Well calculated is better than quickly calculated: Comparison of Pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms according to the number of lesions and fractionation in radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: In this work we compared pencil beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms in single isocenter plans of multiple brain metastases radiosurgery (SIMM-SRS) plans using the quality indices reported for SRS. METHOD: The plans were evaluated concerning the prescribed dose, fractions and the number of metastases. The quality indices studied were mean dose (Dmean), D95, Paddick conformity index (PCI), Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) homogeneity (HIRTOG) and quality of coverage indices (QRTOG), gradient index (GI), efficiency index for targets (Gη12Gy) and organs at risk (OARη12Gy) and V12-V18 for brain. RESULTS: The D95 for plans calculated with PB algorithm increased and differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). For Dmean no differences were observed (p > 0.194). The PCI for the single-fraction cases showed statistical significant differences (p < 0.039). The PCI for the three-fraction cases did not show statistical significant difference (p < 0.569). However, the mean value of the index for all cases did not differ significantly between PB (0.84) and MC (0.81). The GI showed statistically significant differences, only for the plans with more than 10 metastases for a single-fraction (p = 0.0001). The Gη12Gy values reported are within the interval of 0.26-0.80, and for all cases, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: Considering that MC is more accurate for small volumes and heterogeneities, and computational time is reasonable for clinical use, it should be selected in all cases for SIMM-SRS plans. We introduced the potential of novel indices as Gη12Gy, and OARη12Gy for clinical evaluation that potentially serve as optimization factor.

Commissioning of MRI-guided gynaecological brachytherapy using an MR-linac.

Purpose. To evaluate the feasibility of use of an 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR)-linear accelerator MR-linac for imaging in gynaecologic high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.Method. Commissioning measurements for MR images quality control, geometric distortion, dwell position accuracy, applicator reconstruction and end-to-end test for a tandem-and-ring applicator were performed following the recommendations of American Brachytherapy Society, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements and Report of the Brachytherapy Working Group of the Spanish Society of Medical Physics. The values for MR-based IGABT were compared to the corresponding values with computed tomography (CT).Results. Measured distorsions for the MR images were less than 0.50 mm compared to the CT images. The differences between 3D displacements for all dwell positions were 0.66 mm and 0.62 mm for the tandem and ring, respectively. The maximum difference is 0.64 mm for the distances from the applicator tip obtained using the films. The CT and MR dose differences for the right and left 'A' points were 0.9% and -0.7%, respectively. Similar results were observed in terms of dose distribution for CT and Mr The gamma passing rate was 99.3% and 99.5%, respectively.Conclusion. The use of MR images from an MR-linac used in a radiotherapy service for gynaecological brachytherapy was proved to be feasible, safe and precise as the geometrical differences were less than 1 mm, and the dosimetric differences were less than 1% when comparing to the use of CT images for the same purpose.

Assessment of PTV margin adequacy for single isocenter multiple brain metastases using genetic algorithms.

Purpose. To study the impact on dose coverage and the dose to the healthy tissue applying optimized margins in single isocenter multiple brain metastases radiosurgery (SIMM-SRS) in linac machine based on setup rotations/translations induced errors calculated by a genetic algorithm (GA).Method.The following quality indices of SIMM-SRS were analyzed for 32 plans (256 lesions): Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI), maximum (Dmax) and mean (Dmean) doses, local and global V12for the healthy brain. A GA based on Python packages were used to determine the maximum shift produced by induced errors of 0.2°/0.2 mm, and 0.5°/0.5 mm in 6 degrees of freedom.Results.In terms of Dmax, and Dmean, the quality of the optimized-margin plans remains unchanged (p > 0.072) concerning the original plan. However, considering the 0.5°/0.5 mm plans, PCI and GI decreased for ≥10 metastases, and local, and global V12increased considerably in all cases. To consider 0.2°/0.2 mm plans, PCI and GI get worse but local, and global V12improved in all cases.Conclusion.GA facilities to find the individualized margins automatically among the number of possible permutations of the setup order. The user-dependent margins are avoided. This computational approach takes into account more SRS sources of uncertainty, enabling the protection of the healthy brain by 'smartly' reducing the margins, and maintaining clinically acceptable target volumes' coverage in most cases.

Perception and Recognition of Clinical Medical Physicist Roles and Responsibilities by Specialist Physician Staff: The First Mexican Survey.

Introduction: Although medical physics as a profession is recognized as part of the health-care professional workforce by the International Labor Organization, in the Mexican context, the figure of the medical physicist (MP) is often inappropriately associated solely with technical work, leading to perception, recognition, and salary implications. The aim of this study was to explore the perception of medical specialists regarding the role and responsibilities of MPs in clinical practice in Mexico. Methods: A national survey was answered by medical personnel, ranging from residents to qualified specialists in November 2019. The questionnaire consisted of ten questions related to perception of MPs. The survey was open to all medical specialists regardless of their involvement in the use of ionizing radiations or otherwise. Results: It was shown that approximately two-thirds of specialists know and recognize the medical physics profession in hospitals and the roles and responsibilities of MPs. However, 19% of medical specialists considered the standard of service as inadequate. Conclusion: MPs must exert greater efforts to promote their status and enhance the recognition of their contribution to health care. The low level of recognition in diagnostic and interventional radiology and in nuclear medicine in Mexico might be related to nonexistent or unclear documentation and inadequate regulations, policies, or directives promoted by the health-care authorities.

Considerations for MR-linac bunker shielding design.

Purpose.To show the considerations followed for MR-linac in shielding design for the first MR-linac in Mexico following the national clinical necessities.Method.The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) 151 recommendations were followed for the shielding design for primary and secondary barriers and the door design. The calculations were made considering the clinical demands in the country, that is, intensity modulated (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DC-RT) in 80%-20% proportion.Results.The values obtained in the level survey fully comply with the limits established by the national regulatory authority and with those recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) for public and occupational exposures.Conclusion.It is remarkable that the workload may increase or that the doses per patient may increase considering occupancy factors, which would allow the introduction of hypofractionated techniques with the same number of patients considered in this work without the need to make modifications in the bunker design.

Importance of Beam-Matching between TrueBeam STx and Novalis Tx in Pre-Treatment Quality Assurance Using Portal Dosimetry.

Flexibility and efficiency in a radiotherapy department with different linear accelerators (linacs) can be improved if they are dosimetrically equivalent, and there is no need of plan or patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) modification. From 2012 to 2017, our institution purchased three Novalis Tx and one TrueBeam STx beam-matched accelerators with the same high-resolution multileaf collimator (MLC). They are matched taking as reference dosimetric data from Novalis Tx SN-5479. We showed the importance of beam-matched dosimetric units by the use of electronic portal image device (EPID) and Delta4 PSQA. It was able to treat patients on a different machine than the machine used for PSQA. Depth dose, beam profiles, output factors, dosimetric leaf gap, and MLC transmission were compared for all energies and linacs. PSQA in all linacs for 30 volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans was also compared. Prostate, breast, and head-and-neck cases were selected to consider low, middle, and high plan complexity, respectively. The comparisons were evaluated using EPID and Delta4 phantom. Dosimetric differences between the three Novalis Tx and TrueBeam STx in all energies were lower than 1%. The only significant difference was observed in Novalis EPID in middle complexity when the criterion was tighter in distance. This result could be related with the nonsymmetric dose delivery of semi arcs. In all other cases, there were no differences in two different EPID evaluations. However, TrueBeam EPID values were slightly higher than Novalis EPID values. This could be associated with the high-resolution novel diode detector TrueBeam EPID. The dosimetric data indicated that the Novalis Tx and TrueBeam STx are equivalent. PSQA using EPID and Delta4 phantom showed that there are no dosimetric differences in any of the linacs. These results revealed the flexibility performance in PSQA by beam-matching.

Use of genetic algorithm for PTV optimization in single isocenter multiple metastases radiosurgery treatments with Brainlab Elements™.

PURPOSE: To optimize PTV margins for single isocenter multiple metastases stereotactic radiosurgery through a genetic algorithm (GA) that determines the maximum effective displacement of each target (GTV) due to rotations. METHOD: 10 plans were optimized. The plans were created with Elements Multiple Mets™ (Brainlab AG, Munchen, Germany) from a predefined template. The mean number of metastases per plan was 5 ± 2 [3,9] and the mean volume of GTV was 1.1 ± 1.3 cc [0.02, 5.1]. PTV margin criterion was based on GTV-isocenter distance and target dimensions. The effective displacement to perform specific rotational combination (roll, pitch, yaw) was optimized by GA. The original plans were re-calculated using the PTV optimized margin and new dosimetric variations were obtained. The Dmean, D99, Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index (GI) and dose variations in healthy brain were studied. RESULTS: Regarding targets located shorter than 50 mm from the isocenter, the maximum calculated displacement was 2.5 mm. The differences between both PTV margin criteria were statistically significant for Dmean (p = 0.0163), D99 (p = 0.0439), PCI (p = 0.0242), GI (p = 0.0160) and for healthy brain V12 (p = 0.0218) and V10 (p = 0.0264). CONCLUSION: The GA allows to determine an optimized PTV margin based on the maximum displacement. Optimized PTV margins reduce the detriment of dosimetric parameters. Greater PTV margins are associated with an increase in healthy brain volume.