Methods for analysis of glass in glass-containing gunshot residue (gGSR) particles.

When lead, barium and antimony, or lead, barium, calcium, silicon and tin are found together in particles associated with a shooting investigation they are considered characteristic of gunshot residue (GSR). Antimony and tin are often absent from the primer of many low calibre rimfire ammunitions, which are the type most commonly used in Australia. Therefore, the likelihood of characteristic particles forming during the firing process of such rimfire ammunition is significantly less than the likelihood of these particles arising from higher calibre ammunition. The majority of rimfire ammunition examined in this research contains ground glass in the primer, which functions as a frictionator. These ammunitions produce a small number of gunshot residue particles containing glass coated with other primer components, which we refer to as glass-containing GSR (gGSR). If these particles are observed in an investigation, they have the potential to add a new dimension to gunshot residue analysis because they are not common in the environment. Furthermore, the composition of glass frictionator is stable during firing, which raises the possibility that chemical testing of the glass in gGSR may be used to identify the ammunition from which the residue was derived or to link deposits of GSR. This paper examines the application of scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS), focussed ion beam (FIB) techniques and time of flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) to the semi-quantitative analysis and comparisons of gGSR and frictionator extracted from unfired cartridges. SEM-EDS is effective for comparing gGSR with unfired frictionator, but the use of FIB to expose clean glass from the centre of gGSR followed by ToF-SIMS, or ToF-SIMS using ion sputtering to expose clean glass, offers more power for comparisons due to their capability for higher discrimination between frictionators from different sources.

Glass-containing gunshot residues and particles of industrial and occupational origins: Considerations for evaluating GSR traces.

In an ideal case, the value of traces would be determined numerically and presented through the use of likelihood ratios or verbal-equivalent scales. A problem in the evaluation of gunshot residue (GSR) evidence using these models is that in many shooting scenarios insufficient data exist to support a quantitative model of interpretation. The complex relationship that exists between ammunition composition and post-firing residues makes quantitative interpretation more difficult for GSR than for other traces such as glass. When evaluating the significance of traces in a quantitative model, the value of a trace is reduced as the number of random sources that could produce the trace increases. Previously published works have suggested that glass-containing GSR (gGSR), which is glass encrusted with lead (Pb) and barium (Ba) residues, are a new type of GSR not already classified under ASTM E1588 - 17. If random sources of particles resembling gGSR are rare, then gGSR may be valuable evidentiary traces. In order to potentially incorporate these particles into a future model, the general background prevalence of gGSR and specific sources capable of producing similar particles must be understood. Therefore, particles from fireworks, matches, and cartridge actuated nail guns were assessed on an individual basis and at a population level. These sources, known to produce particles resembling GSR, were assessed using backscattered electron - scanning electron microscopy - energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis (BSE-SEM-EDS) for the presence of glass-containing particles that resemble gGSR. In the experiments described in this article the nail gun produced particles compositionally indistinguishable from gGSR, due to the primer in the brand of nail gun cartridges used containing glass as the frictionator in addition to Pb and Ba compounds. In this study, no particles were located from fireworks or matches that were indistinguishable from gGSR, nor was any evidence observed or found in the literature that would suggest that such particles could be formed.

Analysis of elemental and isotopic variation in glass frictionators from 0.22 rimfire primers.

The majority of 0.22 calibre rimfire ammunition available in Australia, and overseas, tends to use glass powder rather than antimony sulfide frictionator in the primer. This glass can be the nucleus of a GSR particle, with other primer components condensing around and onto the glass structure. As the composition of glass frictionator remains largely unaltered during ammunition discharge [1] there is the possibility that frictionator composition could be used in GSR examinations to either correlate or discriminate between samples, thereby providing valuable information to an investigation. In this study, the composition of glass frictionator from a wide variety of ammunition was analysed by time-of-flight - secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) and scanning electron microscopy - energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS). Refractive index (RI) was measured using glass refractive index measurement (GRIM). Across the population of ammunition studied, it was found that the elemental and isotopic composition of frictionator varied. ToF-SIMS was able to discriminate 94.1% of brands in a pairwise comparison and SEM-EDS achieved a pairwise discrimination power of 79.4%. If SHRIMP was combined with the other two techniques, 95.6% of brands could be discriminated. Refractive index measurements supported the elemental data showing that there appeared, in most cases, to be only one population of glass within a cartridge. The results suggest that there is scope for frictionator analysis to contribute valuable, new capability to forensic GSR examinations.

Glass fragments from portable electronic devices: Implications for forensic examinations.

Personal electronic devices (PEDs) are now widespread in the community. Many such devices have glass display screens that, despite being a relatively strong and specialised material, are vulnerable to breakage. Unlike other glass objects that are usually thrown away when they break, PEDs can still function with a broken or cracked screen and it is not uncommon for their owners to keep using them in this condition. Broken PED screens, therefore, might represent a new and significant source of glass fragments that are present on the clothing and belongings of the general public and individuals suspected of offences involving the breaking of glass. The forensic implications of this new source of glass fragments in the community were investigated. PED glass is easily recognised using scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray analysis and refractive index measurement and is easily distinguished from domestic and automotive soda-lime glass using these methods; as a consequence there should be no confusion of soda-lime glass fragments and PED glass fragments in forensic glass casework. In cases where the objective is to compare recovered glass fragments to a putative PED source, comparison using refractive index measurement and elemental analysis achieves good discrimination between sources.