Clinical targeting of HIV capsid protein with a long-acting small molecule.

Oral antiretroviral agents provide life-saving treatments for millions of people living with HIV, and can prevent new infections via pre-exposure prophylaxis1-5. However, some people living with HIV who are heavily treatment-experienced have limited or no treatment options, owing to multidrug resistance6. In addition, suboptimal adherence to oral daily regimens can negatively affect the outcome of treatment-which contributes to virologic failure, resistance generation and viral transmission-as well as of pre-exposure prophylaxis, leading to new infections1,2,4,7-9. Long-acting agents from new antiretroviral classes can provide much-needed treatment options for people living with HIV who are heavily treatment-experienced, and additionally can improve adherence10. Here we describe GS-6207, a small molecule that disrupts the functions of HIV capsid protein and is amenable to long-acting therapy owing to its high potency, low in vivo systemic clearance and slow release kinetics from the subcutaneous injection site. Drawing on X-ray crystallographic information, we designed GS-6207 to bind tightly at a conserved interface between capsid protein monomers, where it interferes with capsid-protein-mediated interactions between proteins that are essential for multiple phases of the viral replication cycle. GS-6207 exhibits antiviral activity at picomolar concentrations against all subtypes of HIV-1 that we tested, and shows high synergy and no cross-resistance with approved antiretroviral drugs. In phase-1 clinical studies, monotherapy with a single subcutaneous dose of GS-6207 (450 mg) resulted in a mean log10-transformed reduction of plasma viral load of 2.2 after 9 days, and showed sustained plasma exposure at antivirally active concentrations for more than 6 months. These results provide clinical validation for therapies that target the functions of HIV capsid protein, and demonstrate the potential of GS-6207 as a long-acting agent to treat or prevent infection with HIV.

Capsid Inhibition with Lenacapavir in Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have limited treatment options. Lenacapavir is a first-in-class capsid inhibitor that showed substantial antiviral activity in a phase 1b study. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection in two cohorts, according to the change in the plasma HIV-1 RNA level between the screening and cohort-selection visits. In cohort 1, patients were first randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral lenacapavir or placebo in addition to their failing therapy for 14 days; during the maintenance period, starting on day 15, patients in the lenacapavir group received subcutaneous lenacapavir once every 6 months, and those in the placebo group received oral lenacapavir, followed by subcutaneous lenacapavir; both groups also received optimized background therapy. In cohort 2, all the patients received open-label oral lenacapavir with optimized background therapy on days 1 through 14; subcutaneous lenacapavir was then administered once every 6 months starting on day 15. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in cohort 1 who had a decrease of at least 0.5 log10 copies per milliliter in the viral load by day 15; a key secondary end point was a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter at week 26. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, with 36 in each cohort. In cohort 1, a decrease of at least 0.5 log10 copies per milliliter in the viral load by day 15 was observed in 21 of 24 patients (88%) in the lenacapavir group and in 2 of 12 patients (17%) in the placebo group (absolute difference, 71 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 35 to 90). At week 26, a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter was reported in 81% of the patients in cohort 1 and in 83% in cohort 2, with a least-squares mean increase in the CD4+ count of 75 and 104 cells per cubic millimeter, respectively. No serious adverse events related to lenacapavir were identified. In both cohorts, lenacapavir-related capsid substitutions that were associated with decreased susceptibility developed in 8 patients during the maintenance period (6 with M66I substitutions). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection, those who received lenacapavir had a greater reduction from baseline in viral load than those who received placebo. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; CAPELLA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04150068.).

Pharmacokinetics of long-acting lenacapavir in participants with hepatic or renal impairment.

Lenacapavir is a novel, first-in-class, multistage inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid function approved for the treatment of multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretrovirals for heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV. Two Phase 1, open-label, parallel-group, single-dose studies assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lenacapavir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment [Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) Class B: score 7-9] or severe renal impairment [15 ≤ creatinine clearance (CLcr) ≤29 mL/min] to inform lenacapavir dosing in HIV-1-infected individuals with organ impairment. In both studies, a single oral dose of 300 mg lenacapavir was administered to participants with normal (n = 10) or impaired (n = 10) hepatic/renal function who were matched for age (±10 years), sex, and body mass index (±20%). Lenacapavir exposures [area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum concentration (Cmax)] were approximately 1.47- and 2.61-fold higher, respectively, in participants with moderate hepatic impairment compared to those with normal hepatic function, whereas lenacapavir AUCinf and Cmax were approximately 1.84- and 2.62-fold higher, respectively, in participants with severe renal impairment compared to those with normal renal function. Increased lenacapavir exposures with moderate hepatic or severe renal impairment were not considered clinically meaningful. Lenacapavir was considered generally safe and well tolerated in both studies. These results support the use of approved lenacapavir dosing regimen in patients with mild (CPT Class A: score 5-6) or moderate hepatic impairment as well as in patients with mild (60 ≤ CLcr ≤ 89 mL/min), moderate (30 ≤ CLcr ≤ 59 mL/min), and severe renal impairment.

Lenacapavir: A Novel, Potent, and Selective First-in-Class Inhibitor of HIV-1 Capsid Function Exhibits Optimal Pharmacokinetic Properties for a Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Agent.

Lenacapavir (LEN) is a picomolar first-in-class capsid inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with a multistage mechanism of action and no known cross resistance to other existing antiretroviral (ARV) drug classes. LEN exhibits a low aqueous solubility and exceptionally low systemic clearance following intravenous (IV) administration in nonclinical species and humans. LEN formulated in an aqueous suspension or a PEG/water solution formulation showed sustained plasma exposure levels with no unintended rapid drug release following subcutaneous (SC) administration to rats and dogs. A high total fraction dose release was observed with both formulations. The long-acting pharmacokinetics (PK) were recapitulated in humans following SC administration of both formulations. The SC PK profiles displayed two-phase absorption kinetics in both animals and humans with an initial fast-release absorption phase, followed by a slow-release absorption phase. Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses informed the LEN systemic input rate from the SC depot and exit rate from the body. Modeling-enabled deconvolution of the input rates from two processes: absorption of the soluble fraction (minor) from a direct fast-release process leading to the early PK phase and absorption of the precipitated fraction (major) from an indirect slow-release process leading to the later PK phase. LEN SC PK showed flip-flop kinetics due to the input rate being substantially slower than the systemic exit rate. LEN input rates via the slow-release process in humans were slower than those in both rats and dogs. Overall, the combination of high potency, exceptional stability, and optimal release rate from the injection depot make LEN well suited for a parenteral long-acting formulation that can be administered once up to every 6 months in humans for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1.

Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Lenacapavir Plus Optimized Background Regimen Versus Other Treatments for Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) may not achieve virologic suppression (VS) with combination antiretroviral therapy due to multidrug resistance (MDR), intolerance, and safety concerns. These PWH often receive highly individualized treatment regimens, but these regimens may not enable PWH to achieve VS, thereby halting disease progression. Novel medications are required for treating individuals with MDR HIV. Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class HIV capsid inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of HTE individuals with MDR HIV in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study. This study aimed to compare LEN plus optimized background regimen (OBR) with fostemsavir (FTR) + OBR, ibalizumab (IBA) + OBR, and OBR alone in terms of VS, CD4 cell count change from baseline, immunologic recovery, and discontinuation due to adverse events, using indirect treatment comparisons. METHODS: A systematic review identified clinical evidence on HIV-1 treatments in HTE PWH. A feasibility assessment evaluated the identified studies for indirect treatment comparison analyses based on population characteristics, interventions, comparators, and outcomes of interest. Unanchored simulated treatment comparisons of LEN + OBR versus comparators were conducted. RESULTS: LEN + OBR had 6.57 times higher odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than FTR + OBR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-32.28), 8.93 times higher odds of VS than IBA + OBR (95% CI 2.07-38.46), and 12.74 times higher odds of VS than OBR alone (95% CI 1.70-95.37). Change from baseline in CD4 cell count was similar across LEN + OBR, FTR + OBR, and IBA + OBR. CONCLUSION: LEN + OBR has statistically significantly greater odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than its comparators and represents a novel treatment for people with MDR HIV.

Resistance Analyses in Highly Treatment-Experienced People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Treated With the Novel Capsid HIV Inhibitor Lenacapavir.

BACKGROUND: Lenacapavir (LEN) is a first-in-class inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function in clinical development for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH) harboring multidrug resistance (MDR) in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here we describe resistance analyses conducted in the pivotal phase 2/3 CAPELLA study. METHODS: CAPELLA enrolled viremic HTE PWH with resistance to ≥3 of 4 of the main antiretroviral (ARV) classes and resistance to ≥2 ARV drugs per class. Baseline resistance analyses used commercial assays (HIV-1 protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase genotypic/phenotypic tests). Postbaseline resistance was evaluated in participants experiencing virologic failure. RESULTS: At baseline, 46% of participants had resistance to the 4 main ARV drug classes, with one-third of participants having exhausted all drugs from ≥3 of the 4 main ARV classes. Treatment with LEN + OBR for 26 weeks led to viral suppression in 81% of participants. Postbaseline resistance mutations to lenacapavir occurred in 8 participants (6 with M66I, 1 with K70H, 1 with Q67H + K70R) who were receiving unintended functional LEN monotherapy at the time of resistance selection. CONCLUSIONS: LEN added to OBR led to high efficacy in this HTE patient population with MDR but could select for resistance when used unintentionally as functional monotherapy.

Phenotypic resistance to lenacapavir and monotherapy efficacy in a proof-of-concept clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Lenacapavir in vitro resistance selections identified seven mutations in HIV-1 capsid protein (CA) associated with reduced susceptibility. OBJECTIVES: To analyse lenacapavir activity against lenacapavir-associated resistance mutations in multiple assays. We also report Day 10 resistance analyses conducted in a Phase 1b study of lenacapavir (Study 4072) in people with HIV (PWH). METHODS: Mutations were inserted in a proviral DNA clone by site-directed mutagenesis, and viruses (n = 12) were generated by transfection. Sequences were used to generate single-cycle (SC) test vectors that were evaluated in a Gag-Pro assay, and replicative viruses were tested in a multicycle (MC) MT-2 assay to determine lenacapavir susceptibility. Study 4072 was a Phase 1b, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, randomized study of lenacapavir in untreated PWH. Participants received a single dose of lenacapavir (up to 750 mg) or placebo (10 day monotherapy). CA resistance was characterized using genotypic and/or phenotypic assays. RESULTS: Lenacapavir susceptibility in the SC assay showed an inverse relationship between replication capacity and resistance. In Study 4072, all 29 participants receiving lenacapavir showed a robust virological response with no rebound. At baseline, no participant had resistance mutations to lenacapavir, and all had WT susceptibility to lenacapavir. Post-monotherapy analyses revealed the emergence of CA mutation Q67H at Day 10 in two participants. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro assays confirmed that increased resistance to lenacapavir was associated with decreased replication capacity of mutant viruses. In the clinical study no pre-existing lenacapavir resistance was detected. Emergence of Q67H occurred at exposures below the dose used in current Phase 2/3 studies. These results support development of lenacapavir as an antiretroviral agent.

Absence of Lenacapavir (GS-6207) Phenotypic Resistance in HIV Gag Cleavage Site Mutants and in Isolates with Resistance to Existing Drug Classes.

Lenacapavir (LEN; GS-6207) is a potent first-in-class inhibitor of HIV-1 capsid with long-acting properties and the potential for subcutaneous dosing every 3 months or longer. In the clinic, a single subcutaneous LEN injection (20 mg to 750 mg) in people with HIV (PWH) induced a strong antiviral response, with a >2.3 mean log10 decrease in HIV-1 RNA at day 10. HIV-1 Gag mutations near protease (PR) cleavage sites have emerged with the use of protease inhibitors (PIs). Here, we have characterized the activity of LEN in mutants with Gag cleavage site mutations (GCSMs) and mutants resistant to other drug classes. HIV mutations were inserted into the pXXLAI clone, and the resulting mutants (n = 70) were evaluated using a 5-day antiviral assay. LEN EC50 fold change versus the wild type ranged from 0.4 to 1.9 in these mutants, similar to that for the control drug. In contrast, reduced susceptibility to PIs and maturation inhibitors (MIs) was observed. Testing of isolates with resistance against the 4 main classes of drugs (n = 40) indicated wild-type susceptibility to LEN (fold change ranging from 0.3 to 1.1), while reduced susceptibility was observed for control drugs. HIV GCSMs did not impact the activity of LEN, while some conferred resistance to MIs and PIs. Similarly, LEN activity was not affected by naturally occurring variations in HIV Gag, in contrast to the reduced susceptibility observed for MIs. Finally, the activity of LEN was not affected by the presence of resistance mutations to the 4 main antiretroviral (ARV) drug classes. These data support the evaluation of LEN in PWH with multiclass resistance.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of boosted elvitegravir in subjects with hepatic impairment.

Elvitegravir (EVG), an HIV strand transfer integrase inhibitor, is metabolized primarily via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A) and secondarily via glucuronidation. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of cobicistat (COBI)-boosted EVG (EVG/co) were evaluated in subjects with impaired liver function. The enrolled subjects had stable moderate liver impairment (n = 10; Child-Pugh-Turcotte [CPT] class B) or were healthy controls (n = 10) matched for age (±5 years), gender, and body mass index (±15%). EVG/co (150/150 mg) was administered once daily for 10 days, followed by pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. Safety was assessed throughout the study. EVG and COBI exposures were compared between the impairment and control groups, with a ≥100% increase considered clinically relevant. EVG and COBI protein binding was also measured. All enrolled subjects completed the study. The treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) incidences were comparable between the groups; all study drug-related AEs were mild. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval [CI]) for EVG area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCtau) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) were 135% (103%, 177%) and 141% (109%, 183%), respectively. The corresponding values for COBI were 99.8% (76.0%, 131%) and 86.1% (65.4%, 113%), respectively, indicating no clinically relevant change in exposure. No correlations were observed between the EVG and COBI exposures versus CPT score. The EVG- and COBI-free fractions were similar between groups. EVG and COBI do not require dose adjustment in moderate or mild liver impairment, as no clinically relevant PK changes were observed for EVG or COBI in this special population. No PK or safety data are available for EVG or COBI in subjects with severe hepatic impairment.

Cobicistat-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients with mild to moderate renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Cobicistat (COBI) is a pharmacoenhancer that optimizes systemic exposures of protease inhibitors (PIs) such as atazanavir (ATV) and darunavir (DRV). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching ritonavir (RTV) to COBI in patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) 50 to 89 mL/min who are virologically suppressed on a stable regimen containing ritonavir (RTV)-boosted ATV or DRV. Other components of the regimen remained unchanged. METHODS: A phase 3, non-comparative, open-label clinical trial. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled. At week 48, 82% maintained virologic suppression. No emergent resistance developed. Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 7%, and study drug discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 10% (7 patients). There were 2 renal discontinuations and no cases of proximal renal tubulopathy. Small reductions in CrCl (median [IQR]) were observed as early as week 2, after which they were nonprogressive through week 48 (-3.8 [-9 to 0.8]). Changes in CrCl by baseline CrCl (< 70 vs ≥ 70) were -1.1 [-6.5 to 6.3] versus -6.6 [-12.4 to -0.7], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-1-infected patients with CrCl 50 to 89 mL/min switching from RTV to COBI, COBI-boosted PIs in combination with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors were well-tolerated and effective in maintaining virologic suppression. The renal safety profile of COBI in this study was consistent with the long-term data in patients without renal impairment from the phase 3 studies of COBI-containing regimens.

Cobicistat versus ritonavir as a pharmacoenhancer of atazanavir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV type 1-infected patients: week 48 results.

BACKGROUND: Cobicistat (COBI) is a pharmacoenhancer with no antiretroviral activity in vitro. METHODS: An international, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of COBI versus ritonavir (RTV) as a pharmacoenhancer of atazanavir (ATV) in combination with emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive patients. The primary end point was a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA load of <50 copies/mL at week 48 by the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm; the noninferiority margin was 12%. RESULTS: A total of 692 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment arm and received study drug (344 in the COBI group vs 348 in the RTV group). At week 48, virologic success was achieved in 85% of COBI recipients and 87% of RTV recipients (difference, -2.2% [95% confidence interval, -7.4% to 3.0%]); among patients with a baseline HIV-1 RNA load of >100 000 copies/mL, rates were similar (86% vs 86%). Similar percentages of patients in both groups had serious adverse events (10% of COBI recipients vs 7% of RTV recipients) and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment with the study drug (7% vs 7%). Median increases in the serum creatinine level were 0.13 and 0.09 mg/dL, respectively, for COBI and RTV recipients. CONCLUSIONS: COBI was noninferior to RTV in combination with ATV plus FTC/TDF at week 48. Both regimens achieved high rates of virologic success. Safety and tolerability profiles of the 2 regimens were comparable. Once-daily COBI is a safe and effective pharmacoenhancer of the protease inhibitor ATV.

Pharmacokinetics, Disposition, and Biotransformation of [14C]Lenacapavir, a Novel, First-in-Class, Selective Inhibitor of HIV-1 Capsid Function, in Healthy Participants Following a Single Intravenous Infusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Lenacapavir (LEN) is a novel, first-in-class, multistage, selective inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function recently approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection. The purpose of this multicohort study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, excretion, safety, and tolerability of LEN following a single intravenous (IV) infusion of 10 mg LEN or 20 mg [14C]LEN in healthy participants. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy adult participants were enrolled into the study and received either a single IV dose of 10 mg LEN (n = 8 active, n = 3 placebo; cohort 1) or a single IV dose of 20 mg [14C]LEN containing 200 µCi (n = 10; cohort 2). Blood, urine, and feces samples (when applicable) were collected after dosing, and radioactivity (cohort 2) was assessed using liquid scintillation counting in both plasma and excreta. LEN in plasma was quantified by liquid chromatography (LC) tandem mass spectroscopy (MS/MS) method bioanalysis. Metabolite profiling in plasma and excreta were performed using LC-fraction collect (FC)-high-resolution MS and LC-FC-accelerator mass spectrometry in plasma. RESULTS: Between the 10 mg and 20 mg doses of LEN, the observed plasma exposure of LEN doubled, while the elimination half-life was similar. Following administration of 20 mg [14C]LEN (200 µCi), the mean cumulative recovery of [14C] radioactivity was 75.9% and 0.24% from feces and urine, respectively. The mean whole [14C] blood-to-plasma concentration ratio was 0.5-0.7, which showed a low distribution of LEN to red blood cells. Intact LEN was the predominant circulating species in plasma (representing 68.8% of circulating radioactivity), and no single metabolite contributed to > 10% of total radioactivity exposure through 1176 h postdose. Similarly, intact LEN was the most abundant component (32.9% of administered dose; 75.9% of recovered dose) measured in feces, with metabolites accounting for trace amounts. These results suggest metabolism of LEN is not a primary pathway of elimination. Of the metabolites observed in the feces, the three most abundant metabolites were direct phase 2 conjugates (glucuronide, hexose, and pentose conjugates), with additional metabolites formed to a lesser extent via other pathways. The administered LEN IV doses were generally safe and well-tolerated across participants in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this mass balance study indicated that LEN was majorly eliminated as intact LEN via the feces. The renal pathway played a minor role in LEN elimination (0.24%). In addition, no major circulating metabolites in plasma or feces were found, indicating minimal metabolism of LEN.

Cross-resistance to entry inhibitors and lenacapavir resistance through Week 52 in study CAPELLA.

BACKGROUND: Lenacapavir (LEN) is a first-in-class inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) harbouring multidrug resistance in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here, we describe in vitro analysis of the interplay between entry inhibitors (EI; enfuvirtide, fostemsavir, ibalizumab, and maraviroc) susceptibility and LEN susceptibility in samples from 72 participants in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study, as well as the emergence of resistance in CAPELLA through 52 weeks. METHODS: The phenotypic susceptibility to EIs of screening samples from participants was analysed using entry assays, and susceptibility to LEN was generated. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance to LEN was evaluated for subjects with virological failure through Week 52. RESULTS: Overall, viruses with resistance to EIs showed no cross-resistance to LEN, with a mean fold change from wild type close to 1.0. Of the 22 participants analysed for resistance through Week 52, 9 participants (13%) had emergence of capsid resistance mutation(s) while the remaining 13 participants (18%) had no change in the capsid sequence. CONCLUSION: The gag sequence from EI-resistant isolates did not affect LEN susceptibility. The lack of cross-resistance to LEN across ARV-resistant isolates supports the use of LEN in PWH regardless of their treatment history. During the second half-year period of the CAPELLA Study, development of LEN resistance was rare and was overall associated with functional LEN monotherapy due to either nonadherence or resistance-driven non-susceptibility to OBR.

Efficacy and safety of the novel capsid inhibitor lenacapavir to treat multidrug-resistant HIV: week 52 results of a phase 2/3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lenacapavir, a first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor, is in development as a long-acting agent for treating and preventing HIV-1. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenacapavir with an optimised background regimen in adults living with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 up to 52 weeks. METHODS: This ongoing, international, phase 2/3 trial at 42 sites included adults living with multidrug-resistant HIV-1. In cohort 1, 36 participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to add oral lenacapavir (600 mg, days 1 and 2; 300 mg, day 8) or placebo to an existing failing regimen. At day 15, those on oral lenacapavir received subcutaneous lenacapavir 927 mg every 26 weeks; those on placebo started lenacapavir (2-week oral lead-in then subcutaneous). Cohort 1 started an optimised background regimen on day 15. In cohort 2 (non-randomised), 36 participants started an optimised background regimen concurrent with lenacapavir (oral to subcutaneous). Here we report the secondary endpoints of plasma HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL or less than 200 copies per mL at week 52 (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm) in cohort 1 along with results for cohorts 1 and 2 combined. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04150068, and clinicaltrialregister.eu, EudraCT 2019-003814-16 and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Of 72 participants, 46 (64%) had CD4 counts of less than 200 cells per µL and 38 (53%) had no more than one fully active antiretroviral drug at baseline. In cohort 1, 30 of 36 participants (83%, 95% CI 67-94) had less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL and 31 of 36 participants (86%, 71-95) had less than 200 HIV RNA copies per mL, at week 52. In all, nine participants (four in cohort 1, five in cohort 2) had emergent lenacapavir resistance; four resuppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) while maintaining lenacapavir use. One participant discontinued study drug owing to injection site reaction. INTERPRETATION: In participants with multidrug-resistant HIV-1, subcutaneous lenacapavir in combination with an optimised background regimen resulted in a high rate of virological suppression up to 52 weeks. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Lenacapavir administered every 26 weeks or daily in combination with oral daily antiretroviral therapy for initial treatment of HIV: a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral agents with novel mechanisms and dosing intervals could expand treatment options for people with HIV. Lenacapavir, an inhibitor of capsid protein that makes use of a unique mechanism, can be administered orally or subcutaneously. We sought to explore the efficacy of lenacapavir in various combination regimens as initial and maintenance therapy for HIV. METHODS: In a phase 2, randomised, open-label, ongoing study at 41 investigational sites in the USA and Dominican Republic, we randomly assigned adults with HIV who had not previously received antiretrovirals to four groups (2:2:2:1). Randomisation was stratified by plasma HIV-1 RNA load (≤100 000 or >100 000 copies per mL) at screening. Groups 1 and 2 both received lenacapavir (927 mg) subcutaneously every 26 weeks (after 2 weeks of oral loading [600 mg on days 1 and 2, followed by 300 mg on day 8]) with oral daily emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) for 28 weeks followed by subcutaneous lenacapavir (927 mg) plus oral daily tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg, group 1) or bictegravir (75 mg, group 2). Group 3 received oral daily lenacapavir (600 mg on days 1 and 2, followed by 50 mg daily) with emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Group 4 received oral daily bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Participants and investigators were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants with virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) at week 54, analysed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study drug) using only on-treatment data. The safety outcome measures were incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events and graded laboratory abnormalities, analysed in the full analysis set. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04143594. FINDINGS: Between Nov 22, 2019, and Aug 27, 2020, 249 people with HIV were screened, 183 participants were randomly assigned and 182 received a dose of antiretroviral drugs (52 in group 1, 53 in group 2, 52 in group 3, and 25 in group 4). 22 participants did not complete the full study course (five in group 1, 12 in group 2, four in group 3, and one in group 4). At week 54, virological suppression was 90% (47 of 52 patients) for group 1 (difference vs group 4: -2·6%, 95% CI -18·4 to 13·2), 85% (45 of 53) for group 2 (-7·1%, -23·4 to 9·3), 85% (44 of 52) for group 3 (-7·2%, -23·5 to 9·1), and 92% (23 of 25) for group 4. The most frequent non-injection-site adverse events with lenacapavir (subcutaneous or oral) were headache (13%, 21 of 157) and nausea (13%, 21 of 157). The most common lenacapavir-related injection-site reactions were erythema (27%, 28 of 105), swelling (23%, 24 of 105), and pain (19%, 20 of 105), which were generally mild or moderate. No serious adverse event related to study treatment occurred. Three participants discontinued subcutaneous lenacapavir because of grade 1 injection-site reactions (two for induration and one for erythema or swelling). INTERPRETATION: Lenacapavir warrants further investigation as a potential antiretroviral used orally and as injection in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Lenacapavir: a first-in-class HIV-1 capsid inhibitor.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes available data for lenacapavir, an investigational first-in-class agent that disrupts functioning of HIV capsid protein across multiple steps in the viral life cycle. RECENT FINDINGS: Lenacapavir demonstrated picomolar potency in vitro with no cross resistance to existing antiretroviral classes and potent antiviral activity in persons with HIV-1. In persons with HIV-1, there was no preexisting resistance to lenacapavir regardless of treatment history. Lenacapavir can be administered orally either daily or weekly and subcutaneously up to every 6 months. In heavily treatment-experienced persons with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 and in treatment-naive persons with HIV-1, lenacapavir in combination with other antiretroviral agents led to high rates of virologic suppression and was well tolerated. SUMMARY: Ongoing studies are evaluating long-acting dosing of lenacapavir for treating HIV-1 in combination with other antiretrovirals and preventing HIV-1 as a single agent.

The renal-bone axis in older people living with HIV on stable antiretroviral therapy: A sub-analysis of the GS-US-104-0423 study.

BACKGROUND: Data on low bone mineral density (BMD) in people living with HIV (PLWH) are mainly derived from younger adults; little is known about how antiretroviral therapy (ART) and alterations in the renal-bone axis relate to BMD in older PLWH. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of men > 50 years and post-menopausal women with HIV. Antiretroviral therapy exposure was stratified into four groups based on use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and protease inhibitors (PI): non-TDF/non-PI, non-TDF/PI, TDF/non-PI, and TDF/PI. Bone mineral density was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone turnover/regulatory markers and renal tubular function were analysed in stored plasma and urine samples. The association of ART exposure and bone/renal biomarkers on BMD was explored using logistic regression models. RESULTS: 247 individuals (median [IQR] age 57 [53, 65] years; 47% female; 13% of Black ethnicity; CD4 count 643 [473, 811] cells/mm3; and 98% with HIV RNA < 200 copies/mL) were included. Bone turnover and renal tubular function differed significantly by ART exposure. In analyses adjusted for demographic and traditional renal/bone risk factors, exposure to TDF and PI was associated with a fourfold greater risk of low BMD at the femoral neck and exposure to TDF and/or PI with a threefold greater risk of low BMD at the lumbar spine. The relationship between ART and low BMD was not altered by further adjustment for bone turnover or renal tubular function markers. CONCLUSIONS: The associations between low BMD and ART exposure (TDF vs. non-TDF and boosted vs. unboosted third agents) were minimally affected by adjustments for bone and kidney biomarkers.

Risk factors for proteinuria in HIV-infected and -uninfected Hispanic drug users.

BACKGROUND: Proteinuria may be an early marker of chronic kidney disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with coexisting chronic hepatitis and/or drug use. Minorities are at greater risk of chronic kidney disease. Data are limited about risk factors for proteinuria in Hispanic drug users with and without HIV infection. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A community-recruited Hispanic cohort to study the role of drug use in HIV-associated malnutrition composed of 4 groups (106 HIV-infected drug users, 96 HIV-uninfected drug users, 38 HIV-infected non-drug users, and 47 healthy controls). Patients on renal replacement therapy were excluded. PREDICTORS: HIV infection, chronic hepatitis, history of hypertension or diabetes, and intravenous drug use (never, prior, or current). OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: The presence of proteinuria was defined as urine dipstick result of 1+ or greater. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for proteinuria. RESULTS: Of 287 patients with available data, 24 (8.4%) had proteinuria. In univariate analyses, those with HIV infection; prior, but not current, intravenous drug use; and a history of hypertension or diabetes were more likely to have proteinuria. In multivariate analyses, significant risk factors for proteinuria were HIV infection (odds ratio, 9.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 45.8; P = 0.007); prior, but not current, intravenous drug use (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 15.3; P = 0.01); and history of hypertension or diabetes (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.1 to 21.7; P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional study design makes it difficult to establish the temporal relationship. The number of outcomes in relation to the number of predictors is small. CONCLUSIONS: HIV and prior intravenous drug use, but not chronic hepatitis or current intravenous drug use, were independently associated with proteinuria in this Hispanic population. Longitudinal studies to assess the development of proteinuria and chronic kidney disease in this high-risk population are warranted.

Pharmacologic consideration for the use of antiretroviral agents in the elderly.

The prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among people older than 50 years is increasing. HIV-infected patients require lifelong treatment with antiretroviral agents to suppress viral replication and maintain immune function. The use of antiretroviral agents in the elderly can be complicated by multiple chronic comorbidities and coadministered non-HIV medications. The pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents may be altered due to age-related decrements in hepatic and renal function. The elderly may be more sensitive than younger people to antiretroviral drug toxicity. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral agents in the elderly is of importance for the successful management of complex antiretroviral regimens in this population.

Tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine versus abacavir plus lamivudine for treatment of virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected adults: a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Abacavir and tenofovir alafenamide offer reduced bone toxicity compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. We aimed to compare safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine with that of abacavir plus lamivudine. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase 3 trial, HIV-1-positive adults (≥18 years) were screened at 79 sites in 11 countries in North America and Europe. Eligible participants were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) and on a stable three-drug regimen containing abacavir plus lamivudine. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size 4) to switch to fixed-dose tablets of tenofovir alafenamide (10 mg or 25 mg) plus emtricitabine (200 mg) or remain on abacavir (600 mg) plus lamivudine (300 mg), with matching placebo, while continuing to take the third drug. Randomisation was stratified by the third drug (boosted protease inhibitor vs other drug) at screening. Investigators, participants, and study staff giving treatment, assessing outcomes, and collecting data were masked to treatment group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) at week 48 (assessed by snapshot algorithm), with a 10% non-inferiority margin. We analysed the primary endpoint in participants enrolled before May 23, 2016 (when target sample size was reached), and we analysed safety in all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug (including patients enrolled after these dates). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02469246. FINDINGS: Study enrolment began on June 29, 2015, and the cutoff enrolment date for the week 48 primary endpoint analysis was May 23, 2016. 501 participants were randomly assigned and treated. At week 48, virological suppression was maintained in 227 (90%) of 253 participants receiving tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine compared with 230 (93%) of 248 receiving abacavir plus lamivudine (difference -3·0%, 95% CI -8·2 to 2·0), showing non-inferiority. Few participants discontinued treatment because of adverse events: 12 (4%) of 280 participants in the tenofovir alafenimide plus emtricitabine group and nine (3%) of 276 in the abacavir plus lamivudine group. Three participants had serious, treatment-related adverse events: one each with renal colic and neutropenia in the tenofovir alafenamide plus emtricitabine group, and one myocardial infarction in the abacavir plus lamivudine group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Tenofovir alafenamide, in combination with emtricitabine and various third drugs, maintained high efficacy with a renal and bone safety profile similar to that of abacavir. In virologically suppressed patients, a regimen containing tenofovir alafenamide could be an alternative to those containing abacavir, without concern for new onset of renal or bone toxicities or hyperlipidaemia. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences Inc.