Detection of lesions in dysplastic Barrett's esophagus by community and expert endoscopists.

Background and aims Endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) consists of endoscopic resection of visible lesions followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for any remaining flat BE. Because RFA is only justified in flat BE, detection of neoplastic lesions (high grade dysplasia [HGD] and early adenocarcinoma [EAC]) is crucial. We hypothesized that the detection of visible lesions containing HGD or EAC would be superior in BE expert centers compared with community hospitals, thereby supporting centralization of therapy for BE-related neoplasia. Methods Patients referred with histologically proven HGD or EAC to two Dutch BE expert centers were included. Referral letters, and endoscopy and pathology reports were reviewed for the description of the BE, presence of lesions, and histopathological analysis of target and random tissue sampling. Primary outcome was the endoscopic detection rate of lesions containing histopathologically proven neoplasia (HGD and/or EAC) in community and expert centers. Results There were 198 patients referred from 37 community hospitals (median referral time 55 days [interquartile range 33 - 85]). Detection rates for visible lesions were 60 % in community centers (75 % in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of EAC, 47 % in HGD) and 87 % in expert centers (98 % in EAC, 75 % in HGD); P < 0.001. Even with HGD/EAC on random biopsies from the index endoscopy, the yield at repeat endoscopy was < 50 % in community hospitals. In 79 patients referred solely because of random biopsy results, a lesion requiring endoscopic resection or surgery was found in 76 % by the expert endoscopists. Conclusions Endoscopists at community hospitals detect neoplastic lesions at a significantly lower rate. These data support the value of BE expert centers for work-up and further treatment of BE.

Efficacy of the CryoBalloon Focal Ablation System for the eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus islands.

Background and study aim Cryoablation can be used for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). A recent dosimetry study, using the CryoBalloon Focal Ablation System (CryoBalloon), demonstrated that 10-second ablations result in complete eradication of BE. However, the efficacy of 10-second ablation in a larger cohort of patients has not been investigated, nor has the potential of precise targeting of specific areas. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and performance (i. e. targeting of BE islands) of a 10-second cryoablation using the CryoBalloon. Results A total of 30 patients were enrolled (worst pathology: low grade dysplasia in 14 [47 %], high grade dysplasia in 7 [23 %], early adenocarcinoma in 9 [30 %]). Of the 47 BE islands, 44 (94 %) were adequately targeted. Complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia was observed in 100 % of the completely ablated areas. No stenoses were observed. Conclusion Cryoablation of BE islands using the CryoBalloon is effective. BE islands were effectively targeted.

Simplified protocol for focal radiofrequency ablation using the HALO90 device: short-term efficacy and safety in patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The standard protocol for focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus comprises two applications of radiofrequency energy, cleaning of the ablated areas and catheter, and two further applications (2 × 15 J/cm(2) - cleaning - 2 × 15 J/cm(2)). A simplified protocol (3 × 15 J/cm(2), no cleaning) proved noninferior to standard protocol for individual islands of Barrett's esophagus, but may be associated with higher stenosis rates when applied circumferentially and sequentially over time. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the above mentioned simplified protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Barrett's esophagus patients undergoing focal RFA using the simplified protocol in four tertiary referral centers were retrospectively included. During each focal ablation, the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) was ablated circumferentially in addition to Barrett's esophagus islands or tongues. Sessions continued at 8 to 12-week intervals until complete resolution of Barrett's esophagus. Primary outcome parameters comprised complete remission of dysplasia and of intestinal metaplasia, and stenosis requiring dilation. RESULTS: 83 patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (median Prague classification C1M3) were enrolled; 66/83 (80 %) had endoscopic resection of a visible lesion before RFA. Intention-to-treat analysis showed complete remission of dysplasia in 78/83 (94 %) and of intestinal metaplasia in 72/83 (87 %). Stenosis requiring dilation developed in 9/83 (11 %), necessitating a median 2 dilation sessions (range 1 - 9), with ≥ 8 sessions in three patients. CONCLUSION: A treatment algorithm incorporating the simplified protocol of 3 × 15 J/cm(2), with no cleaning, for all focal RFA sessions, appears effective. The associated number and severity of stenoses, however, raises safety concerns.

Treatment of Barrett's esophagus with a novel focal cryoablation device: a safety and feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Currently, eradication of Barrett's epithelium is preferably achieved using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or spray cryoablation (SCA). However, both modalities suffer from drawbacks such as the need for sizing, multiple deployment steps, large controller units (RFA), imprecise dosing and need for gas-venting (SCA). The new Cryoballoon Focal Ablation System (CbFAS) may address these limitations. This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and dose response of the CbFAS in patients with flat Barrett's epithelium with or without dysplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, prospective non-randomized trial, 39 patients were each treated with one or two ablations of 6, 8, or 10 seconds. Symptoms were assessed immediately and 2 days post-cryoablation. Follow-up endoscopy was performed 6-8 weeks post-procedure to assess response. Outcome parameters were incidence of adverse events, pain, esophageal stricture formation, and ablation response by cryogen dose. RESULTS: Of 62 ablations, 56 (10 with 6 seconds, 28 with 8 seconds, 18 with 10 seconds) were successfully performed. Six ablations failed because of device malfunction (n=3) and procedural or anatomic issues (n=3). Median procedure time was 7 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 4-10). No major adverse events occurred; six patients experienced a minor mucosal laceration requiring no intervention. Mild pain was reported by 27% of patients immediately after cryoablation and by 14% after 2 days. No strictures were evident at follow-up.  Full squamous regeneration was seen in 47 treated areas (6 [60%] of the 6-second areas; 23 [82%] of the 8-second areas; 18 [100%] of 10-second areas). CONCLUSIONS: Focal cryoablation of Barrett's epithelium with the CbFAS is feasible and safe, resulting in squamous regeneration in the majority of patients.

Is it justified to ablate flat-type esophageal squamous cancer? An analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens of lesions meeting the selection criteria of radiofrequency studies.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) appears to be a safe and effective treatment for flat-type noninvasive squamous neoplasia of the esophagus. However, if RFA is applied to lesions containing invasive cancer (esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC]), histological features associated with lymph node metastases may remain undetected. In addition, extension of neoplasia down the ducts of esophageal submucosal glands (SMGs) may create a sheltered "niche" beyond the reach of ablation. OBJECTIVE: To determine the RFA eligibility of flat-type ESCC. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of ESCC patients. SETTING: National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. PATIENTS: Patients with flat-type ESCC larger than 3 cm removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). INTERVENTIONS: Three endoscopists involved in RFA studies in China reviewed endoscopic images to select lesions eligible for RFA. Corresponding ESD resection specimens were histologically examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The presence of poor histological features (ie, invasion in m3 or deeper, poor tumor differentiation, or lymphovascular invasion) and the number of involved esophageal SMGs and ducts. RESULTS: Sixty-five lesions were included, 17 (26%) of which qualified as RFA eligible by RFA endoscopists. Interobserver agreement for this assessment was poor (κ = 0.09). Six of the 17 specimens (35%) showed relevant disease: 4 lesions invaded in the muscularis mucosae, 1 of which also showed lymphovascular invasion; 2 lesions showed extension of neoplasia into SMGs. LIMITATIONS: Limited number of cases. RFA eligibility status was based on analysis of still images. CONCLUSIONS: One third of flat-type ESCC, deemed eligible for RFA, demonstrated histological features that are considered (relative) contraindications to endoscopic treatment. Because it appears difficult for endoscopists to identify low-risk ESCC, conservative use of RFA for flat-type ESCC is advocated until long-term follow-up data are available.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of preventable hospital readmissions within 30 days.

Knowledge regarding preventable hospital readmissions is scarce. Our aim was to compare the clinical characteristics of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) with non-PPRs. Additionally, we aimed to identify risk factors for PPRs. Our study included readmissions within 30 days after discharge from 1 of 7 hospital departments. Preventability was assessed by multidisciplinary meetings. Characteristics of the readmissions were collected and 23 risk factors were analyzed. Of the 1120 readmissions, 125 (11%) were PPRs. PPRs occurred equally among different departments (p = 0.21). 29.6% of PPRs were readmitted by a practitioner of a different medical specialty than the initial admission (IA) specialist. The PPR group had more readmissions within 7 days (PPR 54% vs. non-PPR 44%, p = 0.03). The median LOS was 1 day longer for PPRs (p = 0.16). Factors associated with PPR were higher age (p = 0.004), higher socio-economic status (p = 0.049), fewer prior hospital admissions (p = 0.004), and no outpatient visit prior to readmission (p = 0.025). This study found that PPRs can occur at any department in the hospital. There is not a single type of patient that can easily be pinpointed to be at risk of a PPR, probably due to the multifactorial nature of PPRs.

Detection of palisade vessels as a landmark for Barrett's esophagus in a Western population.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, palisade vessels (PV) are used to distinguish the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Elsewhere, the EGJ is defined by the upper end of the gastric folds (GF) and PV are considered difficult to detect. This study evaluated the detection rate of PV in Western patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) using white light imaging (WLI) and narrow band imaging (NBI), and quantified any discordance between Western and Japanese criteria for the EGJ. METHODS: In 25 BE patients, the presence and location of PV and GF were determined and biopsies were obtained. High-quality images of the EGJ were collected under different conditions (insufflations-desufflation, WLI-NBI, forward-retroflex approach), resulting in eight different images per patient. The presence of PV on each still image was assessed by a panel of six Western and Japanese endoscopists with expertise in BE. RESULTS: PV were observed in ≥ 1 images by a majority of the panel (≥ 4 raters) in 100 % of patients during insufflation versus 60 % during desufflation (p < 0.001). WLI and NBI detected PV in 100 and 92 %, respectively (p = 0.50). Interobserver agreement of the panel was 'moderate' (κ = 0.51). During endoscopy PV were located a median of 1 cm distal of the GF in 15 patients (63 %), with intestinal metaplasia (IM) in this discordant zone, in 27 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PV are visible in most Western BE patients and are best inspected during insufflation. The location of the GF and PV differed in a substantial group of patients, partially with IM in this discordant zone.

The Efficacy of an Endoscopic Grasp-and-Traction Device for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study (with Video).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether the EndoLifter (Olympus), a counter-traction device facilitating submucosal dissection, can accelerate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHODS: Two endoscopists (novice/expert in ESD) performed 64 ESDs (artificial 3-cm lesions) in 16 ex vivo pig stomachs: per stomach, two at the posterior wall (forward approach) and two at the lesser curvature (retroflex approach). Per approach, one lesion was dissected with (EL+) and one without (EL-) the EndoLifter. The submucosal dissection time (SDT), corrected for specimen size, and the influence of ESD experience on EndoLifter usefulness were assessed. RESULTS: En bloc resection rate was 98.4%. In the forward approach, the median SDT was shorter with the EndoLifter (0.56 min/cm(2) vs. 0.91 min/cm(2)), although not significantly (p=0.09). The ESD-experienced endoscopist benefitted more from the EndoLifter (0.45 [EL+] min/cm(2) vs. 0.68 [EL-] min/cm(2), p=0.07) than the ESD-inexperienced endoscopist (0.77 [EL+] min/cm(2) vs. 1.01 [EL-] min/cm(2), p=0.48). In the retroflex approach, the median SDTs were 1.06 (EL+) and 0.48 (EL-) min/cm(2) (p=0.16). The EndoLifter did not shorten the SDT for the ESD-experienced endoscopist (0.68 [EL+] min/cm(2) vs. 0.68 [EL-] min/cm(2), p=0.78), whereas the ESD-inexperienced endoscopist seemed hindered (1.65 [EL+] min/cm(2) vs. 0.38 [EL-] min/cm(2), p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In gastric ESD, the EndoLifter, in trend, shortens SDTs in the forward, but not in the retroflex approach. Given the low numbers in this study, a type II error cannot be excluded.