Factors associated with the preparedness for bereavement in families of patients with cancer: A secondary analysis of a nationwide bereaved family survey.

OBJECTIVES: Insufficient preparedness for bereavement can affect a family's psychological health status after bereavement. However, factors associated with preparedness remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors associated with preparedness for bereavement in families of patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan, analyzing data from 9123 family members of patients with cancer. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore how sociodemographic factors, health status, and perceived care for patients and families were associated with preparedness for bereavement. RESULTS: Of the 9123 families, 1338 (15.1%) were not prepared for bereavement. Factors associated with insufficient preparedness for bereavement (all p < 0.001) were found as follows: patients' spouses (OR = 2.54), receiving care in acute hospitals (OR = 1.83), worse psychological health status during caregiving (OR = 2.13), lower social support for family members (OR = 1.90), wrong patients' awareness of medical condition from family's perspective (OR = 1.75-2.12), family preference of more aggressive treatment rather than palliative care (OR = 1.71) or not sure (OR = 2.31), not wanting to know information about the patient's prognosis (OR = 1.64-1.77), end-of-life discussion with physician 1 month before patient's death (OR = 1.45), and late or early end-of-life discussions with physician and family (OR = 1.78-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results might assist clinicians in assessing and identifying families who are not prepared for bereavement; however, preparedness for bereavement may have been associated with other factors.

Preferences of bereaved family members on communication with physicians when discontinuing anticancer treatment: referring to the concept of nudges.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to clarify the situation and evaluate the communication on anticancer treatment discontinuation from the viewpoint of a bereaved family, in reference to the concept of nudges. METHODS: A multi-center questionnaire survey was conducted involving 350 bereaved families of patients with cancer admitted to palliative care units in Japan. RESULTS: The following explanations were rated as essential or very useful: (i) treatment would be a physical burden to the patient (42.9%), (ii) providing anticancer treatment was impossible (40.5%), (iii) specific disadvantages of receiving treatment (40.5%), (iv) not receiving treatment would be better for the patient (39.9%) and (v) specific advantages of not receiving treatment (39.6%). The factors associated with a high need for improvement of the physician's explanation included lack of explanation on specific advantages of not receiving treatment (ß = 0.228, P = 0.001), and lack of explanation of 'If the patient's condition improves, you may consider receiving the treatment again at that time.' (ß = 0.189, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Explaining the disadvantages of receiving treatment and the advantages of not receiving treatment, and presenting treatment discontinuation as the default option were effective in helping patients' families in making the decision to discontinue treatment. In particular, explanation regarding specific advantages of not receiving treatment was considered useful, as they caused a lower need for improvement of the physicians' explanation.

Web-Based Post-Bereavement Survey System in Specialized Palliative Care: A Feasibility Pilot Study.

Web-based post-bereavement survey systems for specialized palliative care will enable obtaining timely results on the care quality from more participants at a lower cost. The primary aim of the study was to develop a web-based post-bereavement survey system and to compare response rates for different number of items. The secondary aim was to examine response bias between web-based and mail survey in post-bereavement surveys. Between January and April 2019, two cross-sectional web-based questionnaire surveys were conducted among the bereaved families from six inpatient palliative care units in Japan. Measurements included structure and process of end-of-life (EOL) care, overall care satisfaction, achievement of a good death, depression, grief status, web survey usability, and participant and bereaved family member characteristics. The long survey included 34 items, and the short survey included 16 items. There were no significant differences in the response rates between the long and short surveys (24% and 27%, respectively, p = 0.376). Compared with a previous nationwide post-bereavement mail survey, more children responded; however, the quality rating scores was unchanged. Despite low response rate, no apparent response bias was observed, indicating its feasibility. This survey method is low-cost, less burdensome to the institution, and allows for ongoing quality assurance.

Comparison of the quality of death between primary malignant brain tumor patients and other cancer patients: results from a nationwide bereavement survey in Japan.

PURPOSE: No studies have investigated the association between malignant brain tumor and the quality of dying, which is an important outcome in end-of-life care. This study aimed to clarify whether the quality of dying and related factors in patients with malignant brain tumor differ from those in patients with other malignant diseases. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected by two nationwide, multicenter, bereavement surveys of palliative care units in Japan. This analysis included 14,171 bereaved family members (160 patients with malignant brain tumors). The quality of dying was examined using the good death inventory (GDI), a validated tool widely used in palliative care settings. RESULTS: Patients with malignant brain tumors were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a longer palliative care unit stay during their end-of-life (p < 0.0001) than others. The total GDI score was significantly lower in patients with malignant brain tumors than others (p < 0.0001). Five GDI items were significantly lower in the malignant brain tumor group than other cancer group: "Being able to stay in one's favorite place" (p = 0.03); "Trusting the physician" (p = 0.003); "Not being a burden to others" (p = 0.01); "Being independent in daily activities" (p = 0.01); and "Feeling that one's life is worth living" (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the quality of dying of patients with malignant brain tumors was lower compared to other cancers, suggesting the need to review care for patients with malignant brain tumors based on their characteristics.

Are family relationships associated with family conflict in advanced cancer patients?

OBJECTIVES: Family conflict during end-of-life care is an important issue for advanced cancer patients and their families, although studies are lacking. We investigated the association between family relationships and family conflict in advanced cancer patients. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey targeting the bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in palliative care units, general wards, or at home to evaluate the quality of end-of-life care in Japan. RESULTS: A total of 1084 questionnaires (63.0%) were returned and we analyzed a total of 908 responses. In total, 38.0% of family members reported at least one family conflict during end-of-life care, and the most frequent family conflict was "about certain family members not pulling their weight" (23.5%). Multivariate linear analysis revealed family members who asserted their opinions (p < 0.001), family assessment device score (p < 0.001), worries about family finances during cancer treatment (p < 0.001), family members contacted after illness were helpful (p = 0.003), female patients (p = 0.03), and family with family relationship index ≤7 (p = 0.04) were positively associated with the outcome-family conflict (OFC) score. Proxy decision maker was selected by the patient (p = 0.003), people listened to families' worries or problems (p = 0.003), physician gave sufficient explanation (p = 0.003), living will before their illness (p = 0.038) and female bereaved family members (p = 0.046) were negatively associated with the OFC score. CONCLUSIONS: It may be important for health care providers to actively assess the possibility of family conflicts according to family relationships, such as a proxy decision maker having been selected by the patient.

Association between experiences of advanced cancer patients at the end of life and depression in their bereaved caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: Research on the association between circumstances of death in advanced cancer patients and depression in their bereaved caregivers is limited. METHODS: A longitudinal study was performed on patients admitted to 21 inpatient hospices/palliative care units (PCUs) in Japan. Patient symptoms were assessed at admission and in the last 3 days of life. Data on distressing events (unexpected death, bleeding) and received treatments (morphine prescriptions, continuous deep sedation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation) were also obtained. Bereaved caregiver depression was assessed 6 months or more after patient death via mail survey using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore variables predicting bereaved caregiver depression. RESULTS: Of 1324 deceased patient-bereaved caregiver dyads, data were finally analyzed for 711 dyads. The proportion of probable depression (PHQ-9 scores ≥10) in bereaved caregivers was 13.6% (91/671; 95% confidence interval: 11.0-16.2). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that patient hyperactive delirium at PCU admission was significantly associated with the development of bereaved caregiver depression (odds ratio: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-3.8). Bereaved caregiver perceived low social support (OR: 4.7, 95% CI: 2.2-10.0) and low preparedness for death (OR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.6-7.8) were also significantly associated with the development of depression. Other patient and bereaved caregiver variables had no association with depression. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperactive delirium in terminally ill cancer patients was associated with bereaved caregiver depression. The development of effective strategies to reduce delirium-related agitation and to provide educational interventions for caregivers may be needed.

Changes in depressive symptoms among family caregivers of patients with cancer after bereavement and their association with resilience: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate changes in depressive symptoms after bereavement and the impact of pre-loss resilience on such changes and on the extent of complicated grief and posttraumatic growth. METHODS: Prospective cohort surveys were provided to family caregivers of patients with cancer in four palliative care units (PCUs) before and after bereavement. Pre-loss Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores, pre- and post-loss Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores, post-loss Brief Grief Questionnaire scores, and the expanded Posttraumatic Growth Inventory scores were determined. RESULTS: Out of 186 bereaved family caregivers, 71 (38.2%) responses were analyzed, among which 47% pre-loss and 15% post-loss responses suggested to be a high risk for major depressive disorder (MDD). Approximately 90% of family caregivers at a high risk for post-loss MDD were already at a high risk for pre-loss MDD. Even after adjustment of the background variables as covariates, the interaction effect between family caregivers' pre-loss depressive symptoms and resilience on post-loss depressive symptoms was observed (F = 7.29; p < 0.01). Moreover, pre-loss resilience was not associated with other bereavement outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Among family caregivers of patients with cancer in PCUs, 47% and 15% had high risk for MDD before and after bereavement, respectively. Moreover, pre-loss resilience mitigated post-loss depressive symptoms among family caregivers who had high risk for MDD before bereavement. However, considering the study's small sample size, further research is needed.

The impact of death rattle on bereaved families: not the sound itself, but the resonance with their feelings.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore (i) the consistency between physician-rated and bereaved family-perceived intensity of death rattle, (ii) the relationship between intensity of death rattle and the bereaved family's distress and (iii) the bereaved family's experience and feelings related to suctioning for death rattle. METHODS: We used matched data for deceased patients from a prospective cohort study of cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit, and their bereaved families from a nationwide questionnaire survey in Japan. The intensity of death rattle using Back's score was evaluated prospectively by physicians and retrospectively by bereaved families. RESULTS: In total, 1122 bereaved families answered (response rate: 66.7%). Of these, 297 reported the development of death rattle. The maximum intensity of death rattle evaluated by physicians and perceived by bereaved families was poorly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.188, P = 0.082). The optimal cut-off point of Back's score for detecting high-level distress was 1/2, with a low accuracy of prediction (area under the curve 0.62). More than 70% of bereaved families indicated suctioning reduced the intensity of death rattle, made patients comfortable and themselves relieved, whereas a similar proportion felt patients were in distress during suctioning. Families who felt suctioning was gently performed and discussed well whether to do suctioning with health care providers felt less needs for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Bereaved family-perceived intensity of death rattle did not correlate to physician-evaluated intensity, and the intensity of death rattle itself seemed to poorly correlate to family distress. Gently performed suctioning based on sufficient discussion with families can help reduce family-perceived patient discomfort.

Influence of financial burden on withdrawal or change of cancer treatment in Japan: results of a bereavement survey.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the effect of financial burden of cancer treatment from diagnosis to end-of-life on treatment withdrawal or change in Japan. METHODS: This study was part of a nationwide survey of bereaved family members of cancer patients in Japan (J-HOPE2016 study). Questions regarding withdrawal or change of cancer treatment (stratified according to whether the treatment was recommended by physicians or based on the patients' request), financial difficulties in coping with cancer treatment expenses, and the participants' socioeconomic background were asked. Descriptive analyses were performed, and logistic regression was used to examine the factors related to withdrawal or change of cancer treatment. RESULTS: In total, 510 (60%) questionnaires were returned. Approximately 7.5% of participants reported withdrawal or change of cancer treatment for financial reasons. Financial difficulties in coping with cancer treatment expenses such as using up all or a portion of one's savings (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.14-4.04, p = 0.018/ OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.52-7.81, p = 0.003) and subjective financial burden (OR = 2.54, 95% CI = 1.25-5.14, p = 0.010/OR = 3.89, 95% CI = 1.68-9.00, p = 0.002) were significantly related to withdrawal or change of cancer treatment (recommended by physicians/based on patient request). CONCLUSION: Fewer participants reported withdrawal or change of cancer treatment than in previous studies, which might reflect the characteristics of the Japanese healthcare system. However, there are patients in Japan who withdraw or change cancer treatment for financial reasons. Medical staff should consider financial toxicity as a serious side effect and assist patients in their decision-making regarding treatment while taking into account their socioeconomic backgrounds.

Care needs level in long-term care insurance system and family caregivers' self-perceived time-dependent burden in patients with home palliative care for cancer: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Although home care improves patients' quality of life (QOL), several studies have suggested that home care lowers the QOL of family caregivers and decreases their mortality. To alleviate the deleterious impact of home care on caregivers, the major burdens on caregivers and the clinical characteristics of the caregivers vulnerable to the major burden needs to be clarified. METHOD: A survey questionnaire was distributed to 710 family caregivers of patients with cancer in Japan, and 342 valid responses were obtained (valid response rate: 48.2%). The Burden Index of Caregivers was used to identify the major burden on caregivers. To assess the associations of the patients' care needs level and other clinically relevant factors with the major burden, a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: The time-dependent burden was identified as a major burden. An adjusted model showed a nonlinear association between the care needs level and the time-dependent burden, in which the caregivers of the patients who required moderate care needs level had the highest time-dependent burden [adjusted odds ratio of none, mild, moderate, and severe care needs levels: 0.50 (95% confidence interval 0.07-2.12), 1.08 (0.43-2.57), 1.87 (1.01-3.52), and 1.00 (reference), respectively]. Additionally, older patients and younger caregivers were significantly associated with a time-dependent burden. CONCLUSION: The time-dependent burden was highest in caregivers at the moderate care needs level and younger caregivers. An imbalance between the demand and supply of care services may be improved by considering the clinical characteristics of both patients and caregivers.

Nationwide survey on family caregiver-perceived experiences of patients with cancer of unknown primary site.

PURPOSE: Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. As research on the experiences of CUP patients and their families is scarce, this study aimed to compare the family caregiver-perceived burden of CUP with that of common cancers (lung, colon, and stomach cancers). The association between family caregiver-perceived burden and CUP patients' quality of life (QOL) at end-of-life and family depression, respectively, was also explored. METHODS: This was a pre-planned secondary analysis of nationwide cross-sectional survey data from the bereaved family caregivers of patients with cancer who died at 286 institutions. The major measurements were the eight-item family caregiver-perceived Burden scale (comprising specialist access, uncertainty, and prolonged diagnosis), Good Death Inventory, and Patient Health Questionnaire 9. RESULTS: Of 27,591 survey responses, we analyzed 97 and 717 responses from family caregivers of patients with CUP and common cancer, respectively. The families of CUP patients scored significantly higher on all three burden subscales than those of common cancer patients (effect sizes: specialist access subscale, 0.3; uncertainty subscale, 0.66; and prolonged diagnosis subscale, 0.69; adjusted P < 0.01). Greater family burden was significantly associated with lower patient QOL and higher family depression. Burden was significantly associated with being a spouse, second opinion consultation, and diagnosis period of > 1 month. CONCLUSION: The family caregivers of CUP patients experience poor specialist access, greater uncertainty, and a prolonged diagnosis. They should be cared for from the initial stages to establish access to specialists, obtain an early diagnosis, and reduce uncertainty.

Family experience of palliative sedation therapy: proportional vs. continuous deep sedation.

PURPOSE: Some patients experience intense symptoms refractory to intensive palliative care, and palliative sedation is sometimes used. Palliative sedation may be classified into proportional and continuous deep sedation (CDS). The primary aim of this study was to compare family experience between families of patients who received proportional or CDS. METHODS: A multicenter questionnaire survey was conducted involving bereaved families of cancer patients who received proportional or CDS based on a sedation protocol. Overall evaluation of sedation (satisfaction, family-perceived distress, appropriateness of timing, and patient distress) and 13-item family concerns, good death, satisfaction with care, depression, quality of care, unfinished business, and balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication were measured. RESULTS: Among the 2120 patients who died, 222 patients received a continuous infusion of midazolam. A sedation protocol was used in 147 patients, and questionnaires were sent to 124 families. A total of 78 responses were finally returned (proportional, 58 vs. CDS, 20). There were no significant differences in the overall evaluation, family concerns, total score of good death, satisfaction, depression, or balance between symptom relief and maintaining communication. On the other hand, some quality of care items, i.e., relationship with medical staff (P < 0.01), physical care by nurses (P = 0.04), and coordination and consistency (P = 0.04), were significantly better in the CDS group than in the proportional sedation group. Family-reported unfinished business was also better in the CDS group, with marginal significance. CONCLUSIONS: Family experience of CDS was not less favorable than proportional sedation, and actually rated more favorably for some elements of quality of care and unfinished business.

Appropriate referral timing to specialized palliative care service: survey of bereaved families of cancer patients who died in palliative care units.

Few studies have investigated appropriate referral timing of specialized palliative care (SPC) from the perspective of cancer patients' and families' experiences. We aimed to clarify appropriate SPC referral timing for patients with advanced cancer and their families. We used data from a nationwide bereaved family survey in Japan. We sent a questionnaire to 999 bereaved families of cancer patients who died in 164 palliative care units (PCUs) and analyzed the first SPC referral timing and how patients evaluated it. We defined SPC as outpatient or inpatient palliative care service comprising certified palliative care physicians, advanced-practice nurses, and multidisciplinary practitioners. Finally, 51.6% (n = 515) of all responses were analyzed. The SPC referral timing was evaluated as appropriate (26.1%), late or too late (20.2%), early or too early (1.2%), or none of these (52.5%). Of these, 32.3% reported that they were referred to an SPC when diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer or during anti-cancer treatment, and 62.6% reported they were referred after anti-cancer treatment. Patient-perceived appropriateness of SPC referral timing was associated with their good death process. After excluding "none of these" responses, a significantly higher proportion of respondents who reported being referred to SPC at diagnosis and during anti-cancer treatment evaluated the response timing as appropriate, compared to those who reported being referred after anti-cancer treatment. Appropriate timing for SPC referrals relates to quality of death; findings suggest that appropriate timing is at the time of diagnosis or during anti-cancer treatment.

Effects of financial status on major depressive disorder and complicated grief among bereaved family members of patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine current financial status, changes before and after bereavement, and their effects on possible major depressive disorder (MDD) and complicated grief (CG) among bereaved family members of patients with cancer. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey on 787 bereaved family members of patients with cancer in 71 palliative care institutions in Japan from May to July 2016. The survey assessed perceived level of concern regarding current financial status and whether it changed after bereavement. We also collected information on demographic factors and assessed the possible MDD and CG using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Brief Grief Questionnaire, respectively. We then conducted bivariate analysis to examine the relationship between these factors and financial status. RESULTS: A total of 491 (62%) questionnaires were returned. The majority of the participants (n = 382, 78%) reported having no or mild concerns about their livelihood, whereas 19% (n = 95) had moderate to severe concerns. Regarding the change in financial status after bereavement, 7% (n = 35) reported improvement, 28% (n = 131) reported worsening, and 65% (n = 308) reported no change. The prevalences of possible MDD and CG were 22% (n = 108) and 9% (n = 41), respectively, and were significantly lower among participants with less concern regarding their livelihood and whose financial status had not changed after bereavement (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth of the bereaved family members reported financial difficulties to some extent; these were significantly associated with MDD and CG. These findings provide evidence of the need for psychosocial support including financial consultation for bereaved family members.

The association of family functioning and psychological distress in the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer: a nationwide survey of bereaved family members.

OBJECTIVES: Family conflict and family functioning were regarded as changeable factors associated with complicated grief (CG) and major depressive disorder (MDD) in the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer, although the evidence is limited. We explored the family functioning associated with CG and MDD developing either independently or co-morbidly in the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer who died in palliative care units (PCUs). METHODS: This study comprised a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire survey of bereaved family members of cancer patients who died in Japanese PCUs participating in evaluation of the quality of end-of-life care. RESULTS: A total of 529 questionnaires (69.2%) were returned, and we analyzed a total of 458 responses. A total of 14.2% of participants were considered as having CG, 22.5% as having moderate to severe depression, and 9.6% as having co-morbid symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that many family members insulted or yelled at one another (odd ratio [OR]: 2.99, p = 0.046; OR:2.57, p = 0.033), and conflict regarding what is meant by a good death (OR:3.60, p = 0.026; OR:4.06, p = 0.004) was significantly positively associated with CG, MDD, and co-morbid symptom. CONCLUSIONS: Specific family conflicts may increase the incidence of CG, MDD, and co-morbid symptoms in the bereaved families of patients with advanced cancer. Our results may encourage health care providers to approach discussions about end-of-life issue with the patient and their family in advance, especially focusing on what is considered a good death for the patient, which may prevent or resolve the family conflict.

Predicting models of depression or complicated grief among bereaved family members of patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a risk scoring system for predicting major depressive disorder (MDD) and complicated grief (CG) among bereaved family members of patients with cancer that is feasible for clinical use. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two cross-sectional nationwide bereavement surveys in Japan. From a total of 17,312 bereaved family members of patients with cancer, 8618 and 8619 were randomly assigned to a derivation and a validation group. The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) were used to assess MDD (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10) and CG (BGQ score ≥ 8), respectively. We compared five models with potential predictive variables that could be easily obtained in daily practice and were included in the bereavement survey (i.e., sociodemographic data). RESULTS: The model which included variables such as the families' physical/mental health status and preparedness toward bereavement, in addition to their sociodemographic data, was considered modest for predicting the risk of both MDD and CG. The areas around the curve for MDD and CG were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.73-0.76) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72-0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.79) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-0.79) in the derivation and validation groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a clinical risk score for predicting MDD and CG among bereaved family members of patients with cancer. However, further research is needed for external validation and assessment regarding its implementation in actual practice.

Conditions, possibility and priority for admission into inpatient hospice/palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: Known barriers to admission into inpatient hospice/palliative care units (PCUs) include poor accessibility and stringent conditions for admission. However, the exact criteria are unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the actual conditions, possibilities and priorities for admission to PCU in Japan. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire survey to the responsible physicians of all 251 PCUs in 2014. RESULTS: Responses were received from 190 institutions (response rate 76%). The most frequent condition for admission was 'either the patient or the family knows the diagnosis' [86%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 80-90]. For the conditions for admission to PCU, 10-40% fewer facilities answered that the patient's consent or understanding was required compared with those that answered the patient or family's consent was sufficient. Seventy-one percent (95% CI: 64-77) of PCUs answered that either the patient or a family member needed to agree to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) policy. The factors most likely to result in refusal of admission to a PCU varied greatly. Ninety-four percent (95% CI: 90-97) of PCUs answered that patients who had undergone a long waiting time after applying for admission would be given higher priority, and approximately 50% of PCUs answered they gave priority to their outpatients and inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study should be used to modify the system so that appropriate palliative care can be provided to patients who wish to be admitted to PCU.

Comparison of two measures for Complicated Grief: Brief Grief Questionnaire (BGQ) and Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG).

OBJECTIVE: No prior studies have used a single sample of bereaved families of cancer patients to compare multiple scales for assessing Complicated Grief. Here, we compare the two measures. METHODS: We sent a questionnaire to the bereaved families of cancer patients who had died at 71 palliative care units nationwide. RESULTS: The analysis included 3173 returned questionnaires. Prevalence of Complicated Grief was 7.8% by Brief Grief Questionnaire (with a cutoff score of 8) and 15.5% for Inventory of Complicated Grief (with a cutoff score of 26). The Spearman's correlation coefficient between the Brief Grief Questionnaire and the Inventory of Complicated Grief was 0.79, and a ceiling effect was seen for the distribution of the Brief Grief Questionnaire scores. Although 6.4% of respondents scored both 8 or higher on the Brief Grief Questionnaire and 26 or higher on the Inventory of Complicated Grief, only 1.4% scored both 8 or higher on the Brief Grief Questionnaire and <26 on the Inventory of Complicated Grief. In contrast, 9.1% scored <8 on the Brief Grief Questionnaire but 26 or higher on the Inventory of Complicated Grief. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of Complicated Grief was estimated to be higher by the Inventory of Complicated Grief than by the Brief Grief Questionnaire in this sample. Patients with severe Complicated Grief might be difficult to discriminate their intensity of grief by the Brief Grief Questionnaire. Once the diagnostic criteria of Complicated Grief are established, further research, such as optimization of cutoff points and calculations of sensitivity and specificity, will be necessary.

Unmet need for palliative rehabilitation in inpatient hospices/palliative care units: a nationwide post-bereavement survey.

In end-of-life care, rehabilitation for terminally ill cancer patients is inconsistently provided and rarely discussed. We sought to clarify the prevalence of unmet rehabilitation need for patients admitted to inpatient hospice/palliative care units as perceived by bereaved family members. We conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey of 1001 family members of cancer patients who died at inpatient hospices/palliative care units. For cancer patients who did not receive rehabilitation, we asked if family members perceived that the patient would have wanted rehabilitation intervention. Data were obtained from 416 respondents. Of these, 281 (67.5%) cases received no rehabilitation. The need for physical modalities was the most frequently reported (27.8%; 95% CI: 22.6-33.4), followed by relief of dyspnea (25.6%; 95% CI: 20.6-31.1) and treatment of edema (23.8%; 95% CI: 19.0-29.3). A non-negligible proportion of bereaved families reported unmet need for rehabilitation related to symptom management in inpatient hospices/palliative care units.

Optimizing antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan: Update summary of the 2015 Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis.

Patients with cancer should appropriately receive antiemetic therapies against chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Antiemetic guidelines play an important role in managing CINV. Accordingly, the first Japanese antiemetic guideline published in 2010 by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) has considerably aided Japanese medical staff in providing antiemetic therapies across chemotherapy clinics. With the yearly advancements in antiemetic therapies, the Japanese antiemetic guidelines require revisions according to published evidence regarding antiemetic management worldwide. A revised version of the first antiemetic guideline that considered several upcoming evidences had been published online in 2014 (version 1.2), in which several updated descriptions were included. The 2015 JSCO clinical practice guideline for antiemesis (version 2.0) (in Japanese) has addressed clinical antiemetic concerns and includes four major revisions regarding (1) changes in emetogenic risk categorization for anti-cancer agents, (2) olanzapine usage as an antiemetic drug, (3) the steroid-sparing method, and (4) adverse drug reactions of antiemetic agents. We herein present an English update summary for the 2015 JSCO clinical practice guideline for antiemesis (version 2.0).