Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(6): 1170-1179, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608612

RESUMO

Approximately 476,000 cases of Lyme disease are diagnosed in the United States annually, yet comprehensive economic evaluations are lacking. In a prospective study among reported cases in Lyme disease-endemic states, we estimated the total patient cost and total societal cost of the disease. In addition, we evaluated disease and demographic factors associated with total societal cost. Participants had a mean patient cost of ≈$1,200 (median $240) and a mean societal cost of ≈$2,000 (median $700). Patients with confirmed disseminated disease or probable disease had approximately double the societal cost of those with confirmed localized disease. The annual, aggregate cost of diagnosed Lyme disease could be $345-968 million (2016 US dollars) to US society. Our findings emphasize the importance of effective prevention and early diagnosis to reduce illness and associated costs. These results can be used in cost-effectiveness analyses of current and future prevention methods, such as a vaccine.


Assuntos
Borrelia burgdorferi , Ixodes , Doença de Lyme , Animais , Estresse Financeiro , Humanos , Incidência , Doença de Lyme/diagnóstico , Doença de Lyme/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1565-1570, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is the leading cause of arboviral disease in the United States and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A previous analysis found that a vaccination program targeting persons aged ≥60 years was more cost-effective than universal vaccination, but costs remained high. METHODS: We used a mathematical Markov model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of an age- and incidence-based WNV vaccination program. We grouped states and large counties (≥100 000 persons aged ≥60 years) by median annual WNV incidence rates from 2004 to 2017 for persons aged ≥60 years. We defined WNV incidence thresholds, in increments of 0.5 cases per 100 000 persons ≥60 years. We calculated potential cost per WNV vaccine-prevented case and per quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) saved. RESULTS: Vaccinating persons aged ≥60 years in states with an annual incidence of WNV neuroinvasive disease of ≥0.5 per 100 000 resulted in approximately half the cost per health outcome averted compared to vaccinating persons aged ≥60 years in the contiguous United States. This approach could potentially prevent 37% of all neuroinvasive disease cases and 63% of WNV-related deaths nationally. Employing such a threshold at a county level further improved cost-effectiveness ratios while preventing 19% and 30% of WNV-related neuroinvasive disease cases and deaths, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An age- and incidence-based WNV vaccination program could be a more cost-effective strategy than an age-based program while still having a substantial impact on lowering WNV-related morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Febre do Nilo Ocidental , Vacinas contra o Vírus do Nilo Ocidental , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Incidência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/prevenção & controle
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(9): 1625-31, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26291194

RESUMO

National surveillance provides important information about Lyme disease (LD) but is subject to underreporting and variations in practice. Information is limited about the national epidemiology of LD from other sources. Retrospective analysis of a nationwide health insurance claims database identified patients from 2005-2010 with clinician-diagnosed LD using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes and antimicrobial drug prescriptions. Of 103,647,966 person-years, 985 inpatient admissions and 44,445 outpatient LD diagnoses were identified. Epidemiologic patterns were similar to US surveillance data overall. Outpatient incidence was highest among boys 5-9 years of age and persons of both sexes 60-64 years of age. On the basis of extrapolation to the US population and application of correction factors for coding, we estimate that annual incidence is 106.6 cases/100,000 persons and that ≈329,000 (95% credible interval 296,000-376,000) LD cases occur annually. LD is a major US public health problem that causes substantial use of health care resources.


Assuntos
Doença de Lyme/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/etiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis Emergentes/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Doença de Lyme/etiologia , Doença de Lyme/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Estações do Ano , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 67(4): 407-415, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462811

RESUMO

An estimated 300,000 cases of Lyme disease occur in the United States annually. Disseminated Lyme disease may result in carditis, arthritis, facial palsy or meningitis, sometimes requiring hospitalization. We describe the epidemiology and cost of Lyme disease-related hospitalizations. We analysed 2005-2014 data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Databases to identify inpatient records associated with Lyme disease based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. We estimated the annual number and median cost of Lyme disease-related hospitalizations in the United States in persons under 65 years of age. Costs were adjusted to reflect 2016 dollars. Of 20,983,165 admission records contained in the inpatient databases during the study period, 2,823 (0.01%) met inclusion criteria for Lyme disease-related hospitalizations. Over half of the identified records contained an ICD-9-CM code for meningitis (n = 614), carditis (n = 429), facial palsy (n = 400) or arthritis (n = 377). Nearly 60% of hospitalized patients were male. The median cost per Lyme disease-related hospitalization was $11,688 (range: $140-$323,613). The manifestation with the highest median cost per stay was carditis ($17,461), followed by meningitis ($15,177), arthritis ($13,012) and facial palsy ($10,491). Median cost was highest among the 15- to 19-year-old age group ($12,991). Admissions occurring in January had the highest median cost ($13,777) for all study years. Based on extrapolation to the U.S. population, we estimate that 2,196 Lyme disease-related hospitalizations in persons under 65 years of age occur annually with an estimated annual cost of $25,826,237. Lyme disease is usually treated in an outpatient setting; however, some patients with Lyme disease require hospitalization, underscoring the need for effective prevention methods to mitigate these serious cases. Information from this analysis can aid economic evaluations of interventions that prevent infection and advances in disease detection.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Hospitalização/economia , Seguro Saúde , Doença de Lyme/economia , Doença de Lyme/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(8): e0006650, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080848

RESUMO

Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral illness that causes a variety of health outcomes, from a mild acute febrile illness to potentially fatal severe dengue. Between 2005 and 2010, the annual number of suspected dengue cases reported to the Passive Dengue Surveillance System (PDSS) in Puerto Rico ranged from 2,346 in 2006 to 22,496 in 2010. Like other passive surveillance systems, PDSS is subject to under-reporting. To estimate the degree of under-reporting in Puerto Rico, we built separate inpatient and outpatient probability-based multiplier models, using data from two different surveillance systems-PDSS and the enhanced dengue surveillance system (EDSS). We adjusted reported cases to account for sensitivity of diagnostic tests, specimens with indeterminate results, and differences between PDSS and EDSS in numbers of reported dengue cases. In addition, for outpatients, we adjusted for the fact that less than 100% of medical providers submit diagnostic specimens from suspected cases. We estimated that a multiplication factor of between 5 (for 2010 data) to 9 (for 2006 data) must be used to correct for the under-reporting of the number of laboratory-positive dengue inpatients. Multiplication factors of between 21 (for 2010 data) to 115 (for 2008 data) must be used to correct for the under-reporting of laboratory-positive dengue outpatients. We also estimated that, after correcting for underreporting, the mean annual rate, for 2005-2010, of medically attended dengue in Puerto Rico to be between 2.1 (for dengue inpatients) to 7.8 (for dengue outpatients) per 1,000 population. These estimated rates compare to the reported rates of 0.4 (dengue outpatients) to 0.1 (dengue inpatients) per 1,000 population. The multipliers, while subject to limitations, will help public health officials correct for underreporting of dengue cases, and thus better evaluate the cost-and-benefits of possible interventions.


Assuntos
Dengue/epidemiologia , Notificação de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Vigilância da População , Saúde Pública , Porto Rico/epidemiologia
6.
Vaccine ; 35(23): 3143-3151, 2017 05 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is the leading cause of domestically-acquired arboviral disease in the United States. Several WNV vaccines are in various stages of development. We estimate the cost-effectiveness of WNV vaccination programs targeting groups at increased risk for severe WNV disease. METHODS: We used a mathematical model to estimate costs and health outcomes of vaccination with WNV vaccine compared to no vaccination among seven cohorts, spaced at 10year intervals from ages 10 to 70years, each followed until 90-years-old. U.S. surveillance data were used to estimate WNV neuroinvasive disease incidence. Data for WNV seroprevalence, acute and long-term care costs of WNV disease patients, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and vaccine characteristics were obtained from published reports. We assumed vaccine efficacy to either last lifelong or for 10years with booster doses given every 10years. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in cost-effectiveness ratios across cohorts in both models and all outcomes assessed (Kruskal-Wallis test p<0.0001). The 60-year-cohort had a mean cost per neuroinvasive disease case prevented of $664,000 and disability averted of $1,421,000 in lifelong model and $882,000 and $1,887,000, respectively in 10-year immunity model; these costs were statistically significantly lower than costs for other cohorts (p<0.0001). Vaccinating 70-year-olds had the lowest cost per death averted in both models at around $4.7 million (95%CI $2-$8 million). Cost per disease case averted was lowest among 40- and 50-year-old cohorts and cost per QALY saved lowest among 60-year cohorts in lifelong immunity model. The models were most sensitive to disease incidence, vaccine cost, and proportion of persons developing disease among infected. CONCLUSIONS: Age-based WNV vaccination program targeting those at higher risk for severe disease is more cost-effective than universal vaccination. Annual variation in WNV disease incidence, QALY weights, and vaccine costs impact the cost effectiveness ratios.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização/economia , Vacinas contra o Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Secundária/economia , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação/economia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra o Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
7.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 90(3): 402-9, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24515937

RESUMO

There are no published data on the economic burden for specific West Nile virus (WNV) clinical syndromes (i.e., fever, meningitis, encephalitis, and acute flaccid paralysis [AFP]). We estimated initial hospital and lost-productivity costs from 80 patients hospitalized with WNV disease in Colorado during 2003; 38 of these patients were followed for 5 years to determine long-term medical and lost-productivity costs. Initial costs were highest for patients with AFP (median $25,117; range $5,385-$283,381) and encephalitis (median $20,105; range $3,965-$324,167). Long-term costs were highest for patients with AFP (median $22,628; range $624-$439,945) and meningitis (median $10,556; range $0-$260,748). Extrapolating from this small cohort to national surveillance data, we estimated the total cumulative costs of reported WNV hospitalized cases from 1999 through 2012 to be $778 million (95% confidence interval $673 million-$1.01 billion). These estimates can be used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent WNV disease.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Custos e Análise de Custo , Custos de Medicamentos , Equipamentos Médicos Duráveis/economia , Encefalite Viral/economia , Encefalite Viral/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Meningite Viral/economia , Meningite Viral/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método de Monte Carlo , Paraplegia/economia , Paraplegia/etiologia , Estados Unidos , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/complicações , Adulto Jovem
8.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 16(6): 378-87, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19995203

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for refractive error and fitting with glasses in India. METHODS: We populated a decision tree with the costs of screening and spectacles, prevalence of varying levels of presenting and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from two studies, and sensitivity and specificity of screening. We calculated dollars spent per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted separately in urban and rural areas for school-based screening (SBS) and primary eye care (PEC) programs that fit spectacles to individuals presenting for care. We conducted a series of univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. An intervention was inferred to be highly cost-effective if the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was less than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and moderately cost-effective if the ICER was less than three times this level. RESULTS: Compared with no screening, urban SBS was highly cost-effective; rural SBS was moderately cost-effective for ages 5-15 and highly cost-effective for ages 7-15. Both urban and rural PEC were moderately cost-effective in comparison to SBS. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that SBS is likely the most cost-effective solution for refractive error in India if the 5-15 year old age group is targeted; primary eye care is the best choice if a high value is placed on DALYs and the 7-15 year old age group is targeted. CONCLUSION: Both SBS and PEC Interventions for refractive error can be considered cost-effective in India. Which is the more cost-effective depends on the choice of targeted age group and area of the intervention.


Assuntos
Óculos/economia , Erros de Refração/diagnóstico , Erros de Refração/economia , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Seleção Visual/economia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Ajuste de Prótese , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/economia , Acuidade Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA