Semaglutide versus placebo in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: In the STEP-HFpEF (NCT04788511) and STEP-HFpEF DM (NCT04916470) trials, the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide improved symptoms, physical limitations, bodyweight, and exercise function in people with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In this prespecified pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, we aimed to provide a more definitive assessment of the effects of semaglutide across a range of outcomes and to test whether these effects were consistent across key patient subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a prespecified pooled analysis of individual patient data from STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials at 129 clinical research sites in 18 countries. In both trials, eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 45%, a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2, New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, and a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS; a measure of heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations) of less than 90 points. In STEP-HFpEF, people with diabetes or glycated haemoglobin A1c concentrations of at least 6·5% were excluded, whereas for inclusion in STEP-HFpEF DM participants had to have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at least 90 days before screening and to have an HbA1c of 10% or lower. In both trials, participants were randomly assigned to either 2·4 mg semaglutide once weekly or matched placebo for 52 weeks. The dual primary endpoints were change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS and bodyweight in all randomly assigned participants. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 52 in 6-min walk distance, a hierarchical composite endpoint (all-cause death, heart failure events, and differences in changes in KCCQ-CSS and 6-min walk distance); and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations. Heterogeneity in treatment effects was assessed across subgroups of interest. We assessed safety in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. FINDINGS: Between March 19, 2021 and March 9, 2022, 529 people were randomly assigned in STEP-HFpEF, and between June 27, 2021 and Sept 2, 2022, 616 were randomly assigned in STEP-HFpEF DM. Overall, 1145 were included in our pooled analysis, 573 in the semaglutide group and 572 in the placebo group. Improvements in KCCQ-CSS and reductions in bodyweight between baseline and week 52 were significantly greater in the semaglutide group than in the placebo group (mean between-group difference for the change from baseline to week 52 in KCCQ-CSS 7·5 points [95% CI 5·3 to 9·8]; p<0·0001; mean between-group difference in bodyweight at week 52 -8·4% [-9·2 to -7·5]; p<0·0001). For the confirmatory secondary endpoints, 6-min walk distance (mean between-group difference at week 52 17·1 metres [9·2 to 25·0]) and the hierarchical composite endpoint (win ratio 1·65 [1·42 to 1·91]) were significantly improved, and CRP concentrations (treatment ratio 0·64 [0·56 to 0·72]) were significantly reduced, in the semaglutide group compared with the placebo group (p<0·0001 for all comparisons). For the dual primary endpoints, the efficacy of semaglutide was largely consistent across multiple subgroups, including those defined by age, race, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, baseline CRP, and left ventricular ejection fraction. 161 serious adverse events were reported in the semaglutide group compared with 301 in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: In this prespecified pooled analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials, semaglutide was superior to placebo in improving heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations, and reducing bodyweight in participants with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. These effects were largely consistent across patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Semaglutide was well tolerated. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Semaglutide and Diuretic Use in Obesity-Related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Pooled Analysis of the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the STEP-HFpEF trial program, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. METHODS: In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n=1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. RESULTS: At baseline, across no diuretic (n=220), non-loop diuretic only (n=223), and loop diuretic (<40 [n=219], 40 [n=309], and >40 [n=174] mg/day furosemide-equivalents) groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from -8.8% [95% CI -10.3, -6.3] to -6.9% [95% CI -9.1, -4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P=0.39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P=0.042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6-min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P=0.24-0.92). Safety also favored semaglutide versus placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P<0.0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P<0.001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide versus placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION: NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.

Effect of semaglutide on kidney function across different levels of baseline HbA1c, blood pressure, body weight and albuminuria in SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: This post-hoc analysis explored the semaglutide effects on eGFR slope by baseline glycemic control, blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), and albuminuria status in people with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Pooled SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 data were analyzed for change in estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) slope by baseline HbA1c (<8%/≥8%; <64 mmol/mol/≥64 mmol/mol), systolic BP (<140/90 mmHg/≥140/90 mmHg), and BMI (<30 kg/m2/≥30 kg/m2). SUSTAIN 6 data were analyzed by baseline urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR; <30/30 - 300/>300 mg/g). RESULTS: The estimated absolute treatment differences (ETD) overall in eGFR slope [95% confidence intervals] favored semaglutide versus placebo in the pooled analysis (0.59 [0.29;0.89] mL/min/1.73m2/year) and in SUSTAIN 6 (0.60 [0.24;0.96] mL/min/1.73m2/year); the absolute benefit was consistent across all HbA1c, BP, BMI, and UACR subgroups (all p-interaction > 0.5). CONCLUSION: A clinically meaningful reduction in risk of chronic kidney disease progression was observed with semaglutide versus placebo regardless of HbA1c, BP, BMI, and UACR levels.

Wireless continuous single-lead ST-segment monitoring to detect new-onset myocardial injury at the general ward-An exploratory subanalysis.

Patients admitted for acute medical conditions and major noncardiac surgery are at risk of myocardial injury. This is frequently asymptomatic, especially in the context of concomitant pain and analgesics, and detection thus relies on cardiac biomarkers. Continuous single-lead ST-segment monitoring from wireless electrocardiogram (ECG) may enable more timely intervention, but criteria for alerts need to be defined to reduce false alerts. This study aimed to determine optimal ST-deviation thresholds from wireless single-lead ECG for detection of myocardial injury following major abdominal cancer surgery and during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients were monitored with a wireless single-lead ECG patch for up to 4 days and had daily troponin measurements. Single-lead ST-segment deviations of <0.255 mV and/or >0.245 mV (based on previous study comparison with 0.1 mV 12-lead ECG and variation in single-lead ECG) were analyzed for relation to myocardial injury defined as hsTnT elevation of 20-64 ng/L with an absolute change of ≥5 ng/L, or a hsTnT level ≥ 65 ng/L. In total, 528 patients were included for analysis, of which 15.5% had myocardial injury. For corrected ST-thresholds lasting ≥10 and ≥ 20 min, we found specificities of 91% and 94% and sensitivities of 17% and 13% with odds ratios of 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1; 3.9) and 2.4 (95% CI: 1.1; 5.1) for myocardial injury. In conclusion, wireless single-lead ECG monitoring with corrected ST thresholds detected patients developing myocardial injury with specificities >90% and sensitivities <20%, suggesting increased focus on sensitivity improvement.

Probing Activation and Conformational Dynamics of the Vesicle-Reconstituted ß2 Adrenergic Receptor at the Single-Molecule Level.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are structurally flexible membrane proteins that mediate a host of physiological responses to extracellular ligands like hormones and neurotransmitters. Fine features of their dynamic structural behavior are hypothesized to encode the functional plasticity seen in GPCR activity, where ligands with different efficacies can direct the same receptor toward different signaling phenotypes. Although the number of GPCR crystal structures is increasing, the receptors are characterized by complex and poorly understood conformational landscapes. Therefore, we employed a fluorescence microscopy assay to monitor conformational dynamics of single ß2 adrenergic receptors (ß2ARs). To increase the biological relevance of our findings, we decided not to reconstitute the receptor in detergent micelles but rather lipid membranes as proteoliposomes. The conformational dynamics were monitored by changes in the intensity of an environmentally sensitive boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY 493/503) fluorophore conjugated to an endogenous cysteine (located at the cytoplasmic end of the sixth transmembrane helix of the receptor). Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) and a single small unilamellar liposome assay that we previously developed, we followed the real-time dynamic properties of hundreds of single ß2ARs reconstituted in a native-like environment─lipid membranes. Our results showed that ß2AR-BODIPY fluctuates between several states of different intensity on a time scale of seconds, compared to BODIPY-lipid conjugates that show almost entirely stable fluorescence emission in the absence and presence of the full agonist BI-167107. Agonist stimulation changes the ß2AR dynamics, increasing the population of states with higher intensities and prolonging their durations, consistent with bulk experiments. The transition density plot demonstrates that ß2AR-BODIPY, in the absence of the full agonist, interconverts between states of low and moderate intensity, while the full agonist renders transitions between moderate and high-intensity states more probable. This redistribution is consistent with a mechanism of conformational selection and is a promising first step toward characterizing the conformational dynamics of GPCRs embedded in a lipid bilayer.

Effects of Once-Weekly Semaglutide on Kidney Disease Outcomes by KDIGO Risk Category in the SUSTAIN 6 Trial.

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are recommended by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) as risk-based treatment for hyperglycemia, weight management, and cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess treatment effects of once weekly semaglutide on kidney disease outcomes by KDIGO risk category and on changes in KDIGO risk category, compared with placebo. Methods: Participants with T2D and established CV disease or at high CV risk treated with once weekly semaglutide or placebo in SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446) were stratified by baseline KDIGO risk category (low [n = 1596], moderate [n = 831], high [n = 445], very high [n = 366]). Treatment effect was analyzed for a kidney disease composite end point (macroalbuminuria, serum creatinine doubling and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, or death due to kidney disease) from baseline to 2 years. Results: The treatment effect of semaglutide versus placebo was consistent across KDIGO categories for the kidney disease composite end point (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.35 [0.07-1.72], 0.42 [0.25-0.72], 0.87 [0.45-1.71], and 0.72 [0.42-1.23] for low, moderate, high, and very high risk categories, respectively; P interaction = 0.28). Participants receiving semaglutide were more likely to move to a lower KDIGO risk category (odds ratio: 1.69; 95% CI: [1.32-2.16]) and less likely to move to a higher KDIGO risk category versus placebo (odds ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.59-0.86]). Conclusion: Once weekly semaglutide versus placebo reduced risks of kidney disease end points and improved risk categories irrespective of baseline KDIGO risk.

Effects of semaglutide with and without concomitant SGLT2 inhibitor use in participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the FLOW trial.

People with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease have a high risk for kidney failure and cardiovascular (CV) complications. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) independently reduce CV and kidney events. The effect of combining both is unclear. FLOW trial participants with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease were stratified by baseline SGLT2i use (N = 550) or no use (N = 2,983) and randomized to semaglutide/placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure, ≥50% estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction, kidney death or CV death. The risk of the primary outcome was 24% lower in all participants treated with semaglutide versus placebo (95% confidence interval: 34%, 12%). The primary outcome occurred in 41/277 (semaglutide) versus 38/273 (placebo) participants on SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.69, 1.67; P = 0.755) and in 290/1,490 versus 372/1,493 participants not taking SGLT2i at baseline (hazard ratio 0.73; 0.63, 0.85; P < 0.001; P interaction 0.109). Three confirmatory secondary outcomes were predefined. Treatment differences favoring semaglutide for total estimated glomerular filtration rate slope (ml min-1/1.73 m2/year) were 0.75 (-0.01, 1.5) in the SGLT2i subgroup and 1.25 (0.91, 1.58) in the non-SGLT2i subgroup, P interaction 0.237. Semaglutide benefits on major CV events and all-cause death were similar regardless of SGLT2i use (P interaction 0.741 and 0.901, respectively). The benefits of semaglutide in reducing kidney outcomes were consistent in participants with/without baseline SGLT2i use; power was limited to detect smaller but clinically relevant effects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03819153 .

The effect of technical filtering and clinical criteria on alert rates from continuous vital sign monitoring in the general ward.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous vital sign monitoring at the general hospital ward has major potential advantages over intermittent monitoring but generates many alerts with risk of alert fatigue. We hypothesized that the number of alerts would decrease using different filters. METHODS: This study was an exploratory analysis of the alert reducing effect from adding two different filters to continuously collected vital sign data (peripheral oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate) in patients admitted after major surgery or severe medical disease. Filtered data were compared to data without artifact removal. Filter one consists of artifact removal, filter two consists of artifact removal plus duration criteria adjusted for severity of vital sign deviation. Alert thresholds were based on the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) threshold. RESULTS: A population of 716 patients admitted for severe medical disease or major surgery with continuous wireless vital sign monitoring at the general ward with a mean monitoring time of 75.8 h, were included for the analysis. Without artifact removal, we found a median of 137 [IQR: 87-188] alerts per patient/day, artifact removal resulted in a median of 101 [IQR: 56-160] alerts per patient/day and with artifact removal combined with a duration-severity criterion, we found a median of 19 [IQR: 9-34] alerts per patient/day. Reduction of alerts was 86.4% (p < 0.001) for values without artifact removal (137 alerts) vs. the duration criteria and a reduction (19 alerts) of 81.5% (p < 0.001) for the criteria with artifact removal (101 alerts) vs. the duration criteria (19 alerts). CONCLUSION: We conclude that a combination of artifact removal and duration-severity criteria approach substantially reduces alerts generated by continuous vital sign monitoring.