Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel treatment of colorectal lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the full-thickness resection device. DESIGN: 181 patients were recruited in 9 centres with the indication of difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early cancers and subepithelial tumours (SET). Primary endpoint was complete en bloc and R0 resection. RESULTS: EFTR was technically successful in 89.5%, R0 resection rate was 76.9%. In 127 patients with difficult adenomas and benign histology, R0 resection rate was 77.7%. In 14 cases, lesions harboured unsuspected cancer, another 15 lesions were primarily known as cancers. Of these 29 cases, R0 resection was achieved in 72.4%; 8 further cases had deep submucosal infiltration >1000 µm. Therefore, curative resection could only be achieved in 13/29 (44.8%). In the subgroup with SET (n=23), R0 resection rate was 87.0%. In general, R0 resection rate was higher with lesions ≤2 cm vs >2 cm (81.2% vs 58.1%, p=0.0038). Adverse event rate was 9.9% with a 2.2% rate of emergency surgery. Three-month follow-up was available from 154 cases and recurrent/residual tumour was evident in 15.3%. CONCLUSION: EFTR has a reasonable technical efficacy especially in lesions ≤2 cm with acceptable complication rates. Curative resection rate for early cancers was too low to recommend its primary use in this indication. Further comparative studies have to show the clinical value and long-term outcome of EFTR in benign colorectal lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02362126; Results.

Use of a specially designed partially covered self-expandable metal stent (PSEMS) with a 40-mm diameter for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal suture or staple line leaks in 11 cases.

INTRODUCTION: The use of self-expandable stents to treat postoperative leaks and fistula in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an established treatment for leaks of the upper GI tract. However, lumen-to-stent size discrepancies (i.e., after sleeve gastrectomy or esophageal resection) may lead to insufficient sealing of the leaks requiring further surgical intervention. This is mainly due to the relatively small diameter (≤30 mm) of commonly used commercial stents. To overcome this problem, we developed a novel partially covered stent with a shaft diameter of 36 mm and a flare diameter of 40 mm. METHODS: From September 2008 to September 2010, 11 consecutive patients with postoperative leaks were treated with the novel large diameter stent (gastrectomy, n = 5; sleeve gastrectomy, n = 2; fundoplication after esophageal perforation, n = 2; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, n = 1; esophageal resection, n = 1). Treatment with commercially available stents (shaft/flare: 23/28 mm and 24/30 mm) had been unsuccessful in three patients before treatment with the large diameter stent. Due to dislocation, the large diameter stent was anchored in four patients (2× intraoperatively with transmural sutures, 2× endoscopically with transnasally externalized threads). RESULTS: Treatment was successful in 11 of 11 patients. Stent placement and removal was easy and safe. The median residence time of the stent was 24 (range, 18-41) days. Stent dislocation occurred in four cases (36 %). It was treated by anchoring the stent. Mean follow-up was 25 (range, 14-40) months. No severe complication occurred during or after intervention and no patient was dysphagic. CONCLUSIONS: Using the novel large diameter, partially covered stent to seal leaks in the upper GI tract is safe and effective. The large diameter of the stent does not seem to injure the wall of the upper GI tract. However, stent dislocation sometimes requires anchoring of the stent with sutures or transnasally externalized threads.

Risk factors and complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a case series of 1041 patients.

BACKGROUND: Most studies exclude patients with severe coagulation disorders or those taking anticoagulants when evaluating the outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). OBJECTIVE: To investigate complications and risk factors of PEG in a large clinical series including patients undergoing antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: During a six-year period, 1057 patients referred for PEG placement were prospectively audited for clinical outcome. Exclusion criteria and follow-up care were defined. Complications were defined as minor or severe. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate 14 risk factors. No standardized antibiotic prophylaxis was given. RESULTS: A total of 1041 patients (66% male, 34% female) with the following conditions underwent PEG: neurogenic dysphagia (n=450), cancer (n=385) and others (n=206). No anticoagulants were administered to 351 patients, thrombosis prophylaxis was given to 348 while full therapeutic anticoagulation was received by 313. No increased bleeding risk was associated with patients who had above-normal international normalized ratio values (OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.08 to 7.64]; P=1.00). The total infection rate was 20.5% in patients with malignant disease, and 5.5% in those with nonmalignant disease. Severe complications occurred in 19 patients (bleeding 0.5%, peritonitis 1.3%). Cirrhosis (OR 2.91 [95% CI 1.31 to 6.54]; P=0.008), cancer (OR 2.34 [95% CI 1.33 to 4.12]; P=0.003) and radiation therapy (OR 2.34 [95% CI 1.35 to 4.05]; P=0.002) were significant predictors of post-PEG infection. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.8%. There were no procedure-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer, cirrhosis and radiation therapy were predictors of infection. Post-PEG bleeding and other complications were rare events. Collectively, the data suggested that patients taking concurrent anticoagulants had no elevated risk of post-PEG bleeding.