RESUMO
Cervical cancers constitute a large disease burden in developing countries, with the human papillomavirus (HPV) being responsible for most cervical lesions. Many regions in low-resource countries lack adequate access to sensitive point-of-care (POC) screening tools, preventing timely diagnosis and treatment. To reduce screening barriers, we developed a POC HPV molecular test that detects 14 high-risk HPV types in 30 min in a single assay. We introduced innovations to the underlying amplification (recombinase polymerase amplification) and detection methodologies such as improved probe design, reagent lyophilization, and pipette-less processing to increase sensitivity while enabling minimally trained personnel to conduct reproducible testing. Based on 198 clinically derived samples, we demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 73% compared to an FDA-approved polymerase chain reaction-based clinical method. Our modified pipette-less simplified assay had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 83%. The application of our assay is intended as a near-patient screening tool with further evaluation by a clinician for confirmation.
Assuntos
Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Testes Imediatos , GenótipoRESUMO
Rapid on-site diagnosis of emerging pathogens is key for early identification of infected individuals and for prevention of further spreading in a population. Currently available molecular diagnostic tests are instrument-based whereas rapid antibody and antigen tests are often not sufficiently sensitive for detection in pre-symptomatic subjects. There is a need for rapid point of care molecular screening tests that can be easily adapted to emerging pathogens and are selective, sensitive, reliable in different settings around the world. We have developed a simple, rapid (<30 âmin), and inexpensive test for SARS-CoV-2 that is based on combination of isothermal reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) using modified primers and visual detection with paper-based microfluidics. Our test (CoRapID) is specific for SARS-CoV-2 (alpha to omicron variants) and does not detect other coronaviruses and pathogens by in silico and in vitro analysis. A two-step test protocol was developed with stable lyophilized reagents that reduces handling by using portable and disposable components (droppers, microapplicators/swabs, paper-strips). After optimization of assay components and conditions, we have achieved a limit of detection (LoD) of 1 copy/reaction by adding a blocking primer to the lateral flow assay. Using a set of 138 clinical samples, a sensitivity of 88.1% (P â< â0.05, CI: 78.2-93.8%) and specificity of 93.9% (P â< â0.05, CI: 85.4-97.6%) was determined. The lack of need for instrumentation for our CoRapID makes it an ideal on-site primary screening tool for local hospitals, doctors' offices, senior homes, workplaces, and in remote settings around the world that often do not have access to clinical laboratories.
RESUMO
Objective: Assess turnaround time (TAT) and cost-benefit of on-site C. auris screening and its impact on length of stay (LOS) and costs compared to reference laboratories. Design: Before-and-after retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large-tertiary medical center. Methods: We validated an on-site polymerase chain reaction-based testing platform for C. auris and retrospectively reviewed hospitalized adults who screened negative before and after platform implementation. We constructed multivariable models to assess the association of screening negative with hospital LOS/cost in the pre and postimplementation periods. We adjusted for confounders such as demographics and indwelling device use, and compared TATs for all samples tested. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the testing platform were 100% and 98.11%, respectively, compared to send-out testing. The clinical cohort included 287 adults in the pre and 1,266 postimplementation period. The TAT was reduced by more than 2 days (3 (interquartile range (IQR): 2.0, 7.0) vs 0.42 (IQR: 0.24, 0.81), p < 0.001). Median LOS was significantly lower in the postimplementation period; however, this was no longer evident after adjustment. In relation to total cost, the time period had an effect of $6,965 (95% CI: -$481, $14,412); p = 0.067) on reducing the cost. The median adjusted total cost per patient was $7,045 (IQR: $3,805, $13,924) less in the post vs the preimplementation period. Conclusions: Our assessment did not find a statistically significant change in LOS, nevertheless, on-site testing was not cost-prohibitive for the institution. The value of on-site testing may be supported if an institutional C. auris reduction strategy emphasizes faster TATs.