Multi-Niche Human Bone Marrow On-A-Chip for Studying the Interactions of Adoptive CAR-T Cell Therapies with Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM), a cancer of bone marrow plasma cells, is the second-most common hematological malignancy. However, despite immunotherapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, relapse is nearly universal. The bone marrow (BM) microenvironment influences how MM cells survive, proliferate, and resist treatment. Yet, it is unclear which BM niches give rise to MM pathophysiology. Here, we present a 3D microvascularized culture system, which models the endosteal and perivascular bone marrow niches, allowing us to study MM-stroma interactions in the BM niche and model responses to therapeutic CAR-T cells. We demonstrated the prolonged survival of cell line-based and patient-derived multiple myeloma cells within our in vitro system and successfully flowed in donor-matched CAR-T cells. We then measured T cell survival, differentiation, and cytotoxicity against MM cells using a variety of analysis techniques. Our MM-on-a-chip system could elucidate the role of the BM microenvironment in MM survival and therapeutic evasion and inform the rational design of next-generation therapeutics. TEASER: A multiple myeloma model can study why the disease is still challenging to treat despite options that work well in other cancers.

Understanding and improving cellular immunotherapies against cancer: From cell-manufacturing to tumor-immune models.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is shaped by dynamic metabolic and immune interactions between precancerous and cancerous tumor cells and stromal cells like epithelial cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and hematopoietically-derived immune cells. The metabolic states of the TME, including the hypoxic and acidic niches, influence the immunosuppressive phenotypes of the stromal and immune cells, which confers resistance to both host-mediated tumor killing and therapeutics. Numerous in vitro TME platforms for studying immunotherapies, including cell therapies, are being developed. However, we do not yet understand which immune and stromal components are most critical and how much model complexity is needed to answer specific questions. In addition, scalable sourcing and quality-control of appropriate TME cells for reproducibly manufacturing these platforms remain challenging. In this regard, lessons from the manufacturing of immunomodulatory cell therapies could provide helpful guidance. Although immune cell therapies have shown unprecedented results in hematological cancers and hold promise in solid tumors, their manufacture poses significant scale, cost, and quality control challenges. This review first provides an overview of the in vivo TME, discussing the most influential cell populations in the tumor-immune landscape. Next, we summarize current approaches for cell therapies against cancers and the relevant manufacturing platforms. We then evaluate current immune-tumor models of the TME and immunotherapies, highlighting the complexity, architecture, function, and cell sources. Finally, we present the technical and fundamental knowledge gaps in both cell manufacturing systems and immune-TME models that must be addressed to elucidate the interactions between endogenous tumor immunity and exogenous engineered immunity.

Methionine restriction activates the integrated stress response in triple-negative breast cancer cells by a GCN2- and PERK-independent mechanism.

Transformed cells are often selectively susceptible to depletion of the amino acid methionine, which induces growth arrest and/or apoptosis. In non-transformed cells, amino acid deficiency is sensed by two stress-activated kinases, general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) and protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), which phosphorylate and inactivate elongation initiation factor 2 α (eIF2α), thereby suppressing global mRNA translation and inducing activated transcription factor (ATF4). ATF4 and its downstream transcriptional targets including Sestrin-2 constitute an adaptive integrated stress response. We postulated that methionine depletion activates the integrated stress response in breast cancer cells by a GCN2- and/or PERK-dependent mechanism and that selective disruption of one or both of these kinases would enhance the therapeutic activity of methionine restriction. Here we demonstrate that methionine restriction induces eIF2α phosphorylation and enhances ATF4 gene expression and protein levels of ATF4 and Sestrin-2 in triple (ER/PR/HER2)-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. However, knockdown of GCN2, PERK or both in TNBC cells did not prevent induction of ATF4 or Sestrin-2 by methionine restriction. In contrast, deletion of GCN2 in murine embryonic fibroblasts abrogated ATF4 and Sestrin-2 induction in response to methionine restriction. Moreover, knockdown of GCN2, PERK or both did not affect TNBC cell growth or apoptosis in response to methionine restriction. Overall, our findings point to a GCN2- and PERK-independent mechanism(s) by which methionine restriction activates the integrated stress response in TNBC cells. Elucidation of this pathway(s) could lead to strategies to enhance the therapeutic response of methionine restriction.