Impact of temporal probability in 4D dose calculation for lung tumors.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric uncertainty in 4D dose calculation using three temporal probability distributions: uniform distribution, sinusoidal distribution, and patient-specific distribution derived from the patient respiratory trace. Temporal probability, defined as the fraction of time a patient spends in each respiratory amplitude, was evaluated in nine lung cancer patients. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT), along with deformable image registration, was used to compute 4D dose incorporating the patient's respiratory motion. First, the dose of each of 10 phase CTs was computed using the same planning parameters as those used in 3D treatment planning based on the breath-hold CT. Next, deformable image registration was used to deform the dose of each phase CT to the breath-hold CT using the deformation map between the phase CT and the breath-hold CT. Finally, the 4D dose was computed by summing the deformed phase doses using their corresponding temporal probabilities. In this study, 4D dose calculated from the patient-specific temporal probability distribution was used as the ground truth. The dosimetric evaluation matrix included: 1) 3D gamma analysis, 2) mean tumor dose (MTD), 3) mean lung dose (MLD), and 4) lung V20. For seven out of nine patients, both uniform and sinusoidal temporal probability dose distributions were found to have an average gamma passing rate > 95% for both the lung and PTV regions. Compared with 4D dose calculated using the patient respiratory trace, doses using uniform and sinusoidal distribution showed a percentage difference on average of -0.1% ± 0.6% and -0.2% ± 0.4% in MTD, -0.2% ± 1.9% and -0.2% ± 1.3% in MLD, 0.09% ± 2.8% and -0.07% ± 1.8% in lung V20, -0.1% ± 2.0% and 0.08% ± 1.34% in lung V10, 0.47% ± 1.8% and 0.19% ± 1.3% in lung V5, respectively. We concluded that four-dimensional dose computed using either a uniform or sinusoidal temporal probability distribution can approximate four-dimensional dose computed using the patient-specific respiratory trace.

The Dosimetric and Temporal Effects of Respiratory-Gated, High-Dose-Rate Radiation Therapy in Patients With Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dosimetric and temporal effects of high-dose-rate respiratory-gated radiation therapy in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Treatment plans from 5 patients with lung cancer (3 nongated and 2 gated at 80EX-80IN) were retrospectively evaluated. Prescription dose for these patients varied from 8 to 18 Gy/fraction with 3 to 5 treatment fractions. Using the same treatment planning criteria, 4 new treatment plans, corresponding to 4 gating windows (20EX-20IN, 40EX-40IN, 60EX-60IN, and 80EX-80IN), were generated for each patient. Mean tumor dose, mean lung dose, and lung V20 were used to assess the dosimetric effects. A MATLAB algorithm was developed to compute treatment time. RESULTS: Mean lung dose and lung V20 were on average reduced between -16.1% to -6.0% and -20.0% to -7.2%, respectively, for gated plans when compared to the corresponding nongated plans, and between -5.8% to -4.2% and -7.0% to -5.4%, respectively, for plans with smaller gating windows when compared to the corresponding plans gated at 80EX-80IN. Treatment delivery times of gated plans using high-dose rate were reduced on average between -19.7% (-0.10 min/100 MU) and -27.2% (-0.13 min/100 MU) for original nongated plans and -15.6% (-0.15 min/100 MU) and -20.3% (-0.19 min/100 MU) for original 80EX-80IN-gated plans. CONCLUSION: Respiratory-gated radiation therapy in patients with lung cancer can reduce lung dose while maintaining tumor dose. Because treatment delivery during gated therapy is discontinuous, total treatment time may be prolonged. However, this increase in treatment time can be offset by increasing the dose delivery rate. Estimation of treatment time may be helpful in selecting patients for respiratory gating and choosing appropriate gating windows.