Peripheral nerve stimulation informed design of a high-performance asymmetric head gradient coil.

PURPOSE: Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) limits the image encoding performance of both body gradient coils and the latest generation of head gradients. We analyze a variety of head gradient design aspects using a detailed PNS model to guide the design process of a new high-performance asymmetric head gradient to raise PNS thresholds and maximize the usable image-encoding performance. METHODS: A novel three-layer coil design underwent PNS optimization involving PNS predictions of a series of candidate designs. The PNS-informed design process sought to maximize the usable parameter space of a coil with <10% nonlinearity in a 22 cm region of linearity, a relatively large inner diameter (44 cm), maximum gradient amplitude of 200 mT/m, and a high slew rate of 900 T/m/s. PNS modeling allowed identification and iterative adjustment of coil features with beneficial impact on PNS such as the number of winding layers, shoulder accommodation strategy, and level of asymmetry. PNS predictions for the final design were compared to measured thresholds in a constructed prototype. RESULTS: The final head gradient achieved up to 2-fold higher PNS thresholds than the initial design without PNS optimization and compared to existing head gradients with similar design characteristics. The inclusion of a third intermediate winding layer provided the additional degrees of freedom necessary to improve PNS thresholds without significant sacrifices to the other design metrics. CONCLUSION: Augmenting the design phase of a new high-performance head gradient coil by PNS modeling dramatically improved the usable image-encoding performance by raising PNS thresholds.

The temperature dependence of gradient system response characteristics.

PURPOSE: The gradient system transfer function (GSTF) characterizes the frequency transfer behavior of a dynamic gradient system and can be used to correct non-Cartesian k-space trajectories. This study analyzes the impact of the gradient coil temperature of a 3T scanner on the GSTF. METHODS: GSTF self- and B0 -cross-terms were acquired for a 3T Siemens scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a phantom-based measurement technique. The GSTF terms were measured for various temperature states up to 45°C. The gradient coil temperatures were measured continuously utilizing 12 temperature sensors which are integrated by the vendor. Different modeling approaches were applied and compared. RESULTS: The self-terms depend linearly on temperature, whereas the B0 -cross-term does not. Effects induced by thermal variation are negligible for the phase response. The self-terms are best represented by a linear model including the three gradient coil sensors that showed the maximum temperature dependence for the three axes. The use of time derivatives of the temperature did not lead to an improvement of the model. The B0 -cross-terms can be modeled by a convolution model which considers coil-specific heat transportation. CONCLUSION: The temperature dependency of the GSTF was analyzed for a 3T Siemens scanner. The self- and B0 -cross-terms can be modeled using a linear and convolution modeling approach based on the three main temperature sensor elements.

Gradient waveform pre-emphasis based on the gradient system transfer function.

PURPOSE: The gradient system transfer function (GSTF) has been used to describe the distorted k-space trajectory for image reconstruction. The purpose of this work was to use the GSTF to determine the pre-emphasis for an undistorted gradient output and intended k-space trajectory. METHODS: The GSTF of the MR system was determined using only standard MR hardware without special equipment such as field probes or a field camera. The GSTF was used for trajectory prediction in image reconstruction and for a gradient waveform pre-emphasis. As test sequences, a gradient-echo sequence with phase-encoding gradient modulation and a gradient-echo sequence with a spiral read-out trajectory were implemented and subsequently applied on a structural phantom and in vivo head measurements. RESULTS: Image artifacts were successfully suppressed by applying the GSTF-based pre-emphasis. Equivalent results are achieved with images acquired using GSTF-based post-correction of the trajectory as a part of image reconstruction. In contrast, the pre-emphasis approach allows reconstruction using the initially intended trajectory. CONCLUSION: The artifact suppression shown for two sequences demonstrates that the GSTF can serve for a novel pre-emphasis. A pre-emphasis based on the GSTF information can be applied to any arbitrary sequence type.