Regional anaesthesia in patients on antithrombotic drugs: Joint ESAIC/ESRA guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a potential complication after neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. The risk is increased in patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs. This joint guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia aims to provide an evidence-based set of recommendations and suggestions on how to reduce the risk of antithrombotic drug-induced haematoma formation related to the practice of regional anaesthesia and analgesia. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed, examining seven drug comparators and 10 types of clinical intervention with the outcome being peripheral and neuraxial haematoma. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used for assessing the methodological quality of the included studies and for formulating recommendations. A Delphi process was used to prepare a clinical practice guideline. RESULTS: Clinical studies were limited in number and quality and the certainty of evidence was assessed to be GRADE C throughout. Forty clinical practice statements were formulated. Using the Delphi-process, strong consensus (>90% agreement) was achieved in 57.5% of recommendations and consensus (75 to 90% agreement) in 42.5%. DISCUSSION: Specific time intervals should be observed concerning the adminstration of antithrombotic drugs both prior to, and after, neuraxial procedures or those peripheral nerve blocks with higher bleeding risk (deep, noncompressible). These time intervals vary according to the type and dose of anticoagulant drugs, renal function and whether a traumatic puncture has occured. Drug measurements may be used to guide certain time intervals, whilst specific reversal for vitamin K antagonists and dabigatran may also influence these. Ultrasound guidance, drug combinations and bleeding risk scores do not modify the time intervals. In peripheral nerve blocks with low bleeding risk (superficial, compressible), these time intervals do not apply. CONCLUSION: In patients taking antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications, practitioners must consider the bleeding risk both before and after nerve blockade and during insertion or removal of a catheter. Healthcare teams managing such patients must be aware of the risk and be competent in detecting and managing any possible haematomas.

Comparison of fresh frozen plasma vs. coagulation factor concentrates for reconstitution of blood: An in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Many trauma centres have adopted the administration of fixed ratios of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for bleeding patients. However, the haemostatic efficacy of this concept is not well proven. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterise the haemostatic profile of different ratios (2 : 1 : 1, 1 : 1 : 1 and 1 : 1 : 2) of PRBCs, platelet concentrates and FFP in comparison with coagulation factor concentrates (fibrinogen and/or prothrombin complex concentrate). DESIGN: An in vitro study. SETTING: Research laboratories of the department of transfusion medicine, Linz, Austria. MATERIALS: Whole blood donations from a total of 20 male volunteers. INTERVENTION: Reconstitution of blood at different ratios of PRBCs, platelet concentrates and FFP or coagulation factor concentrates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cell count, conventional and thromboelastometric coagulation parameters, single coagulation factor activities as well as endogenous thrombin potential. RESULTS: Fibrinogen levels and haematocrit were lower in the FFP group at any ratio compared with the concentrate-based groups (P < 0.0001). Reconstitution of blood with FFP at different ratios resulted in haematocrit or fibrinogen levels that were borderline with regard to recommended substitution triggers (haematocrit 41 ±â€Š2% and fibrinogen 1.5 ±â€Š0.3 g l at the 2 : 1 : 1 ratio vs. 21 ±â€Š1% and 2.1 ±â€Š0.4 g l respectively at the 1 : 1 : 2 ratio). Compared with FFP at any ratio, maximum clot firmness showed higher values in the groups using fibrinogen concentrate (P < 0.0001), whereas endogenous thrombin potential revealed higher values in the groups using prothrombin complex concentrate (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Use of coagulation factor concentrates for the reconstitution of blood allows for delivery of a higher haematocrit and a higher fibrinogen content compared with FFP. However, prothrombin complex concentrate might result in an unnecessary excess of thrombin generation. Clinical studies are warranted to further investigate these in vitro findings.

Concentrated lyophilized plasma used for reconstitution of whole blood leads to higher coagulation factor activity but unchanged thrombin potential compared with fresh-frozen plasma.

BACKGROUND: During massive hemorrhage, it is recommended to transfuse red blood cells, platelet concentrate, and fresh-frozen plasma in a ratio close to 1:1:1. To avoid the thawing process of fresh frozen plasma, lyophilized plasma (LP) is increasingly used. Evidence is limited on the activity of coagulation factors in reconstituted blood using LP and concentrated LP versions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood from ten healthy volunteers was separated into red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate units. Aliquots of red blood cells and plasma concentrate were mixed with either fresh frozen plasma (200 mL) or LP at reconstitution ratios of 2:1:1, 1:1:1, and 1:1:2. LP was used either at the recommended standard volume of 200 mL (LP200) or was more concentrated at volumes of 100 and 50 mL (LP100 and LP50, respectively). The hemostatic capacity of each reconstituted whole blood sample was tested with blood cell counts, standard coagulation tests, factor activity, thrombin generation, and viscoelastic assays. RESULTS: Hematocrit, platelet counts, and fibrinogen levels of the three ratios were similar between FFP200 and LP200 units but were lower compared with the corresponding ratios in LP100 and LP50 units. The activity of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors increased linearly with the increasing plasmatic fraction and, at 1:1:2 ratio, was significantly higher in LP50 units compared with FFP200 and LP200 units. Thrombin generation was similar throughout the four plasma groups at any ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the dilution volume of LP facilitates reaching higher hematocrit and coagulation protein levels without a relevant increase in thrombin generation. This is due to preserved balance between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors in the concentrated LP preparations.

Real-life experience with the specific reversal agent idarucizumab for the management of emergency situations in dabigatran-treated patients: a series of 11 cases.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have a favorable benefit-risk profile compared with vitamin K antagonists. However, the lack of specific reversal agents has made the management of some patients receiving long-term treatment with NOACs problematic in emergency situations such as major bleeding events or urgent procedures. Idarucizumab, a fully humanized Fab antibody fragment that binds specifically and with high affinity to dabigatran, was recently approved for use in adult patients treated with dabigatran when rapid reversal of its anticoagulant effect is required. Clinical experience with idarucizumab is currently limited. We report 11 real-life clinical cases in which idarucizumab was used after multidisciplinary consultation in a variety of emergency situations including severe postoperative bleeding, emergency high-bleeding-risk surgery (hip/spine surgery and neurosurgery), invasive diagnostic testing (lumbar puncture), intracranial bleeding (pre-pontine subarachnoid hemorrhage and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage) and thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. This case series illustrates the role of idarucizumab in improving patient safety in rare emergency situations requiring rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, while highlighting the importance of information and education about the availability and appropriate use of this recently approved specific reversal agent.

Efficacy of argatroban in critically ill patients with heparin resistance: a retrospective analysis.

The patients who do not respond even to very high dosages of heparin are assumed to suffer from heparin resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether critically ill patients suffering from heparin resistance generally have low antithrombin III (AT) levels, and if the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban in that case can be an effective option to achieve prophylactic anticoagulation. The study was conducted at the Department for General and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine at the University Hospital Innsbruck. We retrospectively included all patients between 2008 and 2012, who received argatroban because of poor response to high-dosage heparin prophylaxis. The period under observation lasted in total for 9 days, 2 days of anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and 7 days with argatroban. The primary objective was to investigate if after 7 (± 1) hours of switching to argatroban the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels were in a prophylactic range of 45 to 55 seconds. Further objectives were to assess the AT level, side effects such as bleeding or thromboembolism, platelet count, correlation between organ function and argatroban dose as well as any need for allogeneic blood products. The study population, consisting of 5 women and 15 men with a mean (± standard deviation, SD) age of 54.6 ± 16.3 years, differed in many clinical aspects. A median (interquartile range) heparin dose of 1,000, 819 to 1,125 IU/h was administered for 2 days and failed in providing a prophylactic anticoagulation measured by the aPTT. The mean aPTT level with heparin treatment was 38.5 seconds (± 4.7) its change within that period was not significant. After switching to argatroban, the mean increase of the aPTT levels in all study patients amounted from 38.5 to 48.3 seconds (p < 0.001). The rise in aPTT clearly reaches sufficient prophylactic anticoagulant levels. The maintenance of prophylactic aPTT levels was achieved over the period of 1 week. There was neither a correlation found between low-AT levels and occurrence of heparin resistance, nor between the simplified acute physiology score II and the administered argatroban dose (r = -0.224, p = 0.342). The results of the present study indicate that argatroban is an effective alternative therapy, especially in critically ill patients, to achieve prophylactic anticoagulation when heparin resistance occurs.

Can the Viscoelastic Parameter α-Angle Distinguish Fibrinogen from Platelet Deficiency and Guide Fibrinogen Supplementation?

Viscoelastic tests such as thrombelastography (TEG, Haemoscope Inc., Niles, IL) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Tem International GmbH, Munich, Germany), performed in whole blood, are increasingly used at the point-of-care to characterize coagulopathic states and guide hemostatic therapy. An algorithm, based on a mono-analysis (kaolin-activated assay) approach, was proposed in the TEG patent (issued in 2004) where the α-angle and the maximum amplitude parameters are used to guide fibrinogen supplementation and platelet administration, respectively. Although multiple assays for both the TEG and ROTEM devices are now available, algorithms based on TEG mono-analysis are still used in many institutions. In light of more recent findings, we discuss here the limitations and inaccuracies of the mono-analysis approach. Research shows that both α-angle and maximum amplitude parameters reflect the combined contribution of fibrinogen and platelets to clot strength. Therefore, although TEG mono-analysis is useful for identifying a coagulopathic state, it cannot be used to discriminate between fibrin/fibrinogen and/or platelet deficits, respectively. Conversely, the use of viscoelastic methods where 2 assays can be run simultaneously, one with platelet inhibitors and one without, can effectively allow for the identification of specific coagulopathic states, such as insufficient fibrin formation or an insufficient contribution of platelets to clot strength. Such information is critical for making the appropriate choice of hemostatic therapy.

Assessing the Methodology for Calculating Platelet Contribution to Clot Strength (Platelet Component) in Thromboelastometry and Thrombelastography.

The viscoelastic properties of blood clot have been studied most commonly using thrombelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM). ROTEM-based bleeding treatment algorithms recommend administering platelets to patients with low EXTEM clot strength (e.g., clot amplitude at 10 minutes [A10] <40 mm) once clot strength of the ROTEM® fibrin-based test (FIBTEM) is corrected. Algorithms based on TEG typically use a low value of maximum amplitude (e.g., <50 mm) as a trigger for administering platelets. However, this parameter reflects the contributions of various blood components to the clot, including platelets and fibrin/fibrinogen. The platelet component of clot strength may provide a more sensitive indication of platelet deficiency than clot amplitude from a whole blood TEG or ROTEM® assay. The platelet component of the formed clot is derived from the results of TEG/ROTEM® tests performed with and without platelet inhibition. In this article, we review the basis for why this calculation should be based on clot elasticity (e.g., the E parameter with TEG and the CE parameter with ROTEM®) as opposed to clot amplitude (e.g., the A parameter with TEG or ROTEM®). This is because clot elasticity, unlike clot amplitude, reflects the force with which the blood clot resists rotation within the device, and the relationship between clot amplitude (variable X) and clot elasticity (variable Y) is nonlinear. A specific increment of X (ΔX) will be associated with different increments of Y (ΔY), depending on the initial value of X. When calculated correctly, using clot elasticity data, the platelet component of the clot can provide a valuable insight into platelet deficiency in emergency bleeding.

Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox ®) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM ®).

BACKGROUND: Whole blood viscoelastic tests such as the fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) test FIBTEM are increasingly used in the perioperative setting to quickly identify deficits in fibrin quality, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The recently developed FibScreen2 test of the ReoRox(®) method, based on free oscillation rheometry, also provides an evaluation of fibrin clot quality. To date, little information is available on the performance of this test in hemodiluted blood, by comparison to FIBTEM. METHODS: Whole blood samples from eight healthy volunteers were analyzed using FIBTEM and Fibscreen2. Native and diluted (to 33% and 50% using saline, gelatin or hydroxyethyl starch [HES]) samples were analyzed. Clot strength parameters, including FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF), FIBTEM maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and Fibscreen2 maximum elasticity (G'max), were measured. RESULTS: In repeatedly measured samples from two volunteers, FIBTEM MCF and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.3 vs. 16.3% and 5.6 vs. 31.7% for each volunteer, respectively. Hemodilution decreased clot strength. Both Fibscreen2 G'max and FIBTEM parameters decreased proportionally to the dilution ratio when saline was used. The observed reductions in FIBTEM and Fibscreen2 parameters were more severe in samples diluted with gelatin and HES, compared to saline. Finally, a regression analysis between FIBTEM MCE and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a poor goodness of fit (r(2) = 0.37, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ReoRox(®) Fibscreen2 test has a high coefficient of variation, and its application in various hemodilution conditions showed limited comparability with the ROTEM(®) FIBTEM test.

Preferential effects of low volume versus high volume replacement with crystalloid fluid in a hemorrhagic shock model in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Fluid resuscitation is a core stone of hemorrhagic shock therapy, and crystalloid fluids seem to be associated with lower mortality compared to colloids. However, as redistribution starts within minutes, it has been suggested to replace blood loss with a minimum of a three-fold amount of crystalloids. The hypothesis was that in comparison to high volume (HV), a lower crystalloid volume (LV) achieves a favorable coagulation profile and exerts sufficient haemodynamics in the acute phase of resuscitation. METHODS: In 24 anaesthetized pigs, controlled arterial blood loss of 50 % of the estimated blood volume was either (n = 12) replaced with a LV (one-fold) or a HV (three-fold) volume of a balanced, acetated crystalloid solution at room temperature. Hemodynamic parameters, dilution effects and coagulation profile by standard coagulation tests and thromboelastometry at baseline and after resuscitation were determined in both groups. RESULTS: LV resuscitation increased MAP significantly less compared to the HV, 61 ± 7 vs. 82 ± 14 mmHg (p < 0.001) respectively, with no difference between lactate and base excess between groups. Haematocrit after fluid replacement was 0.20 vs. 0.16 (LV vs. HV, p < 0.001), suggesting a grade of blood dilution of 32 vs. 42 % (p < 0.001) compared to baseline values. Compared to LV, HV resulted in decreased core temperature (37.5 ± 0.2 vs. 36.0 ± 0.6 °C, p < 0.001), lower platelet count (318 ± 77 vs. 231 ± 53 K/µL, p < 0.01) and lower plasma fibrinogen levels (205 ± 19 vs. 168 ± 24 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Thromboelastometric measurements showed a significant impairment on viscoelastic clot properties following HV group. While prothrombin time index decreased significantly more in the HV group, activated partial thromboplastin time did not differ between both groups. HV did not result in hyperchloraemic acidosis. DISCUSSION: Coagulation parameters represented by plasma fibrinogen and ROTEM parameters were also less impaired with LV. With regrad to hematocrit, 60 % of LV remained intracascular , while in HV only 30 % remained in circulation within the first hour of administration. In the acute setting of 50 % controlled blood loss, a one fold LV crystalloid replacement strategy is sufficient to adequately raise blood pressure up to a mean arterial pressure >50 mm Hg. The concept of damage control resuscitation (DCR) with permissive hypotension may be better met by using LV as compared to a three fold HV resuscitation strategy. CONCLUSION: High volume administration of an acetated balanced crystalloid does not lead to hyperchloraemic acidosis, but may negatively influence clinical parameters, such as higher blood pressure, lower body temperature and impaired coagulation parameters, which could potentially increase bleeding after trauma. Replacement of acute blood loss with just an equal amount of an acetated balanced crystalloid appears to be the preferential treatment strategy in the acute phase after controlled bleeding.

Endogenous thrombin potential following hemostatic therapy with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: a 7-day observational study of trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Purified prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is increasingly used as hemostatic therapy for trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). However, the impact of PCC administration on coagulation status among patients with TIC has not been adequately investigated. METHODS: In this observational, descriptive study, data relating to thrombin generation were obtained from plasma samples gathered prospectively from trauma patients upon emergency room (ER) admission and over the following 7 days. Standard coagulation tests, including measurement of antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen, were performed. Three groups were investigated: patients receiving no coagulation therapy (NCT group), patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate only (FC group), and patients treated with PCC and fibrinogen concentrate (FC-PCC group). RESULTS: The study population (77 patients) was predominantly male (84.4%); mean age was 40 ± 15 years and mean injury severity score was 25.6 ± 12.7. There were no significant differences between the three study groups in thrombin-related parameters upon ER admission. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was significantly higher in the FC-PCC group compared with the NCT group on days 1 to 4 and the FC group on days 1 to 3. AT levels were significantly lower in the FC-PCC group from admission until day 3 (versus FC group) or day 4 (versus NCT group). Fibrinogen increased over time, with no significant between-group differences after ER admission. Despite ETP being higher, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were significantly prolonged in the FC-PCC group from admission until day 3 to 4. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with PCC increased ETP for several days, and patients receiving PCC therapy had low AT concentrations. These findings imply a potential pro-thrombotic state not reflected by standard coagulation tests. This is probably important given the postoperative acute phase increase in fibrinogen levels, although studies with clinical endpoints are needed to ascertain the implications for patient outcomes. We recommend careful use of PCC among trauma patients, with monitoring and potentially supplementation of AT.

Trauma bleeding management: the concept of goal-directed primary care.

The early and aggressive high-volume administration of fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, and red blood cells (RBCs), using ratio-driven massive transfusion protocols, has been adopted by many for the treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy and hemorrhagic shock. However, the optimal ratio of RBC: fresh frozen plasma and RBC:platelet concentrate is still under investigation. In some European trauma centers, hemostatic agents such as fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrates, and antifibrinolytics are integral parts of goal-directed massive transfusion protocols. Both a ratio-driven coagulation therapy and a point-of-care-guided coagulation management based on coagulation factor concentrates aim for the same target-the rapid prevention and treatment of shock and coagulopathy to prevent death from traumatic hemorrhage. In this review, we compare the evidence relating to the effectiveness and safety of the ratio-driven and goal-directed approaches to trauma-induced coagulopathy to draw attention to the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with these management strategies.

The effectiveness of different functional fibrinogen polymerization assays in eliminating platelet contribution to clot strength in thromboelastometry.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests such as functional fibrinogen polymerization assays (FFPAs) in thrombelastography (TEG®) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) measure clot elasticity under platelet inhibition. Incomplete platelet inhibition influences maximum clot firmness (MCF) of FFPAs. We compared the ability of existing and newly developed FFPAs to eliminate the platelet contribution to clot strength. METHODS: MCF of whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet-poor plasma samples was recorded using a ROTEM device with different FFPAs, including the TEG functional fibrinogen test (FFTEG) and different ROTEM-based assays: the standard fib-tem reagent (FIBTEM), a lyophilized single-portion reagent fib-tem S (FIBTEM-S), a newly developed reagent FIBTEM PLUS, as well as FIBTEM or the standard extrinsic activation reagent ex-tem® (EXTEM) combined with 10-µg abciximab (FIBTEM-ABC/EXTEM-ABC). RESULTS: In WB (platelet count [mean ± SD], 183 ± 37 × 10/µL; plasma fibrinogen concentration, 2.49 ± 0.58 g/L), FFTEG and EXTEM-ABC showed higher MCF (15.7 ± 2.8 mm) than FIBTEM or FIBTEM-S (11.4 ± 3.3 mm, P < 0.001), whereas FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS resulted in lower MCF (9.3 ± 2.8 mm, P < 0.001). In 2 different PRP samples, with platelet counts of 407 ± 80 × 10/µL and 609 ± 127 × 10/µL, FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS reduced platelet contribution to clot strength within 95% confidence interval limits of -1.4 to 0.1 mm and -1.2 to 0.4 mm, respectively. Using all FFPAs it was observed that the Pearson correlation coefficient between plasma fibrinogen concentration and WB MCF was high (range, 0.75-0.93) and significant, regardless of the underlying platelet inhibiting component. Evaluating differences in the interception of regression lines by using analysis of covariance, we compared platelet-poor plasma and both PRP samples within the same assays and found that in contrast to the FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS assays, the FFTEG, EXTEM-ABC, FIBTEM, and FIBTEM-S methods still detected residual platelet activity and grossly overestimated fibrin clot strength in samples with high platelet counts. CONCLUSIONS: FFPAs based solely on glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibition, such as FFTEG or EXTEM-ABC, are less effective than cytochalasin D-based assays, such as FIBTEM or FIBTEM-S, at inhibiting the platelet component of clot strength. The FIBTEM PLUS assay, and the combination of FIBTEM and abciximab, sufficiently inhibits platelet contribution to clot elasticity. The combination of a glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa receptor blocker and cytochalasin D allows evaluation of functional fibrinogen polymerization without platelet "noise." In a clinical setting, the significance of potent platelet inhibition ensures a more accurate assessment of MCF and therefore the need for fibrinogen supplementation therapy. Further studies are necessary to investigate the application and impact of these tests in a clinical situation.

Development of a Paper-based Hematocrit Test and a Lateral Flow Assay to Detect Critical Fibrinogen Concentrations Using a Bottom-Up Pyramid Workflow Approach.

Fibrinogen is a coagulation factor in human blood and the first one to reach critical levels in major bleeding. Hypofibrinogenemia (a too low fibrinogen concentration in blood) poses great challenges to first responders, clinicians, and healthcare providers since it represents a risk factor for exsanguination and massive transfusion requirements. Thus, the rapid assessment of the fibrinogen concentration at the point of care has gained considerable importance in preventing and managing major blood loss. However, in whole blood measurements, hematocrit variations affect the amount (volume fraction) of plasma that passes the detection zone. In an attempt to accurately determine realistic critical levels of fibrinogen (<1.5 mg/mL) in patients needing immediate treatment and medical interventions, we have developed novel diagnostic systems capable of estimating hematocrit and critical fibrinogen concentrations. A lateral flow assay (LFA) for the detection of fibrinogen has been developed by establishing a workflow employing rapid characterization methods to streamline LFA development. The integration of two detection lines enables (i) the identification of fibrinogen (first line) present in the sample and (ii) the determination of the clinically critical fibrinogen concentrations below 1.5 mg/mL (second line). Furthermore, the paper-based separation of blood cells from plasma provides a semiquantitative estimate of the hematocrit by analyzing the fractions. Initial validation of the point-of-care (PoC) hematocrit test revealed good comparability to a standard laboratory method. The developed diagnostic systems have the ability to accelerate decision-making in cases with major bleeding.

Estimation of plasma fibrinogen levels based on hemoglobin, base excess and Injury Severity Score upon emergency room admission.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrinogen plays a key role in hemostasis and is the first coagulation factor to reach critical levels in massively bleeding trauma patients. Consequently, rapid estimation of plasma fibrinogen (FIB) is essential upon emergency room (ER) admission, but is not part of routine coagulation monitoring in many centers. We investigated the predictive ability of the laboratory parameters hemoglobin (Hb) and base excess (BE) upon admission, as well as the Injury Severity Score (ISS), to estimate FIB in major trauma patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, major trauma patients (ISS ≥16) with documented FIB analysis upon ER admission were eligible for inclusion. FIB was correlated with Hb, BE and ISS, alone and in combination, using regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 675 patients were enrolled (median ISS 27). FIB upon admission correlated strongly with Hb, BE and ISS. Multiple regression analysis showed that Hb and BE together predicted FIB (adjusted R2 = 0.46; loge(FIB) = 3.567 + 0.223.Hb - 0.007.Hb2 + 0.044.BE), and predictive strength increased when ISS was included (adjusted R2 = 0.51; loge(FIB) = 4.188 + 0.243.Hb - 0.008.Hb2 + 0.036.BE - 0.031.ISS + 0.0003.ISS2). Of all major trauma patients admitted with Hb <12 g/dL, 74% had low (<200 mg/dL) FIB and 54% had critical (<150 mg/dL) FIB. Of patients admitted with Hb <10 g/dL, 89% had low FIB and 73% had critical FIB. These values increased to 93% and 89%, respectively, among patients with an admission Hb <8 g/dL. Sixty-six percent of patients with only a weakly negative BE (<-2 mmol/L) showed low FIB. Of patients with BE <-6 mmol/L upon admission, 81% had low FIB and 63% had critical FIB. The corresponding values for BE <-10 mmol/L were 89% and 78%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Upon ER admission, FIB of major trauma patients shows strong correlation with rapidly obtainable, routine laboratory parameters such as Hb and BE. These two parameters might provide an insightful and rapid tool to identify major trauma patients at risk of acquired hypofibrinogenemia. Early calculation of ISS could further increase the ability to predict FIB in these patients. We propose that FIB can be estimated during the initial phase of trauma care based on bedside tests.

Thromboelastometric maximum clot firmness in platelet-free plasma is influenced by the assay used.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests such as functional fibrinogen polymerization assays (FFPAs) in thrombelastography (TEG(®)) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) measure the elasticity of extrinsically activated clotting under conditions of platelet inhibition. There are no reports on whether components of the FFPAs have any effects on fibrin polymerization, aside from the effects of platelet inhibition. METHODS: Using various platelet-free plasma (PFP) preparations, we compared the extrinsically activated EXTEM thromboelastometric assay with 3 FFPAs: FIBTEM, FIBTEM PLUS, and the Functional Fibrinogen Test(®) (FFTEG). These FFPAs activate coagulation extrinsically but additionally inhibit platelet function. We used calibration plasma (Instrumentation Laboratory and Siemens), pooled fresh-frozen plasma (Octaplas) and freshly prepared PFP from a healthy volunteer. EXTEM and all FFPAs were run in parallel on a ROTEM device. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) maximum clot firmness (MCF) values for all plasma preparations were: 20.5 mm (17.25-22.0 mm) in EXTEM, 23.0 mm (18.5-24.0 mm) in FIBTEM, 23.0 mm (18.25-24.75 mm) in FIBTEM PLUS, and 18.0 mm (16.0-19.0 mm) in FFTEG. Compared with EXTEM, FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS (P < 0.01) showed increased MCF values whereas FFTEG (P < 0.001) showed decreased MCF values. Further experiments in PFP showed that the platelet inhibitors used in the FFPAs (cytochalasin D or the glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab) were not causing these alterations in MCF. However, reducing the activating tissue factor concentration (by diluting the extrinsic assay) decreased the MCF. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS may contain stabilizing agents that enhance fibrin polymerization whereas FFTEG might contain less tissue factor than the ROTEM assays.

FIBTEM PLUS provides an improved thromboelastometry test for measurement of fibrin-based clot quality in cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: The viscoelastic functional fibrinogen (FF) and FIBTEM assays measure the contribution of fibrin to clot strength. Inhibition of platelet function is a necessary precondition for these tests to work. We investigated a novel test for measuring fibrin-based clotting, FIBTEM PLUS, in cardiac surgery and compared it with FF and FIBTEM. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed which included 30 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Blood samples were drawn at the beginning of surgery (pre-CPB), approximately 20 minutes before weaning from CPB and 5 minutes after heparin neutralization. FF, FIBTEM, and FIBTEM PLUS tests were performed in duplicate for all blood samples. Additional coagulation parameters, including platelet count, plasma fibrinogen levels, factor XIII activity, and heparin concentration, were also recorded for each sample. RESULTS: At all time points, the lowest mean maximum clot firmness (MCF) was observed with FIBTEM PLUS, although a statistically significant difference between FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS was observed only at baseline (mean values 22 vs 19 mm, P = 0.01; FF value for comparison: 27.7 mm). FF maximum amplitude (MA) values were significantly higher than FIBTEM MCF and FIBTEM PLUS MCF pre-CPB, during CPB and after heparin neutralization (P ≤ 0.001 for FF MA versus FIBTEM MCF and for FF MA versus FIBTEM PLUS MCF at all time points). The difference between FIBTEM MCF and FIBTEM PLUS MCF correlated with platelet count (r = 0.46;P < 0.001), whereas differences between FF MA and FIBTEM MCF, or FF MA and FIBTEM PLUS MCF did not (r = -0.07, P = 0.51; r = 0.16, P = 0.12, respectively). Differences between the assays were unrelated to heparin levels, which decreased considerably after protamine administration compared with heparin levels recorded before weaning from CPB (decrease from 2.1 to 0.1 U/mL and from 2.8 to 0.2 U/mL for anti-factor IIa and anti-factor Xa, respectively). Agreement between duplicate measurements was similar with FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS assays and lower with FF. Significant positive correlations were found between MCF or MA and fibrinogen concentration (all P < 0.001); the highest correlation was with FIBTEM PLUS MCF (r = 0.70). CONCLUSION: The FIBTEM PLUS assay produces precise results. At baseline, it provides greater inhibition of platelets than FIBTEM, but there is no meaningful difference between FIBTEM PLUS and FIBTEM in patients with low platelet counts.

Management of hemorrhage in trauma.

Hemorrhage remains one of the leading causes of trauma-related deaths. Uncontrolled diffuse microvascular bleeding in the course of initial care is common, potentially resulting in exsanguination. Early and aggressive hemostatic intervention increases survival and reduces the incidence of massive transfusion. Thus, timely diagnosis of the underlying coagulation disorders is mandatory. It has been shown that standard coagulation tests do not sufficiently characterize trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC). This has led to increasing interest in alternatives, such as the viscoelastic test, to diagnose TIC and to provide the basis for a goal-directed hemostatic therapy. The concept of damage control resuscitation (DCR) has been introduced widely in trauma patients with severe bleeding. This strategy addresses important confounders of the coagulation process such as hemodilution, hypothermia, and acidosis; DCR is based on a damage control surgical approach, permissive hypotension, and improvement of hemostatic competence. Many studies have shown benefit in mortality when using high ratios of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to red blood cells (RBC) as early treatment. However, there is increased awareness that coagulation factor concentrate could be beneficial in the treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy.

Potential value of pharmacological protocols in trauma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnosis and treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) presents a challenge for trauma care providers. Viscoelastic tests (VETs) including thromboelastometry and thrombelastography are increasingly used to diagnose TIC and guide hemostatic therapy. We summarize the concept of individualized, goal-directed coagulation management using coagulation factor concentrates. RECENT FINDINGS: Early and aggressive treatment is mandatory to improve the survival of severely bleeding trauma patients. High ratios of fresh frozen plasma to red blood cells are linked to improved outcome in coagulopathic patients; however, treatment is often delayed because most blood products must first be thawed. Lyophilized plasma potentially overcomes these problems. However, until now only limited data on the use of lyophilized plasma in major trauma are available. VETs provide a rapid and comprehensive overview of the coagulation process. Low maximum clot firmness is associated with increased transfusion requirements, and premature lysis of the clot is indicative of poor outcome. Improvement in clot firmness can be achieved by the administration of fibrinogen concentrate or platelet concentrate, depending on the cause of coagulopathy. Early administration of tranexamic acid improves clot stability and outcome in major trauma. Prothrombin complex concentrate increases thrombin generation, but is potentially associated with increased risk of thromboembolic complications. SUMMARY: VETs are useful in the diagnosis of TIC, allowing precise deficits in the coagulation process to be identified and specifically targeted with coagulation factor concentrates.