RESUMO
Mastocytosis is a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by excessive proliferation and accumulation of mast cells--in one or more organs. The number of symptoms and clinical prognosis vary depending on the disease. One of the most severe potential outcome of mastocytosis is anaphylactic shock. Early diagnosis and identification of triggers enables education and avoidance them. We describe the case of a 31-year-old woman with systemic mastocytosis (SM) without skin symptoms with multiple anaphylactic reactions, including two severe. Systemic mastocytosis was confirmed in bone marrow and genetic studies. We identify allergic triggers: latex and cefuroxime and also other non-immunological triggers as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient never had any allergic reaction after Hymenoptera stings. Only one result of serum tryptase was elevated. There was a need to determine the safety of antibiotic use and anesthetic drugs before cesarean. The moment when the disease was diagnosed and triggers were identifie, helped avoid further severe reactions.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/complicações , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/complicações , Mastocitose/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/imunologia , Cefuroxima/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastocitose/complicações , Mastocitose/imunologia , Mastocitose/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
The symptoms of pollen allergy in the European population occur in a period of increased pollen precipitation, and take the form of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis, bronchial asthma, contact urticaria, and food allergy. Diagnosis in addition to medical history, takes into account the positive results of skin tests and elevated allergen-specific IgE antibodies (specific IgE) in serum. These studies are considered to be objective diagnostic tests confirming the diagnosis of pollen allergy. Not in every case there is a correspondence of symptoms and results of diagnostic tests, which puts into question the accuracy of the diagnosis of pollen allergy. The aim of this study was to test the characteristics of patients with oral allergy syndrome on the background of all patients with pollen allergy and evaluation of the diagnostic value of history, skin tests and specific IgE levels in the diagnosis of patients with pollen allergy and oral allergy syndrome. A retrospective analysis of the cases of 85 patients with a diagnosis of pollen allergy and the 30 patients with OAS was performed. In our study the most common sensitizing allergen in patients with OAS was birch pollen, while patients showing no symptoms of OAS were equally sensitive to timothy and birch pollen. The main food responsible for the presence of the OAS in the mechanism of cross-allergy to pollen was an apple. Among patients with OAS we did not show significantly higher incidence of polyvalent allergies. It was shown, however, that there is a tendency that the maximum concentration of allergen-specific IgE causing clinically significant symptoms, ie in line with the pollen season, is higher in the OAS patients than in the absence of OAS. Further research is needed using new diagnostic methods, which would predict future symptoms after eating certain foods in particularly endangered patients with pollen allergy.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/imunologia , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Pólen/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Betula/imunologia , Criança , Reações Cruzadas , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Testes Cutâneos , Síndrome , Adulto JovemRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Hymenoptera venom allergy is related to higher risk of potential life -threatening anaphylactic reactions, which leads to anxiety and decreased quality of life. AIM: The aim of this paper was: 1) estimation of fear level of being re-stung among venom allergy adults treated with venom specific immunotherapy (VIT)--before and during treatment; 2) estimation of expectation of outcome of VIT as compared to level of anxiety of being re-strug, in the Visual Analogue Scale--VAS score; 3) identification of factors influencing changes in the fear level among patients during VIT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group comprised 42 patients (18 women, 24 men) in the mean age 42.6 years, with bee or vespid allergy, who had been qualified to the VIT treatment with Alutard SQ. Visual Analogue Scale--VAS and the Expectation of Outcome Questionnaire were used. The demographic data were collected. RESULTS: The VAS score before VIT for insect venom allergic patients was 8.8 (SD = 0.9). It decreased after achieving maintenance dose to 3.1 (SD = 1.6) and was significantly lower in men (p < 0.05). Score achieved in the Expectation of Outcome Questionnaire was for each question 2.2 (SD = 1.5) and there was correlation with VAS score during VIT. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with insect venom allergy, who undergo a serious allergic reaction (SR) as a result of being stung and who are qualified to VIT, have a high level of anxiety of being re-stung. Achieving the maintenance dose of VIT, results in a significant decrease of anxiety level in women and men, significantly so in men. There is a significant correlation between VAS score and the Expectation of Outcome Questionnaire results during VIT. Both VAS for anxiety level and the Expectation of Outcome Questionnaire can be simple, easily available and useful instruments helping to estimate quality of life. VIT significantly decreases the patients level of anxiety of being restung and improves their quality of life.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/prevenção & controle , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/complicações , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/terapia , Adulto , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Anafilaxia/prevenção & controle , Anafilaxia/psicologia , Ansiedade/etiologia , Venenos de Abelha/administração & dosagem , Venenos de Abelha/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/psicologia , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Qualidade de Vida , Recidiva , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Venenos de Vespas/administração & dosagem , Venenos de Vespas/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Routine qualification for specific immunotherapy (SIT) is based on clinical history and skin prick tests (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE). In cases of discordance between these two, basophil activation test (BAT) may be decisive. The aim of the present study was to determine the specificity and sensitivity of BAT, sIgE, and SPT, and to analyse cases, in which clinical data and SPT alone would result in wrongful qualification for SIT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BAT results and sIgE levels to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) and Dermatophagoides farinae (Df) were determined in 52 pediatric patients qualified for SIT based on clinical history and positive SPT. The group included 21 children qualified for SIT with birch or timothy grass, used as reference for specificity and sensitivity calculations for BAT, sIgE and SPT. RESULT: The sensitivity and specificity of BAT, using SPT as "gold standard" was 96.9% and 88.9% for Dp, and 89.3% and 100% for Df, respectively and the sensitivity and specificity of sIgE were 89.7%, 88.9% for Dp, and 92.9% and 94.4% for Df. When using BAT as "gold standard", the sensitivity and specificity of SPT was 90% and 90.5% for Dp, 92% and 84,6% for Df, and these indices for sIgE were 87.1% and 90.5% for Dp, 100% and 87.5% for Df. BAT did not confirm the initial qualification for SIT in 2 patients, revealing an unspecific basophil activation. Negative nasal provocation test ultimately confirmed the false-positive SPT, which could be explained by the co-existence of urticaria in those children. In further 2 children qualified for SIT with timothy and birch, BAT revealed lack of reactivity to respective allergens. Altogether BAT helped in avoiding unnecessary SIT in 4 out of 52 children (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, SPT, sIgE and BAT provide comparable information, however, SPT results care is advised in patients with co-existing urticaria. BAT is useful in verifying the actual relevance of allergens selected for SIT and helps in avoiding long-lasting, arduous, costly, and ineffective immunotherapy of wrongly qualified cases.