RESUMO
Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome characterized by a decline in physical and cognitive abilities and an increased vulnerability to stressors such as illnesses and injuries. As the global population is aging, the prevalence of frailty is growing. Frail older adults are at substantial risk of developing mobility and self-care difficulties, hospitalization, and death. Frailty is also associated with a high symptom burden and psychosocial stress, including malnutrition, pain, fatigue, weakness, cognitive loss, depression, falls, and sleep disorders, among others. The role of palliative care is gaining attention in medical literature because frailty is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. While there are no specific guidelines yet for when palliative care should be consulted in older patients with frailty, it has been proposed that palliative care should be considered in frail patients with continued functional decline, increased healthcare utilization, and uncontrolled symptoms. Palliative care can aid in communication with patients and families, establishing goals of care and treatment preferences, improving pain and symptom control, addressing psychosocial and spiritual needs, advance care planning, caregiver needs, and end-of-life care. Once frailty is identified, a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's physical, psychosocial, and spiritual aspects of care is essential for establishing a patient-centered treatment plan. This paper aims to guide clinicians in providing patientcentered care for older adults with frailty in the outpatient setting. Through a comprehensive literature review, we describe the leading models of frailty, frailty screening tools used in the clinical setting, and the assessment and management of palliative care needs in frail patients. We also describe emerging models of care focusing on palliative care for older adults with frailty and discuss issues related to access to palliative care for this population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common valvular disorder with a large symptomatic burden resulting from increased myocardial workload due to valvular obstruction. The contribution of increased afterload from arterial stiffness on symptoms is uncertain. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the symptomatic impact of arterial stiffness as determined by Applanation Tonometry. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with severe AS undergoing intervention with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n = 65) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n = 23) were prospectively enrolled. Symptoms were recorded using the NYHA Class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and a 6 min walk test (6MWT) at baseline, and 1- and 6-months post intervention. Pulse Wave Analysis (PWA) using Applanation Tonometry was performed at all reviews, including the augmentation index (AIx). RESULTS: Patients undergoing TAVR were older, with worse renal function and lower aortic valve areas, but were otherwise similar. There was no significant difference between the augmentation index of our AS population compared with an age matched reference population (p = 0.89).Symptoms significantly improved after intervention according to NYHA Class, KCCQ and 6MWT. Additionally, with adjustment, the initial augmentation index correlated with the final KCCQ (Coeff. = -0.383, p = 0.02) and NYHA Class (Coeff. = 0.012, p = 0.03) and a baseline AIx value in the top quartile resulted in a significantly worse final KCCQ (95.1 v 85.2, p = 0.048) relative to the bottom 3 quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: According to our analysis, an elevated baseline AIx is associated with a poorer symptomatic recovery after aortic valve intervention and so is worthy of consideration when assessing potential symptomatic benefit.
RESUMO
1. As a result of its enormous surface area and necessary thinness for gas exchange, the alveolocapillary barrier is vulnerable to mechanical disruption from raised pulmonary microvascular pressure (Pmv). 2. Because surfactant protein-B (SP-B) leaks into the blood stream from the alveoli in response to alveolocapillary barrier damage and exercise leads to increased Pmv, we sought to determine whether exercise results in increased plasma SP-B. Moreover, in the setting of exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction, the consequent increase in left heart filling pressure and, therefore, P(mv) would be expected to further increase plasma SP-B levels. 3. Twenty consecutive subjects referred for treadmill exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) had venous blood sampled immediately before and after ESE for batch atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and SP-B assay. Echocardiographic measures of pulmonary haemodynamics (pulmonary artery flow acceleration time (pafAT) and right ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (rVTI)) were also taken pre- and post-exercise. 4. Although circulating ANP levels increased following exercise (P < 0.001), there was no change in circulating SP-B levels in the entire cohort. 5. Ten subjects had a positive ESE for ventricular dysfunction. Although circulating ANP was increased post-exercise in both the negative and positive ESE groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), circulating SP-B only increased post-exercise in the positive ESE group (P < 0.05). Echocardiographic parameters supported an increment in P(mv) in the cohort with exercise-induced left ventricular dysfunction because this group had an increase in pafAT (P < 0.05; reflecting pulmonary artery pressure) and no change in rVTI. 6. Physical exertion associated with a Bruce protocol ESE is insufficient to increase circulating SP-B, despite evidence of increased left atrial and pulmonary vascular pressure. However, in the setting of exercise-induced myocardial dysfunction, there is a detectable increase in circulating SP-B. 7. The exaggerated increase in pulmonary vascular pressure in exercise-induced myocardial dysfunction may result in increased SP-B leakage from the alveoli into the circulation by altering the integrity of the alveolocapillary barrier to protein.