Survival but not brain metastasis response relates to lung cancer mutation status after radiosurgery.

We prospectively addressed whether EGFR and KRAS mutations, EML4-ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements, or wild-type (WT), affects radiosurgery outcomes and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). Of 326 patients with BM treated in 2012-2014 with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), 112 NSCLC patients received GKRS as their initial intracranial treatment. OS, intracranial progression-free survival, and time to intracranial failure were determined. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors affecting OS. Toxicity of treatment was evaluated. Median follow-up was 9 months. Patients with EGFR mutant BM had improved survival compared to WT. Median time to development of BM was higher in EGFR mutant patients, but this difference was not significant (2.2 vs 0.9 months; p = 0.2). Median time to distant brain failure was independent of EGFR mutation status. Karnofsky performance status (KPS), non-squamous histopathology, targeted therapy, systemic disease control, EGFR mutation, and low tumor volume were predictive of increased OS on univariate analysis. KPS (p = 0.001) and non-squamous histopathology (p = 0.03) continued to be significant on multivariate analysis. Patients with EGFR mutant BM underwent salvage treatment more often than those without (p = 0.04). Treatment-related toxicity was no different in patients treated with GKRS combined with targeted therapies versus GKRS alone (5 vs 7%, p = 0.7). Patients with EGFR mutant BM had improved survival compared to a WT cohort. Intracranial disease control following radiosurgery was similar for all tumor subtypes. Radiosurgery is effective for BM and concurrent treatment with targeted therapy appears to be safe.

Relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma radiosurgery: Report of the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be used as part of multimodality management for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The objective of this study is to evaluate outcomes of SRS for this disease. The International Gamma Knife Research Foundation identified 23 PCNSL patients who underwent SRS for either relapsed (intracerebral in-field or out-of-field tumor recurrences) or refractory disease from 1995-2014. All 23 patients presented with RPA Class I or II PCNSL, and were initially treated with a median of 7 cycles of methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimens (range, 3-26 cycles). Ten received prior whole brain radiation (WBRT) to a median dose of 43 Gy (range, 24-55 Gy). Sixteen presented with relapsed PCNSL, and seven presented with refractory disease. Twenty-three received 26 procedures of SRS. The median tumor volume was 4 cm3 (range, 0.1-26 cm3), and the median margin dose was 15 Gy (range, 8-20 Gy). Median follow-up from SRS was 11 months (interquartile range, 5.7-33.2 months). Twenty presented with treatment response to twenty-three tumors (12 complete, 11 partial). Fourteen patients relapsed or were refractory to salvage SRS, and local control was 95%, 91%, and 75% at 3, 6, and 12 months post SRS. Intracranial (in-field and out-of-field) and distant (systemic) PFS was 86%, 81%, and 55% at 3, 6, and 12 months post SRS. Toxicity of SRS was low, with one developing an adverse radiation effect requiring no additional intervention. Although methotrexate-based chemotherapy regimens with or without WBRT is the first-line management option for PCNSL, SRS may be used as an alternative option in properly selected patients with smaller relapsed or refractory PCNSL tumors.

Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered?

OBJECTIVE: Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are advocated to provide high-level medical evidence. However, in neurosurgery, there are barriers to conducting RCTs. The authors of this study sought to analyze the quality of neurosurgical RCTs since 2000 to determine the adequacy of their design and reporting. METHODS: A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (2000-2014) was conducted. The medical subject heading (MeSH) terms used in the search included: "neurosurgery" OR "neurosurgical procedure," "brain neoplasms," "infarction" and "decompression," "carotid stenosis," "cerebral hemorrhage," and "spinal fusion." These studies were limited to RCTs, in humans, and in the English language. The Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) and Jadad scales were used to assess the quality of RCT design and reporting. The standardized median times cited (median citations divided by years since publication) were used to assess impact. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary-based scale was used to assess the design of the studies as primarily pragmatic or explanatory. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles were identified, and the following subspecialties were the most common: vascular (23, 37%), followed by functional neurosurgery and neurooncology (both 13, 21%). The following nations were the primary leaders in RCTs: US (25 studies, 41%), Germany (8 studies, 13%), and the United Kingdom (7 studies, 11%). Median sample size was 100 (interquartile range [IQR] 41.5-279). The majority of the studies (40, 66%) had pragmatic objectives. The median number of times cited overall was 69 (IQR 20.5-193). The combined median CONSORT score was 36 (IQR 27.5-39). Blinding was most deficiently reported. Other areas with a relatively low quality of reporting were sample size calculation (34.2% of surgical, 38.5% of drug, and 20% of device studies), allocation concealment (28.9% of surgical, 23.1% of drug, and 50% of device studies), and protocol implementation (18.4% of surgical, 23% of drug, and 20% of device studies). The quality of reporting did not correlate with the study impact. All studies had a median Jadad score ≤ 3. Thirty-three pragmatic studies (83%) and 5 explanatory studies (25%) met the design objectives. All pragmatic studies based on drug and device trials met their objectives, while 74% of pragmatic surgical trials met their objectives. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of neurosurgical RCTs is low. The quality of RCT design and reporting in neurosurgery is also low. Many study designs are not compatible with stated objectives. Pragmatic studies were more likely to meet design objectives. Given the role of RCTs as one of the highest levels of evidence, it is critical to improve on their methodology and reporting.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Prone Accelerated Intensity Modulated Breast Radiation Therapy With a Daily Versus Weekly Boost to the Tumor Bed.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a daily versus weekly boost to the tumor cavity during the course of accelerated radiation to the breast with patients in the prone position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2012, 400 patients with stage 0 to II breast cancer who had undergone segmental mastectomy participated in an institutional review board-approved trial testing prone breast radiation therapy to 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions 5 d/wk to the whole breast, after randomization to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy, on Friday. The present noninferiority trial tested the primary hypothesis that a weekly boost produced no more acute toxicity than did a daily boost. The recurrence-free survival was estimated for both treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method; the relative risk of recurrence or death was estimated, and the 2 arms were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 45 months, no deaths related to breast cancer had occurred. The weekly boost regimen produced no more grade ≥2 acute toxicity than did the daily boost regimen (8.1% vs 10.4%; noninferiority Z = -2.52; P=.006). No statistically significant difference was found in the cumulative incidence of long-term fibrosis or telangiectasia of grade ≥2 between the 2 arms (log-rank P=.923). Two local and two distant recurrences developed in the daily treatment arm and three local and one distant developed in the weekly arm. The 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was not different between the 2 treatment arms (98% for both arms). CONCLUSIONS: A tumor bed boost delivered either daily or weekly was tolerated similarly during accelerated prone breast radiation therapy, with excellent control of disease and comparable cosmetic results.

Preplanning prediction of the left anterior descending artery maximum dose based on patient, dosimetric, and treatment planning parameters.

PURPOSE: Maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery (LADmax) is an important physical constraint to reduce the risk of cardiovascular toxicity. We generated a simple algorithm to guide the positioning of the tangent fields to reliably maintain LADmax <10 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dosimetric plans from 146 consecutive women treated prone to the left breast enrolled in prospective protocols of accelerated whole breast radiation therapy, with a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed (40.5 Gy/15 fraction to the whole breast and 48 Gy to the tumor bed), provided the training set for algorithm development. Scatter plots and correlation coefficients were used to describe the bivariate relationships between LADmax and several parameters: distance from the tumor cavity to the tangent field edge, cavity size, breast separation, field size, and distance from the tangent field. A logistic sigmoid curve was used to model the relationship of LADmax and the distance from the tangent field. Furthermore, we tested this prediction model on a validation data set of 53 consecutive similar patients. RESULTS: A lack of linear relationships between LADmax and distance from cavity to LAD (-0.47), cavity size (-0.18), breast separation (-0.02), or field size (-0.28) was observed. In contrast, distance from the tangent field was highly negatively correlated to LADmax (-0.84) and was used in the models to predict LADmax. From a logistic sigmoid model we selected a cut-point of 2.46 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.19-2.74 mm) greater than which LADmax is <10 Gy (95% confidence interval, 9.30-10.72 Gy) and LADmean is <3.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Placing the edge of the tangents at least 2.5 mm from the closest point of the contoured LAD is likely to assure LADmax is <10 Gy and LADmean is <3.3 Gy in patients treated with prone accelerated breast radiation therapy.

The biology of radiosurgery and its clinical applications for brain tumors.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was developed decades ago but only began to impact brain tumor care when it was coupled with high-resolution brain imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The technique has played a key role in the management of virtually all forms of brain tumor. We reviewed the radiobiological principles of SRS on tissue and how they pertain to different brain tumor disorders. We reviewed the clinical outcomes on the most common indications. This review found that outcomes are well documented for safety and efficacy and show increasing long-term outcomes for benign tumors. Brain metastases SRS is common, and its clinical utility remains in evolution. The role of SRS in brain tumor care is established. Together with surgical resection, conventional radiotherapy, and medical therapies, patients have an expanding list of options for their care. Clinicians should be familiar with radiosurgical principles and expected outcomes that may pertain to different brain tumor scenarios.

Use of a Flexible Inflatable Multi-Channel Applicator for Vaginal Brachytherapy in the Management of Gynecologic Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluate use of novel multi-channel applicator (MC) Capri™ to improve vaginal disease coverage achievable by single-channel applicator (SC) and comparable to Syed plan simulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight plans were evaluated from four patients with primary or recurrent gynecologic cancer in the vagina. Each received whole pelvis radiation, followed by three weekly treatments using HDR brachytherapy with a 13-channel MC. Upper vagina was treated to 5 mm depth to 1500 cGy/3 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost totaling 2100 cGy/3 fractions to tumor. Modeling of SC and Syed plans was performed using MC scans for each patient. Dosimetry for MC and SC plans was evaluated for PTV700 cGy coverage, maximum dose to 2 cm(3) to bladder, rectum, as well as mucosal surface points. Dosimetry for Syed plans was calculated for PTV700 cGy coverage. Patients were followed for treatment response and toxicity. RESULTS: Dosimetric analysis between MC and SC plans demonstrated increased tumor coverage (PTV700 cGy), with decreased rectal, bladder, and contralateral vaginal mucosa dose in favor of MC. These differences were significant (p < 0.05). Comparison of MC and Syed plans demonstrated increased tumor coverage in favor of Syed plans which were not significant (p = 0.71). Patients treated with MC had no cancer recurrence or ≥grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Use of MC was efficacious and safe, providing superior coverage of tumor volumes ≤1 cm depth compared to SC and comparable to Syed implant. MC avoids excess dose to surrounding organs compared to SC, and potentially less morbidity than Syed implants. For tumors extending ≤1 cm depth, use of MC represents an alternative to an interstitial implant.

Resection Followed by Involved-Field Fractionated Radiotherapy in the Management of Single Brain Metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: We expanded upon our previous experience using involved-field fractionated radiotherapy (IFRT) as an alternative to whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with surgically resected brain metastases (BM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with single BM who underwent surgical resection followed by IFRT at our institution from 2006 to 2013 were evaluated. Local recurrence (LR)-free survival, distant failure (DF)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were determined. Analyses were performed associating clinical variables with LR and DF. Salvage approaches and toxicity of treatment for each patient were also assessed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 19.1 months. Fifty-six patients were treated with a median dose of 40.05 Gy/15 fractions with IFRT to the resection cavity. LR-free survival was 91.4%, DF-free survival was 68.4%, and OS was 77.7% at 12 months. No variables were associated with increased LR; however, melanoma histopathology and infratentorial location were associated with DF on multivariate analysis. LRs were salvaged in 5/8 patients, and DFs were salvaged in 24/29 patients. Two patients developed radionecrosis. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant IFRT is feasible and safe for well-selected patients with surgically resected single BM. Acceptable rates of local control and salvage of distal intracranial recurrences continue to be achieved with continued follow-up.

Feasibility and efficacy of local radiotherapy with concurrent novel agents in patients with multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent novel agents (NAs), cytotoxic therapy (CTx), or both in the management of osteolytic bone lesions in multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 patients with MM received RT to 64 different bone sites during the 2007-2012 period, with a dose of 8 to 37.5 Gy (mean, 26.8 Gy) delivered in 1 to 15 fractions (median, 10 fractions). Of these patients, 21 also received concurrent NAs or CTx. Pain response, M protein and κ light chain response, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: RT was completed in 35 of 39 patients (89.7%) in this study. Pain relief was observed in 30 of 31 patients (96.7%). Hematologic toxicity (grade 3 or 4 by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group system) was seen in 43.2% of treated patients, and NA therapy was stopped in 2 patients owing to grade 4 toxicity. RT adverse effects resolved at 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Changes in pre- and posttreatment levels of M protein trended toward significance in patients treated with RT + systemic therapy (ST) versus. RT alone (ΔM ProteinRT+ST = 5.6 g/L; ΔM ProteinRT = 0 g/L; P = .089). CONCLUSION: Treating MM with RT concurrently with CTx including NAs was safe and well tolerated in the majority of patients (14 of 16 [87.5%] for those taking NAs and 19 of 21 [90.5%] for all patients). Excellent clinical pain response (> 95%) was also seen in patients regardless if they were treated with RT + ST or RT alone.