Development and validation of metrics for assessment of ultrasound-guided fascial block skills☆.

BACKGROUND: As few anaesthetists provide lumbar erector spinae block for disc surgery, there is a need to provide training to enable a randomised controlled trial investigating analgesia after painful spinal surgery (NIHR153170). The primary objective of the study was to develop and measure the construct validity of a checklist for assessment of skills in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection using soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. METHODS: Twenty-four UK consultant regional anaesthetists completed two iterations of a Delphi questionnaire. The final checklist consisted of 11 steps conducive to best practice. Thereafter, we validated the checklist by comparing the performance of 12 experts with 12 novices, each performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae plane injections or fascia iliaca, serrato-pectoral (PEC II) and serratus injections, randomly allocated to the left and right sides of six soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers. Six expert, trained raters blinded to operator and site of block examined 120 videos each. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) internal consistency of the 11-item checklist for erector spinae plane injection was 0.72 (0.63-0.79) and interclass correlation was 0.88 (0.82-0.93). The checklist showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, experts vs novices {median (interquartile range [range]) 8.0 (7.0-10.0 [1-11]) vs 7.0 (5.0-9.0 [4-11]), difference 1.5 (1.0-2.5), P<0.001}. Global rating scales showed construct validity for lumbar and thoracic erector spinae injection, 28.0 (24.0-31.0 [7-35]) vs 21.0 (17.0-24.0 [7-35]), difference 7.5 (6.0-8.5), P<0.001. The most difficult items to perform were identifying the needle tip before advancing and always visualising the needle tip. Instrument handling and flow of procedure were the areas of greatest difficulty on the global rating scale (GRS). Checklists and GRS scores correlated. There was homogeneity of regression slopes controlling for status, type of injection, and rater. Generalisability analysis showed a high reliability using the checklist and GRS for all fascial plane blocks (Rho [ρ2] 0.93-0.96: Phi [ϕ] 0.84-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: An 11-point checklist developed through a modified Delphi process to provide best practice guidance for fascial plane injection showed construct validity in performing lumbar and thoracic erector spinae fascial plane injection in soft-embalmed Thiel cadavers.

Arterial Anatomy of the Anterior Abdominal Wall: Evidence-Based Safe Sites for Instrumentation Based on Radiological Analysis of 100 Patients.

Multiple medical interventions require percutaneous instrumentation of the anterior abdominal wall, all of which carry a potential for vascular trauma. We assessed the presence, position, and size of the anterior abdominal wall superior and inferior (deep) epigastric arteries to determine the safest site with respect to vascular anatomy of the rectus sheath. In a review of 100 arterial phase, contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scans, anterior abdominal wall arteries were assessed bilaterally at three axial planes: transpyloric, umbilicus, and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The mean age of patients was 69.2 years (SD ± 15), with 62 male and 38 female. An artery was visible least frequently at the transpyloric plane (5%), compared with the umbilicus (72-79%) and ASIS (93-96%), on the left (χ2 (4) = 207.272; P < 0.001) and right (χ2 (4) = 198.553; P < 0.001), with a moderate strength association (Cramer's V = 0.588 (left) and 0.575 (right)). The arteries were most commonly observed within the rectus abdominis muscle at the level of the umbilicus and ASIS on both sides (62-68%). The inferior epigastric artery was observed to be larger in diameter, start more laterally, and move medially as it travelled superiorly. These data suggest that the safest site to instrument the rectus sheath, with respect to vascular anatomy, is at the transpyloric plane. This information on anatomical variation of the anterior abdominal wall vasculature may be of particular interest to anesthetists performing rectus sheath block and surgeons during laparoscopic port insertion. Clin. Anat. 33:350-354, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Validity and reliability of metrics for translation of regional anaesthesia performance from cadavers to patients.

BACKGROUND: Our goal is to develop metrics that quantify the translation of performance from cadavers to patients. Our primary objective was to develop steps and error checklists from a Delphi questionnaire. Our second objective was to show that our test scores were valid and reliable. METHODS: Sixteen UK experts identified 15 steps conducive to good performance and 15 errors to be avoided during interscalene block on the soft-embalmed cadaver and patients. Thereafter, six experts and six novices were trained, and then tested. Training consisted of psychometric assessment, an anatomy tutorial, volunteer scanning, and ultrasound-guided needle insertion on a pork phantom and on a soft-embalmed cadaver. For testing, participants conducted a single interscalene block on a dedicated soft-embalmed cadaver whilst wearing eye tracking glasses. RESULTS: We developed a 15-step checklist and a 15-error checklist. The internal consistency of our steps measures were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.89) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93) for our error measures. The experts completed more steps (mean difference: 3.2 [95% CI: 1.5-4.8]; P<0.001), had less errors (mean difference: 4.9 [95% CI: 3.5-6.3]; P<0.001), had better global rating scores (mean difference: 6.8 [95% CI: 3.6-10.0]; P<0.001), and more eye-gaze fixations (median of differences: 128 [95% CI: 0-288]; P=0.048). Fixation count correlated negatively with steps (r=-0.60; P=0.04) and with errors (r=0.64; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our tests to quantify ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block training and performance were valid and reliable.

Haematospermia as a presenting symptom: outcomes of investigation in 300 men.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The optimum investigation of haematospermia is unknown. The association of this condition in relation to pathology and in particular prostate cancer is controversial and there is a paucity of evidence based literature regarding the above. The aim of this study was to investigate haematospermia as a presenting symptom of significant underlying pathology and to assess the diagnostic value of routine urological investigations. METHODS: 300 consecutive patients referred from primary care to a tertiary urology referral centre presenting with haematospermia were included in this observational case series. Data on patient age, concurrent presenting symptoms and urological history were collected. Subsequent patient investigations and final diagnoses were recorded. PSA and digital rectal examination (DRE) findings were noted in the over 40 age group. RESULTS: Of 469 investigative episodes, comprising: 206 flexible cystoscopies, 232 renal ultrasounds, 16 intravenous urograms (IVUs) and 15 scrotal ultrasounds; only 2 (0.4%) resulted in findings of significant new pathology which required surgical intervention. 13 prostate cancers were detected (5.7%) and 2 of dysplasia, all in men over 40 years either with a PSA of >3.0 ng/dl or an abnormal DRE. CONCLUSIONS: PSA measurement and a DRE should be carried out in patients over the age of 40 years presenting with haematospermia to screen for prostate cancer. Investigation of haematospermia in the form of flexible cystoscopy, ultrasound or IVU has a very poor diagnostic yield and is not recommended routinely for an initial presentation of haematospermia.