Oral ethanol prescribing for alcohol withdrawal syndrome: initial findings and future directions following implementation within a United Kingdom National Health Service setting.

INTRODUCTION: Prescribing of ethanol may be an alternative to benzodiazepines for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We present our experience of oral ethanol prescribing within an acute United Kingdom National Health Service setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients presenting with alcohol withdrawal who were managed with oral ethanol or benzodiazepines was performed from data collected across two acute care settings. Ethanol prescribing inclusion: high risk of delirium tremens, or a history of harmful alcohol consumption (typically ≥30 units/day; in which 1 unit = 8 grams of alcohol; one standard United States drink = 14 grams of alcohol) or known to have a history of severe alcohol withdrawal, alcohol-related seizures or delirium tremens. Inverse propensity score weighting was used to partially account for variance between the two patient populations. RESULTS: Fifty (82 per cent male; average age 50.9 years) and 93 (84 per cent male; average age 46.5 years) patients in receipt of benzodiazepines or ethanol, respectively, were included. The likelihood of hospital admission was significantly reduced when individuals were managed with ethanol (odds ratio 0.206 (95 per cent confidence interval; 0.066-0.641), Wald chi-square P = 0.006). In those not admitted, the treatment type had no significant impact on length of stay or the number of occasions a pharmacological agent was required. In those admitted, treatment had no significant effect on length of stay. DISCUSSION: We offer preliminary evidence to support a role of oral ethanol in the management of patients with alcohol withdrawal. We have implemented a robust and translatable guideline. Despite limitations in the data set the impact of ethanol in reducing the likelihood of admission remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals at significant risk of severe alcohol withdrawal, prescribing ethanol as part of a comprehensive care plan, may reduce unplanned admissions. The preliminary findings presented here warrant further assessment through prospective studies.

In vivo topical gene therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a phase 1 and 2 trial.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a lifelong genodermatosis associated with blistering, wounding, and scarring caused by mutations in COL7A1, the gene encoding the anchoring fibril component, collagen VII (C7). Here, we evaluated beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC), an engineered, non-replicating COL7A1 containing herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) vector, to treat RDEB skin. B-VEC restored C7 expression in RDEB keratinocytes, fibroblasts, RDEB mice and human RDEB xenografts. Subsequently, a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 clinical trial (NCT03536143) evaluated matched wounds from nine RDEB patients receiving topical B-VEC or placebo repeatedly over 12 weeks. No grade 2 or above B-VEC-related adverse events or vector shedding or tissue-bound skin immunoreactants were noted. HSV-1 and C7 antibodies sometimes presented at baseline or increased after B-VEC treatment without an apparent impact on safety or efficacy. Primary and secondary objectives of C7 expression, anchoring fibril assembly, wound surface area reduction, duration of wound closure, and time to wound closure following B-VEC treatment were met. A patient-reported pain-severity secondary outcome was not assessed given the small proportion of wounds treated. A global assessment secondary endpoint was not pursued due to redundancy with regard to other endpoints. These studies show that B-VEC is an easily administered, safely tolerated, topical molecular corrective therapy promoting wound healing in patients with RDEB.

Anaesthetic management of organ transplant patients.

In this paper we will describe anaesthetic management of solid organ and reconstructive transplantation (RT) patients. We will focus on similar underlying principles of reperfusion, ischaemic-reperfusion injury, preconditioning and extracorporeal donor organ preservation. Special concerns for anaesthetic management of these patients need to focus on pre-assessment, pre-operative optimisation, vascular access, fluid management, blood and products replacement, cardiovascular monitoring, use of inotropes and vasoconstrictors, maintaining electrolyte balance and regional anaesthesia. Despite the complexity and long duration of transplant procedures, fast-tracking to the surgical ward after transplantation is becoming more popular and its benefits are well recognised.