Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area. RESULTS: This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures. CONCLUSIONS: DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

Navigating the Complexities of Symptomatic Hydronephrosis in Pregnancy.

The management of symptomatic hydronephrosis presents substantial challenges due to the absence of consensus within clinical guidelines concerning pain management, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic interventions, and follow-up protocols. This literature review focuses on complexities involving diagnostic challenges that arise from the difficulty in distinguishing physiological from pathological obstruction and treatment complexities that involve deciding on the most appropriate pain management medications and safe interventions while minimizing risks to both the mother and foetus. To address these challenges, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, was conducted for the terms "hydronephrosis", "hydronephrosis in pregnancy", "ionising radiation in pregnancy", and "safe analgesia in pregnancy". Moreover, Mendeley software was used to collect and organize the references. Diagnostic complexities involve selecting the appropriate imaging modality that balances accurate diagnosis with minimal radiation to the foetus. Ultrasound remains the first-line option. However, it has limitations in delineating the underlying aetiology. MRI avoids ionizing radiation but has restricted utility due to foetal movement artifacts. CT provides the highest diagnostic accuracy but raises foetal radiation exposure concerns, though ultra-low dose protocols (<1 mGy) are deemed acceptable by most guidelines. Management includes either a conservative approach, which is a safe option in the majority of cases, or intervention with a percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteric stent insertion, both with comparable symptom control. However, there is no consensus on the optimal frequency for drain changes to prevent rapid encrustation. Definitive procedures like ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomies remain controversial. Most guidelines suggest limiting these interventions to specialist centres during the second trimester if required.

Aspirin Compared to Other Thromboprophylactic Agents in Patients Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common but major surgery performed in the United Kingdom and around the globe. THA is associated with several postoperative complications, with one of the most common being venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the form of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE following orthopaedic surgery can have major consequences in terms of patient morbidity and may even cause mortality. It carries a significant cost to the health service, and thromboprophylactic agents are used to decrease the risk. Several different options are available for chemical thromboprophylaxis, including aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and warfarin. This study aims to review the literature to determine if aspirin is less superior to the other available chemical thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients following THA. The primary outcome assessed in this review is rates of symptomatic 90-day VTE in the form of PE or DVT. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the following terms: 'Aspirin AND (low molecular weight heparin OR LMWH OR Enoxaparin OR Apixaban OR DOAC OR direct oral anticoagulant OR warfarin) AND (orthopaedic OR orthopedic) AND (Total hip replacement OR THR OR THA OR total hip arthroplasty) AND ('venous thromboembolism' OR VTE).' Aspirin appears to have promising results as thromboprophylaxis in cases of THA. However, it is still up for debate as to whether it is non-inferior to other forms of thromboprophylaxis.

Selective Histopathology Examination for Circumcision Specimens: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background Circumcision is a widely performed surgical procedure all over the globe. This can be for religious, cultural, or medical reasons. Routine histological examination of circumcision specimens is a standard practice in many healthcare systems, despite the relatively low incidence of premalignant or malignant lesions. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the necessity of routine histopathological examination of foreskin specimens following adult circumcision. Secondary objectives included determining the frequency of malignancy in these specimens, comparing malignancy rates between clinically suspicious and non-suspicious cases, and assessing the correlation between preoperative clinical suspicion and histopathological findings. Aim This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of routine histopathological evaluation for the foreskin after circumcision. We investigated the frequency of malignancy upon histopathological examination, in clinically suspicious cases compared to non-suspicious cases. Method A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, analyzing data from 334 consecutive adult male patients who underwent circumcision between January 2012 and December 2016. The cohort was retrospectively divided into two groups: those with preoperative suspicious clinical features and those without it. Clinical records on electronic patient records (EPR) were used for follow-up and to identify the percentage of malignancy after final histopathological examinations in both groups. Results Among the 334 patients, only nine patients (2.7%) were deemed as having suspicious clinical features preoperatively, of which, only three (0.9% of the total study sample) showed malignancy upon histological examination. The other six patients in this group were found to have balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO). The other 325 patients (97.3%) were without clinically suspicious lesions preoperatively, and none were found to have any malignant lesions upon histopathological examination. Conclusion The low incidence of malignancy in circumcision specimens indicates that routine histological examination may not be essential for all cases. Among 334 samples, only three (0.9%) were malignant, and all were clinically suspected. Routine histopathological examination of the remaining 331 cases did not impact management or follow-up. Selectively submitting specimens for histology based on clinical suspicion could reduce opportunity costs and time, optimize resource allocation, and maintain appropriate diagnostic evaluation.

The Oncologic Outcomes of Bilateral Central Lymph Node Dissection in Unilobar Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Its Risks: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background Indications for performing a prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remain controversial. Thyroidectomy and central neck dissection (CND) are often recommended in all cases with proven differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and clinically positive lymph nodes (LNs), as well as in high risk for micro-metastasis patients with T3-T4 tumors or established metastatic nodes in the lateral compartments. Aims The aims of this study were to ascertain the role of performing bilateral central LN dissection in unilobar PTC in improving the oncological outcomes and outline the risks involved. Methods This was a department-based, prospective cohort study. We included all 20 patients who had unilobar PTC and underwent total thyroidectomy with bilateral CND. A postoperative histopathological analysis was used to identify metastatic central LNs. Results Twenty total thyroidectomies plus bilateral CNDs were performed, of which 10 were prophylactic bilaterally (those with N0), and all 20 were prophylactic on the contralateral side of PTC. Conventional risk factors (age, tumor size, and extrathyroidal extension) were not associated with performing a pCND. The presence of unilobar PTC by preoperative FNAC was the only factor associated with performing bilateral CND. Positive ipsilateral LNs were retrieved in 55% of CNDs, while positive contralateral LNs were retrieved in only 15% of the patients. Conclusions The incidence of contralateral cervical LN metastasis in patients with unilateral PTC is low, while there is clear evidence of postoperative morbidity from routine contralateral CND in unilobar PTC. Contralateral CND in patients with unilobar PTC may be reserved for high-risk patients: males, those aged ≤45 years, tumors larger than 1.0 cm, and cases with extrathyroidal extension and micro-calcification on ultrasound.

Paediatric Septic Arthritis of the Hip and the Efficacy of Kocher's Criteria: A Literature Review.

Pediatric septic arthritis (SA), an intra-articular infection in children, is considered a surgical emergency. The most commonly affected joints are the lower limb joints. It is more common in children below five years old and in males. Several scoring systems aid in the prediction of the disease and help differentiate it from similar differential diagnoses (such as transient synovitis (TS)). The first and most famous scoring system is Kocher's Criteria (KC), which utilizes a mixture of clinical signs, symptoms, and laboratory markers to predict the likelihood of the diagnosis. This review aims to assess the current literature to look at primary papers comparing the predicted probability of KC to the original probability described therefore evaluating its efficacy and usefulness in today's pediatric population. PubMed was searched using the terms "septic arthritis AND hip AND (Kocher OR Kocher's criteria)," 27 studies resulted, and each study was screened by reading the abstracts. Six studies were included in this review. Inclusion criteria were any study that looked at SA of the hip in the pediatric population prospectively or retrospectively, using KC to help make a diagnosis and looking at the predicted probability of KC. Exclusion criteria included studies looking at adults, joints other than the hip, and papers not assessing the predicted probability. The efficacy of KC for diagnosing SA is not well-supported by current literature. Studies indicate that KC have low specificity for SA, suggesting it should not replace arthrocentesis as the diagnostic gold standard. Clinicians should use this model cautiously, and more extensive, prospective studies are needed to validate its effectiveness.

Incidence of Infection Following Local Anesthetic Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Centre Experience.

Background Local anesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy (LATP) is a widely used diagnostic procedure for prostate cancer. As a diagnostic procedure, it should carry minimal risk. However, morbidity resulting from prostate biopsy is frequent. Prostate biopsy, like any other intervention, carries a significant risk of various infections, ranging from urinary tract infections (UTIs) to potentially life-threatening conditions like sepsis. Aim This study examined the rate of infections following a prostate biopsy at a single center and sought to identify risk factors that could increase the likelihood of developing an infection. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on all 168 patients who underwent LATP biopsy between 01/04/2022 and 01/04/2023. Data were collected from the Clinical Record and Reporting System (CRRS). Patient characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, the main indication for the biopsy, number of cores taken, antibiotic prophylaxis, and comorbidities were analyzed. The inclusion criteria encompassed all patients receiving this procedure within the specified timeframe, without restrictions on age, underlying health conditions, or medical history. No exclusion criteria were applied, aiming to comprehensively analyze and capture the full spectrum of patient outcomes and characteristics associated with these biopsies during the study period. Results In terms of socio-demographics, all patients were male with an average age (mean) of 65.5 years, a mean PSA level of 13.9 ng/dL, and an average prostate volume of 66.1 mL. On average, 23.2 biopsy cores were taken. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis, mainly ciprofloxacin. Despite this, 1.78% of patients (n=3) developed post-biopsy infections. Two of these patients had diabetes mellitus, and two had a large prostate volume of 95 mL.