The host-targeted antiviral drug Zapnometinib exhibits a high barrier to the development of SARS-CoV-2 resistance.

Host targeting antiviral drugs (HTA) are directed against cellular mechanisms which can be exploited by viruses. These mechanisms are essential for viral replication, because missing functions cannot be compensated by the virus. However, this assumption needs experimental proof. Here we compared the HTA Zapnometinib (ZMN), with direct acting antivirals (DAA) (Remdesivir (RDV), Molnupiravir (MPV), Nirmatrelvir (NTV), Ritonavir (RTV), Paxlovid PAX)), in terms of their potency to induce reduced drug susceptibilities in SARS-CoV-2. During serial passage of δ-B1.617.2 adaptation to all DAAs occurred, while the inhibitory capacity of ZMN was not altered. Known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) responsible for partial resistances were found for RDV, NTV and PAX. Additionally, the high mutagenic potential of MPV was confirmed and decreased drug efficacies were found for the first time. Reduced DAA efficacy did not alter the inhibitory potential of ZMN. These results show that ZMN confers a high barrier towards the development of viral resistance and has the potential to act against partially DAA-insensitive viruses.

Immunological changes following electroconvulsive therapy in multiple sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a well-established treatment option in case of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Only a few cases of ECT in depressed patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were reported so far suggesting efficacy for the treatment of severe depression in MS, while data on possible neurological deterioration remained unclear. METHODS: In this case study we report on a case of a middle-aged man with MS. He was on dimethyl fumarate for relapse prevention since 2019 and without signs of active disease in a recent cerebral MRI. He suffered from treatment-resistant severe bipolar depression and thus received a total of 14 ECT sessions. We changed from right-unilateral to bilateral stimulation technique after the 7th session. We rated depression severity and measured biomarkers of neurodegeneration and inflammation before and after the ECT series to determine the impact of ECT on tolerance, response and neurobiology. RESULTS: The ECT series was tolerated well without neurological deterioration and any new neurological symptoms. The seizure quality was sufficient on average. We saw partial response corresponding to an improvement of about 35% in BDI-II and MADRS. The concentration of inflammation and neurodegeneration biomarkers was low both pre-treatment and post-treatment with increases from pre- to post ECT mainly in the CCL-2 pathway. CONCLUSION: In our patient with TRD and MS ECT was safe and feasible. We did not see any neurobiological signs of disease activation of MS or neurodegeneration during the course of ECT, which may even be beneficial as it led to increase in the neuroprotective CCL-2 pathway in the presented patient.