Tackling change in mental health service delivery: A qualitative evaluation of a lifestyle program targeting mental health staff - Keeping our Staff in Mind (KoSiM).

ISSUES ADDRESSED: People with severe mental illness have adverse health outcomes compared to the general population. Lifestyle interventions are effective in improving health outcomes in this population. Current cultural processes in mental health services do not generally incorporate physical health care practices. Innovative education is required to improve knowledge and confidence of staff in the delivery of preventative health measures. METHODS: The Keeping our Staff in Mind (KoSiM) program delivered a brief lifestyle intervention to mental health staff. A qualitative analysis following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews designed to elicit information about the acceptability of the program and the impact of the intervention on participants' personal and professional lives. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, with coding independently developed and reviewed by three authors. RESULTS: Of the 103 eligible participants, 75 were interviewed. Responses revealed four main themes: (i) positive changes in clinician's approach to physical health care, (ii) improvements in attitudes to self-care and family wellbeing, (iii) positive changes in workplace culture associated with physical health care delivery and (iv) high levels of acceptability of the program. CONCLUSION: The KoSiM model may be useful in other settings as a means of changing the culture of mental health services to better integrate physical health care as a core part of mental health service provision. SO WHAT?: A novel approach using staff focussed lifestyle interventions model may cut through the resistance that is encountered when implementing proven methods of clinical intervention where cultural barriers exist.

Keeping our staff in mind: Dietary results of a lifestyle intervention targeting mental health staff.

ISSUES ADDRESSED: 1) Describe the dietary intake of mental health staff within South Eastern Sydney Local Health District and 2) Evaluate the impact of an individualised staff lifestyle program on the following nutrition parameters; (i) energy, (ii) core food groups and (iii) discretionary foods. METHODS: This was a pragmatic single-arm intervention study, conducted for all staff working in a public mental health service, in Sydney, Australia. A five-session individualised lifestyle intervention delivered over 5 weeks incorporated nutritional counselling delivered by a dietitian. Participants were assessed at baseline, following the intervention, and at follow-up using diet history to assess dietary intake. RESULTS: Eighty-eight staff completed the dietary intervention and follow-up. An intake of core food groups significantly below national recommendations was reported for total vegetables (-1.75 ± 0.14 serves, P < .001), fruit (-0.29 ± 0.11 serves, P = .01), grains (-1.25 ± 0.20 serves, P < .001) and dairy servings (-1.00 ± 1.08 serves, P < .001), and protein-based foods were significantly above national recommendations (0.2 ± 0.09 serves, P = .03). At completion of the program, energy from discretionary foods was reduced by 460 kJ (95% CI -635 to -285, P < .001), and the serves of total vegetables (0.91 serves, 95% CI 0.59-1.22, P < .001) and dairy (0.31 serves, 95% CI 0.11-0.50, P < .001) were increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A workplace-based well-being program for staff working in the mental health setting coincided with dietary improvements. SO WHAT: Mental health staff can act as positive role models for clients to promote developing positive physical health behaviours.

Changing health workforce attitudes to promote improved physical health in mental health service users: Keeping our Staff in Mind (KoSiM).

ISSUE ADDRESSED: People living with mental illness die on average 15 years earlier than the general population, primarily due to preventable and premature cardiovascular disease. Lifestyle interventions can be effective in reducing cardiovascular risk, yet mental health services do not routinely provide targeted lifestyle interventions. Exposing mental health staff to lifestyle interventions prior to targeting patients may be critical to changing culture and improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to improve the physical health of mental health staff through a targeted lifestyle intervention. METHODS: A pragmatic single-arm intervention study was conducted in a public mental health service, including inpatient and community settings, in Sydney, Australia. Participants in this study were n = 212 clinical and non-clinical staff. A five-session individualised lifestyle intervention (delivered over 5 weeks) incorporating physical activity and nutritional counselling was delivered by multidisciplinary teams. Participants were assessed at baseline, following the intervention, and at follow-up (mean = 16.7 weeks). The primary outcome was the barriers, attitudes, knowledge and confidence regarding screening, promoting and intervening to improve physical health outcomes of patients (M-BACK questionnaire). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, cardiorespiratory fitness, sedentary time and nutritional intake. Repeated measures ANCOVAs were performed. RESULTS: A total of 212 staff (79% female) participated in this study. M-BACK total score significantly increased from baseline to follow-up (P < .001). Waist circumference, sedentary time and total energy intake all significantly decreased (all P's < .001) and cardiorespiratory fitness significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A brief lifestyle intervention for staff of a public mental health service may increase the capability of the participants to improve their own physical health. SO WHAT?: Improving staff health may be an important strategy in improving the uptake and/or the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions targeting mental health service users.

Cardio-metabolic risk in individuals prescribed long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication.

People living with severe mental illness (SMI) experience significant physical health co-morbidity. Few studies have focused on physical health outcomes for those prescribed long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. This observational cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and other cardio-metabolic risk factors in a large cohort prescribed LAI and managed by community mental health services. For participants with elevated cardio-metabolic risk factors, the proportion receiving appropriate management was assessed. Of the 301 eligible participants, many met the full criteria for MetS (44%) and its components. Cardio-metabolic risk factors were largely under- or un-treated. Smoking rates were very high (62%) along with reported high rates of physical inactivity and poor dietary intake. The vast majority (89%) reported seeing their general practitioner in the preceding twelve months. Individuals prescribed LAI have a very high prevalence of MetS and potentially modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Routine monitoring accompanied by evidence-based treatment of cardiometabolic abnormalities which contribute to significant morbidity, disability and premature death should be prioritised. Better collaboration between mental health services and primary care providers should be pursued to optimise the delivery of effective physical health care to individuals living with SMI.

Is Obesity in Young People With Psychosis a Foregone Conclusion? Markedly Excessive Energy Intake Is Evident Soon After Antipsychotic Initiation.

Introduction: Antipsychotic medication (APM) initiation is associated with rapid and substantial weight-gain and high rates of obesity. Obesity leads to premature onset of cardiometabolic diseases and contributes to the 15-20 year shortfall in life expectancy in those experiencing severe mental illness. Dietary energy intake excess is critical to weight management but is yet to be quantified in youth with first episode psychosis (FEP) receiving APM. This study aimed to describe the degree of energy overconsumption and the food sources contributing to this in youth with FEP. Materials and Methods: People aged 15-30 years with FEP receiving APM completed diet histories through qualified dietitians to assess energy imbalance and food sources. Outcome measures were: (i) energy balance; and (ii) intake of core and discretionary foods. Results: Participants (n = 93) were aged 15-29 years (mean = 21.4 ± 2.9 years) and exposed to APMs for a median for 8 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 11 months). Energy balance was exceeded by 26%, by a median 1,837 kJ per day (IQR 5,365 kJ). APM polypharmacy and olanzapine were linked to larger excesses in dietary energy intake. The greatest contributors to energy intake were refined grain foods (33%) and discretionary foods (31%). Conclusion: Young people with FEP receiving APMs appear to have markedly excessive energy consumption, likely contributing to rapid weight-gain, and thereby seeding future poor physical health. Larger, prospective studies are needed to gain a greater understanding of dietary intake, and its effects on health, in people with FEP.