Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
1.
J Emerg Med ; 58(2): 280-289, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761462

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transfer delays of critically ill patients from other hospitals' emergency departments (EDs) to an appropriate referral hospital's intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that an innovative Critical Care Resuscitation Unit (CCRU) would be associated with improved outcomes by reducing transfer times to a quaternary care center and times to interventions for ED patients with critical illnesses. METHODS: This pre-post analysis compared 3 groups of patients: a CCRU group (patients transferred to the CCRU during its first year [July 2013 to June 2014]), a 2011-Control group (patients transferred to any ICU between July 2011 and June 2012), and a 2013-Control group (patients transferred to other ICUs between July 2013 and June 2014). The primary outcome was time from transfer request to ICU arrival. Secondary outcomes were the interval between ICU arrival to the operating room and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed 1565 patients (644 in the CCRU, 574 in the 2011-Control, and 347 in 2013-Control groups). The median time from transfer request to ICU arrival for CCRU patients was 108 min (interquartile range [IQR] 74-166 min) compared with 158 min (IQR 111-252 min) for the 2011-Control and 185 min (IQR 122-283 min) for the 2013-Control groups (p < 0.01). The median arrival-to-urgent operation for the CCRU group was 220 min (IQR 120-429 min) versus 439 min (IQR 290-645 min) and 356 min (IQR 268-575 min; p < 0.026) for the 2011-Control and 2013-Control groups, respectively. After adjustment with clinical factors, transfer to the CCRU was associated with lower mortality (odds ratio 0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.44-0.93], p = 0.019) in multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION: The CCRU, which decreased time from outside ED's transfer request to referral ICU arrival, was associated with lower mortality likelihood. Resuscitation units analogous to the CCRU, which transfer resource-intensive patients from EDs faster, may improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transferência de Pacientes , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Emerg Med J ; 36(6): 364-368, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30940715

RESUMO

Resuscitation lacks a place in the hospital to call its own. Specialised intensive care units, though excellent at providing longitudinal critical care, often lack the flexibility to adapt to fluctuating critical care needs. We offer the resuscitative care unit as a potential solution to ensure that patients receive appropriate care during the most critical hours of their illnesses. These units offer an infrastructure for resuscitation and can meet the changing needs of their institutions.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/tendências , Ressuscitação/métodos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Planejamento Ambiental/normas , Planejamento Ambiental/tendências , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Maryland , Michigan , Pennsylvania , Ressuscitação/tendências
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 32(3): 1154-1159, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29325841

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine whether venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) reduced mortality in patients with influenza-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Baseline characteristics of participants were compared and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival at last medical center follow-up. Cox proportional hazards modeling also was performed to test for univariate associations between salient variables and mortality. SETTING: A single-center ECMO referral university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients admitted with influenza-related ARDS during the 2015 to 2016 influenza season. INTERVENTIONS: Mechanical ventilation alone versus mechanical ventilation and ECMO cannulation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with influenza-related ARDS were included in the cohort. Thirteen patients were treated with VV ECMO while 13 were not. Twelve of the ECMO patients and 8 of the non-ECMO patients were transferred from outside hospitals. Patients treated with ECMO were younger and had less hypertension and diabetes mellitus. There was no difference in baseline sequential organ failure assessment score between the 2 groups. In-hospital mortality for ECMO patients was 15.4% versus 46.7% for patients not treated with ECMO. Survival at last medical center follow-up was better in patients treated with ECMO (p = 0.02). Age, highest blood carbon dioxide level, and treatment without ECMO were all associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza-related ARDS has a high mortality rate and patients treated only with mechanical ventilation have worse outcome than those managed with VV ECMO. More liberal use of ECMO should be considered in patients with influenza-related ARDS.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Hemofiltração/métodos , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Crit Care ; 20(1): 217, 2016 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27468829

RESUMO

As of 20 May 2016 there have been 28,646 cases and 11,323 deaths resulting from the West African Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak reported to the World Health Organization. There continue to be sporadic flare-ups of EVD cases in West Africa.EVD presentation is nonspecific and characterized initially by onset of fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias, headache, and fever; this is followed several days later by anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Anorexia and gastrointestinal losses lead to dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and metabolic acidosis, and, in some patients, acute kidney injury. Hypoxia and ventilation failure occurs most often with severe illness and may be exacerbated by substantial fluid requirements for intravascular volume repletion and some degree of systemic capillary leak. Although minor bleeding manifestations are common, hypovolemic and septic shock complicated by multisystem organ dysfunction appear the most frequent causes of death.Males and females have been equally affected, with children (0-14 years of age) accounting for 19 %, young adults (15-44 years) 58 %, and older adults (≥45 years) 23 % of reported cases. While the current case fatality proportion in West Africa is approximately 40 %, it has varied substantially over time (highest near the outbreak onset) according to available resources (40-90 % mortality in West Africa compared to under 20 % in Western Europe and the USA), by age (near universal among neonates and high among older adults), and by Ebola viral load at admission.While there is no Ebola virus-specific therapy proven to be effective in clinical trials, mortality has been dramatically lower among EVD patients managed with supportive intensive care in highly resourced settings, allowing for the avoidance of hypovolemia, correction of electrolyte and metabolic abnormalities, and the provision of oxygen, ventilation, vasopressors, and dialysis when indicated. This experience emphasizes that, in addition to evaluating specific medical treatments, improving the global capacity to provide supportive critical care to patients with EVD may be the greatest opportunity to improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Doença pelo Vírus Ebola , Adulto , África Ocidental/epidemiologia , Idoso , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Países em Desenvolvimento , Ebolavirus/patogenicidade , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Crit Care Med ; 43(11): 2403-8, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308434

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In developed countries, public health systems have become adept at rapidly identifying the etiology and impact of public health emergencies. However, within the time course of clinical responses, shortfalls in readily analyzable patient-level data limit capabilities to understand clinical course, predict outcomes, ensure resource availability, and evaluate the effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for seriously ill and injured patients. To be useful in the timeline of a public health emergency, multi-institutional clinical investigation systems must be in place to rapidly collect, analyze, and disseminate detailed clinical information regarding patients across prehospital, emergency department, and acute care hospital settings, including ICUs. As an initial step to near real-time clinical learning during public health emergencies, we sought to develop an "all-hazards" core dataset to characterize serious illness and injuries and the resource requirements for acute medical response across the care continuum. SUBJECTS: A multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, public health professionals, and researchers with expertise in public health emergencies. DESIGN: Group consensus process. INTERVENTIONS: The consensus process included regularly scheduled conference calls, electronic communications, and an in-person meeting to generate candidate variables. Candidate variables were then reviewed by the group to meet the competing criteria of utility and feasibility resulting in the core dataset. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 40-member panel generated 215 candidate variables for potential dataset inclusion. The final dataset includes 140 patient-level variables in the domains of demographics and anthropometrics (7), prehospital (11), emergency department (13), diagnosis (8), severity of illness (54), medications and interventions (38), and outcomes (9). CONCLUSIONS: The resulting all-hazard core dataset for seriously ill and injured persons provides a foundation to facilitate rapid collection, analyses, and dissemination of information necessary for clinicians, public health officials, and policymakers to optimize public health emergency response. Further work is needed to validate the effectiveness of the dataset in a variety of emergency settings.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Emergências , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Recursos em Saúde/economia , United States Public Health Service/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico
7.
JAMA ; 313(12): 1249-55, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25742465

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Safe and effective vaccines and drugs are needed for the prevention and treatment of Ebola virus disease, including following a potentially high-risk exposure such as a needlestick. OBJECTIVE: To assess response to postexposure vaccination in a health care worker who was exposed to the Ebola virus. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case report of a physician who experienced a needlestick while working in an Ebola treatment unit in Sierra Leone on September 26, 2014. Medical evacuation to the United States was rapidly initiated. Given the concern about potentially lethal Ebola virus disease, the patient was offered, and provided his consent for, postexposure vaccination with an experimental vaccine available through an emergency Investigational New Drug application. He was vaccinated on September 28, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: The vaccine used was VSVΔG-ZEBOV, a replicating, attenuated, recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (serotype Indiana) whose surface glycoprotein gene was replaced by the Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein gene. This vaccine has entered a clinical trial for the prevention of Ebola in West Africa. RESULTS: The vaccine was administered 43 hours after the needlestick occurred. Fever and moderate to severe symptoms developed 12 hours after vaccination and diminished over 3 to 4 days. The real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction results were transiently positive for vesicular stomatitis virus nucleoprotein gene and Ebola virus glycoprotein gene (both included in the vaccine) but consistently negative for Ebola virus nucleoprotein gene (not in the vaccine). Early postvaccination cytokine secretion and T lymphocyte and plasmablast activation were detected. Subsequently, Ebola virus glycoprotein-specific antibodies and T cells became detectable, but antibodies against Ebola viral matrix protein 40 (not in the vaccine) were not detected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: It is unknown if VSVΔG-ZEBOV is safe or effective for postexposure vaccination in humans who have experienced a high-risk occupational exposure to the Ebola virus, such as a needlestick. In this patient, postexposure vaccination with VSVΔG-ZEBOV induced a self-limited febrile syndrome that was associated with transient detection of the recombinant vesicular stomatitis vaccine virus in blood. Strong innate and Ebola-specific adaptive immune responses were detected after vaccination. The clinical syndrome and laboratory evidence were consistent with vaccination response, and no evidence of Ebola virus infection was detected.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Ebola/uso terapêutico , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/complicações , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Adulto , Vacinas contra Ebola/efeitos adversos , Ebolavirus/genética , Ebolavirus/imunologia , Febre/etiologia , Vetores Genéticos , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/transmissão , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos , Serra Leoa , Vacinação , Vesiculovirus
8.
Med Care ; 51(3): 259-65, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23295577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Understanding how hospitals functioned during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic may improve future public health emergency response, but information about its impact on US hospitals remains largely unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN: We matched hospital and emergency department (ED) discharge data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project with community-level influenza-like illness activity during each hospital's pandemic period in fall 2009 compared with a corresponding calendar baseline period. We compared inpatient mortality for sentinel conditions at high-surge versus nonsurge hospitals. RESULTS: US hospitals experienced a doubling of pneumonia and influenza ED visits during fall 2009 compared with prior years, along with an 18% increase in overall ED visits. Although no significant increase in total inpatient admissions occurred overall, approximately 10% of all study hospitals experienced high surge, associated with higher acute myocardial infarction and stroke case fatality rates. These hospitals had similar characteristics to other US hospitals except that they had higher mortality for acute cardiac illnesses before the pandemic. After adjusting for 2008 case fatality rates, the association between high-surge hospitals and increased mortality for acute myocardial infarction and stroke patients persisted. CONCLUSIONS: The fall 2009 pandemic period substantially impacted US hospitals, mostly through increased ED visits. For a small proportion of hospitals that experienced a high surge in inpatient admissions, increased mortality from selected clinical conditions was associated with both prepandemic outcomes and surge, highlighting the linkage between daily hospital operations and disaster preparedness.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Epidemias , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Adulto , Criança , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Admissão do Paciente , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Resuscitation ; 187: 109752, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36842677

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Studies support rapid interventions to improve outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. We sought to decrease the time to code team activation and improve dissemination of patient-specific data to facilitate targeted treatments. METHODS: We mapped code blue buttons behind each bed to patients through the electronic medical record. Pushing the button sent patient-specific data (admitting diagnosis, presence of difficult airway, and recent laboratory values) through a secure messaging system to the responding teams' smartphones. The code button also activated a hospital-wide alert through the operator. We piloted the system on seven medicine inpatient units from November 2019 through May 2022. We compared the time from code blue button press to smartphone message receipt vs traditional operator-sent overhead page. RESULTS: The code button was the primary mode of code team activation for 12/35 (34.3%) cardiac arrest events. The code team received smartphone notifications a median of 78 s (IQR = 47-127 s) before overhead page. The median time to adrenaline administration for codes activated with the code button was not significantly different (240 s (IQR 142-300 s for code button) vs 148 s (IQR = 34-367 s) for overhead page, p = 0.89). Survival to discharge was 3/12 (25.0%) for codes activated with the code button vs 4/23 (17.4%) when activated by calling the operator (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a smartphone-based code button notification system reduced time to code team activation by 78 s. Larger cohorts are necessary to assess effects on patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Parada Cardíaca , Equipe de Respostas Rápidas de Hospitais , Humanos , Smartphone , Estudos de Viabilidade , Parada Cardíaca/terapia
10.
Crit Care Med ; 40(5): 1487-98, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511131

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The contribution of bacterial coinfection to critical illness associated with 2009 influenza A virus infection remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine whether bacterial coinfection increased the morbidity and mortality of 2009 influenza A. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective cohort study. SETTING: Thirty-five adult U.S. intensive care units over the course of 1 yr. PATIENTS: Six hundred eighty-three critically ill adults with confirmed or probable 2009 influenza A. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A confirmed or probable case was defined as a positive 2009 influenza A test result or positive test for influenza A that was otherwise not subtyped. Bacterial coinfection was defined as documented bacteremia or any presumed bacterial pneumonia with or without positive respiratory tract culture within 72 hrs of intensive care unit admission. The mean age was 45±16 yrs, mean body mass index was 32.5±11.1 kg/m, and mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Examination II score was 21±9, with 76% having at least one comorbidity. Of 207 (30.3%) patients with bacterial coinfection on intensive care unit admission, 154 had positive cultures with Staphylococcus aureus (n=57) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=19), the most commonly identified pathogens. Bacterial coinfected patients were more likely to present with shock (21% vs. 10%; p=.0001), require mechanical ventilation at the time of intensive care unit admission (63% vs. 52%; p=.005), and have longer duration of intensive care unit care (median, 7 vs. 6 days; p=.05). Hospital mortality was 23%; 31% in bacterial coinfected patients and 21% in patients without coinfection (p=.002). Immunosuppression (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.20 -2.06; p=.0009) and Staphylococcus aureus at admission (relative risk 2.82; 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.51; p<.0001) were independently associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Among intensive care unit patients with 2009 influenza A, bacterial coinfection diagnosed within 72 hrs of admission, especially with Staphylococcus aureus, was associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal/epidemiologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/complicações , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/mortalidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
11.
Crit Care Med ; 39(11): 2534-9, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21926569

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In recent years, healthcare disaster planning has grown from its early place as an occasional consideration within the manuals of emergency medical services and emergency department managers to a rapidly growing field, which considers continuity of function, surge capability, and process changes across the spectrum of healthcare delivery. A detailed examination of critical care disaster planning was undertaken in 2007 by the Task Force for Mass Critical Care of the American College of Chest Physicians Critical Care Collaborative Initiative. We summarize the Task Force recommendations and available updated information to answer a fundamental question for critical care disaster planners: What is a prepared intensive care unit and how do I ensure my unit's readiness? DATA SOURCES: Database searches and review of relevant published literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Preparedness is essential for successful response, but because intensive care units face many competing priorities, without defining "preparedness for what," the task can seem overwhelming. Intensive care unit disaster planners should, therefore, along with the entire hospital, participate in a hospital or regionwide planning process to 1) identify critical care response vulnerabilities; and 2) clarify the hazards for which their community is most at risk. The process should inform a comprehensive written preparedness plan targeting the most worrisome scenarios and including specific guidance on 1) optimal use of space, equipment, and staffing for delivery of critical care to significantly increased patient volumes; 2) allocation of resources for provision of essential critical care services under conditions of absolute scarcity; 3) intensive care unit evacuation; and 4) redundant internal communication systems and means for timely data collection. CONCLUSION: Critical care disaster planners have a complex, challenging task. Experienced planners will agree that no disaster response is perfect, but careful planning will enable the prepared intensive care unit to respond effectively in times of crisis.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Equipamentos e Provisões Hospitalares , Sistemas de Comunicação no Hospital , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/organização & administração
12.
Crit Care Med ; 39(3): 527-32, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21187747

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To adapt an animal model of acute lung injury for use as a standard protocol for a screening initial evaluation of limited function, or "surge," ventilators for use in mass casualty scenarios. DESIGN: Prospective, experimental animal study. SETTING: University research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Twelve adult pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve spontaneously breathing pigs (six in each group) were subjected to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome via pulmonary artery infusion of oleic acid. After development of respiratory failure, animals were mechanically ventilated with a limited-function ventilator (simplified automatic ventilator [SAVe] I or II; Automedx, Germantown, MD) for 1 hr or until the ventilator could not support the animal. The limited-function ventilator was then exchanged for a full-function ventilator (Servo 900C; Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Reliable and reproducible levels of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome were induced. The SAVe I was unable to adequately oxygenate five animals with Pao2 (52.0±11.1 torr) compared to the Servo (106.0±25.6 torr; p=.002). The SAVe II was able to oxygenate and ventilate all six animals for 1 hr with no difference in Pao2 (141.8±169.3 torr) compared to the Servo (158.3±167.7 torr). CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel in vivo model of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that can be used to initially screen limited-function ventilators considered for mass respiratory failure stockpiles and that is intended to be combined with additional studies to definitively assess appropriateness for mass respiratory failure. Specifically, during this study we demonstrate that the SAVe I ventilator is unable to provide sufficient gas exchange, whereas the SAVe II, with several more functions, was able to support the same level of hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome for 1 hr.


Assuntos
Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/terapia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Doenças dos Suínos/terapia , Lesão Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatologia , Animais , Gasometria , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Suínos , Doenças dos Suínos/fisiopatologia
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 204(6 Suppl 1): S21-30, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21514554

RESUMO

We sought to describe the characteristics and clinical management of 71 critically ill pregnant women with pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1 [2009 H1N1]). This was a retrospective case series from April 23, 2009, through March 18, 2010, of pregnant women with 2009 H1N1 in intensive care units in California. Among 71 critically ill pregnant women with 2009 H1N1, rapid decline in clinical status was noted with a median duration of 1 day from hospital admission to intensive care unit admission. Adverse events were common, and included sepsis (n = 26), hematologic disorder (n = 17), and pneumothorax (n = 15). Of 42 women requiring invasive ventilation, 15 (36%) died. In total, 23 women required rescue therapies for severe gas exchange abnormalities. Adverse events were significantly associated with survival (P = .0003). Women who received early antiviral treatment were significantly more likely to survive (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.75). Critically ill pregnant women with 2009 H1N1 declined rapidly and developed frequent adverse events including death.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/terapia , Pandemias , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiologia , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Chest ; 159(2): 634-652, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32971074

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was serious concern that the United States would encounter a shortfall of mechanical ventilators. In response, the US government, using the Defense Production Act, ordered the development of 200,000 ventilators from 11 different manufacturers. These ventilators have different capabilities, and whether all are able to support COVID-19 patients is not evident. RESEARCH QUESTION: Evaluate ventilator requirements for affected COVID-19 patients, assess the clinical performance of current US Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) ventilators employed during the pandemic, and finally, compare ordered ventilators' functionality based on COVID-19 patient needs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Current published literature, publicly available documents, and lay press articles were reviewed by a diverse team of disaster experts. Data were assembled into tabular format, which formed the basis for analysis and future recommendations. RESULTS: COVID-19 patients often develop severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure and adult respiratory defense syndrome (ARDS), requiring high levels of ventilator support. Current SNS ventilators were unable to fully support all COVID-19 patients, and only approximately half of newly ordered ventilators have the capacity to support the most severely affected patients; ventilators with less capacity for providing high-level support are still of significant value in caring for many patients. INTERPRETATION: Current SNS ventilators and those on order are capable of supporting most but not all COVID-19 patients. Technologic, logistic, and educational challenges encountered from current SNS ventilators are summarized, with potential next-generation SNS ventilator updates offered.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Estoque Estratégico , Ventiladores Mecânicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Respiração Artificial/instrumentação , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/normas , Ventiladores Mecânicos/provisão & distribuição
15.
Crit Care Med ; 38(4 Suppl): e103-9, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19901827

RESUMO

The first hints of a global public health crisis emerged with the identification of a new strain of H1N1 influenza A in March and April 2009 in Mexico City. By June 11, the World Health Organization had declared the outbreak of 2009 H1N1 a global pandemic. Now, with the continued growing presence of 2009 H1N1 on the global scene, much attention has been focused on the key role of personal protective equipment in healthcare infection control. Much less emphasis has been placed on specific interventions that may minimize the increased infectious risk commonly associated with critical care delivery. Given the frequency of high-risk respiratory procedures such as intubation and delivery of aerosolized medications in the intensive care unit, the delivery of critical care presents unique infection control challenges and unique opportunities to augment usual infection control practice with specific source-control efforts. Here, we summarize data regarding risks to critical care healthcare workers from previous respiratory virus outbreaks, discuss findings from the early 2009 H1N1 experience that suggest reasons for increased concern for those delivering critical care, and review best available evidence regarding strategies for source control in respiratory and critical care delivery.


Assuntos
Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/transmissão , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Insuficiência Respiratória/virologia , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Surtos de Doenças , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Máscaras , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Decúbito Ventral , Respiração Artificial
16.
Crit Care Med ; 38(4 Suppl): e120-32, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20101176

RESUMO

As a critical care community, we have an obligation to provide not only clinical care but also the research that guides initial and subsequent clinical responses during a pandemic. There are many challenges to conducting such research. The first is speed of response. However, given the near inevitability of certain events, for example, viral respiratory illness such as the 2009 pandemic, geographically circumscribed natural disasters, or acts of terror, many study and trial designs should be preplanned and modified quickly when specific events occur. Template case report forms should be available for modification and web entry; centralized research ethics boards and funders should have the opportunity to preview and advise on such research beforehand; and national and international research groups should be prepared to work together on common studies and trials for common challenges. We describe the early international critical care research response to the influenza A 2009 (H1N1) pandemic, including specifics of observational study case report form, registry, and clinical trial design, cooperation of international critical care research organizations, and the early results of these collaborations.


Assuntos
Notificação de Doenças/métodos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1 , Influenza Humana , Sistema de Registros , Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Demografia , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 25(4): 326-32, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20845319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Seattle-King County (SKC) Washington is at risk for regional disasters, especially earthquakes. Of 1.8 million residents, >400,000 (22%) are children, a proportion similar to that of the population of the State of Washington (24%) and of the United States (24%). The county's large area of 2,134 square miles (5,527 km2) is connected through major transportation routes that cross numerous waterways; sub-county zones may become isolated in the wake of a major earthquake. Therefore, each of SKC's three subcounty emergency response zones must have ample pediatric medical response capabilities. To date, total quantities and distribution of crucial hospital resources (available in SKC) to manage pediatric victims of a medical disaster are unknown. This study assessed whether geographical distribution of hospital pediatric resources corresponds to the pediatric population distribution in SKC. METHODS: Surveys were delivered electronically to all eight acute care hospitals in SKC that admit pediatric patients. Quantities and categories of pediatric resources, including inpatient treatment space, staff, and equipment, were queried and verified via site visits. RESULTS: Within the seven responding hospitals of eight queried, the following were identified: 477 formal pediatric bed spaces (pediatric intensive care unit, neo-natal intensive care unit, general wards, and emergency department), 43 informal pediatric bed spaces (operating room and post-anesthesia care unit), 1,217 pediatric nurses, 554 pediatric physicians, and 252 infant/pediatric-adaptable ventilators. The City of Seattle emergency response zone contains 82.1% of bed spaces, 83.5% of nurses, and 95.8% of physicians, yet only 22.8% of all SKC children live in that zone. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of hospital pediatric resources are located in the SKC sub-region with the fewest children. These resources are potentially inaccessible and unable to be redistributed by ground transportation in the event of a significant regional disaster. Future planning for pediatric care in the event of a medical disaster in SKC must address this vulnerability.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Recursos em Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Hospitais Pediátricos/organização & administração , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Terremotos , Geografia , Coalizão em Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Recursos em Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitais Pediátricos/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Washington
18.
Chest ; 158(1): 212-225, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32289312

RESUMO

Public health emergencies have the potential to place enormous strain on health systems. The current pandemic of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease has required hospitals in numerous countries to expand their surge capacity to meet the needs of patients with critical illness. When even surge capacity is exceeded, however, principles of critical care triage may be needed as a means to allocate scarce resources, such as mechanical ventilators or key medications. The goal of a triage system is to direct limited resources towards patients most likely to benefit from them. Implementing a triage system requires careful coordination between clinicians, health systems, local and regional governments, and the public, with a goal of transparency to maintain trust. We discuss the principles of tertiary triage and methods for implementing such a system, emphasizing that these systems should serve only as a last resort. Even under triage, we must uphold our obligation to care for all patients as best possible under difficult circumstances.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Alocação de Recursos/organização & administração , Triagem/organização & administração , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Saúde Pública/ética , Saúde Pública/métodos , Saúde Pública/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/ética , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências/organização & administração
19.
Crit Care Med ; 37(4): 1210-6, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19242326

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are potential high-risk areas for transmission of viruses causing febrile respiratory illness, such as influenza. Healthcare-associated influenza is prevented through healthcare worker (HCW) vaccination and effective use of U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended infection control practices, including use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Although effective PPE use may significantly reduce healthcare-associated influenza transmission, PPE adherence among ICU HCWs for preventing nosocomial influenza infection has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To characterize ICU HCW behavior, knowledge, and attitudes about recommended precautions for the prevention of healthcare-associated influenza infections. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey of 292 internal medicine housestaff, pulmonary/critical care fellows and faculty, nurses, and respiratory care professionals working in four ICUs in two hospitals in Baltimore, MD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 88% (n = 256) completed the survey. Only 63% of respondents were able to correctly identify adequate influenza PPE, and 62% reported high adherence (>80%) with PPE use for prevention of nosocomial influenza. In multivariable modeling, odds of high adherence varied by clinician type. Respondents who believed adherence was inconvenient had lower odds of high adherence (odds ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.82), and those reporting likelihood of being reprimanded for nonadherence were more likely to adhere (odds ratio 2.40, 95% confidence interval 1.25-4.62). CONCLUSIONS: ICU HCWs report suboptimal levels of influenza PPE adherence. This finding in a high-risk setting is particularly concerning, given that it likely overestimates actual behavior. Both suboptimal adherence levels and significant PPE knowledge gaps indicate that ICU HCWs may be at a substantial risk of developing and/or transmitting nosocomial respiratory viral infection. Improving respiratory virus infection control will likely require closing knowledge gaps and changing organizational factors that influence behavior.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Equipamentos de Proteção , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
20.
Chest ; 133(5 Suppl): 8S-17S, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18460503

RESUMO

In the twentieth century, rarely have mass casualty events yielded hundreds or thousands of critically ill patients requiring definitive critical care. However, future catastrophic natural disasters, epidemics or pandemics, nuclear device detonations, or large chemical exposures may change usual disaster epidemiology and require a large critical care response. This article reviews the existing state of emergency preparedness for mass critical illness and presents an analysis of limitations to support the suggestions of the Task Force on Mass Casualty Critical Care, which are presented in subsequent articles. Baseline shortages of specialized resources such as critical care staff, medical supplies, and treatment spaces are likely to limit the number of critically ill victims who can receive life-sustaining interventions. The deficiency in critical care surge capacity is exacerbated by lack of a sufficient framework to integrate critical care within the overall institutional response and coordination of critical care across local institutions and broader geographic areas.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Ventiladores Mecânicos/provisão & distribuição
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA