Phase 2, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial of a c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Inhibitor in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a fatal and progressive disease with limited treatment options. Objectives: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of CC-90001, an oral inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Methods: In a Phase 2, randomized (1:1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03142191), patients received CC-90001 (200 or 400 mg) or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. Background antifibrotic treatment (pirfenidone) was allowed. The primary endpoint was change in the percentage of predicted FVC (ppFVC) from baseline to Week 24; secondary endpoints included safety. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 112 patients received at least one dose of study drug. The study was terminated early because of a strategic decision made by the sponsor. Ninety-one patients (81%) completed the study. The least-squares mean changes from baseline in ppFVC at Week 24 were -3.1% (placebo), -2.1% (200 mg), and -1.0% (400 mg); the differences compared with placebo were 1.1% (200 mg; 95% confidence interval: -2.1, 4.3; P = 0.50) and 2.2% (400 mg; 95% confidence interval: -1.1, 5.4; P = 0.19). Adverse event frequency was similar in patients in the combined CC-90001 arms versus placebo. The most common adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which were more frequent in patients in CC-90001 arms versus placebo. Fewer patients in the CC-90001 arms than in the placebo arm experienced cough and dyspnea. Conclusions: Treatment with CC-90001 over 24 weeks led to numerical improvements in ppFVC in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis compared with placebo. CC-90001 was generally well tolerated, which was consistent with previous studies. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03142191).

Cerebrovascular function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the impact of exercise training.

This study examined cerebral blood flow (CBF) and its regulation before and after a short-term periodized aerobic exercise training intervention in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Twenty-eight patients with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity < 0.7 and

Aerobic exercise training does not alter vascular structure and function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation, which are linked to increased cardiovascular disease risk. We asked whether periodized aerobic exercise training could improve vascular structure and function in patients with COPD. What is the main finding and its importance? Eight weeks of periodized aerobic training did not improve endothelial function, arterial stiffness or systemic inflammation in COPD, despite improvements in aerobic capacity, blood pressure and dyspnoea. Short-term training programmes may not be long enough to improve vascular-related cardiovascular risk in COPD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffening, which are predictive of future cardiovascular events. Although aerobic exercise improves vascular function in healthy individuals and those with chronic disease, it is unknown whether aerobic exercise can positively modify the vasculature in COPD. We examined the effects of 8 weeks of periodized aerobic training on vascular structure and function and inflammation in 24 patients with COPD (age, 69 ± 7 years; forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of predicted (FEV1 %pred), 68 ± 19%) and 20 matched control subjects (age, 64 ± 5 years; FEV1 %pred, 113 ± 16%) for comparison. Endothelial function was measured using brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation, whereas central and peripheral pulse wave velocity, carotid artery intima-media thickness, carotid compliance, distensibility and ß-stiffness index were measured using applanation tonometry and ultrasound. Peak aerobic power (V̇O2 peak ) was measured using an incremental cycling test. Upper and lower body cycling training was performed three times per week for 8 weeks, and designed to optimize vascular adaptation by increasing and sustaining vascular shear stress. Flow-mediated dilatation was not increased in COPD patients (+0.15 ± 2.27%, P = 0.82) or control subjects (+0.34 ± 3.20%, P = 0.64) and was not different between groups (P = 0.68). No significant improvements in central pulse wave velocity (COPD, +0.30 ± 1.79 m s-1 versus control subjects, -0.34 ± 1.47 m s-1 ) or other markers of vascular structure or function were found within or between groups. The V̇O2 peak increased significantly in COPD and control subjects, and was greater in control subjects (1.6 ± 1.4 versus 4.1 ± 3.7 ml kg min-1 , P = 0.003), while blood pressure and dyspnoea were reduced in COPD patients (P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that 8 weeks of aerobic training improved cardiorespiratory fitness and blood pressure in COPD but had little effect on other established markers of cardiovascular disease risk.

Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Breast Cancer Patients After Treatment With Anthracycline-Containing Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (Anth-C) is associated with long-term cardiovascular mortality. Although cardiovascular risk assessment has traditionally focused on the heart, evidence has demonstrated that vascular dysfunction also occurs during and up to 1 year following Anth-C. Whether vascular dysfunction persists long-term or negatively influences cardiac function remains unknown. Hence, the present study evaluated ventricular-arterial coupling, in concert with measures of vascular structure and function, in the years following Anth-C. METHODS: Arterial elastance (Ea), end-systolic elastance (Ees), and ventricular-arterial coupling (Ea/Ees) were measured during rest and exercise using echocardiography. Resting vascular function (flow-mediated dilation) and structure (carotid intima-media thickness, arterial stiffness) were also measured. RESULTS: Thirty breast cancer survivors (6.5 ± 3.6 years after Anth-C) with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (60% ± 6%) and 30 matched controls were studied. At rest, no differences were found in Ea, Ees, Ea/Ees, or LVEF between groups. The normal exercise-induced increase in Ees was attenuated in survivors at 50% and 75% of maximal workload (p < .01). Ea/Ees was also higher at all workloads in the survivors compared with the controls (p < .01). No differences in vascular structure and function were observed between the two groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: In the years after Anth-C, ventricular-arterial coupling was significantly attenuated during exercise, primarily owing to decreased LV contractility (indicated by a reduced Ees). This subclinical dysfunction appears to be isolated to the heart, as no differences in Ea were observed. The previously reported adverse effects of Anth-C on the vasculature appear to not persist in the years after treatment, as vascular structure and function were comparable to controls. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity results in significantly impaired ventricular-arterial coupling in the years following chemotherapy, owing specifically to decreased left ventricular contractility. This subclinical dysfunction was identified only under exercise stress. A comprehensive evaluation of vascular structure and function yielded no differences between those treated with anthracyclines and controls. Combined with a stress stimulus, ventricular-arterial coupling might hold significant value beyond characterization of integrative cardiovascular function, in particular as a part of a risk-stratification strategy after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. Although vascular function and structure were not different in this cohort, this does not undermine the importance of identifying vascular (dys)function in this population, because increases in net arterial load during exercise might amplify the effect of reductions in contractility on cardiovascular function after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

The impact of comorbidities on productivity loss in asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Health-related productivity loss is an important, yet overlooked, component of the economic burden of disease in asthma patients of a working age. We aimed at evaluating the effect of comorbidities on productivity loss among adult asthma patients. METHODS: In a random sample of employed adults with asthma, we measured comorbidities using a validated self-administered comorbidity questionnaire (SCQ), as well as productivity loss, including absenteeism and presenteeism, using validated instruments. Productivity loss was measured in 2010 Canadian dollars ($). We used a two-part regression model to estimate the adjusted difference of productivity loss across levels of comorbidity, controlling for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: 284 adults with the mean age of 47.8 (SD 11.8) were included (68 % women). The mean SCQ score was 2.47 (SD 2.97, range 0-15) and the average productivity loss was $317.5 per week (SD $858.8). One-unit increase in the SCQ score was associated with 14 % (95 % CI 1.02-1.28) increase in the odds of reporting productivity loss, and 9.0 % (95 % CI 1.01-1.18) increase in productivity loss among those reported any loss of productivity. A person with a SCQ score of 15 had almost $1000 per week more productivity loss than a patient with a SCQ of zero. CONCLUSIONS: Our study deepens the evidence-base on the burden of asthma, by demonstrating that comorbidities substantially decrease productivity in working asthma patients. Asthma management strategies must be cognizant of the role of comorbidities to properly incorporate the effect of comorbidity and productivity loss in estimating the benefit of disease management strategies.

Phenotyping Cardiopulmonary Exercise Limitations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Exercise limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is commonly attributed to abnormal ventilatory mechanics and/or skeletal muscle function, while cardiovascular contributions remain relatively understudied. To date, the integrative exercise responses associated with different cardiopulmonary exercise limitation phenotypes in COPD have not been explored but may provide novel therapeutic utility. This study determined the ventilatory, cardiovascular, and metabolic responses to incremental exercise in patients with COPD with different exercise limitation phenotypes. METHODS: Patients with COPD (n = 95, FEV1:23-113%pred) performed a pulmonary function test and incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test. Exercise limitation phenotypes were classified as: ventilatory [peak ventilation (VEpeak)/maximal ventilatory capacity (MVC) ≥ 85% or MVC-VEpeak ≤ 11 L/min, and peak heart rate (HRpeak) < 90%pred], cardiovascular (VEpeak/MVC < 85% or MVC-VEpeak > 11 L/min, and HRpeak ≥ 90%pred), or combined (VEpeak/MVC ≥ 85% or MVC-VEpeak ≤ 11 L/min, and HRpeak ≥ 90%pred). RESULTS: FEV1 varied within phenotype: ventilatory (23-75%pred), combined (28-90%pred), and cardiovascular (68-113%pred). The cardiovascular phenotype had less static hyperinflation, a lower end-expiratory lung volume and larger tidal volume at peak exercise compared to both other phenotypes (p < 0.01 for all). The cardiovascular phenotype reached a higher VEpeak (60.8 ± 11.5 L/min vs. 45.3 ± 15.5 L/min, p = 0.002), cardiopulmonary fitness (VO2peak: 20.6 ± 4.0 ml/kg/min vs. 15.2 ± 3.3 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001), and maximum workload (103 ± 34 W vs. 72 ± 27 W, p < 0.01) vs. the ventilatory phenotype, but was similar to the combined phenotype. CONCLUSION: Distinct exercise limitation phenotypes were identified in COPD that were not solely dependent upon airflow limitation severity. Approximately 50% of patients reached maximal heart rate, indicating that peak cardiac output and convective O2 delivery contributed to exercise limitation. Categorizing patients with COPD phenotypically may aid in optimizing exercise prescription for rehabilitative purposes.

High Oxygen Delivery to Preserve Exercise Capacity in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated with Nintedanib. Methodology of the HOPE-IPF Study.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary rehabilitation improves dyspnea and exercise capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, it is unknown whether breathing high amounts of oxygen during exercise training leads to further benefits. OBJECTIVES: Herein, we describe the design of the High Oxygen Delivery to Preserve Exercise Capacity in IPF Patients Treated with Nintedanib study (the HOPE-IPF study). The primary objective of this study is to determine the physiological and perceptual impact of breathing high levels of oxygen during exercise training in patients with IPF who are receiving antifibrotic therapy. METHODS: HOPE-IPF is a two-arm double-blind multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial of 88 patients with IPF treated with nintedanib. Patients will undergo 8 weeks of three times weekly aerobic cycle exercise training, breathing a hyperoxic gas mixture with a constant fraction of 60% inhaled oxygen, or breathing up to 40% oxygen as required to maintain an oxygen saturation level of at least 88%. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End points will be assessed at baseline, postintervention (Week 8), and follow-up (Week 26). The primary analysis will compare the between-group baseline with post-training change in endurance time during constant work rate cycle exercise tests. Additional analyses will evaluate the impact of training with high oxygen delivery on 6-minute walk distance, dyspnea, physical activity, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The HOPE-IPF study will lead to a comprehensive understanding of IPF exercise physiology, with the potential to change clinical practice by indicating the need for increased delivery of supplemental oxygen during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with IPF. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02551068).

Intravenous peramivir for treatment of influenza in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Influenza causes over 200,000 hospitalizations a year in the United States, but few antiviral treatment studies have focused on patients hospitalized with influenza. This open-label, randomized study was initiated during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic to help assess the antiviral activity, safety and tolerability of 5-10 days treatment with two different dosing regimens of the intravenous neuraminidase inhibitor, peramivir, in hospitalized subjects with influenza. METHODS: Quantitative virology was done on nasopharyngeal swab specimens from subjects ≥6 years of age to measure change from baseline in tissue culture infective dose (primary end point) and quantitative viral RNA levels by real-time PCR. Clinical end points included time to clinical resolution, a composite end point of four vital signs and oxygen saturation. RESULTS: A total of 234 hospitalized patients were randomized to peramivir 300 mg twice daily or 600 mg once daily; 127 had laboratory confirmed influenza. In those with detectable virus at baseline, viral titres declined without differences between regimens. There were no significant differences in clinical or virological end points between treatment arms, and apparent differences were explained by baseline disease severity differences in the groups. Peramivir was generally safe and well tolerated for treated patients hospitalized with pandemic influenza with outcomes similar to those described in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label trial of intravenous peramivir in subjects hospitalized predominantly with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) demonstrated that once- or twice-daily administration was associated with decreases in viral shedding and clinical improvement. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00957996.