[Advances in antibiotic therapy for tuberculosis]. / Avancées dans l'antibiothérapie de la tuberculose.

ADVANCES IN ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY FOR TUBERCULOSIS. Treatment of tuberculosis is experiencing significant advancements. For the first time, a therapeutic regimen based on rifapentine and moxifloxacin allows for a reduction of treatment duration of drug-susceptible tuberculosis from 6 to 4 months. Regarding multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, combinations of new antituberculosis drugs (bedaquiline, linezolid, delamanid/pretomanid, moxifloxacin) have the potential to reduce the treatment duration from 20 to 6 months. Additionally, considering the extent of anatomical involvement and bacterial burden allows for strategies that involve variable treatment durations based on the severity of the disease. The new tuberculosis treatments thus appear to be shorter and more personalized.

AVANCÉES DANS L'ANTIBIOTHÉRAPIE DE LA TUBERCULOSE. Le traitement de la tuberculose connaît de grandes avancées. Pour la première fois, un protocole thérapeutique à base de rifapentine et moxifloxacine permet de réduire de six à quatre mois la durée du traitement des tuberculoses à bacilles sensibles. S'agissant des tuberculoses à bacilles multirésistants, des combinaisons de nouveaux antituberculeux (bédaquiline, linézolide, délamanide-prétomanide, moxifloxacine) permettent de réduire de vingt à six mois la durée du traitement. Enfin, la prise en compte de l'importance de l'atteinte anatomique et de la charge bacillaire permet d'envisager des stratégies incluant des durées de traitement variables selon l'importance de l'atteinte. Les nouveaux traitements de la tuberculose apparaissent donc plus courts et plus personnalisés.

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3 regulates the transendothelial transport of high-density lipoproteins and low-density lipoproteins in opposite ways.

AIMS: The entry of lipoproteins from blood into the arterial wall is a rate-limiting step in atherosclerosis. It is controversial whether this happens by filtration or regulated transendothelial transport.Because sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) preserves the endothelial barrier, we investigated in vivo and in vitro, whether S1P and its cognate S1P-receptor 3 (S1P3) regulate the transendothelial transport of lipoproteins. METHODS AND RESULTS: Compared to apoE-haploinsufficient mice (CTRL), apoE-haploinsufficient mice with additional endothelium-specific knock-in of S1P3 (S1P3-iECKI) showed decreased transport of LDL and Evan's Blue but increased transport of HDL from blood into the peritoneal cave. After 30 weeks of high-fat diet feeding, S1P3-iECKI mice had lower levels of non-HDL-cholesterol and less atherosclerosis than CTRL mice. In vitro stimulation with an S1P3 agonist increased the transport of 125I-HDL but decreased the transport of 125I-LDL through human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs). Conversely, inhibition or knock-down of S1P3 decreased the transport of 125I-HDL but increased the transport of 125I-LDL. Silencing of SCARB1 encoding scavenger receptor B1 (SR-BI) abrogated the stimulation of 125I-HDL transport by the S1P3 agonist. The transendothelial transport of 125I-LDL was decreased by silencing of SCARB1 or ACVLR1 encoding activin-like kinase 1 but not by interference with LDLR. None of the three knock-downs prevented the stimulatory effect of S1P3 inhibition on transendothelial 125I-LDL transport. CONCLUSION: S1P3 regulates the transendothelial transport of HDL and LDL oppositely by SR-BI-dependent and SR-BI-independent mechanisms, respectively. This divergence supports a contention that lipoproteins pass the endothelial barrier by specifically regulated mechanisms rather than passive filtration.

Diagnosis and treatment of bacterial peritonitis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: an observational multicenter study.

Background: Bacterial peritonitis (BP) in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer has been poorly described, and its prevalence is unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate in patients with both GI cancer and ascites the prevalence of BP, associated features, mechanisms, prognosis, and the diagnostic performance of neutrophil count in ascites. Design: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Methods: All patients with GI cancer and ascites who underwent at least one paracentesis sample analyzed for bacteriology over a 1-year period were included. BP was defined by a positive ascites culture combined with clinical and/or biological signs compatible with infection. Secondary BP was defined as BP related to a direct intra-abdominal infectious source. Results: Five hundred fifty-seven ascites from 208 patients included were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients had at least one episode of BP and the annual prevalence rate of BP was 14%. Among the 28 patients with BP, 19 (65%) patients had proven secondary BP and 17 (59%) patients had multi-microbial BP, mainly due to Enterobacterales. A neutrophil count greater than 110/mm3 in ascites had negative and positive predictive values of 96% and 39%, respectively, for the diagnosis of BP. The median survival of patients with BP was 10 days (interquartile range 6-40) after the diagnosis. Conclusion: BP is not rare in patients with GI cancer and is associated with a poor short-term prognosis. When a patient with GI cancer is diagnosed with BP, a secondary cause should be sought. Further studies are needed to better define the best management of these patients.