RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Misperceptions about intrauterine devices (IUDs) may dissuade potential users and public beliefs are not well understood. We sought to describe public knowledge of mechanism of action, failure rate, and IUD health risks. Secondary objectives included identifying inaccurate information and information sources about IUDs. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a convenience-based survey of participants living in the United States 18 years and older using Amazon Mechanical Turk and ResearchMatch. We collected information on demographics, reproductive history, and IUD knowledge. We asked about IUD mechanism of action, failure rate, potential health risks, and information sources. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association between gender and perceived lower (vs. higher) risks of IUDs. RESULTS: We included 1597 individuals with 726 (45.5%) self-reported men and 871 (54.5%) self-reported women. For both hormonal and non-hormonal IUDs, participants most often selected implantation prevention as the primary mechanism of action. In our sample, 55.5% of individuals believed the failure rate was greater than five percent. Weight gain, uterine perforation, and expulsion were cited as health risks likely to occur ≥5% of the time by 42.1%, 34.3%, and 38.4% of participants, respectively. Participants identified healthcare providers as their primary source of contraceptive information. Our multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed women had higher odds of perceiving IUDs as higher risk (aOR=1.35, 95% CI 1.09-1.68) compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals underestimated IUD effectiveness while overestimating perceived health risks. Our results highlight areas to target education about IUDs to support informed contraceptive decision-making. IMPLICATIONS: Participants misunderstood IUD mechanism of action, underestimated efficacy, and overestimated failure rates and health risks. Providers should begin clinical counseling by assessing baseline knowledge, since mechanism of action, side effect profiles, and concepts like female anatomy should not be assumed to be known.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Telemedicine for contraceptive services is purported to improve contraceptive access, yet few studies assess the quality of contraceptive counseling provided remotely. We assessed the quality of contraceptive counseling during telemedicine and office visits. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study at Cleveland Clinic Women's Health Institute to compare contraceptive counseling quality between telemedicine (synchronous video) and office visits. We identified eligible patients through ambulatory encounters with primary contraceptive management or counseling ICD-10 codes. Respondents completed a survey assessing demographics, quality of contraceptive counseling, contraceptive method choice, an affinity for technology, and attitudes toward telemedicine. We used the validated Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale to assess counseling quality. We used the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact test to compare baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of all eligible patients, 110 of 380 (29%) completed the survey. Of those who were successfully contacted by phone or mail, 110 of 201 (55%) completed the survey. The IQFP scores were 'high quality' for 28 of 52 (54%) of telemedicine-visit respondents vs 37 of 58 (64%) of office-visit respondents (p = 0.29). The birth control pill was the most popular method, chosen by 27 of 52 (52%) of telemedicine-visit respondents and 24 of 58 (41%) of office-visit respondents (p = 0.27). Telemedicine respondents identified ease of communication and less scheduling difficulty as factors that promote telemedicine use. Office-visit respondents identified privacy and communication concerns as factors that deter telemedicine use. CONCLUSION: When patients self-select the encounter type, their assessment of the quality of contraceptive counseling among telemedicine and office visits is similar, with no statistically significant differences in the contraceptive method chosen. Results from this single-center study support the integration of telemedicine in contraceptive service provision. IMPLICATIONS: The quality of contraceptive counseling is similar among telemedicine and office visits. Telemedicine visits for contraceptive counseling should be routinely offered, and existing services should be expanded.