Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approximates Labral Width at the 9-, 12-, and 3-O'Clock Positions in the Setting of Revision Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To compare preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative measurements of labral width and determine whether MRI can reliably predict labral width in the setting of revision surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy with labral repair performed by a single surgeon from January 2008 to December 2015 were identified retrospectively from a prospectively collected database. The width of the labrum was measured intraoperatively at the time of surgery. Two orthopaedic surgeons performed labral width measurements on MRI scans at 3 standardized locations using the clock-face method. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated, and comparisons between intraoperatively measured labral widths and MRI measurements were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy were enrolled in the study. The average labral width measurements at the 3-, 12-, and 9-o'clock positions were 7.4 mm (standard deviation [SD], 1.2 mm), 7.5 mm (SD, 1.4 mm), and 6.6 mm (SD, 1.2 mm), respectively, on MRI compared with 6.7 mm (SD, 2.1 mm), 6.5 mm (SD, 2.5 mm), and 7.0 mm (SD, 1.9 mm), respectively, when measured intraoperatively. The average intraoperative measurements were smaller than the MRI measurements at the 3-o'clock (P = .03) and 12-o'clock (P = .01) positions. The inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients between the 2 surgeons exhibited good agreement (0.612) at the 3-o'clock position, fair agreement (0.498) at the 12-o'clock position, and poor agreement (0.171) at the 9-o'clock position. The positive predictive values of the MRI measurements were 72% at the 3-o'clock position, 68% at the 12-o'clock position, and 88% at the 9-o'clock position for identifying a labral width of 6 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that MRI-measured labral width and actual labral width measured at the time of revision arthroscopy are usually within 1 mm of each other. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study investigating diagnostic test.

Improved Functional Outcomes of Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Periacetabular Osteotomy at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at minimum 2-year follow-up after combined hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) performed in the setting of a single anesthetic event. METHODS: Patients who underwent combined hip arthroscopy (M.J.P.) and PAO (J.M.M.) between January 2017 and June 2020 were identified. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs including Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), HOS-Sport, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, 12-Item Short Form Survey Mental Component Scores (SF-12 MCS), and 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score were collected and compared in addition to revision rate, conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 29 patients (83%) eligible for the study were available for 2-year minimum follow-up with a median follow-up time of 2.5 years (range, 2.0-5.0). There were 19 females and 5 males with mean age of 31 ± 12 years. Mean preoperative lateral center edge angle was 20° ± 5° and alpha angle was 71° ± 11°. One patient underwent reoperation for removal of a symptomatic iliac crest screw at 11.7 months after operation. Two patients, a 33-year-old woman and a 37-year-old man, were converted to THA at 2.6 and 1.3 years, respectively, following the combined procedure. Both patients had a Tönnis grade of 1 on radiographs, as well as bipolar Outerbridge grade III/IV defects requiring microfracture of the acetabulum. For patients who did not convert to THA (n = 22), there was significant improvement from before to after surgery for all scores (P < .05) except SF-12 MCS. The minimal clinically significant difference and patient-acceptable symptom state rates for HOS-ADL, HOS-Sport, and mHHS were 72%, 82%, 86%, and 95%, 91%, and 95%, respectively. Median patient satisfaction was 10 (range, 4 to 10). CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage combined hip arthroscopy with periacetabular osteotomy for patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia results in improvement in PROs and arthroplasty free survivorship of 92% at median 2.5 year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Timing From Symptom Onset to Hip Arthroscopy Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Adolescent Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate symptom duration and its relationship to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship after hip arthroscopy in adolescents. METHODS: Patients ≤18 at time of primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between January 2011 and September 2018 were included. Exclusion criteria consisted of history of previous ipsilateral hip surgery, presence of osteoarthritis or dysplasia on preoperative radiographs, previous hip fracture, or history of slipped capital femoral epiphysis or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. Minimum 2-year PROs (modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score [HOS]-Activities of Daily Living, HOS-Sport Scale, Short Forms 12 [SF-12]), minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) rates, and revision surgery rates were compared based on symptom duration. RESULTS: Two-year minimal follow-up was obtained for 111 patients (134 hips) (80%), including 74 females and 37 males with a mean age of 16.4 ± 1.1 (range 13.0-18.0). The mean symptom duration was 17.2 ± 15.2 months (range 43 days to 6.0 years). Ten patients (11 hips), 6 females (7 hips) and 4 males, required revision surgery at an average of 2.3 ± 1.0 years (range 0.9-4.3 years). At a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.2 years (range 2-10 years), there were statistically significant improvements in all PROs (P < .05 for all). Symptom duration showed no significant correlation to post-operative scores (correlation coefficient range -0.162 to -0.078, P > .05 for all). Symptom duration ≤12 months versus >12 months or as a continuous variable was not a predictor for requiring revision surgery or achieving MCID/PASS (95% confidence interval crosses 1 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In an adolescent cohort of symptomatic FAI patients who underwent hip arthroscopy, there is no difference in PRO measures when analyzing symptom duration by arbitrary time intervals or as a continuous variable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

MRL/MpJ Mice Resist to Age-Related and Long-Term Ovariectomy-Induced Bone Loss: Implications for Bone Regeneration and Repair.

Osteoporosis and age-related bone loss increase bone fracture risk and impair bone healing. The need for identifying new factors to prevent or treat bone loss is critical. Previously, we reported that young MRL/MpJ mice have superior bone microarchitecture and biomechanical properties as compared to wild-type (WT) mice. In this study, MRL/MpJ mice were tested for resistance to age-related and long-term ovariectomy-induced bone loss to uncover potential beneficial factors for bone regeneration and repair. Bone tissues collected from 14-month-old MRL/MpJ and C57BL/6J (WT) mice were analyzed using micro-CT, histology, and immunohistochemistry, and serum protein markers were characterized using ELISAs or multiplex assays. Furthermore, 4-month-old MRL/MpJ and WT mice were subjected to ovariectomy (OV) or sham surgery and bone loss was monitored continuously using micro-CT at 1, 2, 4, and 6 months (M) after surgery with histology and immunohistochemistry performed at 6 M post-surgery. Sera were collected for biomarker detection using ELISA and multiplex assays at 6 M after surgery. Our results indicated that MRL/MpJ mice maintained better bone microarchitecture and higher bone mass than WT mice during aging and long-term ovariectomy. This resistance of bone loss observed in MRL/MpJ mice correlated with the maintenance of higher OSX+ osteoprogenitor cell pools, higher activation of the pSMAD5 signaling pathway, more PCNA+ cells, and a lower number of osteoclasts. Systemically, lower serum RANKL and DKK1 with higher serum IGF1 and OPG in MRL/MpJ mice relative to WT mice may also contribute to the maintenance of higher bone microarchitecture during aging and less severe bone loss after long-term ovariectomy. These findings may be used to develop therapeutic approaches to maintain bone mass and improve bone regeneration and repair due to injury, disease, and aging.

Surgical Treatment of Acetabular Dysplasia With Labral Tears.

Acetabular dysplasia results in abnormal forces across the hip joint and can result in both labral tears and cartilage degeneration. A continuum exists from classic dysplasia to normal acetabular morphology. Diagnosis is aided by several radiographic measurements and parameters including a lateral center edge angle of less than 20°, an anterior center edge angle of less than 20°, a Sharp's angle of greater than 42°, and a Tonnis angle of greater than 10°, or version abnormalities. When patients with acetabular dysplasia present with intra-articular hip pain, skeletal maturity, and preserved radiographic joint space, a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is considered as a surgical treatment option when conservative measures have failed. The Bernese PAO was developed in 1984 as a way for reorienting the acetabulum to restore more normal femoral head coverage and orientation. The long-term results of this procedure have been promising with 10-year and 20-year survivorships of approximately 85% and 60%, respectively. When dysplasia is coupled with a labral tear or other intra-articular pathology including focal chondral damage, ligamentum teres tears, or capsular defects, hip arthroscopy and PAO are performed. Although there is a paucity in the literature of the long-term evidence for the combined procedure, early results indicate improved patient reported outcome measures. Appropriate treatment of borderline hip dysplasia remains controversial.

Management of Complex and Revision Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability has gained significant interest in recent years and involves evaluation of both glenoid and humeral sided bone loss. Decision making is more complex in patients with significant humeral or glenoid bone defects or in those who underwent previous instability surgery. Appropriate assessment of the glenoid track is necessary as "off track" lesions typically require treatments beyond arthroscopic labral repair alone. In those with significant humeral or glenoid sided bone loss, the authors recommend three-dimensional computed tomography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging for accurate evaluation. The Glenoid Track Instability Management Score is a useful guide to help direct treatment by using the glenoid track as well as other known risk factors for recurrence. In circumstances with significant glenoid bone loss, typically over 20%, a coracoid transfer such as the Latarjet is recommended. In patients that previously failed a coracoid transfer, the authors recommend a distal tibia allograft; however, distal clavicle and iliac crest autograft have also been reported to have high success rates. In those with large Hill-Sachs lesions, remplissage or bone grafting are recommended. An estimation of the postoperative glenoid track after glenoid bone augmentation is required for appropriate Hill-Sachs lesion treatment. The authors typically recommend against revision instability surgical treatment with arthroscopic repair alone.

Comprehensive Arthroscopic Management of Shoulder Arthritis.

Glenohumeral arthritis is a challenging problem, especially in the young, active patient. After nonoperative treatment, including activity modification, anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and injections, is exhausted, surgical treatment ranging from simple debridement to arthroplasty is commonly offered. Given concerns regarding arthroplasty implant longevity, there is an interest in joint-preserving procedures. In this difficult population, the authors recommend a systematic, inclusive approach to the array of pathologies encountered in the setting of early glenohumeral arthritis: the Comprehensive Arthroscopic Management (CAM) procedure. CAM consists of the combination of arthroscopy, glenohumeral chondroplasty, synovectomy, loose body removal, microfracture, capsular release, humeral osteoplasty, axillary nerve neurolysis, subacromial decompression, and biceps tenodesis. Key perioperative care includes the use of regional nerve blocks to allow immediate physical therapy with the goal of restoring range of motion by 4 to 6 weeks with strengthening beginning at 6 to 12 weeks and return to full activities at 4 to 6 months. Although this is still considered a bridging procedure, the literature has reported 92% survival at 1 year, 85% survival at 2 years, 77% survival at 5 years, and 63% survival at 10 years. Predictors of failure of the CAM procedure include joint space <2 mm, flattening of the humeral head, and abnormal posterior glenoid morphology. Patient selection and education is therefore essential for optimizing outcomes.

Lower Center Edge Angle and Bioipolar Cartilage Lesions Are Associated With Conversion to Hip Arthroplasty Within 2 Years Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether radiographic parameters, intraoperative findings, patient-reported outcome measures, or intraoperative interventions that were performed differentiate those patients with >2 mm of joint space who convert under two years to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) when compared to those converting after 2 years. METHODS: Included in this study were patients who underwent conversion to THA within 2 years of primary hip arthroscopy from a prospectively collected patient registry from 2007 to 2017. Patients who underwent early conversions to arthroplasty were matched 1:1 with patients who converted after 2 years, based upon age and gender. Preoperative outcome scores were collected, including Short Form-12, modified Harris Hip Score, and Hip Outcome Score. Additionally, variables from the preoperative radiographic evaluation, surgical findings, and procedures performed were also compared. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the early conversion group and were matched with 49 patients in the later conversion group. Patients with lateral center edge angles of less than 25° were more likely to be in the early failure group [OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.01 to 15]. Patients with unipolar chondral defects on either the femoral (P = .128) or acetabular side (P = .656) were not at increased odds for early conversion compared to later conversion; however, those with bipolar chondral lesions at the time of surgery had increased odds of early conversions [OR: 3.3; 95% CI: 1.4 to 8] (P = .01). Neither surgical treatment nor preoperative patient-reported outcome measures were associated with early conversion. CONCLUSIONS: In patient with >2 mm of joint space, lateral center edge angles of less than 25° and those with bipolar articular cartilage lesions seen at the time of hip arthroscopy are at increased risk for conversion to total hip arthroplasty within two years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparison study.

Arthroscopic Hip Capsular Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Allograft as a Salvage Option for Unrepairable Capsular Defects Demonstrates Good Survivorship and Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe patient outcomes 3 to 5 years after arthroscopic hip capsule reconstruction. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2016, patients aged 18 to 50 years who underwent arthroscopic hip capsular reconstruction using an Iliotibial band allograft by the senior author and had minimum of 3-year follow-up were identified. Patients were excluded if they had previous open hip surgery, advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade >2), significant acetabular dysplasia (lateral center edge angle <20°), avascular necrosis, or Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. Outcome scores including the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living scale, modified Harris Hip Score, HOS-Sports scale, SF-12, and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were compared in addition to failure rate, revision rate, and patient satisfaction rate with the outcome (range, 1-10). All patients were assessed by the senior author pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the cohort was 32 ± 10 years, with 6 male and 33 female patients. The average number of previous hip arthroscopy surgeries was 2 ± 1. Six patients (15%) converted to total hip arthroplasty at an average of 2.1 years (range 7 months to 6 years) following capsular reconstruction. Four patients required revision hip arthroscopy after the arthroscopic capsular reconstruction. All arthroscopic revisions occurred in female patients with the primary intraoperative finding of capsulolabral adhesions at the time of revision. At mean follow-up of 4.3 years (range 3-6.8 years), the 29 patients who did not require subsequent surgery had significant improvements from preoperatively to postoperatively in HOS-Activities of Daily Living and HOS-Sport with 90% reaching minimal clinically important difference. All other scores showed significant improvement. Survival for patients not requiring total hip arthroplasty was 86% at 3 years, with a mean survival of 5.7 years (95% confidence interval 4.97-6.4). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic hip capsular reconstruction with iliotibial band allograft is a successful treatment option for patients with symptomatic capsular defects, demonstrating improved patient-reported outcomes maintained at mean follow-up time of 4 years. This technique offers restoration of the anatomic structure and function of the capsular ligaments to improve pain and instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty: Practical Guidelines for Success, Effect of COVID--19, and the Roles of Technology and Partnering With Industry.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a drastic effect on the landscape of outpatient joint arthroplasty. By accelerating the migration to ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments, protocols and techniques had to adapt quickly. In addition, the roles of technology and partnering with industry became more appealing in some cases to address specific voids and needs during this transition period. The COVID-19 pandemic abruptly affected the state of outpatient joint arthroplasty in 2020 with long-lasting effects that will continue to shape the practice of outpatient total joint arthroplasty for years to come.

The influence of excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt on upper-extremity throwing mechanics: a newly characterized parameter for biomechanical evaluation in high school and professional pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Although contralateral trunk tilt has been recognized, the phenomenon of excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt, often observed during earlier portions of the pitch, has not been explored as a potential correlate with throwing-arm kinetics among baseball pitchers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate kinetic and kinematic parameters among high school and professional pitchers related to excessive ipsilateral and contralateral trunk tilt. METHODS: Professional and high school pitchers were assessed with a 3-dimensional motion capture system (480 Hz) while pitching. Pitchers were grouped as follows: excessive ipsilateral tilt at foot contact (FC), neutral, or excessive contralateral tilt at ball release (BR). Trunk and shoulder kinematics as well as throwing-arm kinetics were compared between subgroups via post hoc regression analysis. RESULTS: Professional pitchers (n = 287) had significantly higher ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC (P < .001) than high school pitchers (n = 59). High school pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR experienced significantly higher shoulder superior force (27.0% ± 7.4% body weight [BW] vs. 17.6% ± 5.1% BW, P < .001) and shoulder anterior force (39.6% ± 8.2% BW vs. 35.7% ± 5.4% BW, P < .001) compared with the ipsilateral trunk tilt cohort but had comparable ball velocity (30.2 ± 3.2 m/s vs. 30.4 ± 2.1 m/s, P = .633). For professionals, for every 10° increase in ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC, ball velocity increased by 0.2 m/s (B = 0.02, ß = 0.07, standard error [SE] = 0.005, P = .010) whereas elbow varus torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, ß = -0.08, SE = 0.002, P < .001) and shoulder internal rotation torque decreased by 0.1% BW × height (B = -0.01, ß = -0.07, SE = 0.002, P = .005). CONCLUSION: High school and professional pitchers with excessive ipsilateral trunk tilt at FC consistently demonstrated significantly decreased throwing-arm kinetics (shoulder anterior force and shoulder superior force for high school pitchers and shoulder internal rotation torque and elbow varus torque for professional pitchers) compared with pitchers with excessive contralateral trunk tilt at BR, with equivalent ball velocity. In addition, professional pitchers appeared to engage in significantly greater ipsilateral trunk tilt during early portions of the pitch when compared with high school pitchers, which may represent a kinetically favorable method adopted by pitchers at higher playing levels to maintain adequate ball velocity while concomitantly minimizing throwing-arm kinetics.

Editorial Commentary: High Level of Evidence Randomized Controlled Trials May Report Statistically Fragile Conclusions.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for evidence-based medicine, and although a well-designed and executed RCT can be extremely powerful, many RCTs have significant flaws that may significantly impact the strength of their conclusions. The fragility index is a metric that objectifies the strength of results from RCTs and is one such metric that should be considered when critically evaluating individual studies. Although the RCTs pertaining to hip arthroscopy have a median value of 4, which is slightly greater than other orthopaedic subspecialties investigated thus far, this is far from a robust result, which mostly highlights the difficulty in performing an RCT in the surgical realm. Some topics of investigation may be better suited for well performed case-control, matched cohort, and meta-analysis studies (among other investigation types), which may provide better and more robust conclusions than a poorly performed RCT. In essence, don't be enamored by level of evidence alone.

Tibial Slope Can Be Maintained During Medial Opening-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy With Sagittally Oriented Hinge, Posterior Plate Position, and Knee Hyperextension: A Cadaveric Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is (1) to determine if, when optimizing modern techniques, medial opening-wedge osteotomies can effectively maintain tibial slope and (2) to determine how different magnitude coronal plane corrections affect tibial slope. METHODS: Proximal tibial osteotomies (PTOs) were performed on 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees leaving a consistent lateral hinge, using either a 5-mm or a 10-mm trapezoidal wedged osteotomy plate. Techniques including posterior plate placement; a trapezoidal, sloped plate; and knee hyperextension were used during plate fixation to help close the anterior osteotomy gap. Medial coronal proximal tibia angle and posterior tibial slope were measured preosteotomy, after a 5-mm implant, and after a 10-mm implant using true anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic images. Three independent observers performed all radiographic measurements, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The 5-mm and 10-mm osteotomy plates increased the coronal medial proximal tibia angle by a mean of 3.4° (range, 3.0°-3.7°) and 7.3° (range, 6.7°-7.7°), respectively. The 5-mm and 10-mm trapezoidal wedged osteotomy plates decreased the posterior tibial slope by a mean of 0.9° (range, 0.5°-1.2°) and 0.3° (range, 0°-0.6°), respectively. Intraobserver reliability was found to be high for both the coronal medial proximal tibia angle (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.897 [0.821-0.946]) and the tibial slope measurements (ICC = 0.761 [0.672-0.826]). CONCLUSIONS: When optimizing the medial opening-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy, including utilization of a sagittally oriented hinge, placement of a trapezoidal plate posteriorly, and fixation with knee hyperextension, posterior tibial slope can be maintained regardless of the degree of coronal correction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tibial slope has a significant effect on cruciate ligament stress and a better understanding of coronal plane correction, and its effect on tibial slope is critical when performing proximal tibia osteotomies.

Salvage Revision Hip Arthroscopy Including Remplissage Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes After Cam Over-Resection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of arthroscopic hip remplissage with folded iliotibial band allograft to treat cam over-resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic iliotibial band hip remplissage from May 2013 to April 2018 were prospectively evaluated. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores were compared and included the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF12) Physical Health Composite Score (PCS), SF12 Mental Health Composite Score (MCS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Outcome Score (HOS) (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] and Sport). Postoperative Tegner Activity Scale and patient satisfaction (1-10) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (2 men, 11 women) with an average age of 39.8 ± 9 years underwent arthroscopic hip remplissage with minimum 2-year and mean 3.1-year follow-up (range, 2.1-4.1 years). One hundred percent follow-up was achieved. The average number of previous surgeries was 1.38 (range, 1-3). One patient underwent total hip arthroplasty 2 years after remplissage. All 12 patients who did not undergo total hip arthroplasty had improved patient-reported outcomes after remplissage (mean scores: SF12 PCS 36 vs 42, P = .02; SF12 MCS 45 vs 51, P = .14; mHHS 45 vs 66, P < .001; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 83%; WOMAC 42 vs 28, P < .001; HOS ADL 52 vs 69, P = .003; MCID, 67%; HOS Sport 27 vs 46, P = .015; MCID, 67%). All improvements met statistical significance, besides the SF12 MCS. Median postoperative Tegner score was 2.9. Median postoperative patient satisfaction was 7 out of 10 (range, 5-10). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic hip remplissage is a successful salvage treatment option for hip instability caused by previous cam over-resection. Care must be taken during primary surgery not to over-resect the cam as patient-reported outcomes after remplissage are inferior to those undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopically-Assisted Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Tendon Allograft for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon allograft (AA-ACCR) for the treatment of Rockwood type III-V injuries at minimum 2-year follow-up and to perform subgroup analyses of clinical and radiographic outcomes for acute versus chronic and type III versus type IV-V injuries. METHODS: In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, patients who underwent primary AA-ACCR for the treatment of type III-V dislocations and had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score, Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, and patient satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was obtained. PROs and CCD were reported for the total cohort and for the subgroups. Complication and revision rates were demonstrated. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients (10 women, 92 men) with a mean age of 45.0 years (range, 18-73 years) were included. There were 13 complications (12.7%) resulting in revision surgery. After exclusion of revised patients, PROs were available for 69 (77.5%). At mean follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-12.8 years), all PROs improved significantly (P < .001). Median patient satisfaction was 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.0-10.0). Median preoperative to postoperative CCD decreased significantly (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant improvements in all PROs and CCD from preoperative to postoperative for both acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V dislocations (P < .05) with no significant differences in postoperative PROs and satisfaction between (P > .05). CONCLUSION: AA-ACCR for high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries resulted in high postoperative PROs and patient satisfaction with significant improvements from before to after surgery in those who did not undergo revision surgery. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V injuries benefitted similarly from AA-ACCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; therapeutic case series.

Postoperative Stiffness and Pain After Arthroscopic Labral Stabilization: Consider Anchor Arthropathy.

PURPOSE: To describe the key clinical, imaging, and arthroscopic characteristics of anchor arthropathy after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures and, secondarily, to define risk factors for the development of anchor-induced arthropathy. METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent revision arthroscopic shoulder surgery and were diagnosed with glenohumeral arthropathy were retrospectively identified from prospectively collected data registries between January 2000 and May 2018. Data included initial diagnosis and index procedure performed, presenting arthropathy symptoms including duration, and examination findings before revision surgery. Pre-revision imaging was used to assess presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and chondromalacia, anchors/sutures, loose bodies, and labral pathology. The same parameters were recorded intraoperatively during revision surgery. Descriptive statistics were performed for demographic data and means with standard deviations were calculated for continuous data. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to analyze marginal homogeneity between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Mean age at presentation was 33.4 ± 11.7 years (range 16-59, 17 male patients; 6 female patients). More than one half (13/23) developed symptoms within 10 months after index arthroscopic procedure (mean 32.2 ± 59.9 months, range <1 to 165.2 months) with 87% presenting with pain and 100% presenting with loss of motion on examination. Plain radiographs demonstrated humeral osteoarthritis in 57% (13/23) of patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed recurrent labral pathology in 19 of 23 (83%) patients, potential proud implants in 12 of 23 (52%), and loose bodies in 12 of 23 (52%). Intraoperatively, all had evidence of osteoarthritis; 22 of 23 (96%) had prominent implants. Humeral head chondromalacia was present in 21 of 23 patients (91%), the majority of which was linear stripe wear, and 6 of 23 (26%) had severe global glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Statistical analysis revealed a 54.5% (95% confidence interval 0.327-0.749) sensitivity of MRI identification of proud implants with a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval 0.055-1). The ability of MRI to accurately assess chondromalacia of the humeral head (P = .342) or glenoid (P = .685) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Anchor arthropathy is characterized by symptoms of pain and stiffness on examination and in many cases develops early after stabilization surgery (<10 months). Implants were implicated in the majority of cases of humeral head chondromalacia. MRI scans may produce false-negative identification of proud implants and can be a poor predictor of the severity of chondromalacia and intra-articular pathology; thus, a high index of clinical suspicion is necessary in patients with motion loss and pain postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Anchor Arthropathy of the Shoulder Joint After Instability Repair: Outcomes Improve With Revision Surgery.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing revision surgery after diagnosis of anchor-induced arthropathy. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision arthroscopic shoulder surgery and were diagnosed with post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy performed from January 2006 to May 2018 were included in the current study. Patients were excluded if they underwent prior open shoulder procedures, if glenoid bone loss was present, or if prerevision imaging and records were incomplete or not available. Data included initial diagnosis and index procedure performed, presenting arthropathy symptoms including duration, exam findings before revision surgery, and surgical intervention. PROMs were prospectively collected before surgery and at minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included with a mean (± standard deviation) age at presentation of 35.2 ± 12.1 years (range 16 to 59). The follow-up rate was 86%, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1.1 to 10.6). Mean time to development of arthropathy symptoms was 48.2 months (range <1 month to 13.8 years), all presenting with pain and decreased range of motion on exam. At time of revision surgery, all patients underwent either open or arthroscopic removal of previous implants, including anchors and suture material. Six patients underwent additional revision stabilization procedures, 1 underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, and 7 underwent arthroscopic intraarticular debridement, capsular release, and chondroplasty with or without microfracture. Pain significantly improved in 79% of patients (P = .05). Significant improvements in all PROMs were observed, including 12-item Short Form (43.8 to 54.8, P < .01); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, shortened version (31.8 to 8.4, P < .01); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.0 to 84.5, P < .05); and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (61.6 to 92.1, P < .01). Average external rotation significantly improved, from 31° ± 22° to 52° ± 24° (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Rapid intervention after diagnosis, through either revision arthroscopic or open debridement and stabilization, can lead to significant improvement in range of motion, pain, and overall patient function and satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Intra- versus inter-pitcher comparisons: Associations of ball velocity with throwing-arm kinetics in professional baseball pitchers.

BACKGROUND: The association between ball velocity and elbow varus torque has shown differences when evaluated within a single pitcher and within a cohort. The impact of increasing ball velocity on additional throwing-arm kinetics, in particular shoulder distraction forces, with intra- vs. inter-pitcher evaluations has not been evaluated, even though these kinetic measures have been implicated in injury risk. The purpose of this study was to compare intra- vs. inter-pitcher relationships between ball velocity and all major kinetics at the shoulder and elbow in professional pitchers. METHODS: A total of 323 professional baseball pitchers threw 8-12 fastball pitches while simultaneously being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion-capture technology (480 Hz). A linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate pitch velocity as a predictor of peak kinetic values at the shoulder and elbow among pitchers. A linear mixed model with random intercepts was then created to evaluate ball velocity as a predictor of peak kinetic values when comparing pitches within an individual pitcher. RESULTS: 91 pitchers were included in the analyses. Ball velocity among pitchers had weak correlations with shoulder distraction force (R2 = 0.228, P < .001) and elbow distraction force (R2 = 0.175, P < .001). Within an individual pitcher, strong correlations (R2 > 0.85) were observed for (1) shoulder internal rotation torque (P < .001), (2) shoulder horizontal adduction torque (P = .006), (3) shoulder superior force (P < .001), (4) shoulder anterior force (P < .001), (5) elbow varus torque (P < .001), (6) elbow medial force (P < .001), (7) elbow anterior force (P < .001), (8) elbow flexion torque (P < .001), (9) shoulder distractive force (P < .001), and (10) elbow distractive force (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Faster pitch velocity is a weak predictor of shoulder and elbow distraction forces experienced among professional pitchers. However, when controlling for an individual pitcher, peak kinetics at the shoulder and elbow can be strongly predicted by ball velocity. Therefore, the assumption that higher peak throwing-arm kinetic values are experienced by pitchers with faster ball velocity is likely an inappropriate assumption among pitchers but may be correct for each player who increases pitch velocity.

Does dual plating clavicle fractures increase the risk of refracture after hardware removal? A biomechanical investigation.

BACKGROUND: Dual orthogonal plating of midshaft clavicle fractures is increasingly used for osteosynthesis. The risk of refracture after hardware removal remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the torsional and 3-point bending loads to failure of the clavicle following removal of single-plane, superior 3.5-mm plate fixation vs. dual orthogonal plating 2.7-mm constructs. METHODS: This study used 12 pairs of clavicles (N = 24) harvested from cadaveric specimens with a mean age at death of 56.5 years (range, 46-65 years). One clavicle from each pair was randomly assigned to either superior plating (SP, n = 12) or double plating (DP, n = 12). For SP, a superior 3.5-mm plate was used as a template to drill 3 bicortical 2.8-mm holes medial and lateral to the center of the clavicle. For DP, two 2.7-mm plates were used as a template to drill 4 bicortical 2.0-mm holes medial and lateral to the center of the clavicle. Clavicle pairs were randomly and evenly distributed to undergo either 3-point bending (n = 12) or posterior torsional loading (n = 12). Cyclic loading was performed, followed by load-to-failure testing. Stiffness, displacement at failure, load to failure, and failure mode were assessed and compared between SP and DP constructs. RESULTS: No significant differences between the SP and DP groups were observed for stiffness (768.2 ± 281.3 N/mm vs. 785.5 ± 315.0 N/mm, P = .872), displacement at failure (8.1 ± 2.8 mm vs. 5.4 ± 1.2 mm, P = .150), and ultimate load at failure (1831.0 ± 229.6 N vs. 1842.0 ± 662.4 N, P = .964) under the condition of 3-point bending. Similarly, no significant differences between the SP and DP groups were observed for torsional stiffness (1.3 ± 0.8 N · m/° vs. 1.1 ± 0.4 N · m/°, P = .844), rotation at failure (17.3° ± 4.4° vs. 14.4° ± 1.2°, P = .205), and ultimate torque at failure (14.8 ± 6.5 N · m vs. 14.7 ± 6.9 N · m, P = .103) under the condition of posterior torsional loading. The most common mode of failure for 3-point bending testing was an oblique fracture (7 of 12 clavicles, 58.3%), with no significant difference between groups (3 of 6 in SP group [50%] vs. 4 of 6 in DP group [66.7%], P > .999). The most common mode of failure with posterior torsional loading was a spiral fracture (10 of 12 clavicles, 83.3%), with no significant difference between groups (4 of 6 in SP group [66.7%] vs. 6 of 6 in DP group [100%], P = .455). CONCLUSION: Following clavicle plate removal of either DP or SP, there is no statistically significant difference in the amount of force, under the condition of 3-point bending or torsional loading, required to fracture the diaphyseal clavicle in vitro.

Predictors of patient satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to determine patient satisfaction and to identify predictors of satisfaction after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We hypothesized that the majority of patients would be satisfied after RSA and that patients with worse preoperative mental and physical health would be less satisfied. METHODS: Satisfaction was assessed 2 years after primary RSA with domains for pain, work, activities, quality of life, and overall satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported factors were measured using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Shoulder Activity Scale score, Short Form 12 (SF-12) mental and physical component summary scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain, fatigue, and general health scores. Pearson correlations were used to determine the relationship between patient-reported factors and satisfaction. Multivariate regression was performed to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were evaluated at 2 years postoperatively. Patients were "very satisfied" in an average of 3.3 of the 5 domains. Improvements in ASES, Shoulder Activity Scale, VAS pain, and SF-12 physical component summary scores were associated with higher satisfaction, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.27 to 0.49. On multivariate analysis, patients with higher preoperative ASES scores were less satisfied after surgery (P = .005). In addition, patients with worse VAS fatigue (P = .011) and SF-12 mental (P = .034) and physical (0.011) component summary scores preoperatively had lower satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Improvements in pain and outcome scores are associated with increased satisfaction. Patients with higher shoulder function, worse physical health, and worse mental health prior to surgery are more likely to have lower satisfaction after RSA.