Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(1): 104463, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740027

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke often results in motor impairment and limited functional capacity. This study aimed to verify the relationship between widely used clinical scales and instrumented measurements to evaluate poststroke individuals with mild, moderate, and severe motor impairment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 34 participants with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Modified Ashworth Scale were used to quantify upper and lower limb motor impairment and the resistance to passive movement (i.e., spasticity), respectively. Upper limb Motor performance (movement time and velocities) and movement quality (range of motion, smoothness and trunk displacement) were analyzed during a reaching forward task using an optoelectronic system (instrumented measurement). Lower limb motor performance (gait and functional mobility parameters) was assessed by using an inertial measurement unit system. FINDINGS: Fugl-Meyer Assessment correlated with motor performance (upper and lower limbs) and with movement quality (upper limb). Modified Ashworth scale correlated with movement quality (upper limb). Cutoff values of 9.0 cm in trunk anterior displacement and .57 m/s in gait velocity were estimated to differentiate participants with mild/moderate and severe compromise according to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the Fugl-Meyer Assessment can be used to infer about motor performance and movement quality in chronic poststroke individuals with different levels of impairment.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Atividade Motora , Paresia/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paresia/etiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Paresia/reabilitação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 64(1): 101388, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376404

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the paretic peroneal nerve has positive clinical effects on foot drop secondary to stroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of FES applied to the paretic peroneal nerve on gait speed, active ankle dorsiflexion mobility, balance, and functional mobility. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for articles published from inception to January 2020. We included randomized controlled trials or crossover trials focused on determining the effects of FES combined or not with other therapies in individuals with foot drop after stroke. Characteristics of studies, participants, comparison groups, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. RESULTS: We included 14 studies providing data for 1115 participants. FES did not enhance gait speed as compared with conventional treatments (i.e., supervised/unsupervised exercises and regular activities at home). FES combined with supervised exercises (i.e., physiotherapy) was better than supervised exercises alone for improving gait speed. We found no effect of FES combined with unsupervised exercises and inconclusive effects when FES was combined with regular activities at home. When FES was compared with conventional treatments, it improved ankle dorsiflexion, balance and functional mobility, albeit with high heterogeneity for these last 2 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis revealed low quality of evidence for positive effects of FES on gait speed when combined with physiotherapy. FES can improve ankle dorsiflexion, balance, and functional mobility. However, considering the low quality of evidence and the high heterogeneity, these results must be interpreted carefully.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/etiologia , Transtornos Neurológicos da Marcha/terapia , Humanos , Nervo Fibular , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Velocidade de Caminhada
3.
J Bodyw Mov Ther ; 27: 440-446, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391269

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) in promoting muscle irradiation to the lower limbs and to relate these findings with muscle activation during the sit-to-stand task. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy women were recruited via convenience sampling and submitted to four PNF patterns: upper limb pattern with flexion-abduction-external rotation (UL), lower limb pattern with flexion-adduction-external rotation with knee flexion (lower limb pattern 1 [LL1]), lower limb pattern with flexion-abduction-internal rotation with knee flexion (lower limb pattern 2 [LL2]), and lifting to the right. Electromyography was recorded from the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and soleus during the PNF patterns and during the sit-to-stand task. RESULTS: The most recruited muscles during the sit-to-stand task were the vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and soleus (p < 0.05). Lifting to the right induced the greatest activation of the gluteus maximus (p < 0.001). Lifting to the right and LL2 were better than UL at recruiting the gluteus medius (p < 0.05). Lifting to the right and LL1 were better than UL at recruiting the vastus medialis and lateralis (p < 0.05; p < 0.05). and Lower limb pattern 1 and 2 were better than UL at recruiting the soleus muscle (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PNF can be used to induce muscle irradiation to maintain or improve muscle activity to the muscles recruited during the sit-to-stand task. The best PNF pattern for inducing muscle irradiation to muscles recruited during the sit-to-stand task are lifting to the right, LL2, and LL1.


Assuntos
Exercícios de Alongamento Muscular , Nádegas , Estudos Transversais , Eletromiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Músculo Esquelético
4.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med ; 63(1): 4-11, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31158553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors often present poor upper-limb (UL) motor performance and reduced movement quality during reaching tasks. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) are widely used strategies for stroke rehabilitation. However, the effects of combining these two therapies to rehabilitate individuals with moderate and severe impairment after stroke are still unknown. OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim was to evaluate the effects of concurrent bi-cephalic tDCS and FES on UL kinematic motor performance and movement quality of chronic post-stroke subjects with moderate and severe compromise. Our secondary aim was to verify the effects of combining these therapies on handgrip force and UL motor impairment. METHODS: We randomized 30 individuals with moderate and severe chronic hemiparesis after stroke into tDCS plus FES (n=15) and sham tDCS plus FES (n=15) groups. Participants were treated 5 times a week for 2 weeks. Kinematic motor performance (movement cycle time, velocity profile) and movement quality (smoothness, trunk contribution, joint angles) were assessed during an UL reach-to-target task.Handgrip force and motor impairment were also recorded before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Participants allocated to the tDCS plus FES group improved movement cycle time (P=0.039), mean reaching velocity (P=0.022) and handgrip force (P=0.034). Both groups improved the mean returning phase velocity (P=0.018), trunk contribution (P=0.022), movement smoothness (P=0.001) and UL motor impairment (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent bi-cephalic tDCS and FES slightly improved reaching motor performance and handgrip force of chronic post-stroke individuals with moderate and severe UL impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02818608).


Assuntos
Estimulação Elétrica , Movimento , Paresia/reabilitação , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Método Duplo-Cego , Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Feminino , Força da Mão , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Destreza Motora , Paresia/etiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Estimulação Transcraniana por Corrente Contínua/métodos , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia
5.
J Neurol Sci ; 401: 75-78, 2019 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31029885

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: After a stroke, upper limb (UL) motor impairments interfere with functional activities and quality of life. Even though a range of assessment tools has been developed to assess UL, few studies explore the interfaces between different levels of functioning after stroke. OBJECTIVES: (a) verify the correlation between movement smoothness and other measures of body function/structure [UL - Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and handgrip strength]; (b) verify which body function/structure [UL-FMA and/or handgrip strength] could predict UL movement smoothness; and (c) verify if movement smoothness could predict levels of activity, as assessed by the Box and Block Test (BBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Thirty-four individuals with chronic hemiparesis after stroke were enrolled. Measurements of body function/structure included FMA, handgrip strength and kinematic measure of movement smoothness. Levels of activity were measured using the Box and Block Test (BBT). RESULTS: Movement smoothness showed strong correlation with FMA (r = 0.70, p < .001) and moderate correlation with handgrip strength (r = 0.63, p < .001). FMA explained 46.4% of the variation in movement smoothness. Movement smoothness was moderately correlated with BBT (r = -0.560, p < .005) and predicted 31% of the variation in BBT. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of UL-FMA to predict movement smoothness in chronic post-stroke subjects. This study also showed that movement smoothness influences the level of activity. Then, movement smoothness may be emphasized during stroke rehabilitation to enhance the UL level of activity in chronic post-stroke subjects.


Assuntos
Força da Mão/fisiologia , Movimento/fisiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paresia/diagnóstico , Paresia/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA