Scoliosis in Adolescent Patients With Down Syndrome: Correlation Between Curve Magnitude and Functional Level.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, observational comparative study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether a relationship exists between the functional level and spinal deformity in patients with Down syndrome (DS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with DS have a higher incidence of scoliosis than the general population; however, it is unknown whether functional level influences the characteristics and severity of the deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 649 patients with DS included in a pediatric referral center database, we identified 59 with a diagnosis of scoliosis (59.32% female; mean age, 14.19±1.82 y); the 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria comprised the study cohort. According to their functional gait skills and gross motor skills, they were classified into 2 levels. Different coronal and sagittal parameters were measured using full-spine standing radiographs. The need for surgical treatment and history of thoracotomy were recorded as well. Finally, a multivariate association analysis was performed between radiologic parameters and functional level. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had a functional level consistent with level I and 24 with level II. Twelve curves were thoracic, 10 thoracolumbar, and 24 lumbar. A statistically significant relationship was found between functional level I and II and curve magnitude: 18.9 degrees (6.8) versus 36.9 degrees (20.3) ( P =0.001) with a cutoff point at 22.3 degrees (area under the curve=0.919, P <0.005, sensitivity=0.917 and specificity=0.818). The relationship between patients who required surgery and level II was also significant ( P =0.016). No relationship was found between functional level and coronal and sagittal balance, nor with other radiologic parameters or with curve location, or between the history of thoracotomy and thoracic curves. CONCLUSIONS: DS adolescents with poorer functional level were associated with larger curves and greater risk for surgery. These findings may provide valuable guidance for the follow-up of scoliosis in patients with DS based on their functional level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Use of Electroencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Systems as a Rehabilitative Approach for Upper Limb Function After a Stroke: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Brain-computer interface (BCI) systems have been suggested as a promising tool for neurorehabilitation. However, to date, there is a lack of homogeneous findings. Furthermore, no systematic reviews have analyzed the degree of validation of these interventions for upper limb (UL) motor rehabilitation poststroke. OBJECTIVES: The study aims were to compile all available studies that assess an UL intervention based on an electroencephalography (EEG) BCI system in stroke; to analyze the methodological quality of the studies retrieved; and to determine the effects of these interventions on the improvement of motor abilities. TYPE: This was a systematic review. LITERATURE SURVEY: Searches were conducted in PubMed, PEDro, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial from inception to September 30, 2015. METHODOLOGY: This systematic review compiles all available studies that assess UL intervention based on an EEG-BCI system in patients with stroke, analyzing their methodological quality using the Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies, and determining the grade of recommendation of these interventions for improving motor abilities as established by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. The articles were selected according to the following criteria: studies evaluating an EEG-based BCI intervention; studies including patients with a stroke and hemiplegia, regardless of lesion origin or temporal evolution; interventions using an EEG-based BCI to restore functional abilities of the affected UL, regardless of the interface used or its combination with other therapies; and studies using validated tools to evaluate motor function. SYNTHESIS: After the literature search, 13 articles were included in this review: 4 studies were randomized controlled trials; 1 study was a controlled study; 4 studies were case series studies; and 4 studies were case reports. The methodological quality of the included papers ranged from 6 to 15, and the level of evidence varied from 1b to 5. The articles included in this review involved a total of 141 stroke patients. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that BCI interventions may be a promising rehabilitation approach in subjects with stroke. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.