RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and subtypes of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) in Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN) in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive and negative patients in South Africa. BASIC PROCEDURES: This study was a single center retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted at Tygerberg Hospital, Western Cape, South Africa. We assessed 63 histopathologically confirmed OSSN formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks from 2015-2023. The presence of HPV was determined using the Hybrispot Direct Flow Chip Kit. Corresponding clinical data was retrieved from the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) central data warehouse. MAIN FINDINGS: Of the confirmed OSSN samples, 66.7% tested positive for HPV (95% confidence interval [CI] 54-77.3%). Of the 42 HPV positive samples, 38 (90.5%) had one or more known genotypes detected and 4 had unknown genotypes. The most prevalent subtypes were HPV 11, 16 and 18 (found in 61.9%, 52.4% and 33.3% of HPV positive samples respectively). 88.9% of the lesions biopsied were from HIV positive patients, of whom 56.4% had a CD4 + count of < 200 cells/µL. A lower median CD4 + count was detected among HIV positive patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma compared to those with moderate dysplasia (p < 0.0198). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of HPV in OSSN in South Africa. Certain subtypes namely, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33 and 35 may be more carcinogenic. HIV with HPV co-infection may be linked as a causative factor in the development of OSSN.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , África do Sul/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Adulto , Papillomaviridae/genética , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Neoplasias Oculares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Oculares/virologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Genótipo , Papillomavirus HumanoRESUMO
Translational research requires good quality specimens to ensure the integrity of research results. Clinical research must rely not only on quality specimens, but as well on clinical annotation for consistent, accurate and verifiable scientific and clinical outcomes. In laboratory research performed on a specimen by a single investigator, quality control is easily maintained. In a multi-site clinical research network, the numerous steps for biospecimens from procurement through transport, processing, storage and ultimately testing requires strict standardization of operational workflows and procedures. The practices of a central biorepository can inform and contribute to best practices regarding clinical research specimen integrity for multi-site clinical research.
Assuntos
Manejo de Espécimes , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Humanos , Pesquisadores , Manejo de Espécimes/métodosRESUMO
Background: The AIDS and Cancer Specimen Resource (ACSR) is a network of four regional biospecimen repositories and a technical core in the United States and South Africa. Its mission is to acquire, store, and distribute HIV-associated malignancy specimens and related clinical data to support translational research. At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became apparent that existing ACSR Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) were not sufficient to ensure long-term maintenance and integrity of inventories during periods of extended shutdown. The ACSR needed an administrative SOP for situations pertaining to epidemics/pandemics. The ACSR Quality Working Group (QWG), comprised of representatives from each of the five ACSR sites and an external member who directs a large university medical center biorepository, addressed the issue. Methods: To understand the individual problems the sites faced, questions were developed to query each of the six QWG sites' contingency plans to cover this type of emergency, the amount of work allowed onsite and by whom, the challenges sites experienced, and the lessons learned to assist with future similar situations, while remaining consistent with the existing IRB protocols. Results: Reported challenges spanned all activities of classical biobanks and differed within the geographical locations of the sites and the local COVID-19 infection rate. Review of the responses to the questions revealed that the general shutdown of society external to the biorepositories presented them with a homogeneous collection of problems, limitations, and needs. This led to creating an SOP that addresses planning for pandemic emergencies, scaling down of activities, shutting down, and reopening plans. Conclusions: The ACSR QWG sites now have a structured response SOP for their sites, including guidance on how to develop and implement an emergency shutdown and reopening plan. The complete SOP is publicly available on the ACSR website.