Post-treatment intellectual functioning in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with chemotherapy-only: a prospective, sibling-controlled study.

Intellectual functioning (verbal, performance and full-scale IQ) in 43 children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) with chemotherapy-only was evaluated in a nationwide, prospective, sibling-controlled study. Intellectual assessment was performed at diagnosis and repeated shortly after cessation of 2 years treatment, including intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy. Using hierarchical regression analysis, patients' and siblings' (n=27) scores were longitudinally analysed and compared to assess possible changes and differences over time. At both assessments, before and after treatment, the patients showed average scores on intelligence tests compared to population norms. Longitudinal analysis and cross-sectional comparisons revealed no significant differences between patients and controls. Young patients showed a small relative decline, albeit not significant, on performance-IQ compared to healthy siblings. Despite intensive and potentially neurotoxic treatment, no evident negative effects on intelligence were found. However, it cannot be precluded that younger patients are at risk for a small decline in PIQ.

Neuropsychological outcome in chemotherapy-only-treated children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate neuropsychological functioning over time in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with chemotherapy only. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (median age at first assessment, 6.8 years; range, 4.0 to 11.8 years) treated with intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy were included in a nationwide, prospective-longitudinal, sibling-controlled study. Patients and siblings completed three extensive neuropsychological assessments: at diagnosis, 3 to 6 months after completion of (2-year) treatment and 4.5 years after diagnosis. Assessments included measures of learning, memory, attention, speed, executive functioning, visual-constructive functioning, and fine-motor functioning. Multilevel analyses were applied to evaluate patients' performances over time and to compare patients to 29 siblings (median age of siblings at first assessment, 8.2 years; range, 4.5 to 12.6 years) and to normative data. RESULTS: No major differences were found in neuropsychological performance between patients and siblings, with both groups performing mainly in the normal range. The patient group as a whole, however, scored significantly lower than the siblings on complex fine-motor functioning at the last evaluation. Large practice effects were found for both patients and siblings in four of 11 tasks. Patients who uttered physical complaints (ie, pain and/or tiredness) at the first pretreatment assessment scored significantly lower than siblings on attention and speed at the last two evaluations. CONCLUSION: Despite intensive and potentially neurotoxic treatment, no evident negative, neuropsychological late effects were found 4.5 years after diagnosis, except for effects on complex fine-motor functioning. Both the large practice effects observed and the poorer performances on sustained attention for patients with physical complaints should be reckoned with in prospective, longitudinal neuropsychological research in children.