Laparoscopic Eradication of Deep Endometriosis With Segmental Rectosigmoid Resection and Bilateral Posterior Parametrectomy With Nerve-sparing "Touchless" Technique According to the "Negrar Method".

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection based on the Negrar method [1] using the "touchless" technique. DESIGN: Stepwise video case demonstration with narration. SETTING: Tertiary level endometriosis unit. The patient was a 28 year-old nulliparous patient referred for surgery with persistent dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia despite medical management (progestin-containing hormonal pills). Preoperative ultrasound demonstrated bilateral endometriomas, diffuse adenomyosis, and 35 mm × 17 mm stenosing rectal nodule. Histopathology confirmed 60% stenosis of the rectum secondary to the endometriotic nodule up to submucosal layer with margins free of endometriosis. She was discharged 7 days postoperatively with no postoperative complications. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectosigmoid resection and bilateral posterior parametrectomy [2] according to the "Negrar method" with nerve-sparing "touchless" technique, sliding the nerve bundles laterocaudally, and keeping intact the visceral pelvic fascia covering them, thus without direct contact with the nerves. CONCLUSION: In our experience, based on more than 3000 of these procedures [3], this nerve-sparing procedure, based on identifying the nerves and their laterocaudad dissection, without a direct impact on their fibers but just on their fascial envelopes has proven successful in lowering the rates of postoperative dysfunctions and neural impairment related to neuro-apraxia and edema that occurs by directly affecting them [1]. Although there are no robust data to demonstrate benefit of "touchless" nerve-sparing dissection techniques, neuro-apraxia from compression of neural fibers that has been observed can be minimized [1,4,5].

Early Quality of Life Assessment After Segmental Colorectal Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis is a benign condition afflicting women of reproductive age that significantly impacts their quality of life (QoL). Given its debilitating symptoms and prevalence, it is essential to define its proper management. In this study, we have assessed patient-reported outcomes among women having undergone segmental colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis. Any correlation between preoperative nutritional status and overall postoperative complications has also been analyzed. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Public medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty consecutive patients that had undergone segmental colorectal resection for DIE between November 2020 and October 2021 at IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital of Negrar of Valpolicella (Verona, Italy). INTERVENTIONS: Patient-reported outcomes were measured using data collected from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for gastrointestinal surgery patients and Euro-QoL Group EQ-5D-5L (EQ-5Q-5L) questionnaires, which were administered preoperatively (T0), at discharge (T1) and at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery (T2). Nutritional status was examined through the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short form and Prognostic Nutritional Index. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A significant improvement in the EQ-5Q-5L and MDASI-GI scores was noted between T0 and T2 (p <. 001 and p <. 001, respectively.) No statistically significant differences were found in scores at T2 between patients who had experienced postoperative complications and those who had not. No statistically significant association was observed between the presence of malnutrition and overall postoperative complications and their severity. CONCLUSION: This study confirms, through patient-reported outcomes, the pivotal role of surgery in improving the QoL at 4 to 6 weeks of women affected by endometriosis who have previously been unresponsive to medical therapy.

SUrgical Access and Pattern of Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: The SUPeR Study, a Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence rate and pattern in apparently early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and compare it to the "historical" populations treated by laparotomy. Secondary outcomes were to establish if, among MIS recurrent patients, intermediate-high/high-risk patients presented the same recurrence pattern compared to those at low/intermediate-risk and to evaluate time to first recurrence (TTR) of the study population. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective observational study. SETTING: Five Italian Gynecologic Oncology referral centers. PATIENTS: All patients with proven recurrence of apparently early-stage EC treated with MIS from January 2017 to June 2022 . The laparotomic historical cohort was obtained from Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (LAP2) and Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium trials. INTERVENTIONS: Evaluation of recurrence rate and pattern. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-seven recurrences occurred on the total of 1028 patients treated with MIS for apparently early-stage EC during a median follow-up time of 36 months. The rate of recurrence in our cohort did not differ significantly from the rate of the historical cohort (7.4% vs 7.9%, odds ratio 0.9395, 95% CI 0.6901-1.2792). No significant differences were noticed for local, abdominal, nodal, and multiple site recurrence patterns; distant site recurrence appeared more likely in patients from the historical cohort. Postoperative low/intermediate risk patients had a higher likelihood of local recurrence compared to intermediate-high/high risk patients. Mean TTR was 19 months. No significant difference of TTR was observed for each pattern of recurrence compared to others. CONCLUSION: MIS appears to be safe for the treatment of early-stage EC. We did not identify any recurrence pattern specifically associated with MIS in early-stage EC.

Ultrasonographic Findings Indirectly Predicting Parametrial Involvement in Patients with Deep Endometriosis: The ULTRA-PARAMETRENDO I Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultrasonographic findings as a first-line imaging tool to indirectly predict the presence of parametrial endometriosis (PE) in women with suspected deep endometriosis (DE) undergoing surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (ULTRA-PARAMETRENDO I study; NCT05239871). SETTING: Referral center for DE. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DE. INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography was done according to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis consensus statement. A stepwise forward regression analysis was performed considering the simultaneous presence of DE nodules and the following ultrasonographic indirect signs of DE: diffuse adenomyosis, endometriomas, ovary fixed to the lateral pelvic wall or the uterine wall, absence of anterior/posterior sliding sign, and hydronephrosis. The gold standard for the presence of PE was surgery with histologic confirmation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1079 patients, 212 had a surgical diagnosis of PE (left: 18.5%; right: 17.0%; bilateral: 15.9%). The obtained prediction model (χ2 = 222.530; p <.001) for PE included, as independent indirect DE signs presence of hydronephrosis (odds ratio [OR] = 14.5; p = .002), complete absence of posterior sliding sign (OR = 3.3; p <.001), presence of multiple endometriomas per ovary (OR = 3.0; p = .001), and ovary fixation to the uterine wall (OR = 2.4; p <.001); as independent concomitant DE nodules, presence of uterosacral nodules with the largest diameter >10 mm (OR = 3.2; p <.001), presence of rectal endometriosis with the largest diameter >25 mm (OR = 2.3; p = .004), and rectovaginal septum infiltration (OR = 2.3; p = .003). The optimal diagnostic balance was obtained considering at least 2 concomitant DE nodules and at least 1 indirect DE sign (area under the curve 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.79). CONCLUSION: Specific indirect ultrasonographic findings should raise suspicion of PE in women undergoing preoperative assessment for DE. The suspicion of parametrial invasion may be critical to address patients to expert leading centers, where proper diagnosis and surgical treatment for PE can be performed.

"A Space Odyssey" on Laparoscopic Segmental Rectosigmoid Resection for Deep Endometriosis: A Seventeen-year Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes and Postoperative Complications among 3050 Patients Treated in a Referral Center.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for bowel endometriosis (RSE), reporting surgical and short-term postoperative outcomes in a consecutive large series of patients. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Third-level national referral center for deep endometriosis (DE). PATIENTS: 3050 patients with symptomatic RSE requiring surgical treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Nerve-sparing laparoscopic resection for RSE perfomed by a multidisciplinary team. After collecting intraoperative surgical characteristics, postoperative complications were collected by evaluating the risk factors associated with their onset. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clavien-Dindo IIIb postoperative complications were noted in 13.1% of patients, with anastomotic leakage and rectovaginal fistula accounting for 3.0% and 1.9%, respectively. Postoperative bladder impairment was observed in 13.9% of patients during hospital discharge but spontaneously decreased to 4.5% at the first evaluation after 30 days, alongside a statistically significant change towards global symptom improvement. Multivariate analyses were done to identify the risk factors for segmental bowel resection in terms of occurrence of postoperative major complications. Ultralow (≤5 cm from the anal verge), low rectal anastomosis (<8 cm, >5 cm), parametrectomy, vaginal resection, and previous surgeries seemed more related to anastomotic leakage, rectovaginal fistula, and bladder retention. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection for RSE seems an effective and feasible procedure. The surgical complication rate is not negligible but could be reduced by implementing a multidisciplinary approach, an endless improvement in nerve-sparing techniques and surgical anatomy, as well as technological enhancements. Real future challenges will be to reduce the time for the first diagnosis of DE and the likelihood of surgical indications.

Surgical Outcomes and Complications of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometriosis: A Multicentric Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for endometriosis/adenomyosis in terms of operative outcomes and complications. DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric cohort study. SETTING: Eight European minimally invasive referral centers. PATIENTS: Data from 995 patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis and/or adenomyosis who underwent LH without concomitant urological and/or gastroenterological procedures from January 2010 to December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Total LH. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic patients' characteristics, surgical outcomes, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were evaluated. We considered major postoperative surgical-related complications, any grade 2 or more events (Clavien-Dindo score) that occurred within 30 days from surgery. Univariate analysis and multivariable models fit with logistic regression were used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for major complications. Median age at surgery was 44 years (28-54), and about half of them (505, 50.7%) were on medical treatment (estro-progestins, progestin, or Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone-analogues) at the time of surgery. In association with LH, posterior adhesiolysis was performed in 387 (38.9%) cases and deep nodule resection in 302 (30.0%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3% of the patients, and major postoperative complications were registered in 93 (9.3%). The multivariable analysis showed an inverse correlation between the occurrence of Clavien-Dindo >2 complications and age (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.99), while previous surgery for endometriosis (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.01-2.60) and intraoperative complications (OR 6.49, 95% CI 2.65-16.87) were found as predictors of major events. Medical treatment at the time of surgery has emerged as a protective factor (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.81). CONCLUSION: LH for endometriosis/adenomyosis is associated with non-negligible morbidity. Knowing the factors associated with higher risks of complications might be used for risk stratification and could help clinicians during preoperative counseling. The administration of estro-progestin or progesterone preoperatively might reduce the risks of postoperative complications following surgery.

Heat can treat: long-term follow-up results after uterine-sparing treatment of adenomyosis with radiofrequency thermal ablation in 60 hysterectomy candidate patients.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis may induce pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding or bulk symptoms. If hormonal treatment proves ineffective or contraindicated, hysterectomy may be necessary. For patients who desire to conserve the uterus despite severe symptomatology, uterine-sparing techniques have been introduced. Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) consists of the local application of high temperature to eliminate diseased tissue, applied recently for adenomyosis treatment. The objective of the study was to analyze the efficacy of RFA for avoiding hysterectomy in patients with adenomyosis-related symptoms. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study performed in a referral center for endometriosis. The study population consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) treatment as an alternative to hysterectomy for adenomyosis between March 2011 and June 2019 in our institution. RFA was performed using laparoscopic access. To evaluate the impact of RFA treatment on symptoms, follow-up findings were compared to preoperative symptomatology using the ten-point visual analog scale (VAS) for pain assessment. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study, 39 of them (65%), underwent a concomitant surgery for endometriosis in association to RFA. On a long-term follow-up (mean 56 months (range 10-115, SD 29), hysterectomy was performed in 8 patients (13%). The mean VAS score before vs after surgery was 7.4 vs 3.3 for dysmenorrhea, 3.7 vs 0.3 for dyschezia, 4.7 vs 0.7 for dyspareunia, and 4.0 vs 1.4 for chronic pelvic pain, being significantly reduced after RFA for all these pain components (p < 0.0001 in every case). Thirty-one patients (52%) suffered from AUB before RFA, this symptom persisted in 10 patients (16%) during follow-up (p < 0.001). Bulk symptoms were present in 16 patients (27%) and disappeared after RFA in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: RFA allows for hysterectomy avoidance in most cases. It leads to marked improvements in pain symptomatology, uterine bleeding and bulk symptoms.

Minimally invasive treatment of diaphragmatic endometriosis: a 15-year single referral center's experience on 215 patients.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE) is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition. Most of the times it is asymptomatic and due to the low accuracy of diagnostic tests, it is almost always detected during surgery for pelvic endometriosis. Its management is challenging and, until now, there are not guidelines about its treatment. METHODS: We describe a consecutive series of patients with DE managed by laparoscopy and videothoracoscopy (VATS) in our referral center in a period of 15 years. We developed a flow-chart classifying DE implants in foci, plaques and nodules and proposing an algorithm with the aim of standardizing the surgical approach. RESULTS: 215 patients were treated for DE. Lesions were almost always localized on the right hemidiaphragm (91%), and the endometriotic implants were distributed as: foci in 133 (62%), plaques in 24 (11%) and nodules in 58 patients (27%), respectively. In all cases of isolated pleural involvement, concomitant diaphragmatic hernia or lesions of the thoracic side of the diaphragm VATS was performed, alone or combined with laparoscopy, resulting in a total of 26 procedures. Following the proposed algorithm, specific surgical techniques were identified as the better approaches for the different types of the lesion, such as Argon Beam Coagulation and diathermocoagulation for diaphragmatic foci, peritoneal stripping for plaques, and nodulectomy or full-thickness resection of diaphragm for nodules. CONCLUSIONS: It is crucial to standardize the surgical approach of DE, according to the type of lesion, thus reducing the rate of under- or over-treatments and intra or postoperative complications. This kind of surgery should be performed in a Referral Center by a gynecologic surgeon with oncogynecologic expertise and skills, with the eventual support of a laparoscopic general surgeon, a specialized thoracic surgeon and a trained anesthesiologist.

Nerve-sparing laparoscopic disc excision of deep endometriosis involving the bowel: a single-center experience on 371 consecutives cases.

BACKGROUND: Bowel endometriosis is the most common pattern of Deep Endometriosis (DE). Arising from the posterior portion of the cervix and spreading to the recto-vaginal septum, utero-sacral and parametrial ligaments could lead to a distortion of normal pelvic anatomy, causing pain and infertility. Hormonal therapy is the first-line treatment in non-symptomatic patient. Conversely, laparoscopic surgical treatment has to be considered when symptoms relief are not optimal or with signs of bowel occlusion. METHODS: Retrospective experience of consecutive series of patients who referred to a third-level referral center with suspected bowel DE and failure of multiple medical treatments. After an intraoperative evaluation of nodule size with a rectal shaving of its external portion, patients underwent radical DE eradication with concomitant disc excision in rectal nodules < 3 cm with no signs of substantial full-thickness infiltration. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were considered eligible for analysis, with a median age of 37 years. The median operative time of was 180 min, with an estimated blood loss of 100 mL and a median diameter of removed rectal nodule of 25 mm. Early postoperative procedure-related complications were 47 cases of acute rectal bleeding (12.7%), that were managed by rectal endoscopy, 3 bowel anastomotic dehiscence (0.8%), 8 hemoperitoneum (2.2%) and 3 ureteral fistula (0.8%). 22 patients experienced postoperative hyperpyrexia (5.9%), while 17 women underwent transient bladder deficiency (4.6%). Median follow-up was 60 months with a bowel recurrence rate of 2.2%. There was an improvement of all symptoms in the immediate postoperative follow-up (p < 0.0001). Among all patients with childbearing desire, the pregnancy rate found was 42.2% and was obtained by in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques in 32% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic disc excision for bowel endometriosis is an effective surgical treatment in selected residual rectal nodules < 3.0 cm. The concomitant radical DE excision contributes to a significant improvement of symptoms with an acceptable complications' rate.

Dienogest vs GnRH agonists as postoperative therapy after laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel and parametrial surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) after its surgical excision is a big problem: postoperative treatment is crucial. OBJECTIVE: To compare two postoperative treatments: Dienogest and GnRH agonists. DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). PATIENTS: 146 women submitted to laparoscopic eradication of DIE with bowel and parametrial surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 81) received Triptorelin or Leuprorelin 3.75 mg every 4 weeks for 6 months. Group B (n = 65) received Dienogest 2 mg/day for at least 6 months. A first interview made after six months valued compliance to therapy, treatment tolerability, pain improvement, and side effects. A second interview at 30 ± 6 months valued pain relapse, imaging relapse, and pregnancy rate. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Dienogest about the reduction in pain recurrence. Secondary outcomes were differences in terms of treatment tolerability, side effects, imaging relapse rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Both Dienogest and GnRH agonists were associated with a highly significant reduction of pain at 6 and 30 months, without any significant difference (p < .001). About treatment tolerability, a more satisfactory profile was reported with Dienogest (p = .026). No difference in terms of clinical relapse, imaging relapse, and live births was found. CONCLUSIONS: Dienogest has proven to be as effective as GnRH agonists in preventing recurrence of DIE and associated pelvic pain after surgery. Also, it is better tolerated by patients.

Endometriosis Involving the Diaphragm: A Patient-Tailored Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic endometriosis is a rare presentation of endometriosis and no standardized technique for surgical treatment is available so far. We aim to verify and describe feasibility, safety and post-operative outcomes of patients affected by diaphragmatic endometriosis treated with a minimally invasive video-assisted thoracic approach. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of all patients we operated on at our Institution for diaphragmatic endometriosis between 2015 and 2019. We included all patients with a previous histological diagnosis of pelvic or abdominal endometriosis who have complained chronic thoracic pain or who had two or more episodes of pneumothorax with or without radiological evidence of pleural and diaphragmatic endometriosis. RESULTS: During the study period, we operated on 22 patients, 20 on the right side, one on the left side and one bilaterally. Indication for surgery was based on symptoms and/or radiological evidence of diaphragmatic disease. Diaphragm was resected and reconstructed according to intraoperative findings; in 11 cases, an additional mesh was used to reinforce the suture. According to our experience with VATS, we shift from an open approach to a uniportal VATS technique. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for diaphragmatic endometriosis can be safely performed using a minimally invasive VATS approach, which is feasible and safe even when more extensive diaphragmatic resections are required, and it allows a lower post-operative pain compared to the open approach. Moreover, uniportal VATS approach guarantees similar outcomes with better cosmetic results.

Total laparoscopic bladder resection in the management of deep endometriosis: "take it or leave it." Radicality versus persistence.

BACKGROUND: Bladder endometriosis (BE) is the most common external site of deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) affecting the urinary tract. Frequently associated with other DIE lesions, it can be strongly related to a ventral spread of adenomyosis. Possible symptoms are urinary frequency, tenesmus and hematuria, and they are frequently related to DIE of the posterior and lateral compartment. Hormonal therapy can be used in non-symptomatic patients; conversely, in other cases surgical treatment is the management of choice. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of a series of consecutive patients treated between September 2004 and December 2017 in a tertiary care referral center. Only full-thickness detrusor involvement was considered as BE. All patients underwent laparoscopic bladder resection with concomitant radical excision of DIE. RESULTS: BE was found in 264 patients and was associated with simultaneous bowel DIE requiring bowel resection in 140 patients (53%). Twenty-five patients (9.5%) had associated obstructive ureteral signs requiring ureteroneocystostomy. Mean hospital stay and time of catheter removal were 9.7 and 9.1 days, respectively. Postoperative major complications (< 28 days) were observed in 19 patients (7.2%). Follow-up was performed at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery, with a 2.3% recurrence rate observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial cystectomy for BE is a feasible and safe technique, and experienced laparoscopic surgeons should consider it the gold standard treatment. Surgical eradication leads to excellent surgical outcomes in terms of reduction of symptoms and recurrence rates, considering the need to maintain an adenomyotic uterus for fertility purposes.

Nerve-sparing Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Laparoscopic Eradication of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis with Rectal and Parametrial Resection According to the Negrar Method.

OBJECTIVE: To show technical highlights of a nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection according to the Negrar method. DESIGN: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with narrated video footage. SETTING: Tertiary care endometriosis unit. Bowel endometriosis accounts for about 12% of the total cases of endometriosis. Most frequently, rectal infiltration also means parametrial infiltration from the widespread infiltrating disease. Its removal with inadequate anatomical surgical knowledge may lead to severe damage to visceral pelvic innervation, causing bladder, rectal, and sexual function impairments and lasting lifelong. Nerve-sparing techniques, which are the heritage of onco-gynecologic surgery, have been described to have lower post-operative bladder, rectal, and sexual dysfunctions than classical approaches. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis was performed by following the nerve-sparing Negrar technique in 6 steps: step 0-adhesiolysis, ovarian surgery, and removal of the involved peritoneal tissues; step 1-opening of pre-sacral space, development of avascular spaces, and identification and preservation of pelvic sympathetic fibers of the inferior mesenteric plexus, superior hypogastric plexus, upper hypogastric nerves, and lumbosacral sympathetic trunk and ganglia; step 2-dissection of parametrial planes, isolation of ureteral course, lateral parametrectomy, and preservation of sympathetic fibers of postero-lateral parametrium and lower mesorectum (the lower hypogastric nerves and proximal part of the inferior hypogastric plexus or pelvic plexus); step 3-posterior parametrectomy, deep uterine vein identification, and preservation of the parasympathetic pelvic splanchnic nerves and the cranial and middle part of the mixed inferior hypogastric plexus in caudad posterior parametrium and lower mesorectal planes; step 4-preserving the caudad part of the inferior hypogastric plexus in postero-lateral parametrial ligaments; step 5-preserving the caudad part of the inferior hypogastric plexus in paravaginal planes; and step 6-rectal resection and colorectal anastomosis. CONCLUSION: As shown in this case, the laparoscopic nerve-sparing complete excision of endometriosis is a feasible and reproducible technique in expert hands and, as reported in the literature, offers good results in terms of bladder morbidity reduction with higher satisfaction than the classical technique.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Why We Fail? Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study on the Factors Associated with Failure of Node Mapping with Indocyanine Green.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for endometrial cancer staging is gaining wide diffusion, but there is no definitive evidence on the factors associated with the failure of mapping. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the factors associated with the possible failure of bilateral SLN mapping with indocyanine green (ICG). METHODS: A prospective observational study without control on 110 patients with endometrial cancer apparently confined to the uterus, underwent laparoscopic surgical staging with SLN mapping with ICG. RESULTS: Possible risk factors associated with bilateral mapping failure were analyzed, and a multivariate analysis was performed. The bilateral detection rate for SLNs mapping was 72.7%, whereas at least one SLN was detected in 79.1% of patients. No SLNs were identified in 6.3%. None of the patients or features related to tumor were associated with a risk of failure of the method. The only factor analyzed that was significantly associated with the success of bilateral mapping was the surgeon (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Neither obesity nor the presence of lymph node metastases was associated with mapping failure. However, there remains a need for further studies to understand all the mechanisms linked to the unsuccessful method results and to reduce the use of systematic lymphadenectomy in the case of mapping failure.

Laparoscopy for primary cytoreduction with multivisceral resections in advanced ovarian cancer: prospective validation. "The times they are a-changin"?

BACKGROUND: Primary cytoreduction is the mainstay of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). We developed and prospectively evaluated an algorithm to investigate the possible role of laparoscopic primary cytoreduction (LPC) in carefully selected patients, with AOC. METHODS: From June 2007 to July 2015, all patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer and clinical conditions allowing aggressive surgery were candidate to primary cytoreduction with the aim of achieving residual tumor (RT) = 0. The possibility of attempting laparoscopic cytoreduction was carefully evaluated using strict selection criteria. The other patients were approached by abdominal primary cytoreduction (APC). At the end of LPC, an ultra-low pubic mini-laparotomy was performed to extract surgical specimens and to accomplish a laparoscopic hand-assisted exploration of the abdominal organs, in order to confirm complete excision of the disease. RESULTS: Of the included 66 patients, 21 were considered eligible for LPC; the remaining 45 underwent APC. Optimal cytoreduction (i.e., RT = 0) was obtained in 95 and 88.4% in the LPC and APC groups, respectively. No intra-operative complication and 4 (19%) early post-operative complications were observed among patients who received LPC. Patients who underwent APC had 17.8 and 46.7% intra- and early post-operative complications, respectively. Median time to initiation of chemotherapy was 15 (range, 10-30) days in the LPC group and 28 (20-35) days in the APC group. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 76.2% in the LPC group and 73.4% in the APC group. CONCLUSIONS: After strict selection, a group of patients with AOC may undergo LPC with extremely high rates of optimal cytoreduction, satisfactory perioperative morbidity, a short interval to chemotherapy, and encouraging survival outcomes. Clinical trial registration NCT02980185.

The effect of a uterine manipulator on the recurrence and mortality of endometrial cancer: a multi-centric study by the Italian Society of Gynecological Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Although widely adopted, the use of a uterine manipulator during laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer represents a debated issue, and some authors hypothesize that it potentially may cause an increased risk of relapse, particularly at specific sites. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the risk and site of disease recurrence, overall survival, and disease-specific survival in women who had laparoscopic surgery with and without the use of a uterine manipulator. STUDY DESIGN: Data were reviewed from consecutive patients who had laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging in 7 Italian centers. Subjects were stratified according to whether a uterine manipulator was used during surgery; if so, the type of manipulator was identified. Multivariable analysis to correct for possible confounders and propensity score that matched the minimize selection bias were utilized. The primary outcome was the risk of disease recurrence. Secondary outcomes were disease-specific and overall survival and the site of recurrence, according to the use or no use of the uterine manipulator and to the different types of manipulators used. RESULTS: We included 951 patients: 579 patients in the manipulator group and 372 patients in the no manipulator group. After a median follow-up period of 46 months (range,12-163 months), the rate of recurrence was 13.5% and 11.6% in the manipulator and no manipulator groups, respectively (P=.37). Positive lymph nodes and myometrial invasion of >50% were associated independently with the risk of recurrence after adjustment for possible confounders. The use of a uterine manipulator did not affect the risk of recurrence, both at univariate (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.77) and multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.70). Disease-free, disease-specific, and overall survivals were similar between groups. Propensity-matched analysis confirmed these findings. The site of recurrence was comparable between groups. In addition, the type of uterine manipulator and the presence or not of a balloon at the tip of the device were not associated significantly with the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: The use of a uterine manipulator during laparoscopic surgery does not affect the risk of recurrence and has no impact on disease-specific or overall survival and on the site of recurrence in women affected by endometrial cancer.

Laparoscopic vs. open treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly and very elderly: An age-stratified multicenter study on 1606 women.

Objective To investigate in depth the effect of increasing age on the peri-operative outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer, compared to open surgery, with stratification of patients according to the different definitions of elderly age used in the literature. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer staging at six centers were reviewed and analyzed according to surgical approach (laparoscopic or open), different definitions of elderly and very elderly age (≥65years, ≥75years, ≥80years), and class of age (<65; ≥65-<75; ≥75-80; ≥80years). Multivariable analysis to correct for possible confounders and propensity-score matching to minimize selection bias were used. RESULTS: A total of 1606 patients were included: 938 and 668 patients received laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. With increasing age, fewer patients received laparoscopy (P<0.001 with ANOVA). The percentage of patients who received lymphadenectomy declined significantly in both groups for age ≥80years. Blood transfusions, incidence and severity of post-operative complications, and hospital stay were significantly lower among patients who had laparoscopy both in younger (<65years) and elderly (whether defined as ≥65 or ≥75years) patients, with no effect of age on any of the characteristics analyzed ( ANOVA: P>0.05). The same tendency was observed among very-elderly patients (≥80years). Multivariable and propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer retains its advantages over open surgery even in elderly and very-elderly patients. Our data strongly suggest that minimally-invasive surgery is advantageous even among subjects ≥80years.