applications.

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a powerful clinical tool for evaluation of the thoracic vasculature. MRA can be performed on nearly any magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, and provides images of high diagnostic quality without the use of ionizing radiation. While computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is preferred in the evaluation of hemodynamically unstable patients, MRA represents an important tool for evaluation of the thoracic vasculature in stable patients. Contrast-enhanced MRA is generally performed unless there is a specific contraindication, as it shortens the duration of the exam and provides images of higher diagnostic quality than noncontrast MRA. However, intravenous contrast is often not required to obtain a diagnostic evaluation for most clinical indications. Indeed, a variety of noncontrast MRA techniques are used for thoracic imaging, often in conjunction with contrast-enhanced MRA, each of which has a differing degree of reliance on flowing blood to produce the desired vascular signal. In this article we review contrast-enhanced MRA, with a focus on contrast agents, methods of bolus timing, and considerations in imaging acquisition. Next, we cover the mechanism of contrast, strengths, and weaknesses of various noncontrast MRA techniques. Finally, we present an approach to protocol development and review representative protocols used at our institution for a variety of thoracic applications. Further attention will be devoted to additional techniques employed to address specific clinical questions, such as delayed contrast-enhanced imaging, provocative maneuvers, electrocardiogram and respiratory gating, and phase-contrast imaging. The purpose of this article is to review basic techniques and methodology in thoracic MRA, discuss an approach to protocol development, and illustrate commonly encountered pathology on thoracic MRA examinations. Level of Evidence 5 Technical Efficacy Stage 3.

Imaging Findings of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury.

To listen to the podcast associated with this article, please select one of the following: iTunes or Google Play. OBJECTIVE. E-cigarettes are devices that aerosolize nicotine- or cannabis-based concentrates mixed with other solvents and have been marketed as an alternative to cigarettes. E-cigarette use, or vaping, is increasingly popular but has not been proven to be an innocuous substitute for traditional smoking. Several patterns of vaping-associated inhalational lung injuries have been reported in the past few years. This article reviews many of the imaging patterns that have been encountered in association with e-cigarette use. CONCLUSION. E-cigarette use is associated with a range of lung injury patterns that have only recently been recognized as use of these products continues to rise. When the radiologist sees one of these patterns of lung injury, it is important to raise the possibility of vaping-induced lung injury because cessation of vaping is an important step in treatment.

Chest CT and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Critical Review of the Literature to Date.

OBJECTIVE. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Studies in the radiology literature have suggested that CT might be sufficiently sensitive and specific in diagnosing COVID-19 when used in lieu of a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test; however, this suggestion runs counter to current society guidelines. The purpose of this article is to critically review some of the most frequently cited studies on the use of CT for detecting COVID-19. CONCLUSION. To date, the radiology literature on COVID-19 has consisted of limited retrospective studies that do not substantiate the use of CT as a diagnostic test for COVID-19.

Noninfectious Granulomatous Diseases of the Chest.

Granulomas are pathologically defined as focal aggregations of activated macrophages, Langerhans cells, and lymphocytes. Granulomas form in the lungs when the immune system barricades the substances it perceives as foreign but is unable to remove. Granulomas manifest with numerous imaging appearances in thoracic radiology, and their presence is a nonspecific finding. Granulomatous lung diseases comprise multiple entities with variable clinical manifestations and outcomes. Their imaging findings are rarely specific and can mimic malignancies, often triggering an extensive diagnostic workup. Radiologists must be familiar with the clinical manifestations and imaging findings of these entities to generate appropriate differential diagnoses. This review describes the imaging manifestations of various noninfectious, necrotizing, and nonnecrotizing granulomatous diseases that primarily affect the thorax. ©RSNA, 2020.

Fournier Gangrene in Men and Women: Appearance on CT, Ultrasound, and MRI and What the Surgeon Wants to Know.

Fournier gangrene (FG) is a genitourinary necrotizing fasciitis that can be lethal if not promptly diagnosed and surgically debrided. The diagnosis is often made by physical examination paired with an appropriate clinical suspicion and supporting laboratory values. Imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), plays a role in delineating involved fascial planes for operative debridement and occasionally in diagnosing FG. Less commonly, the imaging manifestations of FG may also be seen on ultrasound, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. With the ubiquitous use and availability of CT, radiologists have a growing role in recognizing FG. This can be challenging in the absence of fascial gas, but a CT scoring system for necrotizing fasciitis can be helpful in making the diagnosis. Recent series suggest that this predominantly male disease has a rising incidence in women. Women with FG are more likely to be morbidly obese and have vulvar or labial involvement compared to men. Imaging mimics include ulcerative and necrotic tumors, traumatic or iatrogenic fascial gas, and vaginitis emphysematosa. The purpose of this pictorial review is to illustrate the imaging manifestations of FG and its mimics, with emphases on necrotizing fasciitis CT scoring systems and FG in women.

Building blocks for thoracic MRI: Challenges, sequences, and protocol design.

Thoracic MRI presents important and unique challenges. Decreased proton density in the lung in combination with respiratory and cardiac motion can degrade image quality and render poorly executed sequences uninterpretable. Despite these challenges, thoracic MRI has an important clinical role, both as a problem-solving tool and in an increasing array of clinical indications. Advances in scanner and sequence design have also helped to drive this development, presenting the radiologist with improved techniques for thoracic MRI. Given this evolving landscape, radiologists must be familiar with what thoracic MR has to offer. The first step in developing an effective thoracic MRI practice requires the creation of efficient and malleable protocols that can answer clinical questions. To do this, radiologists must have a working knowledge of the MR sequences that are used in the thorax, many of which have been adapted from use elsewhere in the body. These sequences can be broadly divided into three categories: traditional/anatomic, functional, and cine based. Traditional/anatomic sequences allow for the depiction of anatomy and pathologic processes with the ability for characterization of signal intensity and contrast enhancement. Functional sequences, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and high temporal resolution dynamic contrast enhancement, allow for the noninvasive measurement of tissue-specific parameters. Cine-based sequences can depict the motion of structures in the thorax, either with retrospective ECG gating or in real time. The purpose of this article is to review these categories, the building block sequences that comprise them, and identify basic questions that should be considered in thoracic MRI protocol design. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:682-701.

CT of Gastric Volvulus: Interobserver Reliability, Radiologists' Accuracy, and Imaging Findings.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify CT findings and determine interobserver reliability of surgically proven gastric volvulus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 30 patients (21 women, nine men; mean age, 73 years old) with surgically proven gastric volvulus who underwent preoperative CT and 31 age- and sex-matched control subjects (21 women, nine men; mean age, 74 years old) with large hiatal hernias who were imaged for reasons other than abdominal pain. Two blinded radiologists reviewed the CT images and recorded findings of organoaxial and mesenteroaxial gastric volvulus and ischemia. Interobserver reliability, reader accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of each CT finding were calculated. RESULTS: The radiologists were overall 90% accurate (55/61; six false-negatives per reader) in identifying gastric volvulus. Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.71) for identifying the presence or absence of gastric volvulus. Agreement for most CT findings of gastric volvulus (11/14, 79%) was excellent (5/14, 36%) or substantial (6/14, 43%); the remaining findings showed moderate agreement (3/14, 21%). The most frequent and sensitive CT findings of volvulus with high positive likelihood ratios were stenosis at the hernia neck (reader 1, sensitivity = 80%, positive likelihood ratio = 26.66; reader 2, sensitivity = 77%, positive likelihood ratio = 12.83) and transition point at the pylorus (reader 1, sensitivity = 80%, positive likelihood ratio = 17; reader 2, sensitivity = 70%, positive likelihood ratio = 15). The presence of perigastric fluid or a pleural effusion were significantly more frequent in patients with ischemia at surgical pathology (p < 0.05 in all comparisons, both radiologists). CONCLUSION: In our series, CT showed substantial interobserver agreement and fair accuracy in identifying the presence of gastric volvulus.

In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Imaging: Applications of Chemical Shift and Magnetic Susceptibility in the Chest and Abdomen.

An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on December 17, 2018.