[Intraabdominal fat redistribution in long-term continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea patients]. / Redistribución de grasa intraabdominal en el tratamiento a largo plazo con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en los pacientes con síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Obesity is the main risk factor for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The aim was to evaluate the long-term effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on intraabdominal fat distribution in OSA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty OSA patients with and 35 without CPAP treatment criteria were followed-up for 2 years. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT and SAT) and preaortic intraabdominal fat (PIF) were assessed by sonography. RESULTS: In the non CPAP treated group, SAT and VAT mean values didn't change, while a significantly PIF growth was observed (55.19 [23.44] vs. 63.45 [23.94] mm, P=.021). In the CPAP treated group, VAT and PIF mean were not changed, while SAT decreased significantly (11.29 [5.69] vs. 10.47 [5.71] mm, P=.012). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term CPAP treatment produces intraabdominal fat redistribution and is associated with an anthropometric profile of lower cardiovascular risk in OSA patients.

Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Moderate-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. / Análisis coste-efectividad del tratamiento con presión positiva continua de la vía aérea en el síndrome de apnea-hipopnea durante el sueño (SAHS) moderado-grave.

INTRODUCTION: The socioeconomic impact of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is considerable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treating OSAHS with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the impact of CPAP compliance. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-crossover study of 373 patients with OSAHS receiving CPAP. We compared changes in costs, Epworth score and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaires) between the year before treatment and the year after treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the first year of treatment was estimated, and projections were made for the second year, using different effectiveness and cost scenarios. RESULTS: The visual analog scale score for the EQ-5D questionnaire increased by 5 points and the Epworth score fell by 10 points during the year of CPAP treatment. Mean gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was 0.05 per patient per year (P<.001): 0.07 among compliers and -0.04 among non-compliers. ICER was €51,147/QALY during the first year of CPAP treatment and €1,544/QALY during the second year. CONCLUSION: CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSAHS improves the quality of life of compliant patients, and is cost-effective as of the second year.

Circulating FABP4 and FABP5 levels are differently linked to OSA severity and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate circulating adipocyte and epidermal fatty acid-binding protein (FABP4 and FABP5) concentrations in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), as well as the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study included 125 patients. After polysomnography, 58 participants met the criteria for CPAP treatment and were included in a closed cohort study of 8 weeks of CPAP treatment. General anthropometric and biochemical data and circulating FABP4 and FABP5 levels were determined in all patients at baseline and after CPAP treatment in those receiving this therapy. RESULTS: Circulating FABP4 but not FABP5 levels were higher in patients with OSA (P = 0.003). FABP4 but not FABP5 values were associated with parameters of OSA severity independently of age, gender, adiposity and insulin resistance (P < 0.05). FABP4 but not FABP5 concentrations were determinants of OSA presence (OR: 1.11, P = 0.010) and severity (OR: 1.06, P = 0.020). After CPAP treatment, FABP4 levels decreased in the more severe patients (P = 0.019), while FABP5 levels increased in all patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FABP4 is directly associated with obstructive sleep apnea severity and did not change with continuous positive airway pressure treatment, while FABP5 was not associated with obstructive sleep apnea severity and increased with continuous positive airway pressure treatment. FABP4 and FABP5 have different associations with obstructive sleep apnea. FABP4 but not FABP5 could be considered a marker of metabolic alterations in obstructive sleep apnea patients.