Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for posteriorly eccentric and concentric osteoarthritis: a comparison at minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis and posteriorly eccentric wear patterns, the early to mid-term results of TSA using conservative glenoid reaming with no attempt at version correction have been favorable at early follow-up. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TSA using this technique for patients with and without eccentric wear patterns at a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent TSA with minimum 5-year follow-up were identified from an institutional registry. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to determine humeroglenoid alignment (HGA-AP), humeroscapular alignment (HSA-AP), version, Walch classification and glenoid component seating. The outcome measures were the Simple Shoulder Test, glenoid component radiolucencies, and the occurrence of complications or revisions. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten patients were included in the study, of which 98 (47%) had posteriorly decentered humeral heads and 108 (51%) had centered humeral heads. There were 77 shoulders with Walch type A glenoids and 122 with Walch type B glenoids. At a mean 8-year follow-up, the final SST, change in SST and percentage of maximal improvement was not correlated with pre- and postoperative humeral head centering, Walch classification or glenoid version. There were no preoperative predictors of a low final SST. Two patients (1%) underwent open re-operations during the study period. In patients with Walch B1 and B2 glenoids (n=110), there were no differences in outcome measures between patients with postoperative retroversion of more and less than 15o. While 15 of 51 patients (29%) with minimum 5-year radiographs had glenoid radioluciences, these radiographic findings were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. On multivariable analysis glenoid component radiolucencies were most strongly associated with incomplete component seating (OR 3.3, p = 0.082). CONCLUSION: The results of TSA with conservative glenoid reaming without attempt at version correction are favorable at minimum 5 year, mean 8-year follow-up. There were no differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients with eccentric and concentric wear patterns. Incomplete glenoid component seating was the greatest predictor of glenoid component radiolucency, but these radiolucencies were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes.

Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a minimum of 10 years' follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has been shown to reliably improve pain and functional outcomes for multiple pathologies. Despite its increasing use in the United States since its introduction in 2004, few studies have investigated long-term outcomes of this procedure. This information is vital in many ways, including durability of functional outcomes, complication profiles, and implant survivorship. METHODS: Our prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty registry included 471 patients who had undergone RSA prior to December 31, 2010, by a single surgeon at a high-volume shoulder arthroplasty center. The study sample included 94 patients with a minimum of 10 years' follow-up, and we evaluated the indications for RSA, complications, pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and patient satisfaction on these patients at baseline, 2-5 years, and 10 or more years of follow-up. Prosthesis survivorship was determined by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed with revision for any reason as the end point for all 471 patients in the study period regardless of follow-up interval. RESULTS: The 93 patients with at least 10 years of follow-up were 63% female (60) and 37% male (34), with an average age of 66±10 years at the time of RSA. There were 70 (75%) primary RSAs and 23 (25%) revision RSAs. Patient-reported outcome measures at 10 years or more included a current pain rating averaging 2±3 on a 0-10 scale and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) of 73±28. There was no deterioration in function or pain from midterm to long-term follow-up, as the SANE and pain score changed by less than the minimal clinically important difference or improved in 87% and 90% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients were satisfied with the RSA procedure, with 52 (56%) very satisfied, 24 (26%) satisfied, 13 (14%) dissatisfied, and 4 (4%) very dissatisfied. For the subset of 68 patients who were contacted for follow-up, 64 (94%) would have the procedure again and 4 (6%) would not. Kaplan-Meier prosthesis survival rate for all 471 RSA patients was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84%-92%) at 5 years and 81% (95% CI 74%-86%) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest American cohort of Grammont design RSA at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Although RSA provided clinically significant and durable improvements in pain and function, the complication and revision rates were higher than prior reports. Despite this, the vast majority of patients were satisfied and would have the procedure again.

Early to midterm outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on dysplastic glenoids.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of primary osteoarthritis with glenoid dysplasia or Walch type C glenoids remains controversial. There is scant literature available on patient outcomes after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty in patients with Walch type C glenoids. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for Walch type C dysplastic glenoids with standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components compared with TSA for glenoids with concentric wear and minimal erosion (Walch type A1). We hypothesized that TSA performed for Walch type C dysplastic glenoids with standard glenoid components can reliably produce successful results at short- to midterm follow-up. METHODS: We identified all patients who had primary anatomic TSA performed for osteoarthritis in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry collected from 2004 to the present time. Twenty-nine patients met inclusion criteria of a preoperative Walch type C dysplastic glenoid, treatment with TSA using standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components, and a minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up. A matched cohort of 58 patients with a type A1 glenoid and minimum of 2-year clinical follow-up for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty served as the control group. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), patient satisfaction, complications, and revisions were evaluated in both cohorts. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for this study was 4.5 years (standard deviation, 2.6 years; range, 2-10 years). Baseline measures were not significantly different between the Walch type C dysplastic group and the matched type A1 cohort (all P > .05). Both groups showed significant improvements in ASES, ASES pain, and SANE scores from baseline to the final follow-up (all P < .001). The Walch type C group had no significant differences in ASES score (P = .118), ASES pain (P = .730), or SANE score (P = .168) compared with the matched type A1 cohort. The complication rate of patients with a type C glenoid was 14% (4 of 29) with a 7% (2 of 29) revision rate. Similarly, the complication rate for the A1 matched cohort was 17% (10 of 58) with a 12% (7 of 58) revision rate. Both groups had high patient satisfaction without statistical differences (P = .549). In addition, there were no differences in the rate of radiographic lucencies or Lazarus scores (P = .222). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic TSA reliably produced clinically significant improvements in pain and function and similar short- to midterm outcomes in patients with Walch type C dysplastic glenoids compared with patients with type A1 glenoids. Anatomic TSA with standard (nonaugmented) glenoid components should remain an option in patients with Walch type C dysplastic glenoids despite emerging treatment options including augmented glenoid components and reverse TSA.

Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients 70 years of age and older: a comparison cohort at early to midterm follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has gained popularity in elderly patients because of its limited reliance on rotator cuff function and high survivorship rates. However, although there are theoretical advantages of RSA over anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in elderly patients, there is little data to guide surgeons on implant selection in this population. METHODS: Patients were identified from our prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty registry. We included patients between the age of 50 and 89 years who underwent primary TSA for osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff or primary RSA for cuff tear arthropathy. The minimum and mean clinical follow-up was 2 and 3.1±1.3 years, respectively. Four patient groups were formed for analysis: (1) TSA age 50-69 years (n=274), (2) TSA age 70-89 years (n=208), (3) RSA age 50-69 years (n=81), and (4) RSA age 70-89 years (n=104). We evaluated age group differences in pain, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, patient satisfaction, complications, and revisions. RESULTS: All groups showed significant improvements from preoperative to final follow-up for all outcome measures (P < .001). Visual analog scale for pain average score decreased from 5.8 preoperatively to 1.1, with no significant differences between groups (TSA P = .180; RSA P = .103). Final ASES scores and improvement from preoperative ASES score between the age groups were not significantly different (TSA P = .520; RSA P = .065). There were no significant differences in outcomes between TSA in patients older than 70 years vs. patients younger than 70 years (all P > .05); however, older RSA patients reported better function during activities of daily living (P = .020) than their younger counterparts. Patients undergoing TSA had a lower revision rate of 3.9% compared with 8.1% in the RSA group (P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: TSA and RSA are reliable procedures for patients older than 70 years, and have comparable results to their respective patient cohorts younger than 70 years. Although some surgeons anecdotally advocate for RSA in patients older than 70 years with primary osteoarthritis and an intact rotator cuff, we found no difference in outcomes for TSA based on our age cutoff. Given satisfactory results following TSA in patients 70 years of age and older, we do not routinely perform RSA for primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff solely based on age. Further studies and longer follow-up are needed to determine the optimal implant selection for elderly patients with primary osteoarthritis.

A localized laminar flow device decreases airborne particulates during shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although the rate of periprosthetic joint infection following shoulder arthroplasty is low, it is a morbid and costly complication. Airborne particulates have long been recognized as a potential source of wound contamination, and operating room-mounted and smaller localized laminar airflow devices have been developed to minimize airborne particulates. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a localized laminar flow device in reducing the intrusion of ambient airborne particles and bacteria into the surgery site during shoulder arthroplasty as measured by overall particle counts and colony-forming units (CFUs). METHODS: Patients undergoing primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty were eligible for participation. After providing informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to the Air Barrier System (ABS) group or control group. For all patients, the ABS was placed on the surgical field; however, it was only turned on by the technician for those randomized to the ABS. Study participants, surgeons, and surgical staff were blinded to group assignment. Bacterial CFUs were collected from within 5 cm of the surgical wound every 10 minutes, whereas airborne particulates were collected every minute. Poisson regression models were used to determine whether differences existed in CFUs and particulate counts between the ABS and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were randomized into the ABS (n = 21) or control (n = 22) group. Surgical time (P = .53) and the average staff count (P = .16) in the operating room did not differ between groups. Poisson regression showed that the ABS group had significantly lower CFUs (ß = -0.583, P < .001) along with surgical time and particulates with a diameter ≥ 5 µm. Staff count and particulates with a diameter < 5 µm were not significant predictors of CFUs. Infection was not a primary outcome; however, no postoperative infections have been reported in either study group with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for all patients. DISCUSSION: This double-blinded, randomized trial demonstrated that a localized laminar flow device dramatically reduced the count of CFUs in the air directly above the wound and beneath the ABS (adjusted for the number of operating room personnel and surgical time). The use of the device was not associated with a longer case duration; however, some additional setup time was required prior to surgical incision to place the device. Further study is required to determine the clinical implications of this finding-specifically, whether such devices result in lower rates of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty.

Outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty performed on B2 vs. A1 type glenoids.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid component malpositioning and glenoid component retroversion have been associated with higher rates of radiolucencies, raising concerns about its implications on glenoid loosening and ultimate failure of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Although there is literature regarding the relative advantages of techniques to address posterior glenoid bone loss, we are not aware of studies comparing outcomes of TSA on these challenging Walch type B2 glenoids vs. more common A1 glenoids. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of TSA performed on A1 glenoids and B2 glenoids treated with asymmetric glenoid reaming. METHODS: We identified 1045 shoulders that had primary TSAs performed for osteoarthritis in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry. Two hundred eighty-nine shoulders met inclusion criteria of a preoperative Walch type A1 (178) or B2 (111) glenoid morphology, treatment with TSA, asymmetric reaming in the B2 group, and a minimum of 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Postoperative radiographs were assessed for lucencies, and patient-reported outcome measures were collected at all follow-up visits. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged 40 ± 15 months for all patients, and more men presented with a B2 glenoid (80 of 111; 72%) compared with A1 (101 of 178; 57%) (P = .009). Age at surgery (P = .166), dominant-sided surgery (P = .281), body mass index (P = .501), smoking (P = .155), preoperative opioid use (P = .154), and diabetes (P = .331) were not significantly different between groups. Both groups had similar Constant Strength scores preoperatively (A1: 4.7 ± 7.1, and B2: 4.3 ± 7.3) but the B2 group improved significantly more at final follow-up (A1: 10.3 ± 6.2 vs. B2: 12.7 ± 6.7, P = .005). The Total Constant score was also significantly better at follow-up in the B2 glenoid group (P = .039). All other Constant subscales, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) measures showed significant improvement preoperatively to final follow-up (all P <.001) but there were no significant differences between the A1 and B2 glenoid groups (all P > .05). A similar proportion of patients rated their satisfaction as either very satisfied or satisfied between the A1 (160; 90%) and B2 (100; 90%) (P = .613). Lazarus scores were also similar between the A1 and B2 groups (P = .952) as were the rates of humeral radiolucent lines (P = .749) and humeral osteolysis (P = .507). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with B2 glenoids may present a more technically challenging anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, treatment with concurrent asymmetric glenoid reaming produced similar, successful clinical and radiographic early to midterm outcomes for patients undergoing TSA compared with A1 glenoids. Additional follow-up on this cohort will be important to confirm the durability of these early results.

Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty for instability arthropathy with a prior coracoid transfer procedure: a retrospective review and matched cohort.

BACKGROUND: Many surgeons are concerned about reports of increased complications, worse outcomes, and early failures in patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty after coracoid transfer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate minimum 2-year outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for instability arthropathy with a prior coracoid transfer procedure and compare them with a matched cohort of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. METHODS: We identified 11 primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon for instability arthropathy with a prior coracoid transfer procedure with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up (mean, 58 ± 35 months). A matched cohort of 33 patients with a total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis served as the control group. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, patient satisfaction, complications, and revisions were evaluated in both cohorts. RESULTS: The coracoid transfer cohort showed no difference in the final ASES score (88 vs. 82, P = .166) or SANE score (85 vs. 67, P = .120) vs. the matched cohort. The postoperative ASES pain score (45 vs. 41, P = .004) was higher in the coracoid transfer cohort, but the mean improvement from preoperative to postoperative values for the ASES score (P = .954), ASES pain score (P = .183), and SANE score (P = .293) was no different between cohorts. Both cohorts had high patient satisfaction without a statistically significant difference (P = .784). CONCLUSION: At early- to mid-term follow-up, total shoulder arthroplasty performed after a coracoid transfer demonstrated similar results to total shoulder arthroplasty performed for primary osteoarthritis. Longer follow-up and larger patient cohorts will provide further insights and highlight any potential differences in outcomes or revision rates.

Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The impending burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in outcomes of revision procedures. Revision of failed anatomic arthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has shown promise alongside concerning complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty during a 7-year period at a tertiary care health system were identified. Presurgical and operative data were analyzed for 110 patients who met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were contacted at a mean follow-up of 57 ± 26 months (range, 23-113 months) from revision surgery for functional outcomes scores, reoperations, and implant survival. RESULTS: Implant survival was 92% at 2 years and 74% at 5 years. Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score, and visual analog scale pain scores were 63 ± 24 (range, 5-97), 60 ± 25 (range, 0-100), and 2.9 ± 2.9 (range, 0-10), respectively. Seventy percent of patients were "very satisfied" or "satisfied with their outcome. Complications occurred in 18 patients (20%), and 10 patients (11%) underwent reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Modest patient results and satisfaction can be achieved with revision of a failed anatomic arthroplasty to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. As is typical of revision surgery, complications are common and can compromise results. Further study is needed to identify factors that may contribute to successful outcomes.

Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty for painful glenoid arthrosis to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The impending burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in outcomes of revision procedures. Painful glenoid arthrosis following hemiarthroplasty is a common cause of reoperation, and conversion to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is one option. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent revision of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty over a 15-year period in a single tertiary-care health system. Presurgical and operative data were analyzed for 28 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were contacted at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up after revision surgery for functional outcome scores, reoperations, and implant survival. RESULTS: The 2- and 5-year implant survival rates were 93% and 86%, respectively. Functional outcomes were obtained from 21 patients with surviving implants. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale score for pain, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation score were 78 ± 20, 2.3 ± 2.6, and 71 ± 24, respectively. The mean Short Form 12 mental and physical scores were 49 ± 10 and 43 ± 9, respectively. Of the patients, 17 (81%) were either satisfied or very satisfied with their outcome. Complications were seen in 10 patients (36%), and 6 patients (21%) required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty following hemiarthroplasty can achieve successful outcomes and implant survival rates. Given our poor understanding of reverse shoulder arthroplasty longevity, this procedure should remain an option for patients with glenoid arthrosis and an intact rotator cuff.

Operative Management for Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures.

This article reviews techniques and outcomes of surgical fixation for distal clavicle fractures. Near 100% union has been reported for several techniques. The most common are locked plating, coracoclavicular fixation and a combination of plating with CC fixation. Hook plates are useful for particular fracture patterns, but there can be complications specific to this implant. Low-profile constructs are favored due to the high rates of symptomatic hardware. Fixation of subacute and chronic injuries can provide reliable functional improvements, but is inferior to acute fixation. Surgery is generally the treatment of choice for displaced fractures in athletes.

Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Review of Current Definitions and Concepts.

Background: While massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) have been abundantly studied, inconsistent definitions in the literature and theories about pain and dysfunction related to them can be difficult to navigate when considering an individual patient. Purpose: To review the current literature for definitions and critical concepts that drive decision-making for MIRCTs. Study Design: Narrative review. Methods: A search of the PubMed database was performed to conduct a comprehensive literature review on MIRCTs. A total of 97 studies were included. Results: Recent literature reflects added attention to clarifying the definitions of "massive, "irreparable," and "pseudoparalysis." In addition, numerous recent studies have added to the understanding of what generates pain and dysfunction from this condition and have reported on new techniques for addressing them. Conclusion: The current literature provides a nuanced set of definitions and conceptual foundations on MIRCTs. These can be used to better define these complex conditions in patients when comparing current surgical techniques to address MIRCTs, as well as when interpreting the results of new techniques. While the number of effective treatment options has increased, high-quality and comparative evidence on treatments for MIRCTs is lacking.

Novel Use of a Medially Applied Internal Joint Stabilizer for Recurrent Elbow Instability After a Terrible Triad.

CASE: A 31-year-old man with recurrent instability after treatment of a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation that was reconstructed with revision coronoid fixation and a novel use of a medially applied internal joint stabilizer (IJS). CONCLUSION: A medially applied IJS is an option to supplement coronoid fixation in cases with tenuous repair because of comminution or relative coronoid insufficiency. This location may be more protective for this instability pattern and, in revision settings, can avoid a second lateral incision.

Early Complication Rates Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Instability Arthropathy With a Prior Coracoid Transfer Procedure.

The purpose of this study was to report early complications for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) performed for instability arthropathy after a prior coracoid transfer procedure and compare them with those of a control group of patients following aTSA for primary osteoarthritis. A retrospective review was performed of 14 patients after aTSA with a prior coracoid transfer procedure. A control group of 42 patients with an aTSA for primary osteoarthritis were matched 3:1 according to age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and dominant shoulder. Chart reviews identified any complications within 1 year, in addition to blood loss and operative time in both groups. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to determine Walch glenoid classification and Goutallier classification of the subscapularis. The mean operative time was not significantly different between the coracoid transfer cohort and the control group, and the mean estimated blood loss was only 6.9 mL greater in the coracoid transfer group. The coracoid transfer group had 2 (14.3%) patients with complications, with 1 early revision for an acute deep infection. The control group had 4 (9.5%) complications in 3 (7.1%) patients, with no early revisions. There was no statistical difference in complications between the groups (P=.618). Anatomic TSA for instability arthropathy after coracoid transfer had similar operative time, blood loss, and 1-year complication rates as those of the control group. These results provide some evidence to support the continued use of aTSA in select patients with instability arthropathy after prior coracoid transfer procedure. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e482-e486.].

Lower Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With Worse Preoperative Function, Pain, and Increased Opioid Use in Patients With Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have identified differences in patient-reported outcome scores and complication rates based on various measures of socioeconomic status (SES); however, there is limited information regarding the role of SES in the shoulder arthroplasty cohort. The purpose of this study was to characterize the role of SES in patients undergoing primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: We identified 1,045 patients who had primary TSA done for OA in a prospective shoulder arthroplasty registry, and 982 patients met inclusion criteria. We prospectively assessed patient demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and preoperative opioid use. Each patient was assigned to a quartile according to the Area Deprivation Index using their home address as a measure of SES. RESULTS: The most disadvantaged patients (lower SES) reported to our center with a higher body mass index and higher rates of preoperative opioid use and diabetes. Patients in the most disadvantaged quartile reported more preoperative pain (Constant-Pain and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES]-Pain) and lower function (Constant-ADL, Constant-Total, and ASES). Multivariate regression identified that male patients and advanced age at surgery had better reported ASES pain scores, while preoperative opioid use, chronic back pain, and the most disadvantaged quartile were associated with worse ASES pain scores. CONCLUSION: Lower SES correlates with worse preoperative function and pain in patients undergoing anatomic TSA for primary glenohumeral OA. Providers should be cognizant of the potential impact of SES when evaluating quality metrics for patients with primary glenohumeral OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, cross-sectional study.

Risk Factors for Preoperative Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The effect of preoperative opioid use in orthopedic patients has been highlighted. Numerous studies have identified worse patient outcomes with pre-operative opioid use; however, there is currently no information identifying risk factors for preoperative opioid use in the total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) population. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing primary anatomic TSA for primary osteoarthritis (OA) and to determine baseline preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in preoperative opioid users compared with nonopioid users. The authors studied 982 TSAs performed for primary glenohumeral joint OA in a prospective TSA registry. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were prospectively assessed and included age; sex; socioeconomic status (SES); smoking status; body mass index (BMI); and history of chronic back pain, depression, diabetes mellitus, and heart disease. Preoperative PROs, range of motion measurements, and preoperative opioid use for shoulder pain were assessed. Overall, 254 (25.9%) of 982 total patients were taking preoperative opioids for shoulder pain in the setting of primary OA. Female sex (P=.023), younger age (P=.019), obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) (P=.043), chronic back pain (P<.001), and lower SES (P=.002) were associated with increased preoperative opioid use following multivariate logistic regression. Patients with opioid use had significantly worse preoperative pain scores (P<.001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (P<.001), and total Constant scores (P<.002) compared with the non-opioid group. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):356-360.].