Evaluation of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on salivary flow and composition in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on xerostomia, salivary flow rate (SFR) and composition in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY DESIGN: Thirty patients undergoing RT (65 Gy) for HNC were enrolled. Saliva and xerostomia evaluations collected pre- and post-PBMT-RT. PBMT involved irradiation of extra and intraoral points, 15-20 sessions, 2-3 times/week. SFR, trace elements, total protein, alkaline phosphatase, xerostomia, and pH were analyzed. RESULTS: The average age was 60.7 years. After treatment, there was not a significant reduction in SFR and there was no difference on xerostomia. Significant reductions in Al, Cd, Fe, Ni, P, and Sb concentrations were observed, along with a significant increase in Mg concentration. Sample data were organized into 3 groups based on a self-organizing map. Low concentrations of Al, As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, S, Sr, and Zn were the primary discriminatory factors for group A, while group B consisted of post-PBMT-RT samples with high concentrations of Ca, K, Mg, Na, and S. CONCLUSIONS: PBMT prevented a significant reduction in SFR and xerostomia induced by radiation therapy. These findings suggest that PBMT prevents salivary gland damage minimizing the decline in salivary flow.

Atypical oral viral coinfection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Diagnosis and treatment challenge.

BACKGROUND: Viral reactivation in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Infections caused by human herpes viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can result in oral lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old male patient who had undergone HSCT presented with ulcerated lesions in different areas of the mouth, for 7 months. The lesions had evolved to painful exophytic nodules with an erythematous, ulcerated surface. They were present on the tongue margins and soft and hard palate. Histological, immunohistochemical (IHC), and polymerase chain reaction analyses were performed, and the results were compatible with HSV-1 and -2 and CMV infections. Treatment comprised five sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and oral valganciclovir. Thirty days after combined antiviral therapy and aPDT, the lesions were completely resolved. Patient was followed up for 12 months without recurrence. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis and treatment of atypical oral infections in immunosuppressed patients is challenging. Assessment of both clinical and laboratory findings is mandatory for a conclusive diagnosis. The use of local antimicrobial and systemic therapies contributes to positive clinical response in such cases.